Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic purse- string suture clamps combined with multi-functional seal caps for esophagojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis during total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TLTG).Methods:This was a retrospective descriptive study of 42 patients with primary gastric malignancies who underwent TLTG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University that utilized laparoscopic purse-string suture clamps and multi-functional seal caps for esophagojejunal anastomosis between May, 2024 and January, 2025. The cohort included 33 males and 9 females, with a mean age of (67.7 ±9.5) years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of (23.9±2.9) kg/m 2. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classifications were I - II in 40 patients and III in 2 patients, and all patients were definitively diagnosed preoperatively via gastroscopy, dual-energy CT, and/or MRI. Tumor locations included the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) in 28 cases (Siewert type II - III), the upper third of the stomach in 12 cases, and the middle third in 2 cases. The median distance of esophageal invasion was 1.3 cm, though in 10 cases this was ≥2 cm. Preoperative TNM staging was I-II in 17 patients and III in 25 patients. Surgical outcomes including operative time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, pathological results, and postoperative recovery were retrospectively analyzed. Results:All 42 operations were successful. The mean operative time was(212.5±26.4) minutes, and the average time from multi-functional seal cap placement to completion of the esophagojejunal anastomosis was (54.2±7.5) minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was (79.9±21.3) ml. Postoperative pathology confirmed R0 resection in all specimens, with a mean proximal esophageal margin distance of (2.1±1.6) cm. Furthermore, (51.9±15.1) lymph nodes on average were harvested from each patient; the mean time to oral intake was (149.5±41.4) hours; and the mean hospital stay was (11.3±5.4) days. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients: anastomotic leakage ( n=2), residual intra-abdominal infection ( n=1), pulmonary infection ( n=3), and Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications occurred in 2 patients. No recurrence, mortality, or anastomosis-related complications were observed within a median follow-up of 5.8 months (range 3.5-11.2). Conclusion:We find the application of the laparoscopic purse-string suture clamps and multi-functional seal caps for esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG to be safe and feasible, with satisfactory short-term outcomes.

Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic purse- string suture clamps combined with multi-functional seal caps for esophagojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis during total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TLTG).Methods:This was a retrospective descriptive study of 42 patients with primary gastric malignancies who underwent TLTG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University that utilized laparoscopic purse-string suture clamps and multi-functional seal caps for esophagojejunal anastomosis between May, 2024 and January, 2025. The cohort included 33 males and 9 females, with a mean age of (67.7 ±9.5) years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of (23.9±2.9) kg/m 2. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classifications were I - II in 40 patients and III in 2 patients, and all patients were definitively diagnosed preoperatively via gastroscopy, dual-energy CT, and/or MRI. Tumor locations included the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) in 28 cases (Siewert type II - III), the upper third of the stomach in 12 cases, and the middle third in 2 cases. The median distance of esophageal invasion was 1.3 cm, though in 10 cases this was ≥2 cm. Preoperative TNM staging was I-II in 17 patients and III in 25 patients. Surgical outcomes including operative time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, pathological results, and postoperative recovery were retrospectively analyzed. Results:All 42 operations were successful. The mean operative time was(212.5±26.4) minutes, and the average time from multi-functional seal cap placement to completion of the esophagojejunal anastomosis was (54.2±7.5) minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was (79.9±21.3) ml. Postoperative pathology confirmed R0 resection in all specimens, with a mean proximal esophageal margin distance of (2.1±1.6) cm. Furthermore, (51.9±15.1) lymph nodes on average were harvested from each patient; the mean time to oral intake was (149.5±41.4) hours; and the mean hospital stay was (11.3±5.4) days. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients: anastomotic leakage ( n=2), residual intra-abdominal infection ( n=1), pulmonary infection ( n=3), and Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications occurred in 2 patients. No recurrence, mortality, or anastomosis-related complications were observed within a median follow-up of 5.8 months (range 3.5-11.2). Conclusion:We find the application of the laparoscopic purse-string suture clamps and multi-functional seal caps for esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG to be safe and feasible, with satisfactory short-term outcomes.

Objective:To collect and analyze the quality control data of gastric cancer surgery in Jiangsu Province from 2020 to 2022,and study the role of publishing surgical quality control data in promoting the improvement of gastric cancer surgery of China. Methods:An online questionnaire was created and distributed to the members of Jiangsu Gastric Cancer Union(JSGCU).The questionnaire collected information including the basic situation of hospital,the diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer,advanced gastric cancer and metastatic gastric cancer,the digestive tract reconstruction,the surgical safety,the economic indicators,and so on. Results:The quality control data of gastric cancer surgery in Jiangsu Province from 2020 to 2022 were consistently collected and published.The data analysis results show that there was a gradual increase in the percent of patients with stage Ⅰ gastric cancer,reflecting the success efforts of early screening and diagnosis.Laparoscopic surgery showed a steady increase and became the mainstream approach for curative surgery of gastric cancer in Jiangsu Province.The percent of hospital with lymph node dissection≥30 was also increased.Different locations of gastric cancer exhibited specific patterns in the choice of anastomosis methods after curative surgery.The rate of grade 3 or higher complications in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery was slightly lower than that in open surgery.For patients experiencing complications,their postoperative hospitalization duration and expenditure were significantly higher.Finally,there was a gradual increase in the proportion of hospital choosing to close the mesentery during gastric cancer surgery. Conclusion:The publication of the quality control data of gastric cancer surgery in Jiangsu Province has driven the improvement of gastric cancer surgery standards of China.

Objective:To share the results of laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy λ- shaped modified double tract reconstruction.Method:This study retrospectively included 3 patients during January 2024 from the Department of Gastric Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University using the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The procedure of the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is as follows. After completing proximal gastrectomy, the jejunum is transected 15 cm from the Treitz ligament. A suture is made 18-20 cm from the distal jejunum to mark the esophagojejunal anastomosis site. A circular stapler anvil is inserted through the distal jejunum, and the remaining end of the jejunum is turned to the right. The circular stapler is pierced through the marked site for an esophagojejunal end-to-end anastomosis, which is reinforced with a barbed suture continuously. A 60mm linear stapler is used to close the remaining end of the jejunum. We then mark the gastric side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with suture in the middle of the anterior wall of the residual stomach, and mark the jejunal side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis at a distance of about 2 cm and 8 cm from the residual end of the distal jejunum. We make an opening of about 0.5 cm and use a 60 mm linear stapler to perform anastomosis on the jejunal side of the anterior wall of the residual stomach according to the markings, so that the distance between the esophagojejunal anastomosis and the gastrojejunal anastomosis is 10-12 cm. The common opening is closed with barbed wire. About 50 cm below the esophagojejunal anastomosis, the small intestine opening is anastomosed side to side using a circular stapler and the common opening is closed. Return the jejunum into the abdominal cavity to complete the reconstruction of the λ-shaped double tract reconstruction. We analyzed the surgery and postoperative conditions, including surgery time, anastomosis time, intraoperative bleeding, tumor size and pathology, postoperative mobilization, passage of gas and water intake time, discharge time, postoperative complications, and postoperative gastrointestinal imaging to observe the passage of food through the gastric and intestinal loops.Results:Three patients successfully received laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The surgical time was 155 minutes, 240 minutes, and 160 minutes, respectively; The postoperative time for first ambulation was 20 hours, 18 hours, and 26 hours, respectively. The time for passage of gas was 59 hours, 83 hours, and 75 hours, respectively. The drinking time was 66 hours, 87 hours, and 90 hours, respectively. The postoperative discharge days were all 7 days. No surgical related complications occurred. On the 6th day and 3 months after surgery, gastrointestinal angiography was performed. The contrast agent passed smoothly through the jejunal loop and residual stomach jejunal loop, and both sides were unobstructed. No contrast agent was found to retrograde to the esophagojejunal anastomosis.Conclusion:Laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is safe and feasible, as it improves the diversion of food through the residual stomach while ensuring anti-reflux effects.

