1.Analysis of clinical factors affecting live birth outcomes in the first FET cycle after intrauterine adhesion separation: a real-world study
Chen WANG ; Yangqin PENG ; Hui CHEN ; Deying BAN ; Yuan LI ; Fei GONG ; Ge LIN
Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception 2025;45(1):45-58
Objective:To investigate the independent clinical factors of live birth rate of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA).Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of patients with intrauterine adhesion (IUA) who received FET in Reproductive Center of Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA from January 2019 to June 2022 ( n=6 154). According to the severity of intrauterine adhesions in patients, they were classified into mild adhesions ( n=172), moderate adhesions ( n=5 723), and severe adhesions ( n=259). Based on the FET outcome, the patients were divided into live birth group and non-live birth group. The risk factors and protective factors of live birth were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results:1) No independent factor of live birth was found in the mild IUA group. 2) In the moderate IUA group, the protective factors of live birth included secondary infertility ( OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.80, P=0.015), hysteroscopic polypectomy ( OR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.05-1.83, P=0.023), No. of high-quality embryos transferred (one embryo: OR=1.58, 95% CI: 1.37-1.82, P<0.001; two embryos: OR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.80-3.64, P<0.001), two embryos transferred ( OR=1.77, 95% CI: 1.48-2.12, P<0.001), embryo stage (blastocyst transferred, OR=4.93, 95% CI: 3.68-6.63, P<0.001; blastocyst+cleavage transferred OR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.11-3.21, P=0.021), preimplantation genetic testing embryo ( OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.19-1.69, P<0.001), endometrial thickness before transplantation ( OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, P<0.001). Risk factors of live birth included female age ( OR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.96, P<0.001), infertility due to male factor ( OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.96, P=0.011), combined repeated implantation failure ( OR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87, P=0.007), combined unicornuate uterus/uterus didelphys ( OR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.06-0.79, P=0.033), American Fertility Society score ( OR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98, P=0.010), No. of TCRA ( OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90, P<0.001), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists down-regulation combined with artificial cycle ( OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.69, P<0.001), artificial cycle ( OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.76, P<0.001). 3) In the severe IUA group, the risk factor of live birth was artificial cycle ( OR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.80, P=0.027). Conclusion:The clinical factors that affect the live birth outcome of the first FET cycle after TCRA have different results in patients with different degrees of adhesion. In patients with moderate adhesions, there are 17 clinical indicators that affect the live birth rate. In patients with severe adhesions, the artificial cycle is an independent factor affecting the live birth rate.
2.Analysis of clinical factors affecting live birth outcomes in the first FET cycle after intrauterine adhesion separation: a real-world study
Chen WANG ; Yangqin PENG ; Hui CHEN ; Deying BAN ; Yuan LI ; Fei GONG ; Ge LIN
Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception 2025;45(1):45-58
Objective:To investigate the independent clinical factors of live birth rate of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA).Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of patients with intrauterine adhesion (IUA) who received FET in Reproductive Center of Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA from January 2019 to June 2022 ( n=6 154). According to the severity of intrauterine adhesions in patients, they were classified into mild adhesions ( n=172), moderate adhesions ( n=5 723), and severe adhesions ( n=259). Based on the FET outcome, the patients were divided into live birth group and non-live birth group. The risk factors and protective factors of live birth were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results:1) No independent factor of live birth was found in the mild IUA group. 2) In the moderate IUA group, the protective factors of live birth included secondary infertility ( OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.80, P=0.015), hysteroscopic polypectomy ( OR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.05-1.83, P=0.023), No. of high-quality embryos transferred (one embryo: OR=1.58, 95% CI: 1.37-1.82, P<0.001; two embryos: OR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.80-3.64, P<0.001), two embryos transferred ( OR=1.77, 95% CI: 1.48-2.12, P<0.001), embryo stage (blastocyst transferred, OR=4.93, 95% CI: 3.68-6.63, P<0.001; blastocyst+cleavage transferred OR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.11-3.21, P=0.021), preimplantation genetic testing embryo ( OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.19-1.69, P<0.001), endometrial thickness before transplantation ( OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, P<0.001). Risk factors of live birth included female age ( OR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.96, P<0.001), infertility due to male factor ( OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.96, P=0.011), combined repeated implantation failure ( OR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87, P=0.007), combined unicornuate uterus/uterus didelphys ( OR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.06-0.79, P=0.033), American Fertility Society score ( OR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98, P=0.010), No. of TCRA ( OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90, P<0.001), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists down-regulation combined with artificial cycle ( OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.69, P<0.001), artificial cycle ( OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.76, P<0.001). 3) In the severe IUA group, the risk factor of live birth was artificial cycle ( OR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.80, P=0.027). Conclusion:The clinical factors that affect the live birth outcome of the first FET cycle after TCRA have different results in patients with different degrees of adhesion. In patients with moderate adhesions, there are 17 clinical indicators that affect the live birth rate. In patients with severe adhesions, the artificial cycle is an independent factor affecting the live birth rate.
3.Expression of miRNA & mRNA and the regulation network in ovarian endometriosis
Licong SHEN ; Wenqing YANG ; Deying BAN ; Yan TIAN
Journal of Chinese Physician 2020;22(10):1468-1473
Objective:To reveal the expression and regulation network of microRNA (miRNA) and mRNA in ovarian endometriosis using high-throughput sequencing, and then explore the potential pathogenesis.Methods:From January 2017 to January 2018, twenty patients with ovarian endometriosis in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were enrolled. Ectopic endometrium and paired eutopic endometrium were collected when surgery was conducted. After total RNA was extracted, miRNA sequencing and mRNA sequencing were performed respectively. Differential miRNA and mRNA expression profiles were analyzed. Predicted mRNA were obtained by Targetscan and miRDB databases, and then intersected with differential mRNA to obtain candidate mRNA. miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was analyzed using Cytoscape software, whereas gene ontology (GO) and pathway function enrichment were performed by DAVID database.Results:Compared with eutopic endometrium, there were 369 miRNAs (197 up-regulated, 172 down-regulated) and 3 765 mRNAs (1 975 up-regulated and 1 790 down-regulated) differentially expressed in ectopic endometrium. Real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the expression of mir-202-5p and mir-514a-5p in ectopic endometrium was higher than that in eutopic endometrium ( P<0.05), while the expression of mir-375-3p, mir-449b-5p in ectopic endometrium was lower than that in eutopic endometrium ( P<0.05). Bioinformatics found that the candidate mRNA related to these four miRNAs are mainly enriched in biological processes of nuclear steroid hormone receptor binding, transmembrane receptor and protein kinase activity, and participate in transforming growth factor β (TGF β) signal pathway, adhesion junction, Wnt signal pathway and Rap1 signal pathway. Conclusions:miRNA and mRNA are differentially expressed in endometriosis, and exact important regulatory network in the development of endometriosis by involving multiple biological processes.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail