Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is recognized as the most common cause of visual impairment in children in high-income countries. It refers to a heterogeneous group of visual processing deficits of cerebral origin that cannot be explained by ocular pathology alone. Major risk factors include prematurity, perinatal brain injury, and structural abnormalities of the developing brain. The terminology has shifted from cortical to CVI to reflect involvement of the entire visual network, including both primary and associative pathways. The term ‘cerebral visual disorders’ has been proposed to describe a broader range of visuoperceptual dysfunction. Clinically, CVI is characterized by inconsistent visual behaviors, including impaired visual attention, difficulty processing complex visual scenes, and delayed visual responses, often despite relatively preserved visual acuity. Diagnosis is clinical and multidisciplinary, requiring exclusion of ocular causes and assessment of functional vision. Neuroimaging may support etiological classification, but is not definitive for diagnosis. Early identification is important, as timely intervention is associated with improved visual and developmental outcomes. Parent-reported questionnaires serve as useful screening tools in early childhood, and the Korean parental questionnaire for children younger than 72 months provides an age-appropriate example. In this mini-review, management is framed around visual habilitation and environmental modification tailored to the child’s visual profile. Although prognosis varies, early recognition and targeted support can improve functional vision and overall quality of life.

Background: and Purpose A multifactorial antiepileptic mechanism underlies the ketogenic diet (KD), and one of the proposed mechanisms of action is that the KD inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. To test this clinically, this study aimed to determine the efficacy of the KD in patients with pathologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) due to genetically identifiable mTOR pathway dysregulation. Methods: A cohort of patients with pathologically confirmed FCD after epilepsy surgery and who were screened for the presence of germline and somatic mutations related to the mTOR pathway in peripheral blood and resected brain tissue was constructed prospectively. A retrospective review of the efficacy of the prior KD in these patients was performed. Results: Twenty-five patients with pathologically confirmed FCD and who were screened for the presence of detectable somatic mTOR pathway mutations had received a sufficient KD. Twelve of these patients (48.0%) had germline or somatic detectable mTOR pathway mutations. A response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. The efficacy of the KD after 3 months of dietary therapy was superior in patients with detectable mTOR pathway mutations than in patients without detectable mTOR pathway mutations, although the difference was not statistically significant (responder rates of 58.3% vs. 38.5%, p=0.434). Conclusions A greater proportion of patients with mTOR pathway responded to the KD, but there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy of the KD between patients with and without detectable mTOR pathway mutations. Further study is warranted due to the smallness of the sample and the limited number of mTOR pathway genes tested in this study.