1.The diagnostic performance of nuchal translucency alone as a screening test for Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma. Sergia Fatima P. SUCALDITO ; John Jefferson V. BESA ; Lia M. PALILEO-VILLANUEVA
Acta Medica Philippina 2025;59(15):7-23
BACKGROUND
Down syndrome or trisomy 21, the most common chromosomal disorder, results from the presence of a third copy of chromosome 21 and manifests as mild to moderate intellectual disability, growth retardation, congenital heart defects, gastrointestinal abnormalities, and characteristic facial features. Several methods have been used to screen for Down syndrome in the prenatal period, such as ultrasound, biomarkers, cell-free DNA testing, and combinations of these tests. A positive result from one or more of these screening tests signals the need for confirmatory karyotyping to clinch the diagnosis. Ultrasound between 11 to 14 weeks of gestation can evaluate nuchal translucency (NT) to screen for Down syndrome. During the second trimester, a triple or quadruple test can also be performed alone or in addition to NT to quantify Down syndrome risk. In limited resource settings however, only the measurement of NT via ultrasound can be performed since biomarker tests are either unavailable or inaccessible. While the diagnostic performance of NT measurement alone has been investigated in several observational studies, there is no consensus on its performance as a sole test to screen for Down syndrome.
OBJECTIVETo determine the diagnostic performance of NT during prenatal first-trimester ultrasound as a screening test for Down syndrome.
METHODSWe performed a systematic search on the PubMed, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases for recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that addressed the objective. The existing reviews found were then independently appraised by the two reviewers with the AMSTAR-2 checklist. To update the existing reviews, a systematic search was done in the same databases to identify additional primary diagnostic studies, which were appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects univariate meta-analysis and summary receiving operator curve (HSROC) analysis for the outcomes were performed using Review Manager version 5.4 and R version 4.2.2, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying the baseline risk of mothers for fetal anomaly as low- or high-risk. Highrisk mothers were defined as women with risk factors such as advanced age, positive serum screen, presence of other ultrasound anomalies, and history of previous fetus with anomaly.
RESULTSWe found 22 cohort studies (n=225,846) of women at low-risk for fetal anomaly. The pooled sensitivity was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4%-73.6%, I2=70.4%) and specificity was 96.3% (95% CI: 95.5%-96.9%, I2=96.7%). For low-risk women, the overall certainty of evidence was low, due to different modes of verification and heterogeneity not completely explained by variability in baseline risk or cut-points. Seven studies (n=9,197) were on high-risk women. The pooled sensitivity was 62.2% (95% CI: 54.1%-69.7%, I2=38.8%) and specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 93.6%-98.1%, I2=95.5%). For women at high-risk, the evidence was rated as moderate due to differential verification.
CONCLUSIONOur analysis showed that NT measured through first-trimester ultrasound is specific for Down syndrome but has low sensitivity. Despite this, it is a useful screening test for Down syndrome in low-resource settings where other strategies may not be available or accessible. Furthermore, interpretation of NT results must take into consideration its limited sensitivity as this may lead to missed cases.
Human ; Nuchal Translucency Measurement ; Down Syndrome ; Sensitivity And Specificity
2.Non-Down-syndrome-related acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in children: a clinical analysis of 17 cases.
Ding-Ding CUI ; Ye-Qing TAO ; Xiao-Pei JIA ; An-Na LIAN ; Qiu-Xia FAN ; Dao WANG ; Xue-Ju XU ; Guang-Yao SHENG ; Chun-Mei WANG
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2025;27(9):1113-1118
OBJECTIVES:
To investigate the clinical features and prognosis of children with non-Down-syndrome-related acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (non-DS-AMKL).
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical data of 17 children with non-DS-AMKL who were admitted to Children's Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2013 to December 2023, and their clinical features, treatment, and prognosis were summarized.
RESULTS:
Among the 17 children with non-DS-AMKL, there were 8 boys and 9 girls. Fourteen patients had an onset age of less than 36 months, with a median age of 21 months (range:13-145 months). Immunophenotyping results showed that 16 children were positive for CD61 and 13 were positive for CD41. The karyotype analysis was performed on 16 children, with normal karyotype in 6 children and abnormal karyotype in 9 children, among whom 5 had complex karyotype and 1 had no mitotic figure. Detected fusion genes included EVI1, NUP98-KDM5A, KDM5A-MIS18BP1, C22orf34-BRD1, WT1, and MLL-AF9. Genetic alterations included TET2, D7S486 deletion (suggesting 7q-), CSF1R deletion, and PIM1. All 17 children received chemotherapy, among whom 16 (94%) achieved complete remission after one course of induction therapy, and 1 child underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and remained alive and disease-free. Of all children, 7 experienced recurrence, among whom 1 child received HSCT and died of graft-versus-host disease. At the last follow-up, six patients remained alive and disease-free.
CONCLUSIONS
Non-DS-AMKL primarily occurs in children between 1 and 3 years of age. The patients with this disorder have a high incidence rate of chromosomal abnormalities, with complex karyotypes in most patients. Some patients harbor fusion genes or gene mutations. Although the initial remission rate is high, the long-term survival rate remains low.
Humans
;
Male
;
Female
;
Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute/etiology*
;
Child, Preschool
;
Infant
;
Child
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Prognosis
;
Down Syndrome/complications*
3.Development and application of a digital PCR-based assay for rapid diagnosis of common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies.
Xuejiao CHEN ; Yanfeng YANG ; Yuanyuan YING ; Feiyan PAN ; Zhiqiang GU ; Weimeng JIAO ; Zehang HE ; Huihui XU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(5):592-596
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the clinical value of digital PCR (dPCR) for the prenatal diagnosis of common fetal aneuploidies.
METHODS:
A dPCR-based assay was developed for detecting trisomies 21, 18, and 13. A retrospective analysis was carried out on 173 amniotic fluid samples collected by the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Taizhou Hospital between January 2017 and December 2023. By using chromosomal karyotyping as the gold standard, the diagnostic performance of the multiplex dPCR system was evaluated in a double-blind manner. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Taizhou Hospital (Ethics No. K20250339).
RESULTS:
Chromosomal karyotyping has identified 59 cases of trisomy 21, 5 cases of trisomy 18, 2 cases of trisomy 13, 6 cases with chromosomal structural abnormalities or mosaicisms, and 101 cases with a normal karyotype. The dPCR results (Z-score cutoff = 4.0, CI = 99.997%) showed full concordance with karyotyping (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, Kappa = 1). Among the 6 structurally abnormal or mosaicism samples, dPCR has accurately detected 4 cases, but mis-classified 2 cases of trisomy 21 with very low-level mosaicisms (3.3%, 6.9%, respectively) as normal.
CONCLUSION
The established multiplex dPCR system demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for common chromosomal aneuploidies, with results available within 24 hours. It can serve as an efficient supplementary tool to conventional chromosomal karyotyping, providing reliable support for time-sensitive clinical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis.
Humans
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Aneuploidy
;
Prenatal Diagnosis/methods*
;
Karyotyping
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods*
;
Chromosome Disorders/genetics*
;
Adult
;
Trisomy 13 Syndrome/diagnosis*
;
Trisomy 18 Syndrome/genetics*
;
Down Syndrome/genetics*
4.Analysis of a child with Congenital leukemia and mosaicism trisomy 21 syndrome without GATA1 gene mutation.
Liya ZHANG ; Yu LIU ; Yu DING ; Lulu YAN ; Fei LI ; Qingqing JIE ; Shuni SUN ; Lili CHEN ; Xiamin JIN
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(6):751-755
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic characteristics and pathogenesis for a child with mosaicism trisomy 21 and Congenital leukemia (CL).
METHODS:
A child who was admitted to Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital in March 2023 was selected as the study subject. A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data, laboratory test results, immunophenotyping, and genetic characteristics of the child. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethics No.: EC2024-063).
RESULTS:
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that the child has mosaicism trisomy of chromosome 21, with a ratio of approximately 74%. In addition, copy number variations involving multiple OMIM genes that could explain his clinical phenotype were detected and rated as pathogenic based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). No pathogenic variant was detected with the GATA1 gene. Blood immune typing of the child conformed to the immunophenotype of acute myeloid leukemia.
CONCLUSION
For children with trisomy 21, even in the absence of GATA1 gene variants, the occurrence of CL should be monitored, and early diagnosis and treatment are of great significance for improving the prognosis.
Child, Preschool
;
Humans
;
DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics*
;
Down Syndrome/genetics*
;
GATA1 Transcription Factor/genetics*
;
Leukemia/congenital*
;
Mosaicism
;
Mutation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Whole Genome Sequencing
5.A case of mosaicism involving trisomy 21, maternal uniparental isodisomy, and normal diploid cells: Challenges and reflections in prenatal diagnosis.
