Objectives: Gastric dysplasia is primarily treated using endoscopic resection. Although argon plasma coagulation (APC) is an alternative treatment for older patients or those with bleeding tendencies, studies have reported a higher rate of local recurrence after APC than after endoscopic resection. Using pathological examinations, this study aimed to investigate the incidence and associated causative factors of residual dysplasia following APC. Methods: This prospective study recruited patients with low-grade gastric dysplasia from March 2020 to February 2021 and conducted follow-up examinations for 15 months after enrollment of the last patient. The patients were randomly assigned to undergo APC at an output power setting of 45, 60, or 80 W. Results: Residual lesions were found in 13 of 68 patients (19.1%) during the 24-h follow-up endoscopy and biopsy. The Ki-67 index, a marker of cellular proliferation, was significantly associated with the presence of residual lesions. The presence of residual dysplasia at the three-month follow-up was associated with the presence of residual lesions at the 24-h follow-up and a positive Ki-67 index. Only three of the 13 patients with residual lesions 24 h after APC demonstrated residual lesions at the three-month follow up. No post-procedural complications were observed. Conclusions Residual dysplasia may persist even after APC and cause local recurrence. If Ki-67-positive cells are detected in the remnant tissue following APC, additional interventions should be considered.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that requires significant experiences and skills and has various procedure-related complications, some of which can be severe and even result in the death of patients. Expanding ERCP availability has the advantage of increasing accessibility for patients. However, ERCP poses a substantial risk if performed without proper quality management. ERCP quality management is essential for both ensuring safe and successful procedures and meeting the social demands for enhanced healthcare competitiveness and quality assurance. To address these concerns, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association established a task force to develop ERCP quality indicators (QIs) tailored to the Korean medical environment. Key questions for five pre-procedure, three intra-procedure, and four post-procedure measures were formulated based on a literature search related to ERCP QIs and a comprehensive clinical review conducted by experts. The statements and recommendations regarding each QI item were selected through peer review. The developed ERCP QIs were reviewed by external experts based on the latest available evidence at the time of development.These domestically tailored ERCP QIs are expected to contribute considerably to improving ERCP quality in Korea.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is a basic procedure for pancreatobiliary endoscopy and is currently widely performed as a standard procedure for the treatment of various pancreatobiliary diseases worldwide. Later, in 1982, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) was introduced as an alternative to EST, and EPBD is known to reduce the risk of bleeding and perforation compared to EST. In order to safely and effectively perform EST and EPBD procedures, it is essential to select an appropriate target for the procedure, as well as to understand and familiarize with the anatomical structure of the duodenal papilla, related instruments, and basic techniques of EST and EPBD.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that requires abundant clinical experience and endoscopic skills, and can lead to various complications, some of which may progress to life-threatening conditions. With expanding indications and technological advancements, ERCP is widely utilized, enhancing procedural accessibility. However, without proper quality management, the procedure can pose significant risks. Quality management in ERCP is essential to ensure safe and successful procedures and meet societal demands for improved healthcare competitiveness. To address these concerns, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association has developed a Korean-specific ERCP quality indicator reflecting domestic medical environments and realities. Initially, based on a review of foreign ERCP quality indicators and related literatures, key questions were formulated for five preprocedural items, three intra-procedural items, and four post-procedural items. Descriptions and recommendations for each item were selected through peer evaluation. The developed Korean-specific ERCP quality indicator was reviewed by external experts based on the latest evidence and consensus in this fields. This Korean-specific indicator is expected to significantly contribute to improving ERCP quality in Korea, as it is tailored to local needs.