1.Diagnostic yield and safety of pancreatic cystic lesions: A comparison between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB.
Xiaoyu YU ; Mingmei YE ; Yawen NI ; Qianqi LIU ; Pan GONG ; Yuanyuan HUANG ; Xiaoyan WANG ; Li TIAN
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2025;50(2):227-236
OBJECTIVES:
In recent years, the incidence and detection rate of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased significantly. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays an indispensable role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PCLs. However, evidence comparing the diagnostic performance of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) remains limited. This study aims to compare the diagnostic yield, adequacy of tissue acquisition, and safety between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB in evaluating PCLs to inform clinical practice.
METHODS:
A retrospective review was conducted on patients with PCLs who underwent either EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB between January 2014 and August 2021. The diagnostic yield, tissue acquisition adequacy, and incidence of adverse events were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS:
A total of 90 patients with PCLs were included (52 in the FNA group and 38 in the FNB group). The diagnostic yield was similar between the FNA and FNB groups (94.2% vs 94.7%, P>0.05). The adequacy of tissue acquisition was 71.2% in the FNA group and 81.6% in the FNB group (P>0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Both EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB demonstrate equally high diagnostic yields and tissue adequacy in PCLs, with excellent safety profiles. Both methods are safe and effective diagnostic tools for evaluating PCLs.
Humans
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/adverse effects*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Female
;
Male
;
Pancreatic Cyst/diagnostic imaging*
;
Middle Aged
;
Biopsy, Fine-Needle/adverse effects*
;
Aged
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis*
;
Adult
;
Endosonography/methods*
;
Pancreas/pathology*
;
Diagnosis, Differential
3.Cytology Smears of Rapid On-site Evaluation as Supplemental Material for Molecular Testing of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Shiqi TANG ; Chunli TANG ; Zeyun LIN ; Juhong JIANG
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2024;26(12):910-918
BACKGROUND:
The thoracic small biopsy sampling procedure including transbronchial forceps lung biopsy (TBLB) and endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can be accompanied by rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of sample material to provide immediate feedback for the proceduralist. The present study aims to investigate the supplemental effect of ROSE smear samples for lung cancer molecular test.
METHODS:
In a retrospective study, 308 patients admitted to our hospital from August 2020 to December 2022 undergoing diagnostic TBLB and EBUS-TBNA with ROSE and subsequently diagnosed as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed. The matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedding (FFPE) tissue section and ROSE smears for tumor cellularity were compared. DNA yields of smears were determined. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on adequate smear samples.
RESULTS:
ROSE smear samples were enriched in tumor cells. Among 308 biopsy samples, 78 cases (25.3%) exhibited inadequate FFPE tissue sections, whereas 44 cases (14.3%) yielded adequate smear samples. Somatic mutations detected in the FFPE tissue section samples were also detected in the matching adequate smear sample.
CONCLUSIONS
ROSE smear samples of the thoracic small biopsies are beneficial supplemental materials for ancillary testing of lung cancer. Combined use of cytology smear samples with traditional FFPE section samples can enhance the detection rate of informative mutations in patients with advanced NSCLC. We recommend that the laboratory could further evaluate the ROSE cell smears of the patient when FFPE tissue sections are inadequate, and that adequate cell smears can be used as a supplemental source for the molecular testing of NSCLC.
Humans
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology*
;
Lung Neoplasms/pathology*
;
Rapid On-site Evaluation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/methods*
4.Research Advances in the Diagnostic Value of Rapid On-site Evaluation in Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Lung Cancer.
Wen Jun LI ; Hong Yan TAO ; Lei SHI ; Yi Xin WAN ; Hong WANG ; Hui Rong HUANG
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2020;42(6):820-824
Rapid on-site evaluation(ROSE),an auxiliary sampling quality evaluation technology,can be used to evaluate the adequacy and diagnostic category of samples,judge the histological type of lung cancer,and optimize the gene type of lung cancer.Applying ROSE to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of suspected lung cancer can improve the puncture success rate and diagnostic rate and reduce complications and puncture attempts.Rose performed via remote cytopathology technology or by trained respiratory specialists may become the future trends.
Bronchoscopy
;
Cytodiagnosis/methods*
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms/pathology*
5.Review of the 2017 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscopic Ultrasound - Guided Sampling in Pancreaticobiliary Lesions
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019;74(3):137-141
EUS currently plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive diseases. In addition, EUS-guided sampling has been applied to pancreaticobiliary lesions for the accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary lesions. Many new instruments and studies for EUS-guided sampling are being developed and attempted. This review introduces and summarizes the key recommendations made in the recent guideline for EUS-guided sampling developed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Biliary Tract
;
Diagnosis
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Pancreas
;
Ultrasonography
6.The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer
Sung Woo KO ; Jun Seong HWANG ; Tae Jun SONG
Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract 2019;24(3):102-110
Pancreatic cancer was the 9th most common cancer in Korea in 2016, and the incidence is on the rise. Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is about 11.7% in Korea, and its prognosis is very poor compared to other cancers. At present, although complete surgical resection is the most effective treatment, only less than 20% of patients are even candidates for resection because diagnosis is usually delayed. So early detection of pancreatic cancer is one of the main objective in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Among imaging modalities, computed tomography-scan is the most widely available, and the most frequently used. However as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) techniques have evolved and based on the results of researches that EUS is superior to computed tomography-scan in the diagnosis of small pancreatic tumor, the role of EUS in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is attracting attention. Herein, the authors focused on the role of EUS in early pancreatic cancer.
Diagnosis
;
Early Diagnosis
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endosonography
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Korea
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Rate
;
Ultrasonography
7.Review of the 2017 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscopic Ultrasound
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019;74(3):137-141
EUS currently plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive diseases. In addition, EUS-guided sampling has been applied to pancreaticobiliary lesions for the accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary lesions. Many new instruments and studies for EUS-guided sampling are being developed and attempted. This review introduces and summarizes the key recommendations made in the recent guideline for EUS-guided sampling developed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Biliary Tract
;
Diagnosis
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Pancreas
;
Ultrasonography
8.Predictive Factors for Inaccurate Diagnosis of Swollen Lymph Nodes in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Yuki FUJII ; Yoshihide KANNO ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Kaori MASU ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Keisuke YONAMINE ; Yujiro KAWAKAMI ; Toji MURABAYASHI ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Yutaka NODA ; Hiroyuki OKADA ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(2):152-158
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for inaccurate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes without rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for abdominal or mediastinal lymph nodes from January 2008 to June 2017 were included from a prospectively maintained EUS-FNA database and retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for the detection of neoplastic diseases were calculated. Candidate factors for inaccurate diagnosis (lymph node size and location, needle type, puncture route, number of passes, and causative disease) were evaluated by comparison between accurately diagnosed cases and others. RESULTS: The final diagnosis of the punctured lymph node was classified as neoplastic (65 cases: a metastatic lymph node, malignant lymphoma, or Crow-Fukase syndrome) or non-neoplastic (18 cases: a reactive node or amyloidosis). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. On multivariate analyses, small size of the lymph node was the sole predictive factor for inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis with a significant difference (odds ratios, 19.8; 95% confidence intervals, 3.15–124; p=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: The lymph node size of <16 mm was the only independent factor associated with inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes.
Diagnosis
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endosonography
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Lymphatic Diseases
;
Lymphoma
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Needles
;
Prospective Studies
;
Punctures
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
10.A “Back Light System” for Identification of Sites for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses: A Prospective, Randomized Study with a Crossover Design
Ryo HARADA ; Hironari KATO ; Soichiro FUSHIMI ; Hirofumi INOUE ; Daisuke UCHIDA ; Yutaka AKIMOTO ; Takeshi TOMODA ; Kazuyuki MATSUMOTO ; Yasuhiro NOMA ; Naoki YAMAMOTO ; Shigeru HORIGUCHI ; Koichiro TSUTSUMI ; Hiroyuki OKADA
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(4):334-339
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We applied a back light system (BLS) with a magnifying glass to improve the ability to assess the adequacy of specimen sampling using endosonography. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of the BLS in sampling of specimens by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover, single-center clinical trial. An endosonographer evaluated adequacy on gross visual inspection and identified whitish specimen sampling sites with and without the BLS according to a randomization sequence in the first and second passes with a 25-G needle. On cytological evaluation, the presence of well-defined pancreatic ductal epithelium was evaluated by a cytopathologist who was blinded to any clinical information. RESULTS: A total of 80 consecutive patients were eligible during the study period. Adequacy was observed for 52 specimens (65%) with the BLS and 54 (68%) without the BLS (p=0.88). In assessment of specimen adequacy on gross examination, only fair agreement was observed both with and without BLS (kappa score 0.40 and 0.29, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The BLS did not influence the ability to identify specimen sampling sites or reliable assessment of specimen site adequacy using gross visual inspection.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
;
Cross-Over Studies
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endosonography
;
Epithelium
;
Glass
;
Humans
;
Needles
;
Pancreatic Ducts
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms
;
Prospective Studies
;
Random Allocation

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail