1.Risk factors for overall postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries: a multicenter observational study.
Xuecai LÜ ; Yanhong LIU ; Shiyi HAN ; Haoyun ZHANG ; Aisheng HOU ; Zhikang ZHOU ; Likai SHI ; Jie GAO ; Jiangbei CAO ; Hong ZHANG ; Weidong MI
Journal of Southern Medical University 2025;45(4):736-743
OBJECTIVES:
To investigate the risk factors of overall postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries.
METHODS:
This study was conducted among a total of 1388 elderly patients, who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgeries at 17 centers across China between April, 2020 and April, 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days, including procedure-related, neuropsychiatric, respiratory, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal complications as well as acute kidney injury. Baseline characteristics, preoperative psychological and functional status, intraoperative anesthesia and surgical factors, intraoperative medication, use of nerve block, and postoperative analgesia methods were compared between the patients experiencing one or more postoperative complications and those without complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The relationship between postoperative acute pain and each type of complication were explored.
RESULTS:
The incidence of overall postoperative complications was 50.8% (705/1388) in these patients. Multivariate analysis showed that age (OR: 1.026; 95% CI: 1.006-1.046), prognostic nutritional index (OR: 0.998; 95% CI: 0.997-1.000), preoperative EuroQol-5 dimensions score (OR: 0.094; 95% CI: 0.018-0.500), blood loss (OR: 1.002; 95% CI: 1.001-1.003), and acute postoperative pain (OR: 1.308; 95% CI: 1.033-1.657) were significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Specifically, patients experiencing severe postoperative pain had a significantly higher incidence of neuropsychiatric (27.2% vs 19.8%), procedure-related (17.3% vs 10.2%), and cardiovascular complications (3.6% vs 1.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
An advanced age, a low preoperative nutritional index, a poor quality of life score, a greater volume of intraoperative blood loss, and acute postoperative pain are independent risk factors for postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries. There is a significant association between acute postoperative pain and multi-system complications.
Humans
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Aged
;
Risk Factors
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
;
Male
;
Female
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology*
;
Incidence
;
Aged, 80 and over
2.Establishment and data quality control of a multicenter prospective database for prevalence of abdominal complications after gastroenterological surgery.
Qi WANG ; Zhou Qiao WU ; Zi Ning LIU ; Zi Yu LI ; Jia Fu JI
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(2):154-159
As the main cause of secondary operation and postoperative death, the incidence of intraperitoneal infectious complications varies significantly in different medical centers in China. Due to the lack of national data, it is not possible to assess and develop appropriate diagnosis and treatment strategies properly. To provide a high-quality data platform for complication registration and clinical research, a multicenter prospective database for the Prevalence of Abdominal Complications After GastroEnterological surgery was established. Based on the Hospital Information System (HIS)of 20 medical centers in China, the electronic case reporting form (e-CRF) listed on the website was used to collect medical information of patients undergoing gastric or colorectal cancer surgery. The data were verified by on-site auditing, and data cleaning was performed by R software. After the data cleaning, the data in the database was checked and evaluated by the principle investigators and data administrators. When all data queries and questions were corrected and answered, the database was locked to establish a multicenter prospective database for postoperative abdominal infectious complications (the PACAGE database). The PACAGE database has rich information resources and high data quality and is a good data platform for complication registration and clinical research.
Humans
;
Prevalence
;
Data Accuracy
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Abdomen/surgery*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
3.Predictive models and prophylactic strategies for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(11):987-991
Anastomotic leakage (AL) has always been a persistent issue for colorectal surgeons. It is still difficult to reduce the incidence of AL despite the advances in technology and equipment. With the development of evidence-based medicine, increasing high-risk factors for AL have been identified. How to efficiently and systematically combine and quantify these isolated risk factors to provide a scientific early warning of AL in clinical practices and help surgeons in choosing the optimal prophylactic strategies, is of great significance for reducing the incidence of AL. There are generally two types of AL prediction models in colorectal surgery, including prognostic models (for preoperative and intraoperative AL prediction) and diagnostic models (for early warning and improving the early diagnosis rate of AL). Prophylactic strategies for AL include stabilizing the underlying diseases, improving anemia and hypoalbuminemia, choosing an appropriate operative time window, and emphasizing and improving anastomotic techniques (including choosing an appropriate size of stapler). However, a prophylactic ostomy is still the most common method for surgeons. However, how to reduce the morbidity of complications following prophylactic ostomy and how to avoid the conversion of the prophylactic stoma to permanent stoma need further study.
Humans
;
Anastomotic Leak/etiology*
;
Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
;
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods*
;
Risk Factors
4.Chinese expert consensus on transanal drug administration for constipation (2022 edition ).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(12):1058-1064
Constipation is a clinical symptom. It can be caused by environment, habit, disease and drugs. Chronic constipation is a disease that can occur at any age and its prevalence increases with age. Transanal administration is a common method to treat all kinds of constipation, especially to relieve stool blockage. However, the method and dose of transanal administration vary by age, drug and preparation types of drugs, and the effect of defecation is also quite different. At present, there is no expert consensus to follow in China or abroad. This consensus was convened by Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Colorectal Surgery Group of Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association and Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, to incorporate the latest evidence in China and abroad. This consensus addressed common transanal preparations, principles of administration, and efficacy for constipation. The evidence quality was assessed and the recommendation intensity was graded according to the GRADE system. The consensus aims to help standardize drug selection in practice and guide clinical application.
Humans
;
Consensus
;
East Asian People
;
Constipation/etiology*
;
Feces
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
5.Progress in diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis after colon cancer surgery.
Zhi Zhong PAN ; Long YU ; Jian Hong PENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(6):558-562
At present, comprehensive treatment dominated by surgical procedures is an important measure for colon cancer to obtain the chance of cure. Surgical intervention, while removing the tumor, carries the risk of postoperative gastroparesis (PG) . Because of the low incidence rate and insignificant early clinical symptoms, early stage PG is often overlooked clinically. However, PG can increase the risk of malnutrition, delay postoperative antitumor treatment, and increase the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis. This review focuses on the mechanisms, clinical risk factors, preventive measures, and advances in treatment of PG due to colon cancer. Aim to increase the clinician's adequate attention to PG in colon cancer and from a surgical point to reduce the risk of gastroparesis in colon cancer by optimizing the surgical strategy.
Colonic Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
;
Gastroparesis/therapy*
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
6.Prehabilitation for gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2021;24(2):122-127
Gastrointestinal cancer and related treatments (surgery and chemoradiotherapy) are associated with declined functional status (FS) that has impact on quality of life, clinical outcome and continuum of care. Psychological distress drives an impressive burden of physiological and psychiatric conditions in oncologic care. Cancer patients often experience anxiety, depression, low self-esteem and fears of recurrence and death. Cancer prehabilitation is a process from cancer diagnosis to the beginning of treatment, which includes psychological, physical and nutritional assessments for a baseline functional level, identification of comorbidity, and targeted interventions that improve patient's health and functional capacity to reduce the incidence and the severity of current and future impairments with cancer, chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation program encompasses a series of planned, structured, repeatable and purposive interventions including comprehensive physical exercise, nutritional therapy, and relieving anxiety and depression, which integrates into best perioperative management ERAS pathway and aims at using the preoperative period to prevent or attenuate the surgery-related functional decline, to cope with surgical stress and to improve the consequences. However, a number of questions remain in regards to prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer surgery, which consists of the optimal makeup of training programs, the timing and approach of the intervention, how to improve compliance, how to measure functional capacity, and how to make cost-effective analysis. Therefore, more high-level evidence-based studies are expected to evaluate the value of implementation of prehabilitation into standard practice.
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/psychology*
;
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Humans
;
Preoperative Care
;
Preoperative Exercise
;
Quality of Life
;
Recovery of Function
7.Readmission to surgical intensive care unit after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: risk factors and prediction.
Fangfang HAO ; Wenjuan LIU ; Hui LIN ; Xinting PAN ; Yunbo SUN
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2019;31(3):350-354
OBJECTIVE:
To find the pathogenies and risk factors related to surgical intensive care unit (SICU) readmission for patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery, and to develop a predictive model for determining patients who are likely to be readmitted to SICU.
METHODS:
The patients who admitted to SICU of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2013 to August 2018; who first stayed in SICU after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery; who were assessed and discharged from SICU by surgeons and SICU physicians after treatment, and then transferred to SICU again because of the change of their condition were enrolled. The unintended return to SICU within 3 days and 7 days were recorded. Patients who returned to SICU within 7 days were studied for the pathogenies, risk factors and predictive model of returning to SICU, and non-returning patients were enrolled according to 1:1 as the controls. A total of 43 indicators were divided into five categories, including general clinical data, medical history, surgical indicators before first admission of SICU, length of first SICU stay, and other indicators on the day of first discharge from the SICU. Logistic regression was used to screen the risk factors associated with SICU readmission, then the Nomogram diagram was drawn by using the R 3.4.1 software for predicting SICU readmission, and the classification performance of Nomogram was evaluated by self-help sampling test.
RESULTS:
Of the 763 patients discharged from the SICU, 2.10% (16/763) of them were readmitted within 3 days and 3.28% (25/763) were readmitted within 7 days to the SICU unexpectedly. The pathogenies of SICU readmission within 7 days included infection [56.00% (14/25)], heart failure [16.00% (4/25)], infarction [12.00% (3/25)], bleeding [12.00% (3/25)], and sutures splitting [4.00% (1/25)]. The pathogenies of SICU readmission within 3 days included infection [56.25% (9/16)], heart failure [18.75% (3/16)], infarction [12.50% (2/16)], and bleeding [12.50% (2/16)]. Nomogram analysis showed that the risk factors associated with unplanned SICU readmission were length of first SICU stay, history of hypertension, and activity of daily living (ADL) score, white blood cell count (WBC), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen (FIB) on the day of first SICU discharge. Self-help sampling test was carried out on the Nomogram map, and the results showed that the coherence index (C-index) was 0.962 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.869-1.057]. The classification performance of the model was good.
CONCLUSIONS
The common pathogenies of SICU readmission for patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery were infection, heart failure, infarction and bleeding. Risk factors of readmission after SICU discharge included the length of first SICU stay, history of hypertension, and ADL score, WBC, PaO2, PT, FIB on the day of first SICU discharge. The model consisted of above risk factors showed a good performance in predicting the probability of readmission after SICU discharge for patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery.
Biliary Tract Diseases/surgery*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Liver Diseases/surgery*
;
Models, Statistical
;
Pancreatic Diseases/surgery*
;
Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data*
;
Postoperative Complications/therapy*
;
Risk Factors
8.Analysis on risk factors of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus enterocolitis after gastrointestinal surgery.
Meng WANG ; Yang LI ; Liming ZHENG ; Wenxian GUAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2018;21(12):1387-1390
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) enterocolitis after gastrointestinal surgery.
METHODS:
Clinical and pathological data of 17 cases with MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery from March 2015 to March 2017 at Department of General Surgery of Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
(1) age of 18 to 80 years;(2) with history of gastrointestinal surgery; (3) diarrhea symptoms within 7 days after gastrointestinal surgery; (4) use of antibiotics before diarrhea; (5) fecal smear showing a large number of gram positive cocci; (6) fecal culture suggested the presence of MRSA; (7) application of antibiotic therapy against MRSA was effective.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
(1)clostridium difficile toxin positive; (2) toxic shock syndrome caused by food poisoning. According to gender, age, and inpatient ward, 1:2 pairing was performed, and 34 patients with non-MRSA enteritis from the hospitalized cases in the same ward were selected as the control group for retrospective case-control study. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, and constitution index between two groups (all P>0.05), indicating that the two groups were comparable. The χ² test was used to perform univariate analysis on 11 factors, including the nature of the primary disease, colorectal surgery, emergency surgery, use of multiple antibiotics, preoperative bowel preparation, perioperative hormone, intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, perioperative nasogastric tube, diabetes history, intensive care unit stay, and previous infectious disease hospitalization, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS:
MRSA enteritis occurred 3 to 5 days after surgery in all the 17 cases, and 4 cases developed septic shock rapidly. Univariate analysis showed that the operation site (colorectal surgery) (χ²=4.747, P=0.029) and use of two antibiotics before MRSA enteritis (χ²=3.959, P=0.047) were associated with MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that colorectal surgery was the only independent risk factor for MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery(OR=5.526, 95%CI: 1.350-22.602,P=0.017), while the use of two antibiotics was not (OR=0.204, 95%CI:0.051-0.819, P=0.025).
CONCLUSIONS
MRSA enteritis has a rapid onset, and a high incidence of septic shock, which requires immediate attention. Colorectal surgery is an independent risk factor for MRSA enteritis.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Colorectal Surgery
;
adverse effects
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
;
adverse effects
;
Enterocolitis
;
etiology
;
microbiology
;
Humans
;
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Staphylococcal Infections
;
etiology
9.Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer.
Hairong ZHANG ; Weitang YUAN ; Quanbo ZHOU ; Xiaoming GU ; Fuqi WANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(5):540-544
OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancers.
METHODSFrom January 2015 to March 2016, intra-operative and postoperative follow-up data of 30 patients with middle-low rectal cancers who underwent robotic radical resection(robot group) and 32 patients with middle-low rectal cancers who underwent laparoscopic radical resection (laparoscopy group)n in our department were retrospectively collected. The distance from cancer to anal margin was less than 10 cm in both two groups and advanced rectal cancers were confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy biopsy. Associated data were compared between two groups.
RESULTSThere were 13 males and 17 females in robot group with age of 27 to 85 (mean 59.7) years, disease course of 3 to 12 (mean 6.2) months and clinical stage T2-3N0-1. There were 16 males and 16 females in laparoscopic group with age of 32 to 79 (mean 60.3) years, disease course of 2 to 10(mean 5.9) months and clinical stage T2-3N0-1. The baseline data of two groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05). All the patients in two groups completed operations successfully without conversion to open operation. Compared with laparoscopic group, the blood loss was less [(100.3±43.7) ml vs. (150.3±68.2) ml, t=3.413, P=0.001], the first flatus time [(49.3±12.4) h vs. (58.6±12.5) h, t=2.838, P=0.006] and urinary catheter removal time [(3.0±0.7) d vs. (4.8±0.9) d, t=5.491, P=0.000] were shorter, while the operation time [(217.3±57.8) min vs. (187.9±23.1) min, t=2.772, P=0.009] was longer in robot group. No cancer tissue was observed in resection margin of two groups. Number of harvested lymph node per case (15.2±7.4 vs. 13.9±4.9, t=-0.764, P=0.448), distance from anal margin to tumor distal edge [(7±3) cm vs. (6.5±3) cm, t=-1.952, P=0.056] and postoperative hospital stay [(13.6±1.3) d vs. (13.8±1.8) d, t=0.925, P=0.359] were not significantly different between two groups. No serious complications occurred in two groups during intra-operative and postoperative period. During following up of 3 to 12 (average 8.7) months, 1 case of anastomotic fistula occurred in each group and was cured by conservative treatment without significant difference [3.3%(1/30) vs. 3.1%(1/32), P=1.000]. No sexual dysfunction was found in either groups. Two cases in laparoscopic group presented relapse and metastasis, but no recurrence and metastasis was observed in robot group. There was no death in two groups.
CONCLUSIONRobotic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancers is safe and effective with the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, rapid recovery of intestinal function and urinary function.
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Defecation ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Female ; Fistula ; etiology ; surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Period ; Recovery of Function ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Urination
10.Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Bin ZHANG ; Ke ZHAO ; Quanlong LIU ; Shuhui YIN ; Yujuan ZHAO ; Guangzuan ZHUO ; Yingying FENG ; Jun ZHU ; Jianhua DING
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(4):432-438
OBJECTIVETo summarize the perioperative and postoperative complications follow laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LapISR) in the treatment of low rectal cancer and their management.
METHODSAn observational study was conducted in 73 consecutive patients who underwent LapISR for low rectal cancer between June 2011 and February 2016 in our hospital. The clinicopathological parameters, perioperative and postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and postoperative complications were defined as any complication occurring within or more than 3 months after the primary operation, respectively.
RESULTSForty-nine(67.1%) cases were male and 24(32.9%) were female with a median age of 61(25 to 79) years. The median distance from distal tumor margin to anal verge was 4.0(1.0 to 5.5) cm. The median operative time was 195 (120 to 360) min, median intra operative blood loss was 100 (20 to 300) ml, median number of harvested lymph nodes was 14(3 to 31) per case. All the patients underwent preventive terminal ileum loop stoma. No conversion or hospital mortality was presented. The R0 resection rate was 98.6% with totally negative distal resection margin. A total of 34 complication episodes were recorded in 21(28.8%) patients during perioperative period, and among which 20.6%(7/34) was grade III(-IIII( according to Dindo system. Anastomosis-associated morbidity (16.4%,12/73) was the most common after LapISR, including mucosa ischemia in 9 cases(12.3%), stricture in 7 cases (9.6%, 4 cases secondary to mucosa necrosis receiving anal dilation), grade A fistula in 3 cases (4.1%) receiving conservative treatment and necrosis in 1 case (1.4%) receiving permanent stoma. After a median follow up of 21(3 to 60) months, postoperative complications were recorded in 12 patients (16.4%) with 16 episodes, including anastomotic stenosis (8.2%), rectum segmental stricture (5.5%), ileus (2.7%), partial anastomotic dehiscence (1.4%), anastomotic fistula (1.4%), rectovaginal fistula (1.4%) and mucosal prolapse (1.4%). These patients received corresponding treatments, such as endoscopic transanal resection, anal dilation, enema, purgative, permanent stoma, etc. according to the lesions. Six patients (8.2%) required re-operation intervention due to postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONAnastomosis-associated morbidity is the most common after LapISR in the treatment of low rectal cancer in perioperative and postoperative periods, which must be strictly managed with suitable methods.
Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Colectomy ; adverse effects ; Constriction, Pathologic ; etiology ; therapy ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; adverse effects ; Intestinal Mucosa ; pathology ; Ischemia ; etiology ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Lymph Node Excision ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Necrosis ; etiology ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Rectovaginal Fistula ; etiology ; therapy ; Surgical Stomas ; Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail