Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of atelocollagen injections in isolated grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries of the knee joint. Methods: A total of 50 participants were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-six patients underwent conservative treatment with a single atelocollagen injection, while the remaining patients underwent only typical conservative treatment. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging to identify and grade MCL injury. Valgus stress radiography was performed on both knees at 6 and 12 months after the injury. The visual analog scale (VAS) score was collected at the first visit and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after injury. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) formula activity level and Lysholm score were evaluated for patient-reported outcomes at the first visit and at 6 and 12 months after injury. The participant's return to the pre-injury activity level ratio was measured by comparing the IKDC formula activity level at 12 months after the injury with that before the injury. Results: The VAS and Lysholm scores improved over time in both groups. The VAS and Lysholm scores were significantly better in the collagen injection group than in the control group. Regarding the activity level, the collagen injection group showed significantly better results at the 6-month follow-up, but there was no significant difference at the 12-month follow-up. The medial gap in the injured knee and the side-to-side difference (SSD) in both groups gradually decreased over time. The SSD in the collagen injection group was significantly smaller than that in the control group. Conclusions Atelocollagen injections resulted in better clinical and radiologic outcomes along with a higher rate of return to the pre-injury activity level, thereby exhibiting a positive effect in the nonsurgical treatment of grade III MCL injuries.

Objective: The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) is a relatively specific test for bipolar disorders designed to assess the main functioning problems experienced by patients. This brief instrument includes 24 items assessing impairment or disability in 6 domains of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships, and leisure time. It has already been translated into standardized versions in several languages. The aim of this study is to measure the validity and reliability of the Korean version of FAST (K-FAST). Methods: A total of 209 bipolar disorder patients were recruited from 14 centers in Korea. K-FAST, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument Brief Form (WHOQOL-BREF) were administered, and psychometric analysis of the K-FAST was conducted. Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of the K-FAST was 0.95. Test-retest reliability analysis showed a strong correlation between the two measures assessed at a 1-week interval (ICC = 0.97; p ＜ 0.001). The K-FAST exhibited significant correlations with GAF (r = −0.771), WHOQOL-BREF (r = −0.326), YMRS (r = 0.509) and BDRS (r = 0.598). A strong negative correlation with GAF pointed to a reasonable degree of concurrent validity. Although the exploratory factor analysis showed four factors, the confirmatory factor analysis of questionnaires had a good fit for a six factors model (CFI = 0.925; TLI = 0.912; RMSEA = 0.078). Conclusion The K-FAST has good psychometric properties, good internal consistency, and can be applicable and acceptable to the Korean context.

The objective of this study was to compare recommendations of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022 (KMAP-BP 2022) with other recently published guidelines for treating bipolar disorder. We reviewed a total of six recently published global treatment guidelines and compared treatment recommendation of the KMAP-BP 2022 with those of other guidelines. For initial treatment of mania, there were no significant differences across treatment guidelines. All guidelines recommended mood stabilizer (MS) or atypical antipsychotic (AAP) monotherapy or a combination of an MS with an AAP as a first-line treatment strategy in a same degree for mania. However, the KMAP-BP 2022 recommended MS + AAP combination therapy for psychotic mania, mixed mania and psychotic depression as treatment of choice. Aripiprazole, quetiapine and olanzapine were the first-line AAPs for nearly all phases of bipolar disorder across guidelines. Some guideline suggested olanzapine is a second-line options during maintenance treatment, related to concern about long-term tolerability. Most guidelines advocated newer AAPs (asenapine, cariprazine, long-acting injectable risperidone, and aripiprazole once monthly) as first-line treatment options for all phases while lamotrigine was recommended for depressive and maintenance phases. Lithium and valproic acid were commonly used as MSs in all phases of bipolar disorder. KMAP-BP 2022 guidelines were similar to other guidelines, reflecting current changes in prescription patterns for bipolar disorder based on accumulated research data. Strong preference for combination therapy was characteristic of KMAP-BP 2022, predominantly in the treatment of psychotic mania, mixed mania and psychotic depression.