Objective:To share the results of laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy λ- shaped modified double tract reconstruction.Method:This study retrospectively included 3 patients during January 2024 from the Department of Gastric Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University using the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The procedure of the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is as follows. After completing proximal gastrectomy, the jejunum is transected 15 cm from the Treitz ligament. A suture is made 18-20 cm from the distal jejunum to mark the esophagojejunal anastomosis site. A circular stapler anvil is inserted through the distal jejunum, and the remaining end of the jejunum is turned to the right. The circular stapler is pierced through the marked site for an esophagojejunal end-to-end anastomosis, which is reinforced with a barbed suture continuously. A 60mm linear stapler is used to close the remaining end of the jejunum. We then mark the gastric side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with suture in the middle of the anterior wall of the residual stomach, and mark the jejunal side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis at a distance of about 2 cm and 8 cm from the residual end of the distal jejunum. We make an opening of about 0.5 cm and use a 60 mm linear stapler to perform anastomosis on the jejunal side of the anterior wall of the residual stomach according to the markings, so that the distance between the esophagojejunal anastomosis and the gastrojejunal anastomosis is 10-12 cm. The common opening is closed with barbed wire. About 50 cm below the esophagojejunal anastomosis, the small intestine opening is anastomosed side to side using a circular stapler and the common opening is closed. Return the jejunum into the abdominal cavity to complete the reconstruction of the λ-shaped double tract reconstruction. We analyzed the surgery and postoperative conditions, including surgery time, anastomosis time, intraoperative bleeding, tumor size and pathology, postoperative mobilization, passage of gas and water intake time, discharge time, postoperative complications, and postoperative gastrointestinal imaging to observe the passage of food through the gastric and intestinal loops.Results:Three patients successfully received laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The surgical time was 155 minutes, 240 minutes, and 160 minutes, respectively; The postoperative time for first ambulation was 20 hours, 18 hours, and 26 hours, respectively. The time for passage of gas was 59 hours, 83 hours, and 75 hours, respectively. The drinking time was 66 hours, 87 hours, and 90 hours, respectively. The postoperative discharge days were all 7 days. No surgical related complications occurred. On the 6th day and 3 months after surgery, gastrointestinal angiography was performed. The contrast agent passed smoothly through the jejunal loop and residual stomach jejunal loop, and both sides were unobstructed. No contrast agent was found to retrograde to the esophagojejunal anastomosis.Conclusion:Laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is safe and feasible, as it improves the diversion of food through the residual stomach while ensuring anti-reflux effects.

Objective:To investigate the short-term efficacy of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus direct TLDG for early gastric cancer.Methods:The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 623 patients with early gastric cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from March 2014 to December 2019 were collected. There were 405 males and 218 females, aged from 26 to 86 years, with a median age of 62 years. Of 623 patients, 25 cases undergoing TLDG after ESD were divided into ESD+TLDG group and 598 cases undergoing TLDG directly were divided into TLDG group. Observation indicators: (1) the propensity score matching conditions and comparison of general data between the two groups after propensity score matching; (2) intraoperative and postoperative situations of TLDG; (3) stratification analysis of the ESD+TLDG group. The propensity score matching was conducted by 1∶2 matching using the nearest neighbor method. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was done using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range) and comparison between groups was done using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were represented as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results:(1) The propensity score matching conditions and comparison of general data between the two groups after propensity score matching: 75 of 623 patients had successful matching, including 25 in the ESD+TLDG group and 50 in the TLDG group. Before propensity score matching, the body mass index (BMI), cases with tumor diameter ≤20 mm, 21 to 30 mm or>30 mm, cases with tumor classified as stage Ⅰ, stage Ⅱ or stage Ⅲ of clinical staging were (22.3±3.6)kg/m 2, 16, 6, 3, 24, 1, 0 of the ESD+TLDG group, respectively, versus (24.3±2.7)kg/m 2, 238, 125, 235, 312, 126, 160 of the TLDG group, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( t=2.744, Z=?2.834, ?4.209, P<0.05). After propensity score matching, the BMI, cases with tumor diameter ≤20 mm, 21 to 30 mm or >30 mm, cases with tumor classified as stage Ⅰ or stage Ⅱ of clinical staging were (22.3±3.6)kg/m 2, 16, 6, 3, 24, 1 of the ESD+TLDG group, versus (23.6±2.9)kg/m 2, 29, 12, 9, 48, 2 of the TLDG group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.542, Z=?0.597, 0.000, P>0.05). (2) Intraoperative and postoperative situations of TLDG: after propensity score matching, the operation time and time to postoperative drainage tube removal were 180 minutes(range, 124 to 289 minutes) and 6 days(range, 4 to 13 days) of the ESD+TLDG group,respectively,versus 170 minutes(range, 106 to 250 minutes) and 6 days (range, 4 to 9 days) of the TLDG group, showing significant differences between the two groups ( Z=-2.396, -3.039, P<0.05). Cases with the volume of intraoperative blood loss <50 mL, 50 to 100 mL or >100 mL, the number of lymph node dissected, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with perioperative complications as incision fat liquefaction, delayed gastric emptying, anastomotic bleeding or pulmonary infection were 7, 9, 9,34(range, 16 to 58), 8 days(range, 6 to 31 days), 1, 1, 0, 0 of the ESD+TLDG group,respectively,versus 18, 26, 6, 39 (range, 22 to 68), 8 days (range, 6 to 29 days), 0, 0, 1, 1 of the TLDG group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( Z=-1.703, -1.958, -1.139, χ2=0.033, P>0.05). Cases with anastomotic bleeding were recovered after hemostasis under endoscopy and cases with other perioperative complications were recovered after conservative treatment. (3) Stratification analysis of the ESD+TLDG group. ① For 5 cases undergoing TLDG ≤14 days after ESD and 20 cases undergoing TLDG >14 days after ESD, the operation time of TLDG, cases with the volume of intraoperative blood loss <50 mL, 50 to 100 mL or >100 mL during TLDG, the number of lymph node dissected, time to postoperative drainage tube removal, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with perioperative complications were 200 minutes(range, 170 to 289 minutes), 0, 3, 2, 36(range, 9 to 57), 7 days(range, 5 to 9 days), 8 days(range, 7 to 9 days), 1 and 180 minutes (range, 124 to 253 minutes), 8, 6, 6, 34(range, 8 to 78), 6 days(range, 4 to 13 days), 8 days(range, 6 to 31 days), 1, respectively, showing no significant difference in the operation time of TLDG, volume of intraoperative blood loss during TLDG, the number of lymph node dissected, time to postoperative tube removal and duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups ( Z=?1.536, ?1.993, ?0.238, ?0.932, ?0.589, P>0.05), and no significant difference in cases with perioperative complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). ② For 13 cases undergoing TLDG ≤21 days after ESD and cases undergoing TLDG >21 days after ESD, the operation time of TLDG, cases with the volume of intraoperative blood loss as <50 mL, 50 to 100 mL or >100 mL during TLDG, the number of lymph node dissected, time to postoperative drainage tube removal, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with perioperative complications were 200 minutes(range, 145 to 289 minutes), 2, 6, 5, 34(range, 8 to 57), 6 days(range, 4 to 11 days), 8 days(range, 6 to 11 days), 1 and 179 minutes(range, 124 to 240 minutes), 6, 3, 3, 34(range, 16 to 78), 6 days(range, 5 to 13 days), 8 days(range, 6 to 31 days), 1, respectively, showing a significant difference in the operation time of TLDG between the two groups ( Z=?2.241, P<0.05), while showing no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss during TLDG, the number of lymph node dissected, time to postoperative drainage tube removal, duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups ( Z=?1.471, ?0.163, ?0.084, ?0.194, P>0.05) and no significant difference in cases with perioperative complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). ③ For 15 cases undergoing TLDG ≤28 days after ESD and 10 cases undergoing TLDG >28 days after ESD, the operation time of TLDG, cases with the volume of intraoperative blood loss <50 mL, 50 to 100 mL or >100 mL during TLDG, the number of lymph node dissected, time to postoperative drainage tube removal, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with perioperative complications were 190 minutes (range, 145 to 289 minutes), 2, 7, 6, 33(range, 8 to 57), 6 days(range, 4 to 11 days), 8 days(range, 6 to 31 days), 1 and 179 minutes(range, 124 to 240 minutes), 6, 2, 2, 37(range, 16 to 78), 6 days (range, 5 to 13 days), 8 days(range, 6 to 14 days), 1, respectively, showing no significant difference in the operation time of TLDG, volume of intraoperative blood loss during TLDG, the number of lymph node dissected, time to postoperative tube removal and duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups ( Z=?1.619, ?2.000, ?0.667, ?0.370, ?0.057, P>0.05), and no significant difference in cases with perioperative complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with cases undergoing TLDG directly, the operation time to TLDG and time to drainage tube removal after TLDG for cases undergoing ESD+TLDG are prolonged, but there is no difference in the short-term efficacy. For cases undergoing TLDG ≤21 days after ESD and cases undergoing TLDG >21 days after ESD, there is a significant difference in the operation time of TLDG.

