As the main cause of secondary operation and postoperative death, the incidence of intraperitoneal infectious complications varies significantly in different medical centers in China. Due to the lack of national data, it is not possible to assess and develop appropriate diagnosis and treatment strategies properly. To provide a high-quality data platform for complication registration and clinical research, a multicenter prospective database for the Prevalence of Abdominal Complications After GastroEnterological surgery was established. Based on the Hospital Information System (HIS)of 20 medical centers in China, the electronic case reporting form (e-CRF) listed on the website was used to collect medical information of patients undergoing gastric or colorectal cancer surgery. The data were verified by on-site auditing, and data cleaning was performed by R software. After the data cleaning, the data in the database was checked and evaluated by the principle investigators and data administrators. When all data queries and questions were corrected and answered, the database was locked to establish a multicenter prospective database for postoperative abdominal infectious complications (the PACAGE database). The PACAGE database has rich information resources and high data quality and is a good data platform for complication registration and clinical research.
Humans ; Prevalence ; Data Accuracy ; Postoperative Complications/etiology* ; Abdomen/surgery* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*

Anastomotic leakage (AL) has always been a persistent issue for colorectal surgeons. It is still difficult to reduce the incidence of AL despite the advances in technology and equipment. With the development of evidence-based medicine, increasing high-risk factors for AL have been identified. How to efficiently and systematically combine and quantify these isolated risk factors to provide a scientific early warning of AL in clinical practices and help surgeons in choosing the optimal prophylactic strategies, is of great significance for reducing the incidence of AL. There are generally two types of AL prediction models in colorectal surgery, including prognostic models (for preoperative and intraoperative AL prediction) and diagnostic models (for early warning and improving the early diagnosis rate of AL). Prophylactic strategies for AL include stabilizing the underlying diseases, improving anemia and hypoalbuminemia, choosing an appropriate operative time window, and emphasizing and improving anastomotic techniques (including choosing an appropriate size of stapler). However, a prophylactic ostomy is still the most common method for surgeons. However, how to reduce the morbidity of complications following prophylactic ostomy and how to avoid the conversion of the prophylactic stoma to permanent stoma need further study.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods* ; Risk Factors

At present, comprehensive treatment dominated by surgical procedures is an important measure for colon cancer to obtain the chance of cure. Surgical intervention, while removing the tumor, carries the risk of postoperative gastroparesis (PG) . Because of the low incidence rate and insignificant early clinical symptoms, early stage PG is often overlooked clinically. However, PG can increase the risk of malnutrition, delay postoperative antitumor treatment, and increase the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis. This review focuses on the mechanisms, clinical risk factors, preventive measures, and advances in treatment of PG due to colon cancer. Aim to increase the clinician's adequate attention to PG in colon cancer and from a surgical point to reduce the risk of gastroparesis in colon cancer by optimizing the surgical strategy.
Colonic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Gastroparesis/therapy* ; Humans ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

Constipation is a clinical symptom. It can be caused by environment, habit, disease and drugs. Chronic constipation is a disease that can occur at any age and its prevalence increases with age. Transanal administration is a common method to treat all kinds of constipation, especially to relieve stool blockage. However, the method and dose of transanal administration vary by age, drug and preparation types of drugs, and the effect of defecation is also quite different. At present, there is no expert consensus to follow in China or abroad. This consensus was convened by Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Colorectal Surgery Group of Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association and Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, to incorporate the latest evidence in China and abroad. This consensus addressed common transanal preparations, principles of administration, and efficacy for constipation. The evidence quality was assessed and the recommendation intensity was graded according to the GRADE system. The consensus aims to help standardize drug selection in practice and guide clinical application.
Humans ; Consensus ; East Asian People ; Constipation/etiology* ; Feces ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*

Gastrointestinal cancer and related treatments (surgery and chemoradiotherapy) are associated with declined functional status (FS) that has impact on quality of life, clinical outcome and continuum of care. Psychological distress drives an impressive burden of physiological and psychiatric conditions in oncologic care. Cancer patients often experience anxiety, depression, low self-esteem and fears of recurrence and death. Cancer prehabilitation is a process from cancer diagnosis to the beginning of treatment, which includes psychological, physical and nutritional assessments for a baseline functional level, identification of comorbidity, and targeted interventions that improve patient's health and functional capacity to reduce the incidence and the severity of current and future impairments with cancer, chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation program encompasses a series of planned, structured, repeatable and purposive interventions including comprehensive physical exercise, nutritional therapy, and relieving anxiety and depression, which integrates into best perioperative management ERAS pathway and aims at using the preoperative period to prevent or attenuate the surgery-related functional decline, to cope with surgical stress and to improve the consequences. However, a number of questions remain in regards to prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer surgery, which consists of the optimal makeup of training programs, the timing and approach of the intervention, how to improve compliance, how to measure functional capacity, and how to make cost-effective analysis. Therefore, more high-level evidence-based studies are expected to evaluate the value of implementation of prehabilitation into standard practice.
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/psychology* ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy* ; Humans ; Preoperative Care ; Preoperative Exercise ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function

OBJECTIVE: To find the pathogenies and risk factors related to surgical intensive care unit (SICU) readmission for patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery, and to develop a predictive model for determining patients who are likely to be readmitted to SICU. METHODS: The patients who admitted to SICU of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2013 to August 2018; who first stayed in SICU after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery; who were assessed and discharged from SICU by surgeons and SICU physicians after treatment, and then transferred to SICU again because of the change of their condition were enrolled. The unintended return to SICU within 3 days and 7 days were recorded. Patients who returned to SICU within 7 days were studied for the pathogenies, risk factors and predictive model of returning to SICU, and non-returning patients were enrolled according to 1:1 as the controls. A total of 43 indicators were divided into five categories, including general clinical data, medical history, surgical indicators before first admission of SICU, length of first SICU stay, and other indicators on the day of first discharge from the SICU. Logistic regression was used to screen the risk factors associated with SICU readmission, then the Nomogram diagram was drawn by using the R 3.4.1 software for predicting SICU readmission, and the classification performance of Nomogram was evaluated by self-help sampling test. RESULTS: Of the 763 patients discharged from the SICU, 2.10% (16/763) of them were readmitted within 3 days and 3.28% (25/763) were readmitted within 7 days to the SICU unexpectedly. The pathogenies of SICU readmission within 7 days included infection [56.00% (14/25)], heart failure [16.00% (4/25)], infarction [12.00% (3/25)], bleeding [12.00% (3/25)], and sutures splitting [4.00% (1/25)]. The pathogenies of SICU readmission within 3 days included infection [56.25% (9/16)], heart failure [18.75% (3/16)], infarction [12.50% (2/16)], and bleeding [12.50% (2/16)]. Nomogram analysis showed that the risk factors associated with unplanned SICU readmission were length of first SICU stay, history of hypertension, and activity of daily living (ADL) score, white blood cell count (WBC), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen (FIB) on the day of first SICU discharge. Self-help sampling test was carried out on the Nomogram map, and the results showed that the coherence index (C-index) was 0.962 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.869-1.057]. The classification performance of the model was good. CONCLUSIONS The common pathogenies of SICU readmission for patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery were infection, heart failure, infarction and bleeding. Risk factors of readmission after SICU discharge included the length of first SICU stay, history of hypertension, and ADL score, WBC, PaO₂, PT, FIB on the day of first SICU discharge. The model consisted of above risk factors showed a good performance in predicting the probability of readmission after SICU discharge for patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery.
Biliary Tract Diseases/surgery* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Liver Diseases/surgery* ; Models, Statistical ; Pancreatic Diseases/surgery* ; Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data* ; Postoperative Complications/therapy* ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) enterocolitis after gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: Clinical and pathological data of 17 cases with MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery from March 2015 to March 2017 at Department of General Surgery of Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) age of 18 to 80 years;(2) with history of gastrointestinal surgery; (3) diarrhea symptoms within 7 days after gastrointestinal surgery; (4) use of antibiotics before diarrhea; (5) fecal smear showing a large number of gram positive cocci; (6) fecal culture suggested the presence of MRSA; (7) application of antibiotic therapy against MRSA was effective. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1)clostridium difficile toxin positive; (2) toxic shock syndrome caused by food poisoning. According to gender, age, and inpatient ward, 1:2 pairing was performed, and 34 patients with non-MRSA enteritis from the hospitalized cases in the same ward were selected as the control group for retrospective case-control study. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, and constitution index between two groups (all P>0.05), indicating that the two groups were comparable. The χ² test was used to perform univariate analysis on 11 factors, including the nature of the primary disease, colorectal surgery, emergency surgery, use of multiple antibiotics, preoperative bowel preparation, perioperative hormone, intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, perioperative nasogastric tube, diabetes history, intensive care unit stay, and previous infectious disease hospitalization, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: MRSA enteritis occurred 3 to 5 days after surgery in all the 17 cases, and 4 cases developed septic shock rapidly. Univariate analysis showed that the operation site (colorectal surgery) (χ²=4.747, P=0.029) and use of two antibiotics before MRSA enteritis (χ²=3.959, P=0.047) were associated with MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that colorectal surgery was the only independent risk factor for MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery(OR=5.526, 95%CI: 1.350-22.602,P=0.017), while the use of two antibiotics was not (OR=0.204, 95%CI:0.051-0.819, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS MRSA enteritis has a rapid onset, and a high incidence of septic shock, which requires immediate attention. Colorectal surgery is an independent risk factor for MRSA enteritis.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Case-Control Studies ; Colorectal Surgery ; adverse effects ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Enterocolitis ; etiology ; microbiology ; Humans ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Staphylococcal Infections ; etiology

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of rectal cancer.

METHODSPubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase database were searched for clinical studies comparing the ELAPE and abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2016. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and extracted the data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the observational studies and the score more than 5 points was the inclusion criteria. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions v5.1.0 was used to evaluate the quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCT). Intra-operative perforation rate, circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement, local recurrence rate, perineal wound complications were brought into meta-analysis by Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTSA total of 556 articles were retrieved and 12 articles were enrolled finally, including 11 observational studies and 1 RCT study. All the 12 articles were high quality (scores of all observational studies were more than 11 points, RCT study accorded with 6 criteria of the quality evaluation). A total of 3 788 patients were enrolled, including 2 141 cases of ELAPE and 1 647 cases of APE. Meta-analysis revealed that intra-operative perforation rate of ELAPE was lower than APE (RR=0.52, 95%CI:0.34-0.79, P=0.002). There were no significant differences between two groups in CRM involvement (RR=0.72, 95%CI:0.49-1.07, P=0.10), local recurrence rate (OR=0.55, 95%CI:0.24-1.29, P=0.17) and perineal wound complications (RR=0.94, 95%CI:0.58-1.53, P=0.800).

CONCLUSIONSCompared with APE, ELAPE reduces the intra-operative perforation rate, and does not increase the perineal wound complications, but it has no advantages in decreasing the CRM involvement and local recurrence rate.

Abdomen ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Margins of Excision ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; epidemiology ; Perineum ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) versus open repair (OR) for perforated peptic ulcers.

METHODSFrom January 2010 to June 2014, in Shanghai Tongji Hospital, 119 patients who were diagnosed as perforated peptic ulcers and planned to receive operation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into LR (58 patients) and OR(61 patients) group by computer. Intra-operative and postoperative parameters were compared between two groups. This study was registered as a randomized controlled trial by the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ChiCTR-TRC-11001607).

RESULTSThere was no significant difference in baseline data between two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences of operation time, morbidity of postoperative complication, mortality, reoperation probability, decompression time, fluid diet recovery time and hospitalization cost were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to OR group, LR group required less postoperative fentanyl [(0.74±0.33) mg vs. (1.04±0.39) mg, t=-4.519, P=0.000] and had shorter hospital stay [median 7(5 to 9) days vs. 8(7 to 10) days, U=-2.090, P=0.001]. In LR group, 3 patients(5.2%) had leakage in perforation site after surgery. One case received laparotomy on the second day after surgery for diffuse peritonitis. The other two received conservative treatment (total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition). There was no recurrence of perforation in OR group. One patient of each group died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) 22 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONLR may be preferable for treating perforated peptic ulcers than OR, however preventive measures during LR should be taken to avoid postopertive leak in perforation site.

China ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; rehabilitation ; Laparotomy ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Multiple Organ Failure ; epidemiology ; Operative Time ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; Parenteral Nutrition, Total ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; rehabilitation ; surgery ; Peritonitis ; therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.

METHODSClinical data of 133 patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014 in the General Hospital of the PLA Rocket Force were retrospectively analyzed. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter, incidence of postoperative urinary retention, and time to re-insert indwelling catheter were recorded. Risk factors of urinary retention were analyzed.

RESULTSOf 133 patients, 70 were males and 63 were females, with a median age of 62 (20-79) years old. Distance from tumor lower margin to anal verge were ≤5 cm in 58 patients, >5 cm to 10 cm in 41 patients, and >10 cm to 15 cm in 34 patients. The postoperative TNM stage was recorded in 35 patients with stage I(, 34 with stage II(, 59 with stage III( and 5 with stage IIII(. Surgical procedures included anterior resection (AR) for 92 patients, abdominoperineal resection (APR) for 25 patients and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for 16 patients. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 89 patients compared with open operation in 44 patients. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter was 2-7 days after operation (median, 5 days) and 36 (27.1%) patients developed urinary retention. All the 36 patients achieved spontaneous voiding by re-inserting urinary catheter for 2-28 days (median, 6 days). Univariate analysis showed that elderly (>65 years) and laparoscopic approach had significantly higher incidence of urinary retention [37.5%(21/56) vs. 19.5%(15/77), χ=5.333, P=0.021; 34.8%(31/89) vs. 11.4%(5/44), χ=8.214, P=0.004; respectively]. Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that old age(OR=3.949, 95%CI:1.622 to 9.612, P=0.002), laparoscopic approach (OR=5.665, 95%CI:1.908 to 16.822, P=0.002), and abdominoperineal resection (OR=3.443, 95%CI:1.199 to 9.887, P=0.022) were independent risk factors of urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.

CONCLUSIONSPatients undergoing rectal cancer surgery have a high risk of postoperative urinary retention. More attention should be paid to the old patients, especially those undergoing laparoscopic procedure or abdominoperineal resection, to prevent postoperative urinary retention and urinary dysfunction.

Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms ; classification ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Catheterization ; statistics & numerical data ; Urinary Retention ; epidemiology ; Urination ; physiology