Background: Pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive gram-negative bacilli (GNB) has limited options for oral antibiotic treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the susceptibility of ESBLpositive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from pediatric urine samples to two oral antibiotics (fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin). Methods: From November 2020 to April 2022, ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from urine samples were collected at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Patients over 18 years of age or with malignancy were excluded. For repeated isolates from the same patient, only the first isolate was tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured using agar (fosfomycin) or broth (nitrofurantoin) dilution methods. MIC 50 and MIC 90 were measured for fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Results: There were 117 isolates from 117 patients, with a median age of 7 months (range, 0.0–18.5 years). Among 117 isolates, 92.3% (108/117) were E. coli and 7.7% (9/117) were K. pneumoniae. Isolates from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and general ward (GW) was 11.1% (13/117) and 88.9% (104/117), respectively. Among 108 E. coli isolates, MIC 50 and MIC 90 for fosfomycin were 0.5 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL, respectively. Fosfomycin susceptibility rate was 97.2% (105/108) with a breakpoint of 128 μg/mL. Fosfomycin susceptibility rate was significantly lower in PICU isolates than in GW isolates (81.8% vs. 99.0%, P = 0.027).For nitrofurantoin, both the MIC 50 and MIC 90 were 16 μg/mL. Nitrofurantoin susceptibility rate was 96.3% (104/108) with a breakpoint of 64 μg/mL based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Among the nine K. pneumoniae isolates, the MIC 50 and MIC 90 for fosfomycin was 2 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL, respectively. MIC 50 and MIC 90 for nitrofurantoin were 64 μg/mL and 128 μg/mL, respectively. Conclusion For uncomplicated UTI caused by ESBL-positive GNB in Korean children, treatment with fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin for E. coli infections can be considered as an effective oral therapy option.

Methods: Thirty-six patients with calcific tendinitis of the shoulder treated by US-guided barbotage with a spinal needle and subacromial steroid injection were included in the study. We evaluated clinical outcomes based on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score. Radiological outcomes were assessed by X-ray imaging at each visit. Results: Our results showed that US-guided barbotage and subacromial steroid injection produced good clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Of the 36 patients, only one required surgical treatment, while the others showed improvement without any complications. Compared to values before the procedure, calcific deposit size and VAS, ASES, and Constant scores showed significant improvement 6 weeks after the procedure. No significant correlation was found between the initial calcific deposit size and clinical outcomes at each time point. Conclusions In patients with calcific tendinitis of the shoulder, US-guided barbotage using a spinal needle and subacromial steroid injection can yield satisfactory clinical and radiological results.

Objectives: This study revised the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2018 for rapid cycling. Methods: Questionnaires to survey the expert opinion of medication for rapid cycling were completed by a review committee consisting of 87 Korean expert psychiatrists. The experts’ opinions were classified into three categories based on the lowest category in which the confidence interval fell (6.5≤ for first-line, 3.5≤ for second-line, and 3.5> for third-line treatment). Results: The first-line treatments were a combination of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, or mood stabilizer monotherapy. Furthermore, a mood stabilizer with lamotrigine therapy and an atypical antipsychotic with lamotrigine combinations was the first-line treatment for a depressive episode. The first-line medications in all episodes were valproate, lithium, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole. Risperidone was the first-line medication in manic episodes and mixed states, and lamotrigine was the first-line medication for treating depressive episodes. Conclusion Compared to the surveys in 2018, the preference for atypical antipsychotics and lamotrigine has increased, and the modalities as a second-line treatment are more diversified.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to revise the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) 2022: children and adolescents. Methods: We performed a survey, using a questionnaire comprising 23 questions according to various situations facing children and adolescents with bipolar disorders. A total of 40 of the 60 experts in child and adolescent psychiatry responded to the survey. Results: The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for manic and depressive episodes in children with bipolar disorders were a combination of mood stabilizer (MS) and atypical antipsychotics (AAP). The first-line medications selected for these children were aripiprazole (treatment of choice, TOC) and risperidone. The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for manic episodes in adolescents were a combination of MS and an AAP (TOC), monotherapy with MS, and monotherapy with an AAP. Lithium, valproate, aripiprazole, risperidone, and quetiapine were selected as first-line medications for these adolescents. First-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for depressive episodes in adolescents were a combination of MS and an AAP, monotherapy with MS, and monotherapy with an AAP. The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the depressive episodes in adolescents at high risk for bipolar disorder were a combination of MS and AAP and monotherapy with an AAP. Lithium, valproate, aripiprazole (TOC), quetiapine, and risperidone were selected as first-line medications for the treatment of depressive episodes in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Conclusion It is expected that the present KMAP-BP 2022: children and adolescents will give the direction and be usefully applied by clinicians to treat children and adolescents with bipolar disorders.

Objectives: In this study, we investigated and organized the maintenance-treatment strategies for Bipolar I and II disorders outlined in The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar disorder 2022 (KMAP-BP 2022). Methods: The questionnaire sought to survey expert opinion on medication for bipolar disorders and was completed by a review committee consisting of 87 experienced Korean psychiatrists. It comprised 56 questions, and each question included various sub-items. The questionnaire for the maintenance treatments covered overall treatment strategies after acute mood episodes in bipolar I and II disorders, the choice of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, duration of medication, and treatment strategies for breakthrough symptoms. Results: In the case of bipolar I disorder, mood stabilizer monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, and a combination of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics were selected as the first-line treatments. In maintenance management of bipolar II disorder, mood stabilizer monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, and combinations of mood stabilizers were selected as the preferred first-line treatments. Conclusion There has been a growing body of evidence that atypical antipsychotics have a greater preference than observed in the previous KMAP-BP of 2018. Also, monotherapy of mood stabilizers or atypical antipsychotics was more frequently selected in KMAP-BP 2022 than in the KMAP-BP 2018.

Objectives: The safety and tolerability of drugs are very important to ensure compliance and efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorders. An expert opinion survey was conducted on treatment strategies in various special clinical situations, such as patients with significant weight gain, reporting characteristic drug side effects, low drug adherence, pregnant and reproductive women, and genetic counseling. Methods: A written survey that addressed treatment strategies related to safety and tolerability was prepared. The survey focused on significant weight gain, characteristic drug side effects, low drug adherence, treatment of pregnant and reproductive women, and genetic counseling. Eighty-seven experts in the review committee completed the survey. Results: In the case of weight gain occurring during drug treatment, it was considered preferable to replace the treatment drug with a drug that caused less weight gain, such as lamotrigine, aripiprazole, or ziprasidone. If there was a significant weight gain due to the treatment drug, it was considered preferable to intervene as soon as possible. In the case of hyperprolactinemia, it was considered preferable to change the drug. It was recommended that the drug beto discontinued in case of a benign rash as seen in patients treated with lamotrigine. For improving drug adherence, there was an increased preference for long-acting injections. It was also opined that antipsychotics should be used with great caution in pregnant or reproductive women. Conclusion Treatment strategies in various clinical situations related to the safety and tolerability of drugs for bipolar disorder have been described. It is hoped that this information would be useful in practical clinical situations.

Objectives: The present study was carried out to revise the guidelines for the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) 2018. The revision was carried out based on expert opinions to facilitate clinical decisions related to the treatment of bipolar disorders in patients with comorbid physical illnesses. Methods: A 56-item questionnaire was developed; a consensus was arrived at by 87 out of 93 experts (93.5%), on the pharmacological treatment strategies to be used in cases of comorbid physical illnesses accompanying bipolar disorders. Results: For patients with bipolar disorder exhibiting comorbid conditions, by consensus, lamotrigine, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone were recommended as the first-line strategies for metabolic syndrome; lamotrigine and aripiprazole were the recommended first-line strategies for cardiovascular problems; lithium and aripiprazole were the recommended first-line strategies for haptic problems; valproate, lamotrigine, aripiprazole, and quetiapine were the recommended first-line strategies for renal problems; and valproate and aripiprazole were the recommended first-line strategies for cerebrovascular problems or cerebral damage. Conclusion The present study is the most recent consensus among experts on recommendations for the treatment of bipolar disorders in patients with comorbid physical illnesses. Aripiprazole was recommended as the first-line pharmacotherapeutic agent in five comorbid physical conditions. This recommendation is similar to KMAP-BP 2018. Additionally, lamotrigine has been added as a first -line pharmacotherapeutic agent in patients with the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular problems, and renal problems in the current algorithm.