Incidence of gastric cancer is high in China and standard radical operation is currently the main treatment for gastric cancer. Postoperative complications, especially some special complications, can directly affect the prognosis of patients, even result in the increase of mortality. But the incidences of these special complications are low, so these complications are often misdiagnosed and delayed in treatment owing to insufficient recognition of medical staff. These special complications include (1) Peterson hernia: It is an abdominal hernia developed in the space between Roux loop and transverse colon mesentery after Roux-Y reconstruction of digestive tract. Peterson hernia is rare and can quickly result in gangrenous ileus. Because of low incidence and without specific clinical symptoms, this hernia does not attract enough attention in clinical practice, so the outcome will be very serious. Once the diagnosis is made, an emergent operation must be performed immediately. Peterson space should be closed routinely in order to avoid the development of hernia. (2) Lymphatic leakage: It is also called chyle leakage. Cisterna chylus is formed by gradual concentration of extensive lymphatic net to diaphragm angle within abdominal cavity. Lymphadenectomy during operation may easily damage lymphatic net and result in leakage. The use of ultrasonic scalpel can decrease the risk of lymphatic leakage in certain degree. If lymphatic leakage is found during operation, transfixion should be performed in time. Treatment includes total parenteral nutrition, maintenance of internal environment, supplement of protein, and observation by clamp as an attempt. (3)Duodenal stump leakage: It is one of serious complications affecting the recovery and leading to death after subtotal gastrectomy. Correct management of duodenal stump during operation is one of key points of the prevention of duodenal stump leakage. Routine purse embedding of duodenal stump is recommend during operation. The key treatment of this complication is to promt diagnosis and effective hemostasis.(4) Blood supply disorder of Roux-Y intestinal loop: Main preventive principle of this complication is to pay attention to the blood supply of vascular arch in intestinal edge. (5) Anastomotic obstruction by big purse of jejunal stump: When Roux-en-Y anastomosis is performed after distal radical operation for gastric cancer, anvil is placed in the remnant stomach and anastomat from distal jejunal stump is placed to make gastrojejunal anastomosis, and the stump is closed with big purse embedding. The embedding jejunal stump may enter gastric cavity leading to internal hernia and anastomotic obstruction. We suggest that application of interruptable and interlocking suture and fixation of stump on the gastric wall can avoid the development of this complication.
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y ; adverse effects ; China ; Chylous Ascites ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Duodenum ; blood supply ; surgery ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Gastric Outlet Obstruction ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Gastric Stump ; surgery ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Hernia ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation ; instrumentation ; Humans ; Jejunum ; blood supply ; surgery ; Lymph Node Excision ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; Lymphatic System ; injuries ; Postoperative Complications ; classification ; diagnosis ; mortality ; prevention & control ; Prognosis ; Stomach ; surgery ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Suture Techniques ; standards ; Thoracic Duct ; injuries ; Wound Closure Techniques ; standards

Objective To analyze the clinicopathologic factors affecting the formation of lymphovascular invasion (LⅥ) in patients with gastric cancer.Methods The retrospective case-control study was conduted.The clinicopathologic data of 1 260 patients with gastric cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2014 and December 2015 were collected.All the surgical specimens of patients were detected by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stain and diagnosed by pathological experts.Stages of patients were evaluated by the seventh TNM staging system for gastric cancer of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC).Observation indicators:(1) pathologica features:histological differentiation,invasive depth,lymph node metastasis and TNM staging;(2) follow-up situations;(3) influenced factors of the positive LⅥ:sex,age,histological differentiation,invasive depth,number of lymph node metastasis and TNM staging affecting positive LⅥ were analyzed.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview were performed to detect survival of patients up to June 2016.Univariate analysis was done using the chi-square test,and multivariate analysis was done using the trend chi-square test,and binary Logistic regression model.Results (1) Pathological features:1 260 patients with gastric cancer were diagnosed by postoperative pathological examinations,including 355 with positive LⅥ and 905 with negative LⅥ.Histological differentiation:high-differentiated tumor was detected in 13 patients,moderate-differentiated tumor in 232 patients and low-differentiated tumor in 775 patients.There were 95 patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma and 145 with signet-ring cell carcinoma.Invasive depth:tumor invasion into mucosal layer or submucosal layer (T1 stage) was detected in 242 patients,muscular layer (T2 stage) in 160 patients,gastric wall layer and no invasion into serosal layer (T3 stage) in 37 patients and subserosal layer (T4 stage) in 821 patients.Lymph node metastasis:no regional lymph node metastasis (N0 stage) was detected in 461 patients,1-2 lymph nodes metastases (N1 stage)in 164 patients,3-6 lymph nodes metastases (N2 stage) in 245 patients and more than 7 lymph nodes metastases (N3 stage) in 390 patients.TNM staging:there were respectively 191 patients in Ⅰ A stage,114 in Ⅰ B stage,62 in ⅡA stage,202 in ⅡB stage,132 in ⅢA stage,80 in ⅢB stage,476 in ⅢC stage and 3 in Ⅳ stage.(2)Follow-up situations:1 142 patients (320 with positive LⅥ and 822 with negative LⅥ) were followed up for 4.0-24.0 months,with a meidan time of 11.0 months and a follow-up rate of 90.635％ (1 142/1 260).During the follow-up,154 patients died,including 41 with positive LⅥ and 113 with negative LⅥ.(3) Influenced factors of the positive LⅥ:① results of univariate analysis showed that histological differentiation,invasive depth,number of lymph node metastasis and TNM staging were factors affecting positive LⅥ of patients with gastric cancer (X2=16.930,29.190,64.463,46.539,P＜0.05).② Results of the trend chi-square test showed that histological differentiation,invasive depth,number of lymph node metastasis and TNM staging were factors affecting positive LⅥ of patients with gastric cancer,with a linear correlation (X2 =54.883,69.130,164.618,119.594,r=0.211,0.243,0.365,0.316,P＜0.05).There was a greater correlation between number of lymph node metastasis and formation of lymphovascular invasion.③ Results of the binary Logistic regression model showed that moderate-and low-differentiated tumor and N1-N3 stage of lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors affecting positive LⅥ of patients with gastric cancer (OR=2.572,1.782,95％ confidence interval:0.495-1.494,0.386-0.781,P＜0.05).Conclusion Patients with lower tumor differentiation and / or greater number of lymph node metastasis may have a higher risk of forming LⅥ.

Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of the π-shaped esophagojeunostomy in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy.Methods The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 6 patients with gastric cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between May 2016 and August 2016 were collected.All the 6 patients underwent totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy,operation procedures included esophagus and stomach mobilization,lymph node dissection,π-shaped esophagojejunostomy,and then laparoscopic digestive tract reconstruction after jejunojejunal anastomosis.Observation indicators included:(1) surgical situations:conversion to open surgery,operation time,time of π-shaped esophagojejunostomy,volume of intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph node dissected;(2) postoperative situations:time for initial out-of-bed activity,time of initial anal exsufflation,time of initial liquid diet intake,time of abdominal drainage tube removal,postoperative complications and duration of postoperative hospital stay;(3) postoperative pathological examination;(4) follow-up and survival situations.Follow-up using outpatient examination was performed to detect the anastomotic stenosis,patients' survival and tumor metastasis and recurrence up to November 2016.The measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)±s.Results (1) Surgical situations:all the 6 patients underwent successful totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy,without conversion to open surgery and perioperative death.Operation time,time of π-shaped esophagojejunostomy,volume of intraoperative blood loss and number of lymph node dissected were respectively (282 ± 49) minutes,(37 ± 9) minutes,(37 ± 8) mL and 39 9.(2) Postoperative situations:time for initial out-of-bed activity,time of initial anal exsufflation,time of initial liquid-diet intake,time of abdominal drainage tube removal and duration of postoperative hospital stay of 6 patients were (44± 38)hours,(72±21)hours,(6.5±l.1)days,(11±7) days and (15±7) days,respectively.Six patients were not complicated with postoperative hemorrhage,duodenal stump fistula and death.One patient with anastomotic fistula was cured by abdominal puncture drainage under guidance of computed tomography (CT),enteral nutrition and antibiotic therapy,and then was discharged from hospital.(3) Postoperative pathological examination:pTNM staging showed that stage Ⅰ A,Ⅱ A,ⅡB and ⅢA were detected in 3,1,1 and 1 patients,respectively.(4) Follow-up and survival situations:6 patients were followed up for 3-6 months,with a median time of 4 months.During follow-up,results of compound meglumine diatrizoate gastrointestinal radiography showed that there were smooth anastomoses,and no tumor recurrence or metastasis and death.Conclusion The π-shaped esophagojejunostomy is safe and feasible in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVETo investigate the factors which may influence the imatinib plasma concentration in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST), and to illuminate the significance of monitoring imatinib plasma concentration in adjuvant therapy for patients with GIST.

METHODSA cross-sectional study with 60 GIST patients who accepted the imatinib therapy after surgery was conducted. They were respectively administrated in 10 domestic hospitals from December 2014 to April 2016, including The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University(n=28), The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University(n=9), The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College(n=6), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital(n=5), The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (n=2), Jingling Hospital (n=2), The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang(n=2), Shandong Provincial Hospital(n=2), Jiangsu Province Tumor Hospital(n=2), and The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University(n=2). Some specific time points for collecting blood sample before and after taking imatinib were determined, then liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used for monitoring imatinib plasma concentration in patients with GIST. Linear regression analysis was used for the correlation analysis of imatinib plasma concentration with dosage, clinicopathologic feature and side effect.

RESULTSPatients who could not tolerate 400 mg imatinib per day(n=3) received 300 mg per day. There was no significant difference in imatinib plasma concentration between patients with 300 mg and those with 400 mg imatinib(n=53)(P=0.527). However, the imatinib plasma concentration in patients with 600 mg imatinib per day (n=4) was significantly higher as compared to those with 400 mg(P=0.000). Linear regression analysis indicated a negative correlation between the imatinib plasma concentration in patients with 400mg imatinib per day for 90 days continuously and body surface area(R=0.074, P=0.035), but no significant correlations of with age, creatinine clearance and serum albumin concentration were observed (all P>0.05). The differences in imatinib plasma concentration were not statistically significant between patients of different gender and those taking proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or not (both P>0.05). Difference in imatinib plasma concentration between patients with different surgery was significant (P=0.026). Compared to patients who underwent wedge resection, enterectomy and other surgeries, the imatinib plasma concentration of patients with subtotal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy decreased significantly (all P<0.05). After 90 days of taking imatinib continuously, linear regression analysis revealed a negative correlation between imatinib plasma concentration in patients with 400 mg imatinib per day and white blood cell count (R=0.103, P=0.013), and a positive correlation with serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration (R=0.076, P=0.033).

CONCLUSIONSThe imatinib plasma concentration in patients with larger body surface area, subtotal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy may be lower. For these patients, dosage of imatinib should be considered to increase in order to achieve effective plasma concentration. Excessive imatinib plasma concentration can result in some side effects, such as decrease of white blood cells and liver damage. Therefore, it is significant for receiving optimal clinical therapeutic efficacy to monitor imatinib plasma concentration, adjust imatinib dosage timely and keep imatinib plasma concentration in effective and safe range.

Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Benzamides ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Piperazines ; Pyrimidines ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry