Objective To explore factors affecting the postoperative renal function and surgical complications in recipients of living donor kidney transplantation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on medical records of 119 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, from January 2020 to September 2024. The severity of surgical complications was evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo score. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between preoperative general data, surgical data, preoperative laboratory data and the Clavien-Dindo score. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed on the correlated factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the factors affecting the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) after surgery. Results The body mass index, history of hypertension, cold ischemia time, the first warm ischemia time, the second warm ischemia time, prothrombin activity and international normalized ratio were all correlated with the Clavien-Dindo score. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the longer the second warm ischemia time and the first warm ischemia time were, the higher the Clavien-Dindo score was, and the more severe the postoperative surgical complications were (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that long the first warm ischemia time and long dialysis time were independent risk factors for the occurrence of DGF after surgery (all P<0.05). Conclusions Prolonged the second warm ischemia time and the first warm ischemia time may increase the severity of surgical complications in recipients after living donor kidney transplantation. Long the first warm ischemia time and long dialysis time are independent risk factors for the occurrence of DGF after surgery.

ObjectiveTo explore the current status and issues regarding the application of ancient books in clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） published in China， and to provide methodological recommendations for the incorporation of ancient books in the development of TCM guidelines. MethodsWe searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）， WanFang Data， VIP， SinoMed， PubMed， Embase， as well as six industry websites including China Association of Chinese Medicine， National Group Standards Information Platform， and Chinese Association of the Integration of Traditional and Western Medicine，etc. TCM clinical practice guidelines or expert consensus issued during January 1st， 2017， to November 26th， 2022 were searched. Clinical practice guidelines or expert consensus that explicitly referred to ancient books were included， and the content regarding the searching for ancient books， sources of access to ancient books， methods of evaluating the level of evidence， methods of evaluating the level of recommendation， and methods of evaluating the evidence for the ancient books were analysed. ResultsA total of 1,215 TCM clinical practice guidelines or expert consensus were retrieved， with 442 articles explicitly mentioning the application of ancient books， including 300 （67.87%） clinical practice guidelines and 142 （32.13%） expert consensus. Sixty of the 442 publications explicitly reported that ancient books searching had been conducted （13.57%）； among these 60 publications 27 （45.00%） explicitly reported ancient books searching strategies， and the most frequent method was manual searching with a total of 24 articles （40.00%）. The most popular search source was Chinese Medical Dictionary， a TCM classics database， with a total of 18 articles. 197 articles （44.57%） explicitly reported the evaluation criteria for the level of evidence， of which 141 articles （71.57%） involved the evaluation criteria for the ancient books； 413 articles （93.44%） mentioned ancient books in the recommendations， and only the source of formula name was mentioned in 409 （99.03%） of the publications. ConclusionThe current application of ancient books in TCM clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus is limited， with issues of non-standard searching and evaluation methods. Standar-dization and uniformity are needed in evidence grading and recommendation standards. Future research should clarify the scope and methods of applying ancient book， emphasize their integration with modern research evidence， and enhance their value and quality in the development of TCM clinical practice guidelines.

This study delves into the pivotal factors influencing the consensus process within traditional Chinese medicine guideline development, with the objective of augmenting the quality of this process through methodological recommendations aimed at elevating standardization.