Background/Aims: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Results: Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4–9 years, and ≥10 years of experiencein colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4–5 mm (61.0%) and 6–9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10–19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20–25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10–19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Conclusions Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depend-ing on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Background/Aims: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Results: Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4–9 years, and ≥10 years of experiencein colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4–5 mm (61.0%) and 6–9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10–19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20–25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10–19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Conclusions Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depend-ing on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant concern for patients with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). CMV management differs between institutions due to the lack of local guidelines. Here, we describe a case of refractory/resistant CMV infection treated using our institution's CMV management protocol. A 59-year-old woman who underwent allo-HCT was treated for CMV reactivation. Despite 3 months of valganciclovir administration, serum CMV level surged. CMV gene mutation test revealed a ganciclovir-resistant A594V mutation in the UL97 gene.Treatment was switched to foscarnet until the drug became unavailable nationwide. During the foscarnet shortage, cidofovir was used, leading to a decline in CMV levels when foscarnet was reintroduced and used for 2 months.Following allo-HCT, CMV prophylaxis with letermovir is crucial to prevent reactivation in seropositive recipients.CMV titers should be monitored frequently after allo-HCT. The cutoff value for preemptive therapy varies across institutions, with ganciclovir/valganciclovir usually administered as first-line therapy. Maribavir is an option in cases of ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance or intolerance. CMV gene mutations should be examined in patients with suspected resistance after 2 weeks of appropriate treatment. This case was discussed at the Clinical Grand Round of the Annual Conference of the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases on November 2, 2023.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant concern for patients with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). CMV management differs between institutions due to the lack of local guidelines. Here, we describe a case of refractory/resistant CMV infection treated using our institution's CMV management protocol. A 59-year-old woman who underwent allo-HCT was treated for CMV reactivation. Despite 3 months of valganciclovir administration, serum CMV level surged. CMV gene mutation test revealed a ganciclovir-resistant A594V mutation in the UL97 gene.Treatment was switched to foscarnet until the drug became unavailable nationwide. During the foscarnet shortage, cidofovir was used, leading to a decline in CMV levels when foscarnet was reintroduced and used for 2 months.Following allo-HCT, CMV prophylaxis with letermovir is crucial to prevent reactivation in seropositive recipients.CMV titers should be monitored frequently after allo-HCT. The cutoff value for preemptive therapy varies across institutions, with ganciclovir/valganciclovir usually administered as first-line therapy. Maribavir is an option in cases of ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance or intolerance. CMV gene mutations should be examined in patients with suspected resistance after 2 weeks of appropriate treatment. This case was discussed at the Clinical Grand Round of the Annual Conference of the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases on November 2, 2023.

Background/Aims: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Results: Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4–9 years, and ≥10 years of experiencein colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4–5 mm (61.0%) and 6–9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10–19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20–25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10–19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Conclusions Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depend-ing on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Background/Aims: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Results: Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4–9 years, and ≥10 years of experiencein colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4–5 mm (61.0%) and 6–9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10–19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20–25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10–19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Conclusions Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depend-ing on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant concern for patients with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). CMV management differs between institutions due to the lack of local guidelines. Here, we describe a case of refractory/resistant CMV infection treated using our institution's CMV management protocol. A 59-year-old woman who underwent allo-HCT was treated for CMV reactivation. Despite 3 months of valganciclovir administration, serum CMV level surged. CMV gene mutation test revealed a ganciclovir-resistant A594V mutation in the UL97 gene.Treatment was switched to foscarnet until the drug became unavailable nationwide. During the foscarnet shortage, cidofovir was used, leading to a decline in CMV levels when foscarnet was reintroduced and used for 2 months.Following allo-HCT, CMV prophylaxis with letermovir is crucial to prevent reactivation in seropositive recipients.CMV titers should be monitored frequently after allo-HCT. The cutoff value for preemptive therapy varies across institutions, with ganciclovir/valganciclovir usually administered as first-line therapy. Maribavir is an option in cases of ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance or intolerance. CMV gene mutations should be examined in patients with suspected resistance after 2 weeks of appropriate treatment. This case was discussed at the Clinical Grand Round of the Annual Conference of the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases on November 2, 2023.

Background: The ongoing medical crisis in Korea has severely impacted the operational environment of intensive care units (ICU), posing significant challenges to quality care for critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the ongoing crisis on ICUs. Methods: A survey was conducted in July 2024 among intensivists in charge of ICUs at institutions accredited by the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine for critical care. The survey compared data from January 2024 (pre-crisis) and June 2024 (post-crisis) on the number ICU beds, staffing composition, work hours, and the number and roles of nurse practitioners. Results: Among the total of 71 participating ICUs, 22 experienced a reduction in the number of operational beds, with a median decrease of six beds per unit, totaling 127 beds across these ICUs. The numbers of residents and interns decreased from an average of 2.3 to 0.1 per ICU, and the average weekly working hours of intensivists increased from 62.3 to 78.8 hours. Nurse practitioners helped fill staffing gaps, with their numbers rising from 150 to 242 across ICUs, and their scope of practice expanded accordingly. Conclusions The medical crisis has led to major changes in the critical care system, including staffing shortages, increased workloads, and an expanded role for nurse practitioners. This is a critical moment to foster interest and engage in active discussions aimed at creating a sustainable and resilient ICU system.

Patients with acute leukemia, particularly those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, are at a high risk of contracting invasive fungal infections (IFIs). These IFIs substantially increase morbidity and mortality.Over the past decade, the paradigm of IFI management has shifted markedly, with an increased emphasis on prevention and treatment. Expanded use of antifungal agents and advances in novel therapies have prolonged survival in patients with hematologic malignancies. This progress also allows subsequent lines of chemotherapy to be administered while maintaining antifungal therapy once IFIs are controlled. However, these shifts have introduced new challenges, including a rising incidence of breakthrough infections despite prophylaxis, the emergence of infections caused by rare fungi, and growing concerns regarding azole resistance. Although Aspergillus species remain the predominant pathogens, infections by uncommon molds and yeasts are increasingly encountered. This phenomenon complicates the diagnosis and necessitates diagnostic tools beyond galactomannan testing alone. Integration of novel biomarkers and antifungal susceptibility testing is essential for timely and accurate diagnosis. Current guidelines provide relatively well-defined recommendations for the definitive management of invasive aspergillosis, candidiasis, and mucormycosis.Individualized care and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to optimize patient outcomes. In addition to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, a deeper understanding of host immunity and its interactions with IFIs is critical for improving patient outcomes and guiding the next generation of management strategies.

Background: Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a complex process involving multiple mediators that initiate inflammatory responses, ultimately leading to cell necrosis and apoptosis. During hepatic IRI, various inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) exacerbate liver injury. Infliximab is an antibody that neutralizes TNF-α, and suppression of TNF-α activity with infliximab treatment can protect the liver from IRI. Splenectomy also alleviates hepatic IRI by decreasing neutrophil infiltration, reducing the release of ROS into the hepatic sinusoids, and suppressing TNF-α release. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of infliximab on hepatic IRI based on inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, and to compare these effects with those of splenectomy. Methods: Twenty-four rats were randomly assigned to the following four groups: (1) sham, (2) hepatic ischemia-reperfusion (IR), (3) hepatic IR with 10 mg/kg infliximab, and (4) hepatic IR with splenectomy. Each group consisted of six rats. Hepatic ischemia was induced for 30 minutes, followed by 2 hours of reperfusion injury. Infliximab was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before surgery and splenectomy was performed immediately before hepatic ischemia. Results: Infliximab and splenectomy downregulated the levels of liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase [p<0.001 for all] and alanine aminotransferase [p<0.001 for all]), a prooxidant (malondialdehyde [p=0.006 for infliximab; p<0.001 for splenectomy]), inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and nuclear factor kappa B [p<0.001 for all]), and an apoptotic mediator (caspase-3 [p=0.005 for infliximab; p=0.004 for splenectomy]) compared with those with hepatic IR alone. Conclusion Infliximab treatment and splenectomy mitigated hepatic IRI. These protective effects are likely mediated via anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic pathways within the pathophysiology of hepatic IRI.