Obesity is a chronic, progressive neuroendocrine disease that warrants a shift toward an “onco-bariatric” treatment paradigm. This study introduces the tri-phasic metabolic obesity (TPMO) framework, which integrates glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) with metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Recent clinical and economic evidence—including findings from the Indiana multicenter study and the Highmark Health analysis—was reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness of the TPMO model in improving surgical and metabolic outcomes. The TPMO framework streamlines the patient journey through three synergistic phases. In the neoadjuvant phase, a 4–8-week course of GLP-1 RAs reduces liver volume and visceral fat, thereby improving surgical access, provided that treatment is discontinued 1 week before surgery to mitigate aspiration risk. During the core surgery phase, MBS provides a definitive metabolic reset and remains the most cost-effective treatment, yielding an average savings of $11,689 per patient over 2 years compared with medication alone. In the adjuvant phase, pharmacotherapy—used by 17.2% of post-bariatric patients—counteracts metabolic adaptation and supports sustained weight loss, while a high-protein intake (≥1.2 g/kg/day) is essential for preserving lean body mass. The TPMO framework represents a precision-based, synergistic standard of care designed to promote durable, cost-effective long-term metabolic health within the onco-bariatric paradigm.

Purpose: Weight regain following metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) is a common challenge that may compromise the long-term benefits of surgery. This study evaluated the effects of an 8-week circuit training and dietary counseling program on body composition and obesity-related hormones in patients with early post-bariatric weight regain and assessed the influence of FTO rs9939609 genotype. Methods: This prospective, single-arm intervention enrolled 16 adults with ≥5% weight regain after MBS. Participants completed a structured hybrid program consisting of weekly supervised and home-based circuit training, alongside standardized dietary guidance. Anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic parameters were measured before and after the intervention. Participants were genotyped for FTO rs9939609 and categorized into TT (non-risk) and AA/AT (risk allele) groups. Results: After 8 weeks, participants showed significant reductions in body mass index (−4.4%, P < 0.001), waist circumference (−5.8%, P = 0.001), and fat mass (−7.1%, P = 0.004), whereas muscle mass decreased modestly (−2.7%, P = 0.056). Leptin (−29.8%, P = 0.002), ghrelin (−10.2%, P = 0.002), and insulin (−14.5%, P = 0.039) levels also declined significantly. Although the AA/AT group exhibited higher absolute adiposity than the TT group both pre- and postintervention, percentage changes in anthropometric parameters did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Conclusion A structured hybrid exercise and dietary program was effective in reversing early weight regain and improving hormonal profiles after MBS. The FTO risk allele was associated with greater baseline obesity but did not attenuate response to the intervention.

Purpose: After the initiation of national health insurance coverage in 2019, the number of metabolic bariatric surgeries (MBSs) in Korea has been increasing. Despite evidence regarding its efficacy, many candidates are hesitant regarding surgery for the treatment of severe obesity. This study interviewed patients who received MBS to further understand potential barriers and increase the accessibility of MBS. Materials and Methods: Eight interviewees who received MBS after 2019 participated. The interviews began in mid-July 2022 over approximately a month. Each one-on-one interview lasted a few hours and was done in person. The interviews were transcribed, and the results were analyzed based on grounded theory. Results: This study focused on the quality of life before and after MBS. On a scale of 1 to 10, all patients had a high degree of satisfaction in quality of life after surgery (average score: 8.9, sleeve gastrectomy: 8.8, and bypass surgery: 9). Scores did not differ depending on procedure type, but factors that caused satisfaction and dissatisfaction were distributed differently between the 2 procedures. Conclusion Quality of life is significantly improved for patients undergoing MBS despite discomfort after surgery. Further promotion of the understanding of obesity as a chronic progressive disease is needed for both surgical candidates and the public to increase acceptance of MBS.