PURPOSE: Renal trauma constitutes 0.5% - 5% of all trauma patients, and 10% - 20% of abdominal trauma. It is the most commonly injured organ in the genitourinary tract. Road traffic crash (RTC) is the most common cause. In recent years due to the advances in radiological imaging and endovascular techniques, there has been an increase in the nonoperative management of renal trauma. We investigated a large trauma cohort at a level I trauma centre to evaluate patients' demographics with renal trauma, their management, and the outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data of renal trauma patients managed from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients who visited the level I trauma centre in north India with renal trauma were included in this study. Patients who were dead on arrival in the emergency department were excluded. Demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of hemorrhagic shock, associated injuries, complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), discharge, and mortality were recorded. The data were entered in Microsoft Excel 365 and analysed using SPSS version 21. RESULTS: This study collected data from 303 renal trauma patients. Males constituted 86.5% of the patients. Most patients were young, aged from 20 - 40 years. Blunt renal trauma was the predominant mode of injury (n = 270, 89.1%). RTCs (n = 190, 62.7%) and falls from height (n = 65, 21.4%) were the 2 most common mechanisms of injury. Focused assessment with sonography in trauma was positive in 68.4% of patients. Grade III (grading by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) renal trauma (30.4%) was the most common grade in our study. The liver (n = 104, 34.3%) and splenic trauma (n = 96, 31.7%) were the most commonly associated injuries. Of the 303 patients, 260 (85.8%) were managed nonoperatively. The mean (SD) of the patients' LOS was 12.5 (6.5) days. There were 25 (8.3%) mortalities during the study period and all of them had associated other injuries. The comparison of LOS of isolated renal trauma group and renal trauma with associated injuries group was not statistically significant (p = 0.322). All the patients who died during the study period had renal trauma with associated other organ injuries. None of the patients with isolated renal trauma died during the study. The outcome comparison between both groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.110). CONCLUSION Renal trauma predominantly occurs in young males, especially due to RTCs followed by fall from height. Focused assessment with sonography in trauma is not reliable in detecting renal injuries, other diagnostic tools such as contrast enhanced computed tomography torso should be considered in diagnosing and grading these injuries. Renal trauma usually does not occur in isolation. Majority are associated with other abdominal and extra abdominal injuries. Most of the times these injuries can be managed nonoperatively, which can achieve a low mortality. The patients who required surgery had high mortality as compared to patients who managed nonoperatively. These patients who required surgery had either severe renal or extra renal trauma and were in hemorrhagic shock. Renal trauma from this large cohort may contribute to improving the quality of care for patients with renal trauma by obtaining knowledge about the patient's characteristics, management, and outcomes.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; India/epidemiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Kidney/injuries* ; Trauma Centers ; Middle Aged ; Young Adult ; Length of Stay ; Adolescent ; Aged

PURPOSE: Road traffic accidents (RTA), assaults, falls, and sports-related injuries are the leading causes of maxillofacial trauma. Due to quite different geographical environment and fast urbanization, the use of various protective equipment is restricted in India. Thus, compared to other countries, there might be a significant difference in the pattern and frequency of associated injuries among subjects with maxillofacial trauma. The present study was conducted to identify the causes and pattern of various maxillofacial fractures and the frequency of other related injuries among subjects with maxillofacial trauma. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study recording 2617 subjects with maxillofacial trauma from October 2017 to October 2022. The patient demographics, causes of trauma, types of maxillofacial injury, and associated soft and hard tissue injuries were recorded. The types of maxillofacial and associated injuries were diagnosed from details of clinical examinations and the interpretation of various radiographs available in the file. The associated injuries were divided into head injury, other bony injuries, and soft tissue and vital structure injuries. Descriptive statistics and the test of proportion were used. A p value < 0.05 was considered as a level of significance. RESULTS: The maxillofacial injuries were significantly common in patients aged 16 - 45 years (66.7%) than in patients aged ≤ 15 and > 46 years (33.3%) (p < 0.001). The RTA was the most common cause of maxillofacial injury (n = 2139, 81.7%), followed by fall (n = 206, 7.9%), other causes of injury (n = 178, 6.8%), and assaults (n = 94, 3.6%). The maxillofacial injury by 2-wheel vehicle accidents was significantly higher than that by 4-wheel vehicle and other vehicle accidents (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between alcohol and RTA (p < 0.001). The head injury (n = 931, 61.1%) was the most common associated injury, followed by soft tissue and vital structures injuries (n = 328, 21.5%) and other bone injuries (n = 264, 17.3%). DISCUSSION Head injury was the most common associated injury followed by soft tissue and vital structures and bone injuries among subjects with maxillofacial trauma. Clavicle fracture and injury to the lower extremities were the most common hard and soft tissue-associated injuries.
Humans ; Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Adult ; India/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Middle Aged ; Adolescent ; Young Adult ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data* ; Child ; Aged ; Multiple Trauma/epidemiology* ; Child, Preschool

