Congenital smooth muscle hamartoma is a benign proliferation of smooth muscles within the dermis. The classic form presents as well-defined, skin-colored, or hyperpigmented plaques associated with hypertrichosis. However, there have been reports of atypical forms, including a follicular spotted appearance, linear atrophic plaques, and morphea-like forms. In such cases, distinguishing congenital smooth muscle hamartomas from other cutaneous diseases can be challenging. Herein, we report on a 16-month-old boy who presented with a hypopigmented patch and hypertrichosis on his back since birth. Histopathological examination revealed mild acanthosis and well-defined smooth muscle bundles haphazardly oriented in the dermis. These bundles stained positively with Masson’s trichrome stain. Based on these findings, a definitive diagnosis of congenital smooth muscle hamartoma was established. In conclusion, an exceptionally rare case of congenital smooth muscle hamartoma with a hypopigmented appearance is reported.

Background: Female-pattern hair loss (FPHL) is characterized by diffuse hair thinning in the mid-frontal scalp and increased hair shedding. Although the use of low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) is increasing significantly in Korea, data on its use are limited. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of LDOM in Korean patients with FPHL. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted at Pusan National University Hospital. The study included female patients with pattern hair loss who received treatment with LDOM at 1.25 mg/d for a minimum of 6 months in combination with other treatments. Patients were eligible for LDOM addition if their previous treatments showed a limited response and the previous treatment regimen remained unchanged throughout the evaluation period. Clinical response to treatment was evaluated using the Sinclair hair loss severity scale. Results: The study included 44 females with FPHL. Before treatment, the mean Sinclair scale score was 2.77, which decreased to 2.27 after treatment. By the 3rd month, one patient (2.3%) experienced worsening, while seven patients (15.9%) showed slight improvement. By the 6th month, the treatment response was as follows: stabilization in 30 patients (68.2%), slight improvement in 13 patients (29.5%), and substantial improvement in one patient (2.3%). Adverse effects, predominantly hypertrichosis, were observed in nine patients. All adverse effects improved upon discontinuation of LDOM and no life-threatening adverse effects were observed during the study. Conclusion This study provides evidence that LDOM can be an effective therapeutic option with a good safety profile for FPHL.

Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed. Results: A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–1.79; p = 0.336). Conclusion SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.

Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed. Results: A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–1.79; p = 0.336). Conclusion SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.

Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed. Results: A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–1.79; p = 0.336). Conclusion SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.

In the rapidly evolving healthcare environment, radiologists strive to establish their rightful place.Thus, there is a need for enhanced outpatient and clinical education within the Department of Radiology and exploration of its methodologies. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Radiology established a task force to investigate the clinical and outpatient practice status of radiologists overseas, current state of related education, involvement of other specialties in radiologic practices and education in Korea, and clinical and outpatient practice status among Korean radiologists. Furthermore, a survey on clinical competency enhancement was conducted among the members of the Korean Society of Radiology. These findings suggest the need for visibility and clinical competency enhancement in radiologists and methodologies for strengthening clinical competencies.

In the rapidly evolving healthcare environment, radiologists strive to establish their rightful place.Thus, there is a need for enhanced outpatient and clinical education within the Department of Radiology and exploration of its methodologies. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Radiology established a task force to investigate the clinical and outpatient practice status of radiologists overseas, current state of related education, involvement of other specialties in radiologic practices and education in Korea, and clinical and outpatient practice status among Korean radiologists. Furthermore, a survey on clinical competency enhancement was conducted among the members of the Korean Society of Radiology. These findings suggest the need for visibility and clinical competency enhancement in radiologists and methodologies for strengthening clinical competencies.