Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections (TRIAM) to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma.Subjects and Method We reviewed and documented the medical charts of 20 patients who were administered with TRIAM to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma from January 2018 to June 2019 were. The surface area of the granulomatous tissue was measured using Image J. The differences between the area of the granulomatous tissue after conventional treatment and after TRIAM on the same patient were compared. Results: A total of 20 patients consisting of 12 males and 8 females were included, with the patients’ average age being 60.0±14.3 years. The initial surface area of granulation tissue was 1.266±0.449 cm2, and 1.243±0.432 cm2 after conventional treatment, showing no statistically significant difference in the tissue area (p=0.143). The pre-injection surface area of granulation tissue was 1.243±0.432 cm2, and the area on the 7th day after the third injection was 0.477±0.217 cm2, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional treatment, the surface area of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma significantly decreased after being treating with TRIAM. This finding suggests the effectiveness of TRIAM as a treatment of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma without complications such as bleeding.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections (TRIAM) to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma.Subjects and Method We reviewed and documented the medical charts of 20 patients who were administered with TRIAM to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma from January 2018 to June 2019 were. The surface area of the granulomatous tissue was measured using Image J. The differences between the area of the granulomatous tissue after conventional treatment and after TRIAM on the same patient were compared. Results: A total of 20 patients consisting of 12 males and 8 females were included, with the patients’ average age being 60.0±14.3 years. The initial surface area of granulation tissue was 1.266±0.449 cm2, and 1.243±0.432 cm2 after conventional treatment, showing no statistically significant difference in the tissue area (p=0.143). The pre-injection surface area of granulation tissue was 1.243±0.432 cm2, and the area on the 7th day after the third injection was 0.477±0.217 cm2, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional treatment, the surface area of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma significantly decreased after being treating with TRIAM. This finding suggests the effectiveness of TRIAM as a treatment of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma without complications such as bleeding.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections (TRIAM) to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma.Subjects and Method We reviewed and documented the medical charts of 20 patients who were administered with TRIAM to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma from January 2018 to June 2019 were. The surface area of the granulomatous tissue was measured using Image J. The differences between the area of the granulomatous tissue after conventional treatment and after TRIAM on the same patient were compared. Results: A total of 20 patients consisting of 12 males and 8 females were included, with the patients’ average age being 60.0±14.3 years. The initial surface area of granulation tissue was 1.266±0.449 cm2, and 1.243±0.432 cm2 after conventional treatment, showing no statistically significant difference in the tissue area (p=0.143). The pre-injection surface area of granulation tissue was 1.243±0.432 cm2, and the area on the 7th day after the third injection was 0.477±0.217 cm2, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional treatment, the surface area of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma significantly decreased after being treating with TRIAM. This finding suggests the effectiveness of TRIAM as a treatment of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma without complications such as bleeding.

Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.