1.A Case of Malignant Pleural Effusion Due to Urothelial Carcinoma
Akina KOIDE ; Kazuyoshi YAMADA ; Miki FUKAI ; Akio DOI ; Mikiko MIZUTANI ; Mayumi ITOH ; Masateru KITAJIMA ; Katsura YAMAGUCHI ; Eizo MIYATA ; Arisa TSUCHIMORI ; Takuji TSUYUKI ; Hiroki KUBOTA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2025;74(1):40-44
Malignant pleural effusion is characterized by fluid buildup between the lung and the chest wall due to cancer cells in the pleura. Most cases are caused by lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or malignant lymphoma. Urothelial carcinoma is a rare cause of malignant pleural effusions and is difficult to diagnose by cytological examination. We report a case of malignant pleural effusion due to urothelial carcinoma. An 80-year-old man presented with right back pain. After close examination, he was diagnosed with ureteral cancer. During the course of treatment, a unilateral pleural effusion was found, and cytological and histological examinations were performed on suspicion of malignant pleural effusion. Cytological examination revealed numerous round-to-ovoid cells with irregularly enlarged nuclei. Immunohistological studies were performed on cell block specimens, and urothelial carcinoma was diagnosed. Cytological examination of malignant pleural effusions may require estimation of the primary site. It is important to take a multifaceted approach that considers not only the cytological findings but also the clinical findings and medical history.
2.Eliminating Discrepancies Between Assessments of Left Ventricular Wall Motion on Echocardiograms
Rina WAKISAKA ; Chinari FURUICHI ; Hideto FUKUOKA ; Masaya HIGUCHI ; Chihiro YANAGIMACHI ; Masahiko SODA ; Eizo MIYATA ; Manabu MIURA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2022;71(1):41-45
Echocardiographic assessment of wall motion is prone to interrater variability because it requires subjective visual evaluation. Echocardiography technicians were divided into 2 groups by years of experience, and their assessments of left ventricular wall motion on previously recorded echocardiograms were scored and compared. Scores did not differ within the more experienced group but differed significantly between technicians in the less experienced group. However, this difference disappeared after 3 months of training. This suggests that training can eliminate discrepancies between technicians, even inexperienced ones, in a relatively short period of time.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail