1.Countertraction method for reduction of irreducible subcoracoid dislocation of the shoulder joint with Hill-Sacks lesion.
Ru-Yi ZHANG ; Cai YUN ; Tao YANG ; Yi ZHANG ; Jian-Hua ZHU ; Feng LIU ; Li-Chao ZHANG ; Peng SU
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022;35(12):1115-1120
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate clinical outcomes of countertraction method in treating irreducible subcoracoid dislocation of shoulder joint combined with Hill-Sacks injury.
METHODS:
A total of 56 patients with irreducible subcoracoid dislocation of the shoulder joint combined with Hill-Sacks injury admitted from December 2013 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Under the anesthesia of shoulder joint cavity injection, the reduction was performed by using anti-traction method (experimental group) and traditional Hippocrates method (control group), 28 cases in each group. There were 11 males and 17 females in experimental group, with an average age of (61.95±19.32) years old, 9 cases on the left side, and 19 cases on the right side. Twelve males and 16 females in control group, with an average age of (63.13±12.75) years old, 11 cases on the left side, 17 cases on the right side. The curative effects between two groups were evaluated before and after operation, including the success rate of reduction, the duration of reduction, the distance from successful reduction to injury, complications and functional rehabilitation(Constant score of shoulder joint).
RESULTS:
The success rates of reduction in experimental group and control group were 92.86%(26/28) and 67.86% (19/28), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The duration of simple reduction was (4.25±2.13) min and ( 6.31±1.69) min, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the time from successful reduction to injury was (9.16±0.94) h and (8.94±1.31) h, respectively, with no significant difference(P>0.05). There were no complications such as vascular nerve injury and fracture in experimental group, 2 cases of axillary nerve injury and 1 case of humeral head fracture in control group. Constant scores of shoulder joint between experimental group and control group were (92.34±5.62) points and (90.91±4.73) points, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
For patients with irreducible subcoracoid dislocation of the shoulder joint with Hill-Sacks injury, the countertraction method under anesthesia of the shoulder joint cavity achieved a higher success rate and few complications.
Male
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Shoulder Joint/surgery*
;
Shoulder Dislocation/complications*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Shoulder Injuries
;
Joint Dislocations/complications*
;
Joint Instability/surgery*
2.A modified three-incision approach to treating three-column Lisfranc injuries.
Ting-Hu ZHAO ; Han-Xin CHEN ; Bin JIA ; Yun-Bo BAI ; Jike LU ; Wei REN
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2022;25(6):362-366
PURPOSE:
The most popular surgical approach to manage Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is the double-incision approach, which frequently causes a variety of complications, such as skin necrosis, rotational malreduction of the first tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) and lateral column dorsoplantar malreduction of the TMTJ. We introduce a three-incision approach to treat Lisfranc fracture-dislocations with only minor postoperative complications and good foot function.
METHODS:
We prospectively selected 30 previously healthy patients, ranging from 18 to 60 years of age, but only 23 patients completed the follow-up and thus were finally included, with an average age of 38.1 ± 12.9 years. All patients have sustained Lisfranc fracture-dislocations involving all three-column; 13.0% (3/23) were Myerson classification type A (medial), 47.8% (11/23) were type A (lateral), and 39.1% (9/23) were type C2. All patients were treated via a three-incision approach: a long incision made along the lateral border of the second ray was used as a working incision to visualize and reduce the first three TMTJs, as well as to apply internal fixation instrumentation; a 2 cm medial incision was made at the medial side of the first TMTJ as an inspecting incision, ensuring good reduction of the first TMTJ in medial and plantar view; another 1 cm inspecting incision was made at the dorsal side of the fourth/fifth TMTJ to prevent sagittal subluxation of the lateral column. Mean ± SD was used for quantitative data such as operation time, follow-up time and foot function scores. Postoperative complications were documented, and foot function was evaluated using the American orthopaedic foot & ankle society score, foot function index and Maryland foot score at follow-up. The foot function of the injured foot and contralateral foot of the same patient was at the end of follow-up, and independent sample t-test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS:
The median operation time was 117.9 ± 14.6 min (range 93 - 142 min). All complications occurred within three months after the operation, and included delayed wound healing (17.4%), superficial infection (8.7%), complex regional pain syndrome (4.3%) and neuroma (4.3%). There was no case of postoperative skin necrosis or malreduction. At the end of follow-up of 14.1 ± 1.2 months (range 12-16 months), the median American orthopaedic foot & ankle society score of the operated foot was 89.7 ± 5.7, the median foot function index was 21.7 ± 9.9, and the median Maryland foot score was 88.7 ± 4.8. There were no significant differences between the operated and contralateral sides, in terms of foot function, at the end of followup (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The three-incision approach can provide adequate visualization of all TMTJs to ensure anatomical reduction and offer sufficient working space to apply internal fixation instrumentation, which is effective in treating three-column Lisfranc fracture-dislocations with minor soft tissue complications and satisfactory functional recovery.
Humans
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal
;
Joint Dislocations/surgery*
;
Fracture Dislocation
;
Surgical Wound
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Necrosis
;
Treatment Outcome
3.Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications after Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Stabilization
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2019;11(1):103-111
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic stabilization of torn coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments gained popularity recently. However, loss of reduction after the operation and complications unique to this technique involving tunnel placement through the distal clavicle and coracoid process are concerns. The purpose of this study was to report intraoperative and early postoperative complications associated with this procedure. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 18 consecutive patients who had undergone arthroscopic stabilization for torn CC ligaments between 2014 and 2015. The indications for surgery were acute or chronic acromioclavicular dislocation and acute fracture of the distal clavicle, associated with CC ligament disruption. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Intra- and postoperative complications and reoperations were investigated. RESULTS: There were six female and 12 male patients with a mean age of 47 years (range, 22 to 86 years). At a mean follow-up of 17 ± 10 months (range, 10 to 28 months), the mean ASES score was 88.8 ± 19.9 and the mean UCLA score was 30.9 ± 5.2. Intraoperatively, seven complications developed: breach of lateral cortex of the coracoid process in five patients, medial cortex of the coracoid process in one, and anterior cortex of the clavicle in one. Postoperative complications developed in eight patients: four ossifications of the CC interspace, four tunnel widening of the clavicle, one bony erosion on the clavicle, and one superficial infection. A loss of reduction was found in six patients. Reoperation was performed in three patients for loss of reduction in two and superficial infection in the other. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic CC stabilization resulted in high rates of intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Most of them were related to the surgical technique involving bone tunnel placement in the coracoid process and the clavicle.
California
;
Clavicle
;
Dislocations
;
Elbow
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Ligaments
;
Male
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Reoperation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Shoulder
;
Surgeons
4.Points to consider before the insertion of maxillary implants: the otolaryngologist's perspective
Sung Won KIM ; Il Hwan LEE ; Soo Whan KIM ; Do Hyun KIM
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2019;49(6):346-354
Maxillary implants are inserted in the upward direction, meaning that they oppose gravity, and achieving stable support is difficult if the alveolar bone facing the maxillary sinus is thin. Correspondingly, several sinus-lifting procedures conducted with or without bone graft materials have been used to place implants in the posterior area of the maxilla. Even with these procedures available, it has been reported that in about 5% of cases, complications occurred after implantation, including acute and chronic sinusitis, penetration of the sinus by the implant, implant dislocation, oroantral fistula formation, infection, bone graft dislocation, foreign-body reaction, Schneiderian membrane perforation, and ostium plugging by a dislodged bone graft. This review summarizes common maxillary sinus pathologies related to implants and suggests an appropriate management plan for patients requiring dental implantation.
Dental Implantation
;
Dental Implants
;
Dislocations
;
Foreign-Body Reaction
;
Gravitation
;
Humans
;
Maxilla
;
Maxillary Sinus
;
Maxillary Sinusitis
;
Nasal Mucosa
;
Oroantral Fistula
;
Pathology
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Sinusitis
;
Transplants
5.Shoulder Replacement Arthroplasty after Failed Proximal Humerus Fracture
Jin Young PARK ; Beom Ho SEO ; Seung Jun LEE
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019;54(2):110-119
Proximal humerus fracture can be defined as a fracture that occurs in the surgical neck or proximal part of the humerus. Despite the appropriate treatment, however, various complications and sequelae can occur, and the treatment is quite difficult often requiring surgical treatment, such as a shoulder replacement. The classification of sequelae after a proximal humerus fracture is most commonly used by Boileau and can be divided into two categories and four types. Category I is an intracapsular impacted fracture that is not accompanied by important distortions between the tuberosities and humeral head. An anatomic prosthesis can be used without greater tuberosity osteotomy. In category I, there are type 1 with cephalic collapse or necrosis with minimal tuberosity malunion and type 2 related to locked dislocation or fracture-dislocation. Category II is an extracapsular dis-impacted fracture with gross distortion between the tuberosities and the humeral head. To perform an anatomic prosthesis, a tuberosity osteotomy should be performed. In category II, there are type 3 with nonunion of the surgical neck and type 4 with severe tuberosity malunion. In type 1, non-constrained arthroplasty (NCA) without a tuberosity osteotomy should be considered as a treatment. On the other hand, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) should be considered if types 1C or 1D accompanied by valgus or varus deformity or severe fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff. In general, the results are satisfactory when NCA is performed in type 2 sequelae. On the other hand, RSA can be considered as an option when there is no bony defect of the glenoid and a defect of the rotator cuff is accompanied. In type 3, it would be effective to perform internal fixation with a bone wedge graft rather than shoulder replacement arthroplasty. Recent reports on the results of RSA are also increasing. On the other hand, recent reports suggest that good results are obtained with RSA in type 3. In type 4, RSA should be considered as a first option.
Arthroplasty
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement
;
Classification
;
Congenital Abnormalities
;
Dislocations
;
Hand
;
Humeral Head
;
Humerus
;
Neck
;
Necrosis
;
Osteotomy
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Prostheses and Implants
;
Rotator Cuff
;
Shoulder Fractures
;
Shoulder
;
Transplants
6.Osteomyelitis post acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
Raymond Dk YEAK ; Hafiz DAUD ; Nasir M NIZLAN
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2019;22(3):182-185
Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a common shoulder injury. There are various techniques of ACJ reconstruction. Superficial infection after ACJ reconstruction is not an uncommon complication. However, osteomyelitis post ACJ reconstruction has never been highlighted as a possible complication. Our patient is a 31-year-old male who sustained a Rockwood 5 ACJ dislocation and had anatomical ACJ reconstruction with autogenous gracilis and semitendinosus graft. Our technique involved the anatomical reconstruction of the ACJ and the coracoclavicular ligament with the usage of two bioscrews and the temporary stabilisation of the ACJ with two k-wires. As in any orthopaedic surgery, infection is often disastrous especially when the surgery involves implants. It can be disastrous with high morbidity to the patient as well as a costly complication to treat. Therefore, we wish to highlight this case as despite its rarity, osteomyelitis can be devastating to the patient and should be prevented if possible.
Acromioclavicular Joint
;
injuries
;
surgery
;
Adult
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
administration & dosage
;
Bone Screws
;
adverse effects
;
Bone Wires
;
adverse effects
;
Gracilis Muscle
;
transplantation
;
Hamstring Muscles
;
transplantation
;
Humans
;
Joint Dislocations
;
surgery
;
Male
;
Orthopedic Procedures
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Osteomyelitis
;
etiology
;
prevention & control
;
therapy
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
prevention & control
;
therapy
;
Prognosis
;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
;
adverse effects
;
methods
7.Pars Plana Posterior Capsulectomy during Phacovitrectomy
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019;60(2):152-159
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pars plana posterior capsulectomy (PPPC) during phacovitrectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 76 patients (76 eyes) who underwent phacovitrectomy were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether PPPC was performed during phacovitrectomy. In group A, PPPC using a vitreous cutter was combined with phacovitrectomy; in group B, only phacovitrectomy was performed. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), predicted and actual refractive errors, adverse events, and posterior capsular opacity (PCO) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Age, sex, and pre- and postoperative BCVA were not significantly different between group A (n = 37) and group B (n = 39). No intraoperative complications were identified in either group. In group A, the actual refraction (postoperative 2 months) was −0.44 ± 0.88 diopters (D) and a mild hyperopic shift was found compared to the preoperative predicted refraction (−0.56 ± 0.40 D). In group B, the actual refraction was −0.70 ± 0.72 D and a mild myopic shift was found compared to the preoperative predicted refraction (−0.60 ± 0.81 D). The difference in refraction shifts between the two groups was not significant but very close to it (p = 0.050). In group A, yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy was not required. However, PCO was observed in 10 eyes in group B, 6 of which subsequently underwent YAG laser posterior capsulotomy at the last follow-up. Lens instability such as dislocation or subluxations was not observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: PPPC combined with phacovitrectomy may lead to hyperopic refractive changes. However, this was a safe and effective approach to prevent PCO and additional YAG laser posterior capsulotomy.
Capsule Opacification
;
Dislocations
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Intraoperative Complications
;
Lasers, Solid-State
;
Phacoemulsification
;
Posterior Capsulotomy
;
Refractive Errors
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Visual Acuity
;
Vitrectomy
8.Temporary Haptic Externalization and Four-point Fixation of Intraocular Lens in Scleral Fixation to Enhance Stability
Joo Young SHIN ; Se Rang CHOI ; Ji Hoon JEON ; Joon Won KANG ; Jangwon HEO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2018;32(1):23-28
PURPOSE: To report the results of a new technique for intraocular lens scleral fixation of temporary haptic externalization and four-point fixation for enhanced stability. METHODS: Two 10–0 polypropylene strands were fixed at two points 2 mm apart on each haptic of a conventional three-piece intraocular lens, using our previously reported method of temporary haptic externalization after injector implantation. Postoperative refractive outcome and stability were evaluated. RESULTS: Although the intraocular lens was fixed at a total of four points, no intraoperative difficulties were observed during the process. Patients showed successful fixation of the intraocular lens postoperatively. The fixed intraocular lens showed good centering and minimal tilting. When compared to the two-point fixation technique, postoperative astigmatism was significantly smaller in the four-point fixation group (1.80 ± 0.84 vs. 1.00 ± 0.0.50, p = 0.033). Lens-induced astigmatism calculated from subtraction of corneal astigmatism from total astigmatism was also significantly smaller in the four-point fixation group (2.23 ± 0.98 vs.1.17 ± 0.0.70, p = 0.043). No postoperative complications were identified during a mean follow-up period of 14.8 months (range, 10 to 19 months). CONCLUSIONS: By fixing the intraocular lens at two points on each side of the haptics, this method minimizes the tilting of the intraocular lens and thus decreases postoperative lens-induced astigmatism. Also, the possibility of intraocular lens dislocation in the long term might be decreased by this two-point fixation technique.
Aphakia
;
Astigmatism
;
Cataract
;
Dislocations
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Lens Subluxation
;
Lenses, Intraocular
;
Methods
;
Polypropylenes
;
Postoperative Complications
9.Postoperative malocclusion after maxillofacial fracture management: a retrospective case study
Sang Yun KIM ; Yong Hoon CHOI ; Young Kyun KIM
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2018;40(1):27-
PURPOSE: Various complications occur when a maxillofacial fracture is malunionized or improperly resolved. Malocclusion is the most common complication, followed by facial deformity, temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), and neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental treatment of postoperative complications after maxillofacial fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, nine patients with a postoperative complication after maxillofacial fracture who had been performed the initial operation from other units and were referred to the authors’ department had been included. Of the nine patients, six had mandibular fractures, one had maxillary fractures, one had maxillary and mandibular complex fractures, and one had multiple facial fractures. All the patients had tooth fractures, dislocations, displacements, and alveolar bone fractures at the time of trauma, but complications occurred because none of the patients underwent preoperative and postoperative dental treatment. Malocclusion and TMD are the most common complications, followed by dental problems (pulp necrosis, tooth extrusion, osteomyelitis, etc.) due to improper treatment of teeth and alveolar bone injuries. The patients were referred to the department of dentistry to undergo treatment for the complications. One of the nine patients underwent orthognathic surgery for a severe open bite. Another patient underwent bone reconstruction using an iliac bone graft and vestibuloplasty with extensive bone loss. The other patients, who complained of moderate occlusal abnormalities and TMDs such as mouth-opening limitation, underwent occlusal treatment by prosthodontic repair and temporomandibular joint treatment instead of surgery. RESULTS: One patient who underwent orthognathic surgery had complete loss of open bite and TMD after surgery. One patient who underwent reconstruction using an iliac bone graft had a good healing process. Other patients were treated with splint, injection, and physical therapy for mouth-opening limitation and temporomandibular joint pain. After treatment, the TMDs were resolved, but the remaining occlusal abnormalities were resolved with prosthetic restoration. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the severity of malocclusion and TMJ symptom and the feasibillity of reoperation, nonsurgical methods such as orthodontic and prosthodontic treatments and splint therapy can be used to manage the dental and TMD complication after the trauma surgery. However, reoperation needs to be strongly considered for severe malocclusion and TMD problem. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40902-018-0167-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Congenital Abnormalities
;
Dentistry
;
Dislocations
;
Fractures, Bone
;
Humans
;
Malocclusion
;
Mandibular Fractures
;
Maxillary Fractures
;
Necrosis
;
Open Bite
;
Orthodontic Extrusion
;
Orthognathic Surgery
;
Osteomyelitis
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Reoperation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Splints
;
Temporomandibular Joint
;
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
;
Tooth
;
Tooth Fractures
;
Transplants
;
Vestibuloplasty
10.Clinical Outcomes of Combined Vitrectomy and Intrascleral Fixation of New Intraocular Lenses in In-the-bag Dislocations
Min Soo LEE ; Sue Hey CHAE ; Chan Woo BANG ; Hye Min JEON ; Hee Seong YOON
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018;59(7):657-664
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical outcomes of combined vitrectomy and intrascleral fixation of a new posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL) as a treatment for IOL dislocation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective interventional study at our medical facility from January 2015 to January 2017. Posteriorly dislocated IOLs were removed with pars plana vitrectomy. Two intrascleral tunnels, 2.0 mm in length, were created 1.5 mm to the limbus at 6 and 12 o'clock positions. Both haptics of new foldable acrylic 3-piece IOLs were inserted into the tunnel until the IOL was secured in a central position. We analyzed the preexisting ocular condition, visual acuity (VA), and refractive error preoperatively and postoperatively, and recorded postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (50 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up period was 12.8 ± 6.6 months. A best-corrected VA of 6/12 or better was achieved in 43 eyes (86%). The mean VA significantly improved from 0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline to 0.18 logMAR at last follow-up (p = 0.03). The refractive status after intrascleral fixation of the PC IOL revealed a mean hyperopic shift of +1.09 ± 1.28 diopters from the predicted spherical equivalent. Postoperative vitreous hemorrhages occurred in six cases and were cleared without visual compromise. Cystoid macular edema was well-controlled by topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) medications in two cases. In two cases, IOL dislocation recurred and required re-operation. There were no serious adverse events of suture-related complications, retinal detachment, corneal compromise, or endophthalmitis in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that use of combined vitrectomy and intrascleral fixation of PC IOLs is a safe and efficient technique to correct IOL dislocation. We observed good visual outcomes with only minor complications.
Dislocations
;
Endophthalmitis
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Lenses, Intraocular
;
Macular Edema
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Refractive Errors
;
Retinal Detachment
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Visual Acuity
;
Vitrectomy
;
Vitreous Hemorrhage

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail