Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Background: Humans are exposed to mercury primarily in its highly toxic form, methyl mercury, which is known to have adverse effects on various organs and systems. The negative impact of mercury exposure on the growth, development, and mental health of children, from infancy to adolescence, is well-documented. However, there are no internationally standardized safe limits for mercury exposure. This study investigated the impact of dietary habits and higher body mass index (BMI) on blood mercury levels in adolescents. Methods: This study analyzed the data from the 4th Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2018–2020. The focus was on 825 middle and high school students aged 13–18 years, whose blood mercury levels were measured. A survey on dietary and lifestyle habits was also conducted. Blood mercury levels were categorized by geometric median values, and associations with overweight status and seafood consumption were examined using a generalized linear model. Results: The geometric mean blood mercury level for the entire sample was 1.37 μg/L, with levels of 1.31 μg/L in normal-weight individuals and 1.43 μg/L in overweight individuals, showing a statistically significant difference between the two groups. After adjusting for other variables, blood mercury levels were significantly associated with overweight status (estimate: 0.084; p = 0.018; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.015–0.153), consumption of large fish and tuna more than once a week (estimate: 0.18; p = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.077–0.284), and consumption of fish once a week or more (estimate: 0.147; p = 0.004; 95% CI: 0.043–0.250). Conclusions In adolescents, a higher BMI and an increased consumption of large fish, tuna, and fish were associated with higher blood mercury levels. Notably, a stronger association was found between large fish consumption and blood mercury levels in the overweight group. These findings suggest the need to moderate seafood consumption and establish more proactive mercury exposure standards for adolescents.

Objective: Primary frozen shoulder causes significant pain and progressively restricts shoulder movements. Diagnosis is made clinically based on patient history and physical examination. Management is mainly non-invasive owing to its self-limiting clinical course. However, clinical practice guidelines for frozen shoulder have not yet been developed in Korea. The developed guidelines aim to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of frozen shoulder. Methods: A guideline development committee reviewed the literature from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KMbase). Using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) framework, the committee formulated two backgrounds and 16 key questions to address common clinical concerns. Recommendations were made using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Results: Diabetes, thyroid disease, and dyslipidemia significantly increase the risk of developing a frozen shoulder. Although frozen shoulder is often self-limiting, some patients may experience long-term functional disabilities. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging should be used as adjunctive tools alongside clinical diagnosis, and rather than as independent diagnostic methods. Noninvasive approaches, such as medications, physical modalities, exercises, electrical stimulation, and manual therapy, may reduce pain and improve shoulder function. Other noninvasive interventions have limited evidence, and their application should be based on clinical judgment. Intra-articular steroid injections are recommended for treatment, and physiotherapy or hydrodilation with steroid injections can also be beneficial. Conclusion These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating primary frozen shoulder.

Background: It is well known that a large number of patients with diabetes also have dyslipidemia, which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination drugs consisting of metformin and atorvastatin, widely used as therapeutic agents for diabetes and dyslipidemia. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and phase III multicenter study included adults with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels >7.0% and <10.0%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >100 and <250 mg/dL. One hundred eighty-five eligible subjects were randomized to the combination group (metformin+atorvastatin), metformin group (metformin+atorvastatin placebo), and atorvastatin group (atorvastatin+metformin placebo). The primary efficacy endpoints were the percent changes in HbA1c and LDL-C levels from baseline at the end of the treatment. Results: After 16 weeks of treatment compared to baseline, HbA1c showed a significant difference of 0.94% compared to the atorvastatin group in the combination group (0.35% vs. −0.58%, respectively; P<0.0001), whereas the proportion of patients with increased HbA1c was also 62% and 15%, respectively, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). The combination group also showed a significant decrease in LDL-C levels compared to the metformin group (−55.20% vs. −7.69%, P<0.001) without previously unknown adverse drug events. Conclusion The addition of atorvastatin to metformin improved HbA1c and LDL-C levels to a significant extent compared to metformin or atorvastatin alone in diabetes and dyslipidemia patients. This study also suggested metformin’s preventive effect on the glucose-elevating potential of atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, insufficiently controlled with exercise and diet. Metformin and atorvastatin combination might be an effective treatment in reducing the CVD risk in patients with both diabetes and dyslipidemia because of its lowering effect on LDL-C and glucose.