PURPOSE: Over 30,000 hip hemiarthroplasties for neck of femur fractures are performed annually in the United Kingdom (UK). The national recommendation is via the lateral approach, to reduce the risk of dislocation, with the potential expense of reduced function and mobility post-operatively. Muscle-sparing approaches, such as SPAIRE (sparing piriformis and internus repairing externus), have been invented to address the issue of dislocation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective data collection at a single center with a high annual volume of hip hemiarthroplasties over 12 months. All patients who had hip hemiarthroplasty as their primary treatment were included. Patients who passed away and were non-ambulant before their surgery were excluded from the study. Our primary outcome was the dislocation rate and secondary outcomes were the time to mobilization after surgery and the duration of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT software. RESULTS: We identified 194 cases, and these were divided into 3 groups based on the surgical approach: SPAIRE (n = 43), lateral (n = 97), and posterior (n = 54). Groups had similar demographics and a minimum 3-month follow-up after surgery. There were no dislocations in the SPAIRE group, whereas the dislocation rate for the other 2 groups was 2.5% in the lateral and 9.1% in the posterior groups at 6 months post-surgery. There was an earlier return to mobility in the SPAIRE (1.4 day) compared to the 2 other groups ( 2 days and 2.6 days). Average surgical times were very similar among all 3 groups (74 min vs. 79 min vs. 71 min). CONCLUSION The SPAIRE approach seems to be safe and provides a low risk of dislocation and good post-operative function for patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasties.
Humans ; Hemiarthroplasty/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Male ; Aged ; United Kingdom ; Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery* ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Trauma Centers ; Hip Dislocation/prevention & control* ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*

PURPOSE: Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) is a final salvage procedure for critically injured trauma patients. Given its low success rate and ambiguous indications, its use in blunt trauma scenarios remains highly debated. Consequently, our study seeks to ascertain the overall survival rate of ERT in blunt trauma patients and determine which patients would benefit most from this procedure. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted for this research. Blunt trauma patients who underwent ERT between January 2020 and December 2023 in our trauma center were selected for analysis, with the endpoint outcome being in-hospital survival, divided into survival and non-survival groups. Inter-group comparisons were conducted using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, the Kruskal-Wallis test, Student's t-test, or the Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess potential predictors of survival. Then, the efficacy of the predictors was assessed through sensitivity and specificity analysis. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included in the study, with 4 survivors (12.12%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between cardiac tamponade and survival, with an adjusted odds ratio of 33.4 (95% CI: 1.31 - 850.00, p = 0.034). Additionally, an analysis of sensitivity and specificity, targeting cardiac tamponade as an indicator for survivor identification, showed a sensitivity rate of 75.0% and a specificity rate of 96.6%. CONCLUSION The survival rate among blunt trauma patients undergoing ERT exceeds traditional expectations, suggesting that select individuals with blunt trauma can significantly benefit from the procedure. Notably, those presenting with cardiac tamponade are identified as the subgroup most likely to derive substantial benefits from ERT.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; China ; Logistic Models ; Resuscitation/mortality* ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Thoracotomy/methods* ; Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data* ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery*

PURPOSE: Although there are significant differences between China and the United States (US) in trauma medical services, there has been no direct comparative research on the epidemiological data of trauma centers between the 2 countries. This study aims to fill this research gap by directly comparing trauma centers in China and the US, providing valuable data and insights for the development of trauma centers in both countries, promoting academic exchange and cooperation internationally, and enhancing the level of global trauma medical care. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective descriptive study. Data were collected for trauma patients with an injury severity score ≥16 treated from September 2013 to September 2019 at 2 hospital trauma centers in these 2 countries. Detailed clinical data (including injury mechanism, age, injury site, injury severity score, pre-hospital transport time, whether blood transfusion was performed, whether resuscitative thoracotomy was conducted, hospital and intensive care unit stay duration, the number of organ donor patients, mortality rates, and costs) were meticulously compiled and retrospectively analyzed to identify differences between the 2 trauma centers. The comparison was conducted using SPSS 23 software. Continuous variables are reported as median (Q₁, Q₃), and Mann Whitney U test is used to compare the median of continuous variables. Use clinically relevant critical points to classify continuous variables, with categorical variables represented as n (%), and comparisons were made between the 2 groups using the χ² test or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided p < 0.05. RESULTS: These results point to significant differences in trauma center capacity, pre-hospital transport times, treatment procedures, hospital stay duration, mortality rates, and costs between the 2 centers. The volume of patients in trauma centers is less in China (2465 vs. 5288). Pre-hospital transport time was notably longer in China (180 min vs. 14 min), and the rate of emergency blood transfusions was lower in China (18.4% vs. 50.6%), Emergency thoracotomy was not performed in China but was conducted in 9.8% of cases in the US. Hospitalization costs were significantly lower in China than in the US ($5847 vs. $75,671). CONCLUSION There are clear differences in trauma center capacity (number of patients treated), pre-hospital transport time, age distribution of injured patients, injury mechanisms, injury sites, whether emergency thoracotomy is performed, hospital costs, and length of stay between the 2 trauma centers in China and America. Understanding these differences can help us further recognize the characteristics of Eastern and Western trauma patients.
Humans ; China/epidemiology* ; Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data* ; Retrospective Studies ; United States/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Wounds and Injuries/therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Injury Severity Score ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data* ; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric patients admitted to the inpatient units from the emergency department (ED) are increasing, but the mean length of stay has fallen significantly. We aimed to determine the reasons behind paediatric one-day admissions in Singapore and to assess their necessity. METHODS: A retrospective study involving paediatric patients who were admitted from a general ED of an adult tertiary hospital to a paediatric tertiary hospital between 1 August 2018 and 30 April 2020. One-day admission was defined as an inpatient stay of less than 24 h from the time of admission to discharge. An unnecessary admission was defined as one with no diagnostic test ordered, intravenous medication administered, therapeutic procedure performed or specialty review made in the inpatient unit. Data were captured in a standardised form and analysed. RESULTS: There were 13,944 paediatric attendances - 1,160 (8.3%) paediatric patients were admitted. Among these, 481 (41.4%) were one-day admissions. Upper respiratory tract infection (62, 12.9%), gastroenteritis (60, 12.5%) and head injury (52, 10.8%) were the three most common conditions. The three most common reasons for ED admissions were inpatient treatment (203, 42.2%), inpatient monitoring (185, 38.5%) and inpatient diagnostic investigations (32, 12.3%). Ninety-six (20.0%) one-day admissions were unnecessary. CONCLUSION Paediatric one-day admissions present an opportunity to develop and implement interventions targeted at the healthcare system, the ED, the paediatric patient and their caregiver, in order to safely slow down and perhaps reverse the trend of increased hospital admissions.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Child ; Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data* ; Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data* ; Female ; Male ; Child, Preschool ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data* ; Infant ; Adolescent ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data* ; Infant, Newborn ; Gastroenteritis/therapy* ; Respiratory Tract Infections

INTRODUCTION: Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common paediatric emergency. While guidelines exist for urgent intervention, less is known of the natural progress of FBs passing through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). We reviewed these FB transit times in an outpatient cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all children (≤18 years) treated for radiopaque FB ingestion at two major tertiary paediatric centres from 2015 to 2016. Demographic data, FB types, outcomes and hospital visits (emergency department [ED] and outpatient) were recorded. All cases discharged from the ED with outpatient follow-up were included. We excluded those who were not given follow-up appointments and those admitted to inpatient wards. We categorised the outcomes into confirmed passage (ascertained via abdominal X-ray or reported direct stool visualisation by patients/caregivers) and assumed passage (if patients did not attend follow-up appointments). RESULTS: Of the 2,122 ED visits for FB ingestion, 350 patients who were given outpatient follow-up appointments were reviewed (median age 4.35 years [range: 0.5-14.7], 196 [56%] male). The largest proportion (16%) was aged 1-2 years. Coins were the most common ingested FB, followed by toys. High-risk FB (magnets or batteries) formed 9% of cases ( n =33). The 50 th centile for FB retention was 8, 4 and 7 days for coins, batteries and other radiopaque FBs, respectively; all confirmed passages occurred at 37, 7 and 23 days, respectively. Overall, 197 (68%) patients defaulted on their last given follow-up. CONCLUSION This study provides insight into the transit times of FB ingested by children, which helps medical professionals to decide on the optimal time for follow-up visits and provide appropriate counsel to caregivers.
Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Eating ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging* ; Gastrointestinal Tract/diagnostic imaging* ; Gastrointestinal Transit ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Tertiary Care Centers

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) is a major public health challenge and post-return-of-spontaneous-circulation (ROSC) goals have shifted from just survival to survival with intact neurology. Although post-ROSC care is crucial for survival with intact neurology, there are insufficient well-established protocols for post-resuscitation care. We aimed to evaluate post-resuscitation care in the emergency department (ED) of adult (aged ≥16 years) OHCA patients with sustained ROSC and its associated neurologically intact survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for OHCA patients with sustained ROSC at the ED. Data including demographics, pre-hospital resuscitation, ED resuscitation, post-resuscitation care and eventual outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Among 921 OHCA patients, 85 (9.2%) had sustained ROSC at the ED. Nineteen patients (19/85, 22.4%) survived, with 13 (13/85, 15.3%) having intact neurology at discharge. Electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were performed in all OHCA patients, whereas computed tomography (CT) was performed inconsistently, with CT brain being most common (74/85, 87.1%), while CT pulmonary angiogram (6/85, 7.1%), abdomen and pelvis (4/85, 4.7%) and aortogram (2/85, 2.4%) were done infrequently. Only four patients (4.7%) had all five neuroprotective goals of normoxia, normocarbia, normotension, normothermia and normoglycaemia achieved in the ED. The proportion of all five neuroprotective goals being met was significantly higher ( P = 0.01) among those with neurologically intact survival (3/13, 23.1%) than those without (1/72, 1.4%). CONCLUSION Post-resuscitation care at the ED showed great variability, indicating gaps between recommended guidelines and clinical practice. Good quality post-resuscitation care, centred around neuroprotection goals, must be initiated promptly to achieve meaningful survival with intact neurology.
Humans ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods* ; Return of Spontaneous Circulation ; Aged ; Adult ; Treatment Outcome ; Electrocardiography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Aged, 80 and over

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients attending emergency departments (EDs) often present with acute symptoms and are frequently admitted. This study aimed to characterise the profile of oncology patients who were discharged from the ED. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit of patients with cancer-related diagnoses who presented to the ED at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) over a 6-month period from 1 October 2018 to 31 March 2019 and were directly discharged from the ED. Data was extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record system. RESULTS: Of the 492 participants included in the study, the majority were triaged as Priority 2 (61.4%), while 30.7% were triaged as Priority 3, 6.9% as Priority 1 and 1.0% as Priority 4. There was no statistical difference between the National Early Warning scores across the different triage categories in these patients. The most common complaint was (44.3%), followed by genitourinary symptoms (19.5%) and those related to devices, catheters or stomas (17.3%). More investigations of all types were done for patients being managed in Priority 1 (57.6%) than in the other triage categories (40.1% for Priority 2, 23.2% for Priority 3 and 12.0% for Priority 4). Treatment procedures carried out were mainly symptomatic (analgesics, antiemetics, proton pump inhibitors) for 79.8% of the patients. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients requiring various treatment modalities among the triage categories. CONCLUSION Selected oncological patients may potentially be managed in an ambulatory setting.
Humans ; Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data* ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Male ; Singapore ; Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data* ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Triage ; Adult ; Emergencies ; Aged, 80 and over

INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) virus emerged and caused a worldwide pandemic, leading to measures being imposed by many countries to reduce its transmission. Singapore implemented the 'circuit breaker', which restricted all movements except for access to necessities and healthcare services. We aimed to investigate the impact of lockdown measures on the pattern of trauma and its effects. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, single-centre descriptive study was conducted using the trauma registry in Singapore General Hospital. It included patients above 18 years old who presented to the emergency department with trauma and were subsequently admitted. Patients admitted from 1 February 2020 to 31 July 2020 and those admitted during the same timeframe in 2019 were studied. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients aged ≥65 years and those <65 years. RESULTS: A total of 1,037 patients were included for analysis. A 17.6% increase in trauma presentations was seen from 2019 to 2020. Patients aged ≥65 years accounted for the rise in admissions. The predominant mechanism of injury was falls at home for older patients and vehicular accidents in patients <65 years. There were no significant differences in injury severity score, intensive care/high-dependency unit admission rates, length of stay, mortality rate, and subsequent need for inpatient rehabilitation. CONCLUSION Our study provided information on differences in trauma presentations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further studies are required to better inform on additional precautionary measures needed to reduce trauma and improve safety during future lockdowns and pandemics.
Humans ; COVID-19/prevention & control* ; Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Middle Aged ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data* ; Adult ; Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data* ; Registries ; Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data* ; Pandemics ; Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data* ; Length of Stay ; Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data*