Chenxia XU ; Xingsheng DONG ; Yi XIONG ; Degang WANG
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(8):1006-1010
OBJECTIVE:
To report on a case of mosaicism involving trisomy 21, maternal uniparental isodisomy, and normal diploid cells in uncultured amniocytes, and to explore the discrepancies between conventional cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques during prenatal diagnosis.
METHODS:
A 30-year-old pregnant woman who presented to Boai Hospital of Zhongshan on June 27, 2023 has undergone amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation. The amniotic fluid sample was subjected to quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR), G-banded karyotype analysis, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The discrepancies between the results of each method were analyzed. This study was approved by Medical Ethics Committee of Boai Hospital of Zhongshan (Ethics No.: KY-2024-001-01).
RESULTS:
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at 12 weeks indicated a high risk of trisomy 21. QF-PCR of uncultured amniocytes revealed a pattern of trisomy 21. After one week of cell culture, G-banding analysis showed mos 47,XX,+21[1]/46,XX[72]. CMA revealed a homozygous state of chromosome 21 in cultured cells, while uncultured amniocytes showed mosaic trisomy 21 with an estimated proportion of 50%. These findings suggested a complex chromosomal mosaicism in the fetus, which may result from a trisomy rescue event during early embryogenesis, leading to coexistence of three cell lines including trisomy 21, maternal uniparental isodisomy, and normal diploid cells.
CONCLUSION
In prenatal diagnosis, discrepancies may arise between QF-PCR and conventional chromosomal karyotyping analysis, particularly in complex genetic phenomena such as trisomy rescue and uniparental disomy. For cases where NIPT indicated a high risk of trisomy 21 but G-banding karyotype analysis yielded a normal result, further molecular genetic testing using uncultured cells is recommended.
Humans
;
Female
;
Mosaicism
;
Pregnancy
;
Uniparental Disomy/diagnosis*
;
Adult
;
Down Syndrome/diagnosis*
;
Prenatal Diagnosis/methods*
;
Diploidy
;
Karyotyping
;
Amniocentesis
6.The diagnostic performance of nuchal translucency alone as a screening test for Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ma. Sergia Fatima P. Sucaldito ; John Jefferson V. Besa ; Lia M. Palileo-villanueva
Acta Medica Philippina 2025;59(Early Access 2025):1-17
BACKGROUND
Down syndrome or trisomy 21, the most common chromosomal disorder, results from the presence of a third copy of chromosome 21 and manifests as mild to moderate intellectual disability, growth retardation, congenital heart defects, gastrointestinal abnormalities, and characteristic facial features. Several methods have been used to screen for Down syndrome in the prenatal period, such as ultrasound, biomarkers, cell-free DNA testing, and combinations of these tests. A positive result from one or more of these screening tests signals the need for confirmatory karyotyping to clinch the diagnosis. Ultrasound between 11 to 14 weeks of gestation can evaluate nuchal translucency (NT) to screen for Down syndrome. During the second trimester, a triple or quadruple test can also be performed alone or in addition to NT to quantify Down syndrome risk. In limited resource settings however, only the measurement of NT via ultrasound can be performed since biomarker tests are either unavailable or inaccessible. While the diagnostic performance of NT measurement alone has been investigated in several observational studies, there is no consensus on its performance as a sole test to screen for Down syndrome.
OBJECTIVETo determine the diagnostic performance of NT during prenatal first-trimester ultrasound as a screening test for Down syndrome.
METHODSWe performed a systematic search on the PubMed, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases for recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that addressed the objective. The existing reviews found were then independently appraised by the two reviewers with the AMSTAR-2 checklist. To update the existing reviews, a systematic search was done in the same databases to identify additional primary diagnostic studies, which were appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects univariate meta-analysis and summary receiving operator curve (HSROC) analysis for the outcomes were performed using Review Manager version 5.4 and R version 4.2.2, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying the baseline risk of mothers for fetal anomaly as low- or high-risk. Highrisk mothers were defined as women with risk factors such as advanced age, positive serum screen, presence of other ultrasound anomalies, and history of previous fetus with anomaly.
RESULTSWe found 22 cohort studies (n=225,846) of women at low-risk for fetal anomaly. The pooled sensitivity was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4%-73.6%, I2=70.4%) and specificity was 96.3% (95% CI: 95.5%-96.9%, I2=96.7%). For low-risk women, the overall certainty of evidence was low, due to different modes of verification and heterogeneity not completely explained by variability in baseline risk or cut-points. Seven studies (n=9,197) were on high-risk women. The pooled sensitivity was 62.2% (95% CI: 54.1%-69.7%, I2=38.8%) and specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 93.6%-98.1%, I2=95.5%). For women at high-risk, the evidence was rated as moderate due to differential verification.
CONCLUSIONOur analysis showed that NT measured through first-trimester ultrasound is specific for Down syndrome but has low sensitivity. Despite this, it is a useful screening test for Down syndrome in low-resource settings where other strategies may not be available or accessible. Furthermore, interpretation of NT results must take into consideration its limited sensitivity as this may lead to missed cases.
Human ; Nuchal Translucency Measurement ; Down Syndrome ; Sensitivity And Specificity
7.Research progress on the cognitive deficit of Down syndrome patients.
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2024;41(12):1503-1507
As the most common chromosomal disorder compatible to life, Down syndrome (DS) is caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21. Almost all DS patients have cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, it is important to study the underlying pathogenetic mechanism to elucidate its molecular basis. This article has provided a review for the molecular mechanisms of NRIP1 and DYRK1A genes, which have been closely associated with the cognitive dysfunctions of DS patients. It has also summarized the research progress on the mechanism of DS and development of new therapeutic strategies based on such studies, with an aim to provide insights into the prevention and treatment for the cognitive dysfunctions in DS patients.
Down Syndrome/psychology*
;
Humans
;
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics*
;
Dyrk Kinases
;
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics*
;
Cognition Disorders/etiology*
8.Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing:Results in 3733 Cases of Twin Pregnancy and Association With Factors Such as Age.
Hao-Yan TU ; Yuan JIANG ; Zhai'e LU
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2023;45(6):912-920
Objective To explore the clinical significance of non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT)for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in the cases of twin pregnancy and its relationship with age and other related factors.Methods A total of 3733 women with twin pregnancy of 12-26+6 weeks who voluntarily underwent NIPT in the Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were selected.The results of NIPT and amniocentesis were compared and all the participants were followed up.The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities by NIPT was calculated,and its correlations with age,gestational weeks,chorionicity,and pregnancy type were analyzed.Results Among the 3733 cases,71 cases of fetal chromosome abnormality were indicated by NIPT,including 13 cases of trisomy 21,19 cases of trisomy 18,5 cases of trisomy 13,18 cases of sex chromosome abnormality,and 16 cases of chromosome microdeletion/duplication(excluding 21,18,13,and sex chromosomes),among which 34 cases were true positive and 37 cases were false positive.The overall sensitivity,specificity,and positive predictive value(PPV)of NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities in the cases of twin pregnancy were 100%,98.99%,and 47.89%(34/71),respectively.NIPT showed the sensitivity,specificity,and PPV of 100%,99.78%,and 78.38%(29/37)for trisomy 21,18,and 13,100%,99.56%,and 16.67%(3/18)for sex chromosome abnormalities,and 100%,99.62%,and 12.5%(2/16)for chromosome microdeletion/duplication,respectively.In the age group of ≥40 years,the NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities showed the PPV of 66.67%,the sensitivity of 100%,and the misdiagnosis rate of 30%。However,the NIPT for trisomy 21,18,and 13 showed the PPV of 100%,the misdiagnosis rate of 0,and the sensitivity and specificity of 100%.In terms of grouping based on gestational weeks,the NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities showed the highest PPV(51.28%)in the women with twin pregnancy for 14-17+6 weeks,followed by that(50.00%)in the women with twin pregnancy for 22-26+6 weeks;the NIPT for trisomy 21,18,and 13 showed the highest PPV of 94.74% in the gestation group of 14-17+6 weeks,followed by that(83.33%)in the gestation group of 18-21+6 weeks.The rate of dichorionic diamniotic twins was higher in assisted pregnancies than in natural pregnancies,and NIPT showed the same detection efficiency for dichorionic diamniotic twins and monochorionic diamniotic twins and the same detection efficiency for different pregnancy types.Conclusions NIPT has high accuracy in the diagnosis of twin pregnancy and high sensitivity and high specificity for different ages and gestational weeks,especially for trisomy 21,18,and 13.NIPT is suitable for assisted pregnancy and natural pregnancy,and it is of high value in clinical application.However,extensive application needs a large population-based study.
