1.From organoids to organoids-on-a-chip: Current applications and challenges in biomedical research.
Kailun LIU ; Xiaowei CHEN ; Zhen FAN ; Fei REN ; Jing LIU ; Baoyang HU
Chinese Medical Journal 2025;138(7):792-807
The high failure rates in clinical drug development based on animal models highlight the urgent need for more representative human models in biomedical research. In response to this demand, organoids and organ chips were integrated for greater physiological relevance and dynamic, controlled experimental conditions. This innovative platform-the organoids-on-a-chip technology-shows great promise in disease modeling, drug discovery, and personalized medicine, attracting interest from researchers, clinicians, regulatory authorities, and industry stakeholders. This review traces the evolution from organoids to organoids-on-a-chip, driven by the necessity for advanced biological models. We summarize the applications of organoids-on-a-chip in simulating physiological and pathological phenotypes and therapeutic evaluation of this technology. This section highlights how integrating technologies from organ chips, such as microfluidic systems, mechanical stimulation, and sensor integration, optimizes organoid cell types, spatial structure, and physiological functions, thereby expanding their biomedical applications. We conclude by addressing the current challenges in the development of organoids-on-a-chip and offering insights into the prospects. The advancement of organoids-on-a-chip is poised to enhance fidelity, standardization, and scalability. Furthermore, the integration of cutting-edge technologies and interdisciplinary collaborations will be crucial for the progression of organoids-on-a-chip technology.
Organoids/physiology*
;
Humans
;
Biomedical Research/methods*
;
Lab-On-A-Chip Devices
;
Animals
;
Microphysiological Systems
2.Research of tricuspid regurgitation associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Danqing YU ; Yan LIN ; Qi CHEN ; Xianbao LIU ; Jian'an WANG
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2025;54(2):219-229
Tricuspid regurgitation associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) constitutes a significant subset of secondary tricuspid regurgitation, characterized by a multifactorial etiology involving pacing lead-mediated mechanical interference and CIED-related systemic factors. The pathogenesis of CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation encompasses direct mechanical trauma or functional disruption of the tricuspid valve apparatus by pacing leads, pacing mode-induced hemodynamic alterations, and clinical risk factors such as permanent atrial fibrillation, apical pacing, and high right ventricular pacing burden. The natural progression and clinical outcomes of CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation parallel those of tricuspid regurgitation stemming from other etiologies. Advanced imaging modalities, including echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, enable precise diagnosis and longitudinal assessment of CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation. Management strategies emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration as well as integration of preventive approaches-such as refined lead implantation techniques and tailored pacing modalities-with therapeutic interventions ranging from pharmacotherapy to surgical valve repair or replacement. This article reviews the current understanding of CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation to provide a reference for clinical practice and research.
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis*
;
Humans
;
Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects*
;
Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects*
3.Application and Progress of Organoid-on-a-chip Platforms in Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.
Wuyang YUN ; Xiaoyun ZHANG ; Li XIAO
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2025;28(9):689-699
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. The advancement of its precise diagnosis and therapeutic development urgently requires in vitro models that can highly recapitulate the pathophysiological characteristics of human tissues. Organ-on-a-chip has emerged as a novel technological platform that integrates microfluidic engineering, biomaterials, and other engineering strategies with organoid culture. This platform enables precise control over the cellular microenvironment, thereby closely mimicking the three-dimensional structure and physiological functions of human organs in vitro. Organ-on-a-chip systems demonstrate significant advantages in cancer research, developmental biology, and disease modeling, as they not only preserve the heterogeneity and pathological features of patient samples but also support co-culture of various cell types to reconstruct the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, standardized construction methods and integrated analytical strategies for this technology in lung cancer research remain to be further refined. This review systematically elaborates on the key technical principles of organ-on-a-chip and its recent advances in lung cancer modeling, drug screening, and immunotherapy research. It aims to provide a theoretical foundation and technical perspective for promoting the deeper application of organ-on-a-chip in precision medicine and translational research for lung cancer.
.
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Organoids/drug effects*
;
Lab-On-A-Chip Devices
;
Animals
;
Tumor Microenvironment
4.Issues of auditory implant in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(1):7-9
Cochlear nerve deficiency(CND) is a rare inner ear malformation characterized by a hypoplastic or absent cochlear nerve, resulting in variable hearing loss or total deafness, depending on the quantity of nerve fibers present. About 18% of congenital hearing loss are associated with CND. It is a disease of uncertain cause. The outcome of auditory implant in CND patients varies widely. This article will discuss the related issues of CND.
Humans
;
Cochlear Nerve/abnormalities*
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Child
;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*
;
Deafness
;
Hearing Loss
5.Perception of Mandarin aspirated/unaspirated consonants in children with cochlear implants.
Yani LI ; Qun LI ; Jian WEN ; Lin LI ; Yun ZHENG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(4):312-318
Objective:This study aims to investigate the perception of Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated consonants by children with cochlear implants (CIs) under quiet and noisy conditions. It also examines factors that may affect their acquisition, such as auditory conditions, place of articulation, manner of articulation, chronological age, age at implantation, and non-verbal intelligence. Methods:Twenty-eight CI children aged 3 to 5 years who received implantation from 2018 to 2023 were recruited. Additionally, 88 peers with normal hearing (NH) were recruited as controls. Both groups participated in a perception test for aspirated/unaspirated consonants under quiet and noisy conditions, along with tests for speech recognition, speech production, and non-verbal intelligence. The study analyzed the effects of group (CI vs. NH), auditory condition, and consonant characteristics on children's perception of aspirated/unaspirated consonants in Mandarin, as well as the factors contributing to CI children's acquisition of these consonants. Results:①CI children's ability to perceive aspirated/unaspirated consonants was significantly poorer than that of their NH peers (χ²= 14.16, P<0.01), and their perception accuracy was influenced by the acoustic features of consonants (P<0.01); ②CI children's consonant perception abilities were adversely affected by noise (P<0.01), with accuracy in noisy conditions particularly influenced by the manner of articulation (P<0.05); ③The age at implantation significantly affected CI children's ability to perceive aspirated/unaspirated consonants (β= -0.223, P=0.012), with earlier implantation associated with better performance. Conclusion:It takes time for CI children to acquire Mandarin aspirated/unaspirated consonants, and early implantation shows many advantages, especially for the perception ability of fine speech features.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Child, Preschool
;
Speech Perception
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Male
;
Female
;
Language
6.Minimally invasive cochlear implantation: advances and future directions.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(5):393-395
Objective:Over the past decades, minimally invasive cochlear implantation(CI) have achieved significant advancements, evolving from initial emphasis on incision miniaturization to comprehensive strategies for preserving intracochlear structures and functions, as well as optimizing overall minimally invasive surgical procedure. However, current academic debates persist regarding standardized definitions and consensus on technical protocols. Future research should prioritize innovations in surgical-assistive robots, refinement of hidden cochlear implant, and exploration of drug deliver electrodes. These efforts aim to advance surgical methodologies toward enhanced minimally invasive approaches, functional preservation, and personalized therapeutic interventions.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation/trends*
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends*
;
Cochlear Implants
7.Perioperative safety assessment and complications follow-up of simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in young infants.
Xiaoge LI ; Pu DAI ; Yongyi YUAN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(5):413-424
Objective:To evaluate the perioperative safety and long-term complications of simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation(BCI) in young infants, providing reference data for clinical BCI in young children. Methods:Seventy-four infants aged 6-23 months with congenital severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implantation at the Department of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA General Hospital between August 2018 and August 2019 were consecutively enrolled. Parents made the decision to implant either unilaterally or bilaterally. Participants were divided into unilateral cochlear implantation(UCI) group(before and after 12 months of age) and simultaneous BCI group(before and after 12 months of age). Safety indicators, including perioperative risk variables, complications, and other postoperative adverse events were monitored, with complications followed up for 5-6 years. Comparisons were made between the BCI and UCI, as well as between implantation before and after 12 months of age regarding perioperative safety and long-term complications. Results:A total of 40 BCI patients(23 before 12 months, 17 after 12 months) and 34 UCI patients(20 before 12 months, 14 after 12 months) were included in the study. Regarding perioperative risk variables, the BCI group showed significantly longer anesthesia duration, operative time, and greater blood loss compared to the UCI group, though less than twice that of the UCI group; no anesthetic complications occurred in either group; and there was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the groups. Regarding surgical complications during the 5-year follow-up period, the BCI group experienced 7 complications(2 major, 5 minor), while the UCI group had 7 complications(1 major, 6 minor), with no statistical differences between groups. Regarding other postoperative adverse events, the BCI group demonstrated significantly higher total adverse event rates than the UCI group(80.0% vs 38.2%), with higher rates of moderate to severe anemia(60.0% vs 20.6%) and lower mean hemoglobin levels[(92.35±12.14) g/L vs(102.39±13.09) g/L]. No significant differences were found in postoperative fever rates(50.0% vs 52.9%) or C-reactive protein levels between groups. Within the BCI group, patients implanted before 12 months indicated notably higher rates of total adverse events(91.3% vs 64.7%), high fever(26.1% vs 0), and moderate to severe anemia(78.3% vs 35.3%) compared to those implanted after 12 months. Conclusion:Simultaneous BCI in young children under 2 years of age demonstrates controllable overall risks. Compared to UCI, while it shows no increase in anesthetic or surgical complications, it presents higher perioperative risks and adverse event rates, especially in patients implanted before 12 months of age, warranting special attention from medical staff.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*
;
Infant
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Male
;
Perioperative Period
;
Female
;
Cochlear Implants
8.Analysis of cochlear reimplantation surgery and factors influencing postoperative auditory and speech function.
Qingling BI ; Zhongyan CHEN ; Yong LYU ; Wenjing YANG ; Xiaoyu XU ; Yan LI ; Yuan LI
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(5):419-424
Objective:The aim of this study was to present an institution's experience with cochlear reimplantation(CRI), to assess surgical challenges and post-operative outcomes and to increase the success rate of CRI. Methods:We retrospectively evaluated data from 76 reimplantation cases treated in a tertiary center between 2001 and 2022. Clinical features include caused of CRI, type of failure, surgical issues, and auditory speech performance were analyzed. Categorical Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores were used to evaluate pre-and post-CRI outcomes. Our center's consecutive cohort of 1 126 patients had seven patients, while 69 patients were from other cochlear implant centers. Device failure was the most common cause of CRI(68/76), with the remaining cases including flap complications(3/76), magnet displacement(3/76), secondary meningitis(1/76), and foreign bodies around the implant(1/76). Postoperative auditory and speech outcome improved in 31.6%(24/76) of patients, remained unchanged in 63.2%(48/76), and decreased in CAP and SIR scores in 5.2%(4/76) of patients. Postoperatively, the seven patients with cochlear ossification and fibrosis scored lower on the overall CAP and SIR scale than non-ossification individuals, which is a significant factor in surgical success rates and auditory-speech outcomes. Conclusion:CRI surgery is a challenging but relatively safe procedure, and most reimplanted patients experience favorable postoperative outcomes. Medical complications and intracochlear damage are the main causes of poor postoperative results. Therefore, minimally invasive CI has a positive significance for reducing the difficulty of CRI surgery and improving the CI performance.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Male
;
Female
;
Postoperative Period
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Adult
;
Speech
;
Middle Aged
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Replantation
;
Cochlea/surgery*
9.A clinical study of electrocochleography monitoring for residual hearing retention during minimally invasive cochlear implant.
Ruijie WANG ; Jianfen LUO ; Qinglei DAI ; Xiuhua CHAO ; Yifei NI ; Fangxia HU ; Yueran CAO ; Haibo WANG ; Xiaohui ZHOU ; Lei XU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(5):425-432
Objective:To investigate the application value of intraoperative electrocochleography(ECochG) monitoring technique and insertion techniques in cochlear implant(CI) and analyze its relationship with postoperative residual hearing(RH) preservation. Methods:Thirty-one patients(35 ears) who received CI in our hospital from June 2022 to July 2024 were enrolled. The Advanced Bionics Active Insertion Monitoring(AIM) system was used for real-time ECochG monitoring during surgery. Intraoperative cochlear microphonics (CM) waveform changes were recorded and analyzed in relation to postoperative RH preservation. Results:①ECochG recordings were successfully obtained in 34 of 35 ears (97.1%). ②According to Harris classification, there were 7 ears(20.6%) of Type A(rising), 7 ears(20.6%) of Type C(declining), 8 ears(23.5%) of Type CC(fluctuating), and 12 ears(35.3%) of Type D(no response). ③The total CM amplitude decrease was significantly moderately correlated with postoperative low-mid frequency hearing loss(r=0.67, P=0.017). The total CM amplitude decrease was significantly moderately correlated with postoperative low frequency hearing loss(r=0.65, P=0.023). ④For the mean amplitude variation, the Amax was 30.70 μV, the Amin was 8.64 μV, and the Aend was 18.27 μV. ⑤Sixteen cases completed postoperative follow-up, with an average low-mid frequency(125-1 000 Hz) residual hearing loss of 15.25 dB HL and a RH preservation rate of 87.5%. Conclusion:Intraoperative ECochG monitoring can effectively predict postoperative residual hearing changes, effectively guide surgical manipulation, and improve residual hearing preservation rate.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*
;
Audiometry, Evoked Response
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Male
;
Female
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Monitoring, Intraoperative
;
Adolescent
;
Young Adult
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
;
Child
;
Aged
;
Postoperative Period
10.Comparison and study of multiple scales results in children with cochlear reimplantation, mainly the speech, spatial, and other qualities of hearing scale for parents.
Tian NI ; Jinyuan SI ; Haotian LIU ; Xinyi YAO ; Xiangling ZHANG ; Huilin YIN ; Lin ZHANG ; Xiuyong DING ; Yu ZHAO
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(5):433-442
Objective:To compare the outcomes of multiple scales, primarily the speech, spatial, and other qualities of hearing scale for parents(SSQ-P), in children with ipsilateral vs. Contralateral cochleareimplantat ion(CRI). Methods: A total of 69 children who received cochlear implantation surgery from April 1999 to June 2024 were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether the implantation was on the same side. General information such as gender, age, age at initial implantation and reimplantation was collected. The primary caregivers of the children were followed up by telephone using the categories of auditory performance(CAP), speech intelligibility rating(SIR), and SSQ-P questionnaires. Statistical methods including stepwise regression, linear regression, and permutation tests were employed to investigate if there were any statistically significant differences in the scores of CAP, SIR, SSQ-P total, SSQ-P speech perception, SSQ-P spatial hearing, and SSQ-P auditory quality dimensions between the ipsilateral and contralateral reimplantation groups. Results:Of the 69 children included, 62 were in the ipsilateral reimplantation group with a mean age of 11.1 years, and 7 were in the contralateral reimplantation group with a mean age of 11.7 years. Statistical analysis showed that patients in the contralateral reimplantation group had significantly lower SSQ-P total scores (P<0.05) and spatial hearing dimension scores (P<0.05) than those in the ipsilateral reimplantation group after controlling for the corresponding confounders. Conclusion:The effect of ipsilateral reimplantation of cochlear implants is superior to that of contralateral reimplantation in terms of overall auditory function and spatial hearing in daily life for children, but the mechanisms require further investigation.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Child
;
Parents
;
Speech Perception
;
Male
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Female
;
Hearing
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Speech
;
Child, Preschool

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail