BACKGROUND

Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) help identify children at risk of clinical deterioration, but their accuracy across diverse settings, populations, interventions, and outcomes remains unexplored.

To determine the accuracy of PEWS in detecting clinical deterioration events (CDE) among pediatric patients seen at the emergency department (ED).

Retrospective cohort study.

Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years seen at the ED.

Southern Philippines Medical Center Emergency Department, Davao City, Philippines from January 2021 to December 2022.

Area under the curve (AUC) of PEWS in detecting CDE; Brighton PEWS optimal cut-off and its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR).

Among the 345 patients, 56 experienced CDE and 289 did not. Patients with CDE had significantly lower median age (1.00 year vs 5.00 years; p < 0.001), oxygen saturation (93.00% vs 98.00%; p < 0.001), and pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale scores (8.00 vs 15.00; p < 0.0001) compared to those without CDE. Heart rate (135.00 vs 111.00 beats per minute; p < 0.001), and respiratory rate (32.50 vs 24.00 breaths per minute; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with CDE. The two groups also differed significantly in terms of comorbidity distribution (p < 0.001) and diagnosis (p < 0.001). The AUC of Brighton PEWS was 0.9064 (95% CI 0.8716 to 0.9357), with an optimal cut-off score of ≥4.00. This threshold yielded 76.79% sensitivity, 88.58% specificity, 56.60% PPV, 95.20% NPV, 6.72 LR+, and 0.26 LR-.

The Brighton PEWS demonstrates strong diagnostic accuracy in predicting CDE among pediatric patients. A cut-off score of ≥4.00 offers a balanced combination of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for ED application.

Background: Burnout is a pressing concern among Emergency Ward (EW) nurses, stemming from the intense demands of their profession, including long hours, exposure to traumatic events, and the need for quick decision-making. This issue not only affects nurses' well-being but also has repercussions for patient care and the healthcare system. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between effort-reward and work-life imbalance on burnout among EW nurses in a public hospital. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional analytical study conducted from February to May 2022 involving 32 EW nurses employed at Public Hospital I.A. Moeis Hospital in Samarinda City, Indonesia. The research employed several instruments for data collection through stratified random sampling. Chi square and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the factors contributing to burnout among EW nurses, including effort-reward imbalance, worklife balance, namely monotonous work, self-efficacy, communication among healthcare professionals, and workload. Result: There was positive correlation between effort-reward and work-life imbalance on burnout among EW nurses. The multivariate test results showed that workload, self-efficacy, communication, and monotonous work had higher risk of developing burnout in EW nurses. Conclusion In this study, we found that effort-reward and work-life imbalance were significantly associated with burnout in EW nurses in a public hospital. The development of comprehensive assessment of burnout among EW nurses and its early intervention should be warranted.
Burnout, Psychological ; Emergency Ward ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Nurses ; Hospitals, Public

BACKGROUND

Palliative Care focuses on the needs of both the patient and their families, aiming to enhance their overall quality of life. It achieves this by anticipating, preventing, reducing, and treating suffering through comprehensive support across various aspects of life. This approach promotes patient autonomy, provides access to information, and encourages the freedom to make choices. Referring patients to Supportive and Palliative Care in a timely manner enhances their quality of life, improving symptom control, mood, and understanding of their illness. Additionally, it reduces distress for both the patient and their caregiver during the end-of-life period.

This study aimed to determine the proportion of late referrals among patients diagnosed with debilitating illnesses consulting at the Emergency Department of Batangas Medical Center from July to December 2022 and who needed Supportive and Palliative Care using the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening Tool, considering age, sex, and the specific diagnosis of the debilitating illness. Additionally, the timing of referrals for both discharged and admitted patients requiring Supportive and Palliative Care was described, with categories including those referred within one week, beyond one week, and those not referred at all.

This retrospective study was conducted via chart review of all patients with debilitating illnesses who visited the Emergency Department of Batangas Medical Center, admitted or discharged, from July 2022 to December 2022. Timing of referral to Supportive and Palliative Care was obtained from the admission charts and/or the SPC referral logbook. Frequency analysis specifically frequency tabulation was used to summarize data.

Between July and December 2022, 2,097 patients diagnosed with debilitating illnesses at the Emergency Department were identified. Only 2.52% of them received referrals to Supportive and Palliative Care, and among this group, more than half (38) were referred later than one week after diagnosis.

This study identified the need for comprehensive improvements in the referral process, emphasizing timely access to Supportive and Palliative Care for patients of all demographic facing debilitating illnesses. The call for systemic changes advocates for clear protocols and guidelines, reducing oversight and delays. The Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening Tool can streamline referrals, while collaboration between healthcare providers and the palliative care team ensures a more efficient system. Strategies advocating for healthcare infrastructure improvement and awareness campaigns may be developed to facilitate timely referrals for patients across age and gender spectrums.

PURPOSE: Spine injury is one of the leading causes of death and mortality worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, pattern and outcome of trauma patients with spine injury referred to the largest trauma center in southern Iran during the last 3 years. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted between March 2018 and June 2021 in the largest trauma center in the southern Iran. The data collection form included the age, sex, injury location (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar), cause of injury (traffic accidents, falls, and assaults), length of hospital stay, injured segment of spine injury, severity of injury, and outcome. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS software version 24. RESULTS: Totally 776 cases of spine injury were identified. The spine injury rate was 17.0%, and the mortality rate was 15.5%. Cervical spine injury (20.4%) more often occulted in motorcycle accident, and thoracic spine injury (20.1%) occulted in falls. The highest and lowest rates of spine injurys were related to lumbar spine injury (30.2%) and cervical spine injury (21.5%), respectively. There was a statistically significant relationship between the mechanism of injury and the location of spine injury (p < 0.001). And patients with lumbar spine injury had the highest mortality rate (16.7%). Injury severity score (OR= 1.041, p < 0.001) and length of stay (OR = 1.018, p < 0.001) were strong predictors of mortality in trauma patients with spine injury. CONCLUSION The results of the study showed that the incidence of traumatic spine injury rate was approximately 17.0% in southern of Iran. Road traffic injury and falls are the common mechanism of injury to spine. It is important to improve the safety of roads, and passengers, as well as work environment, and improve the quality of cars. Also, paying attention to the pattern of spine injury may assist to prevent the missing diagnosis of spine injury in multiple trauma patients.
Humans ; Incidence ; Trauma Centers ; Iran/epidemiology* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Spinal Injuries/etiology* ; Neck Injuries ; Accidents, Traffic

Chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department. Diseases of the heart, aorta, lungs, esophagus, stomach, mediastinum, pleura, and abdominal viscera can all cause chest discomfort (Gulati et al., 2021; Jiao et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022). Clinicians in the emergency department are expected to immediately recognize life-threatening chest pain (Jiao et al., 2021). Delayed diagnosis further increases the risk of complications and mortality (Liu et al., 2021). In this case, we present an elderly Chinese female who had a history of myocardial infarction two years previously, with chest pain eventually found to be caused by ingestion of a duck bone.
Humans ; Female ; Aged ; Esophagus ; Foreign Bodies/diagnosis* ; Chest Pain/complications* ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Heart

PURPOSE: To prepare for future possible communicable disease epidemics/pandemics, health care providers should know how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced injured patients. This study aimed to compare epidemiologic features, outcomes, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of trauma patients admitted to a university-affiliated hospital before and during the pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on data from the National Trauma Registry of Iran. All injured patients admitted to the hospital from July 25, 2016 to March 10, 2021 were included in the study. The patients were excluded if they had hospital length of stay less than 24 h. The injury outcomes, trauma mechanisms, and therapeutic and diagnostic procedures of the 2 periods: before (from July 25, 2016 to February 18, 2020) and during (from February 19, 2020 to March 10, 2021) COVID-19 pandemic were compared. All analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Totally, 5014 patients were included in the registry. Of them, 773 (15.4%) were registered after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic on February 19, 2020, while 4241 were registered before that. Gender, education level, and cause of injury were significantly different among the patients before and after the beginning of the pandemic (p < 0.001). In the ≤ 15 years and ≥ 65 years age groups, injuries decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.001). The frequency of intensive care unit (ICU) admission decreased from 694 (16.4%) to 88 (11.4%) (p < 0.001). The mean length of stay at the hospital (days) and at the ICU (days) declined as follow: 8.3 (SD = 17.2) vs. 5.5 (SD = 6.1), p < 0.001 and 7.5 (SD = 11.5) vs. 4.5 (SD = 6.3), p < 0.022. The frequency of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures before and during the pandemic was as follows, respectively: ultrasonography 905 (21.3%) vs. 417 (53.9%) (p < 0.001), echocardiography 313 (7.4%) vs. 107 (13.8%) (p < 0.001), angiography 1597 (37.7%) vs. 534 (69.1%) (p < 0.001), MRI 166 (3.9%) vs. 51 (6.6%) (p < 0.001), surgery 3407 (80.3%) vs. 654 (84.6%) (p < 0.001), and internal/external fixation 1215 (28.6%) vs. 336 (43.5%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The pandemic affected the epidemiology of traumatic patients in terms of gender, age, educational level, and trauma mechanism. It changed the outcomes of injured patients: ICU admission, length of stay at the hospital and ICU decreased. The patients received more diagnostic and therapeutic procedures during the pandemic. To be more precise, more research is needed on the details.
Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Pandemics ; Retrospective Studies ; Iran/epidemiology* ; Intensive Care Units ; Registries ; Trauma Centers ; COVID-19 Testing

PURPOSE: Trauma centres have been proven to provide better outcomes in developed countries for overall trauma, but there is limited literature on the systematic factors that describe any discrepancies in outcomes for trauma laparotomies in these centres. This study was conducted to examine and interrogate the effect of systematic factors on patients undergoing a trauma laparotomy in a developed country, intending to identify potential discrepancies in the outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all laparotomies performed for trauma at a level 1 trauma centre in New Zealand. All adult patients who had undergone an index laparotomy for trauma between February 2012 and November 2020 were identified and laparotomies for both blunt and penetrating trauma were included. Repeat laparotomies and trauma laparotomies in children were excluded. The primary clinical outcomes reviewed included morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. All statistical analysis was performed using R v.4.0.3. RESULTS: During the 9-year study period, 204 trauma laparotomies were performed at Waikato hospital. The majority (83.3%) were performed during office hours (170/204), and the remaining 16.7% were performed after hours (34/204). And 61.3% were performed on a weekday (125/204), whilst 38.7% were performed on the weekend/public holiday (79/204). Most of the parameters in office hours and after hours groups had no statistically significant difference, except lactate (p = 0.026). Most of the variables in weekday and weekend groups had no statistically significant difference, except pH, lactate, length of stay, and gastrointestinal complications (p = 0.012, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSION The current trauma system at Waikato hospital is capable of delivering care for trauma laparotomy patients with the same outcome regardless of working hours or after hours, weekday or weekend. This confirms the importance of a robust trauma system capable of responding to the sudden demands placed on it.
Adult ; Child ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Trauma Centers ; Retrospective Studies ; New Zealand/epidemiology* ; Lactic Acid ; Abdominal Injuries/surgery*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate humanistic practice ability of nurses in a general hospital in Hunan Province and analyze the factors affecting their practices to provide evidence for interventions to improve humanistic practice ability of the nurses. METHODS: A total of 1196 nurses were surveyed using a self-designed questionnaire and a nurse humanistic practice ability assessment scale questionnaire for assessment of their abilities for humanistic care practice, psychological adjustment, interpersonal communication, self-management, ethics and legal practice. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for analysis of the factors affecting the practice abilities of the nurses. RESULTS: The total score of humanistic practice ability of the 1196 nurses was 105.69±16.45 (the full score of the scale was 130), and the scores of humanistic care practice ability, psychological adjustment ability, interpersonal communication ability, self-management ability, ethics and legal practice ability were 40.95±6.46, 16.41±2.66, 16.41±2.66, 11.32±2.05 and 12.43±2.00, respectively. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender (P=0.033), age (P < 0.001), department (P=0.015), working years (P < 0.001), professional title (P < 0.001), first academic degree (P < 0.001), highest academic degree (P < 0.001), family location (P=0.010), marital status (P=0.023), number of patients to care for (P=0.022), number of children (P=0.001), previous humanities related training (P < 0.001), training times (P < 0.001), and care received from family members (P < 0.001) and colleagues (P < 0.001) were all the factors affecting humanistic practice ability of the nurses. Among these factors, age, working in department of obstetrics and gynecology and emergency department, professional title, humanities training, and care from family and colleagues explained 20.7% of the variance. CONCLUSION The humanistic practice ability of nurses in this general hospital is above the average level, but their self-management ability needs to be improved. Intervention measures should be implemented to improve the nurses' humanistic practice ability including more attentions to the key groups and departments, strengthening the training of humanistic practice ability, and improving the promotion assessment system.
Child ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Humans ; Hospitals, General ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Multivariate Analysis ; Research Design

Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Contact Tracing ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Emergency Service, Hospital

Child ; Humans ; Nitrous Oxide ; Emergency Service, Hospital