Pregnancy
;
Child
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Adult
;
Down Syndrome/genetics*
;
Pregnancy, Twin
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Trisomy
;
Chromosome Aberrations
9.Prenatal diagnosis of two fetuses with Xp22.31 microdeletion syndrome indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing.
Rui WANG ; Meixia XI ; Youhua WEI ; Li WEI ; Wenjuan ZHU ; Yan LIU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(8):928-932
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication syndromes by carrying out prenatal diagnoses for two fetuses with Xp22.31 microdeletion indicated by NIPT.
METHODS:
Two pregnant women suspected for fetal Xp22.31 microdeletion syndrome who presented at Zaozhuang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital on December 5, 2017 and October 15, 2020 were selected as the study subjects. Clinical data of the two women were collected, and peripheral venous blood samples were collected for NIPT testing. Amniotic fluid samples were taken for G-banding chromosomal karyotyping analysis and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) for fetus 1, while G-banding chromosomal karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis (SNP array) were carried out for fetus 2. Peripheral venous blood samples of couple 1 were collected for CNV-seq to verify the origin of copy number variation .
RESULTS:
NIPT indicated that fetus 1 had harbored a 1.3 Mb deletion in the Xp22.31 region, while G-banding chromosomal karyotyping had found no abnormality. CNV-seq analysis verified the fetus to be seg[GRCh37]del(X)(p22.31)chrX:g.6800001_7940000del, with a 1.14 Mb deletion at Xp22.31, which was derived from its mother. NIPT indicated that fetus 2 had harbored a 1.54 Mb deletion in the Xp22.31 region, while G-banding chromosomal karyotyping had found no abnormality. SNP array analysis indicated arr[GRCh37]Xp22.31(6458940_8003247)×0, with a 1.54 Mb deletion in Xp22.31 region.
CONCLUSION
NIPT not only has a good performance for detecting fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13, but also has the potential for detecting chromosomal microdeletion/microduplications. For high risk fetuses indicated by NIPT, prenatal diagnosis needs to be carry out to verify the chromosomal abnormalities.
Child
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Humans
;
DNA Copy Number Variations
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Down Syndrome/diagnosis*
;
Chromosome Aberrations
;
Fetus
10.Retrospective analysis of cell-free fetal DNA prenatal testing of maternal peripheral blood.
Youhua WEI ; Rui WANG ; Meixia XI ; Li WEI ; Wenjuan ZHU ; Yan LIU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(8):933-938
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications using cell-free fetal DNA from peripheral blood samples of pregnant women.
METHODS:
A total of 15 237 pregnant women who had undergone NIPT testing at the Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Zaozhuang from February 2015 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. For those with a high risk by NIPT, amniotic fluid samples were collected for G-banding chromosomal karyotyping analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis to verify the consistency of NIPT with results of prenatal diagnosis. All of the women were followed up by telephone for pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS:
Among the 15 237 pregnant women, 266 (1.75%) were detected with a high risk for fetal chromosomal abnormality were detected. Among these, 79 (29.7%) were at a high risk for T21, 26 (9.77%) were at a high risk for T18, 9 (3.38%) were at a high risk for T13, 74 (27.82%) were at a high risk for sex chromosome aneuploidies, 12 (4.51%) were at a high risk for other autosomal aneuploidies, and 66 (24.81%) were at a high risk for chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications. 217 women had accepted invasive prenatal diagnosis and respectively 50, 13, 1, 25, 1 and 18 were confirmed with T21, T18, T13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, autosomal aneuploidies and microdeletions/microduplications, and the positive predictive values were 75.76%, 68.42%, 11.11%, 40.32%, 10% and 35.29%, respectively. For 13 042 women (85.59%), the outcome of pregnancy were successfully followed up. During the follow-up, one false negative case of T21 was discovered. No false positive cases for T13 and T18 were found.
CONCLUSION
NIPT has a sound performance for screening T13, T18 and T21, and is also valuable for screening other autosomal aneuploidies, sex chromosome aneuploidies and chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.
Child
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Humans
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
;
Chromosome Disorders/genetics*
;
Prenatal Diagnosis/methods*
;
Down Syndrome/genetics*
;
Sex Chromosome Aberrations
;
Trisomy 18 Syndrome/genetics*
;
Trisomy 13 Syndrome/diagnosis*
;
Aneuploidy
;
DNA/genetics*
;
Trisomy/genetics*


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail