INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has become a cornerstone in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the prevention of stent thrombosis. However, aspirin intolerance poses a problem in the lack of guideline-based alternatives with proven benefit. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT as an alternative treatment for aspirin among patients undergoing PCI.

A comprehensive literature search was performed. All studies that investigated cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin on top of P2Y12 inhibitors for patients undergoing PCI were included. Outcomes of interest in this meta-analysis were reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding.

Three cohort studies including 1,227 patients on cilostazol and 1,480 on aspirin, both with a P2Y12 inhibitor were analyzed. Pooled estimates showed no significant difference in MACE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79–2.23; p = 0.29) or acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46–1.89; p = 0.85) between groups. However, cilostazol-based DAPT was associated with significantly less bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27–0.99; p = 0.05). All outcomes were statistically homogeneous (p>0.1, I²CONCLUSION

Cilostazol compared to aspirin, both on top of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is as efficient in the reduction of MACE and acute myocardial infarction; and even safer in terms of bleeding. Cilostazol-based DAPT may serve as an alternative to standard DAPT among aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing PCI.

INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has become a cornerstone in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the prevention of stent thrombosis. However, aspirin intolerance poses a problem in the lack of guideline-based alternatives with proven benefit. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT as an alternative treatment for aspirin among patients undergoing PCI.

A comprehensive literature search was performed. All studies that investigated cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin on top of P2Y12 inhibitors for patients undergoing PCI were included. Outcomes of interest in this meta-analysis were reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding.

Three cohort studies including 1,227 patients on cilostazol and 1,480 on aspirin, both with a P2Y12 inhibitor were analyzed. Pooled estimates showed no significant difference in MACE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79–2.23; p = 0.29) or acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46–1.89; p = 0.85) between groups. However, cilostazol-based DAPT was associated with significantly less bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27–0.99; p = 0.05). All outcomes were statistically homogeneous (p>0.1, I²CONCLUSION

Cilostazol compared to aspirin, both on top of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is as efficient in the reduction of MACE and acute myocardial infarction; and even safer in terms of bleeding. Cilostazol-based DAPT may serve as an alternative to standard DAPT among aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing PCI.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in indwelling duration, clinical scenarios, and complications between the modified midline catheter (MMC) and the central venous catheter (CVC) in the treatment of patients in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) and the risk factors for complications based on real-world data. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The adult patients admitted to the medical ICU of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and had undergone placement of either a MMC or a CVC between January 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024, were consecutively enrolled by querying the hospital's electronic medical record system. Based on the type of catheter inserted, the patients were divided into the MMC group and the CVC group. The two groups were compared regarding the selection of catheters in the context of different underlying diseases, the actual clinical application after catheterization, catheter-related complications, the international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet count (PLT) during puncture and catheterization, the length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay, catheter indwelling duration, and mortality during hospitalization. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors for catheter removal. RESULTS: Among the 274 patients, 52 received a MMC and 222 received a CVC. The utilization rate of MMC was significantly higher than that of CVC in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), cardiovascular disease, and cancer [ARDS: 92.3% (48/52) vs. 70.3% (156/222), cardiovascular disease: 84.6% (44/52) vs. 54.5% (121/222), cancer: 30.8% (16/52) vs. 17.1% (38/222), all P < 0.05]. However, the use of MMC was significantly lower than CVC when vasoactive drug infusion was required [57.7% (30/52) vs. 79.7% (177/222), P < 0.05]. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the MMC group had a catheter indwelling time ≥ 12 days as compared with the CVC group [32.7% (17/52) vs. 13.5% (30/222), P < 0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences in other underlying diseases, venous access usage, INR and PLT during puncture and catheterization, length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality of patients between the two groups. Regarding catheter-related complications, although the incidence of partial or complete catheter removal in the MMC group was significantly higher than that in the CVC group [36.5% (19/52) vs. 5.4% (12/222), P < 0.05], the incidence of puncture site fluid leakage, puncture site skin allergy, and deep vein thrombosis were significantly lower than those in the CVC group [puncture site fluid leakage: 1.9% (1/52) vs. 22.1% (49/222), puncture site skin allergy: 0% (0/52) vs. 20.7% (46/222), deep vein thrombosis: 3.8% (2/52) vs. 16.7% (37/222), all P < 0.05]. Furthermore, the proportion of patients experiencing three or more types of complications in the MMC group was significantly lower than that in the CVC group [5.8% (3/52) vs. 17.6% (39/222), P < 0.05]. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for catheter removal identified the use of a MMC [odds ratio (OR) = 8.518, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 3.710-19.560, P < 0.001] and a catheter indwelling time ≥ 12 days (OR = 3.133, 95%CI was 1.297-7.567, P = 0.011) as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS MMC was more frequently used in patients with ARDS, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, whereas CVC was primarily employed for vasoactive drug infusion. The use of MMC and a longer indwelling time were identified as independent risk factors for catheter removal. Despite a higher removal rate, the overall incidence of complications was significantly lower with MMC than with CVC. These findings suggest that MMC could serve as a routine alternative to CVC in most of clinical scenarios, provided that measures are implemented to prevent removal.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Intensive Care Units ; Catheterization, Central Venous/methods* ; Central Venous Catheters ; Risk Factors ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Aged

Endovascular treatment has become the primary treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion. Its development and clinical application have expanded significantly in recent years. Imaging assessment plays a pivotal role in guiding both preoperative screening and postoperative management in AIS patients undergoing such interventions. However, updated expert consensus and standardized guidelines remain lacking. To address this gap, the Professional Committee of Interventional Neurology of the Chinese Research Hospital Association convened leading cerebrovascular disease experts to formulate consensus recommendations based on domestic clinical practice, aiming to provide authoritative guidance for imaging evaluation in this patient population.
Humans ; Endovascular Procedures ; Ischemic Stroke/therapy* ; Consensus ; Stroke/therapy* ; Brain Ischemia/therapy*

Traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is an acute, critical, and severe disease, and then combined with multiple organ damage, it is even more dangerous. TAI progresses very rapidly, with a pre-hospital mortality rate of 57%-80%, and even when arriving at the hospital, more than one-third of the patients die within 4 h, and it is the 2nd leading cause of death in individuals aged 4-34 years. In addition, the incidence of TAI combined with injury was 81.4%. Therefore, early diagnosis, expeditious surgery, and timely and effective multidisciplinary cooperation are essential for successful rescue. The authors report 2 patients with acute traumatic aortic dissection combined with multiple organ injuries and treated with emergency endovascular surgery to discuss their clinical characteristics and treatment experience, and to provide experience in the diagnosis and treatment of such patients.
Humans ; Aortic Dissection/surgery* ; Endovascular Procedures ; Multiple Trauma/surgery*

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and prognosis. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who received TEVAR for BTAI at our institution from October 2016 to September 2023 were divided into 2 categories depending on the injury severity score (ISS) (≤ 25 vs. > 25) and when the TEVAR was performed for BTAI (within 24 h vs. after 24 h), respectively. The analysis included all patients who received TEVAR treatment after being diagnosed with BTAI through whole-body CT angiography. Patients treated with open repair and non-operative management were excluded. After propensity-score matching for various factors, outcomes during hospitalization and follow-up were compared. These factors included demographics, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, cause and location of aortic injury, Glasgow coma scale score, society for vascular surgery grading, hemoglobin concentration, creatinine concentration, shock, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate at admission. The comparison was conducted using SPSS 26 software. Continuous variables were presented as either the mean ± standard deviation or median (Q₁, Q₃), and were compared using either the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as n (%), and comparisons were made between the 2 groups using the χ² test or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided p < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients were involved in the study, with 65 (59.1%) patients having ISS scores > 25 and 32 (29.1%) receiving immediate TEVAR. The perioperative overall mortality rate in the group with ISS > 25 was significantly higher than that in the group with ISS ≤ 25 (11 (16.9%) vs. 2 (4.4%), p < 0.001). Upon admission, the elective group exhibited a notably higher Glasgow coma scale score (median (Q₁, Q₃)) compared to the immediate group (15 (12, 15) vs. 13.5 (9, 15), p = 0.039), while the creatinine concentration (median (Q₁, Q₃)) at admission was significantly higher in the immediate group (90.5 (63.8, 144.0) vs. 71.5 (58.3, 80.8), p = 0.012). The final sample included 52 matched patients. Complications occurred significantly less frequently in the elective group compared to the immediate group (16 (50.0%) vs. 3 (10.0%), p < 0.001). Single-factor analysis of variance showed that complications in hospitalized patients were significantly associated with immediate TEVAR as the sole independent risk factor (odds ratio: 9.000, 95% confidence interval: 2.266-35.752, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION In this propensity-score matched analysis of patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI, elective TEVAR was significantly associated with a lower risk of complication rates. In this study using propensity-score matching, patients who underwent elective TEVAR for BTAI had lower complication rates than immediate TEVAR.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Aorta, Thoracic/surgery* ; Female ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Aged ; Injury Severity Score ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Vasculature injury occurs rarely in traumatic brain injury but increases lifetime risk of ischemic or hemorrhage stroke. The diverse and nonspecific clinical manifestations make the diagnosis and treatment of these injuries highly challenging. With advancements in device design, endovascular treatments have become widely adopted, playing an increasingly vital role in the management of vascular diseases. The purpose of this review is to introduce and summarize endovascular treatments of traumatic cerebrovascular injury and other related pathological states after traumatic brain injury. Given the innovations of neuroendovascular devices and improvements in the techniques over the past decade, this review will outline several recent advancements in endovascular treatment strategies for cerebrovascular pathologies. Popularizing more treatment options to clinicians will benefit in dealing with a variety of clinical scenarios and reduce the overall morbidity of traumatic cerebrovascular injury.
Humans ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications* ; Cerebrovascular Trauma/therapy*

The high incidence of bleeding after peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) catheterization increases the risk of puncture site infection and unplanned extubation. Hemostatic dressings should be used in the early stages of catheterization to reduce blood infiltration. However, new hemostatic dressings have various types and advantages, which makes them difficult to choose dressings for medical staff. This paper introduces the types and hemostatic characteristics of novel functional hemostatic dressings, reviews the hemostatic mechanism and hemostatic effect of chitosan, cyanoacrylate gum, alginate, gelatin sponge and oxycellulose dressings in PICC puncture respectively, and prospects the development of new functional hemostatic dressings. It is expected that future hemostatic dressings will move towards multifunctionality and compositeness.
Humans ; Bandages ; Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation* ; Hemorrhage/prevention & control* ; Hemostatics/therapeutic use*

This study investigated a novel coronary knobby scoring balloon through finite element analysis (FEA) and in vitro anti-slippage testing, evaluating its dilation process under various vascular conditions and comparing it with other balloons. The FEA results indicated that in the cases of healthy artery and diseased artery with different stenosis rates, the stress on the vessels caused by the knobby scoring balloon was significantly smaller than that of the scoring balloon, and was close to that of the plain balloon. In vitro anti-slippage testing showed that the slippage distance of a plain balloon was 0.11±0.06 mm, and there was no slippage for knobby scoring balloon under nominal pressure. Knobby scoring balloon can effectively expand calcified lesion while providing anti-slippage function, and has a lower risk of vascular injury.
Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation* ; Equipment Design ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Coronary Vessels

OBJECTIVES: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a life-threatening vascular emergency with extremely high in-hospital mortality. Open surgical repair (OSR) was historically the only treatment option but is associated with substantial trauma and perioperative risk. In recent years, endovascular repair (EVAR) has gained widespread use due to its minimally invasive nature and faster recovery, becoming the preferred option for anatomically suitable patients in many centers. However, controversy remains regarding the long-term survival benefits of EVAR compared with OSR and key prognostic factors affecting outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of OSR and EVAR for rAAA and identify independent predictors of postoperative survival to guide clinical decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients diagnosed with rAAA and treated surgically in the Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients were divided into an OSR group and an EVAR group based on surgical approach. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up outcomes were compared between groups. Long-term survival was analyzed, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among the 83 patients, 32 (38.6%) underwent OSR and 51 (61.4%) received EVAR, with the proportion of EVAR steadily increasing to nearly 80% in the most recent 5 years. Patients in the EVAR group were older [(68.76±8.57) years vs (60.59±13.24) years, P=0.012], and had a lower proportion of males (76.5% vs 96.9%, P=0.013). EVAR significantly reduced operating time [(181.86±69.87) min vs (291.09±60.33) min] and hospital stay [(12.14±6.31) days vs (16.22±7.89) days (P<0.05)], but total hospitalization costs were markedly higher [(208 735.84±101 394.19) yuan vs (84 893.35±40 668.56) yuan, P<0.001]. There were no significant differences between groups in 30-day mortality (15.6% vs 15.7%), aneurysm-related mortality (9.4% vs 11.7%), overall mortality (28.1% vs 29.4%), or re-intervention rate (0 vs 5.9%) (P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 54.6 months (range, 12-144 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed comparable cumulative survival rates between OSR and EVAR (82.7% vs 76.2%, P=0.420). Cox regression identified hyperlipidemia [hazard ratio (HR)=2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 4.19, P=0.005] and elevated preoperative serum creatinine (HR=3.33, 95% CI 1.69 to 6.55, P<0.001) as significant predictors of poor prognosis. Both factors remained independently associated with mortality in the multivariate model (hyperlipidemia: HR=2.02, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.70; elevated serum creatinine: HR=2.77, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.47; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS EVAR offeres advantages in operative and recovery times, though its long-term survival outcomes are comparable to OSR. A history of hyperlipidemia and elevated preoperative creatinine levels are independent predictors of poor prognosis. Surgical approach should be chosen based on anatomical feasibility and patient condition, with close management of lipid levels and renal function to improve outcomes.
Humans ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality* ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Prognosis ; Aged ; Aortic Rupture/mortality* ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged, 80 and over