Inflammation is the body’s response to damage， infection or other stimuli， but its excessive or continuous development can lead to a variety of diseases. Although modern medical anti-inflammatory therapies were widely used， it is often accompanied by limitations such as more adverse reactions. Based on the “holistic view” and “differential treatment”， traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） regards inflammation as a manifestation of the imbalance of yin and yang in the body and the conflict between good and evil. The application of anti-inflammatory TCM is not only aimed at the pathological state of “inflammation”， but also based on the overall consideration of “syndrome”. According to different types of syndrome， anti-inflammatory TCM can be divided into heat-clearing and detoxifying agents （such as Lonicera japonica and Isatis indigotica ）， heat-clearing and drying dampness agents （such as Coptidis Rhizoma）， blood-activating and stasis-dissolving agents （such as Salvia miltiorrhiza ） and vital qi-strengthening and pathogenic factor-expelling agents （such as Panax ginseng ）. Four types of anti-inflammatory TCM restore the body’s immune balance through the systematic regulation of multi-component， multi-target and multi-pathway， exhibiting a good anti-inflammatory effect. Future research should focus on integrating systematic biology， applying artificial intelligence， carrying out high-quality evidence-based research， and combining traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine， so as to reveal the overall regulatory law of anti-inf lammatory effects of TCM and promote clinical rational use.

OBJECTIVE To formulate Guidelines for the standardized implementation of pharmacist-managed clinics （ 2026 edition ） in response to the challenges faced by such clinics in China， including uneven development， large discrepancies in service specifications， insufficient patient awareness， and limited medical insurance coverage. METHODS Led by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Professional Committee of the Chinese Hospital Association， the Evidence-based Pharmacy Professional Committee of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association， and the Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee of the Cross-strait Medical and Health Exchange Association， a total of 19 domestic hospital pharmacy experts were organized. Through a systematic review of national policies and literature research， current practical experience was summarized. Consensus on the contents of the guidelines was reached after in-depth discussions. RESULTS &CONCLUSIONS The guidelines covered five sections： definition and connotation of pharmacist-managed clinics， establishment requirements， implementation and management， post competency， and practical research. Firstly， the definition and connotation included three operational forms of pharmacist-managed clinics （independent mode， physician-pharmacist joint mode， and online pharmacist-managed clinic mode） and classified service modes （specialty-specific， drug-specific， and disease-specific pharmacist-managed clinics）. The establishment requirements were further refined， covering system construction （pharmaceutical service management system， quality control and assessment mechanism）， personnel qualifications （professional credentials， continuing education and professional training， etc）， service recipients， as well as service venues and facilities. Subsequently， the implementation and management of pharmacist-managed clinics were proposed， involving service procedures， intervention measures， documentation and records， patient education and follow-up， humanistic care， as well as risk management and quality control. Finally， post competency encompassed the competency requirements for pharmacists providing services in pharmacist-managed clinics， as well as the suggestions on teaching methods； practical research encouraged the conduct of high-quality pharmaceutical practice in the setting of pharmacist-managed clinics. The guidelines provide valuable guidance for the standardized implementation of pharmacist-managed clinics in China in terms of establishment， management， teaching， and research， fill the guideline gap in this field， and can promote the high-quality development of pharmacist-managed clinics.

Debates persist regarding the efficacy and safety of azvudine, particularly its real-world outcomes. This study involved patients aged ≥60 years who were admitted to 25 hospitals in mainland China with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality during hospitalization, the proportion of patients discharged with recovery, time to nucleic acid-negative conversion (T _NANC), time to symptom improvement (T _SI), and time of hospital stay (T _HS). Safety was also assessed. Among the 5884 participants identified, 1999 received azvudine, and 1999 matched controls were included after exclusion and propensity score matching. Azvudine recipients exhibited lower all-cause mortality compared with controls in the overall population (13.3% vs. 17.1%, RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90; P = 0.001) and in the severe subgroup (25.7% vs. 33.7%; RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients discharged with recovery, and a shorter T _NANC were associated with azvudine recipients, especially in the severe subgroup. The incidence of adverse events in azvudine recipients was comparable to that in the control group (2.3% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.170). In conclusion, azvudine showed efficacy and safety in older patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron wave in China.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor tablets produced by Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (the generic drug) and ticagrelor tablets produced by AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (the original drug) in antiplatelet therapy.Methods:The study design was a retrospective cohort study. The subjects were patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and postoperative antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor tablets at First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University during January 2020 to July 2021. Through the hospital electronic medical record system, relevant clinical data of patients (age, gender, comorbidities, blood lipid level on admission, PCI indications, antiplatelet treatment regimen, efficacy and safety assessment endpoint events within 12 months of treatment, etc.) were collected. The patients were divided into the generic drug group and the original drug group. To exclude confounders, propensity score matching (PSM) method was used. The efficacy evaluation index was the incidence of the primary endpoint events (cardiogenic death, stroke, target revascularization, recurrent infarction) and secondary endpoint events (all-cause mortality, peripheral artery occlusion, stent thrombosis, angina attacks) within 12 months of treatment. The safety evaluation index was the incidence of bleeding event within 12 months of treatment.Results:A total of 1 486 patients were included in this study, including 734 in the generic drug group and 752 in the original drug group. The proportion of women and unstable angina, and the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were higher than those in the original drug group (all P<0.05). The proportion of patients with hyperlipidemia and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were lower than those in the original drug group (both P<0.05). After PSM, 690 patients were enrolled in the generic drug group and 690 patients in the original drug group (all P>0.05). No differences in the comparison of clinical features between the 2 groups was significant (all P>0.05). No differences in the incidences of primary endpoints, secondary endpoints, and bleeding events between the 2 groups was significant before and after PSM [before PSM: 12.1%(89/734) vs. 10.9%(82/752), 10.8%(79/734) vs. 8.4%(63/752), 0.3%(2/734) vs. 0.5%(4/752); after PSM: 12.6%(87/690) vs. 12.3%(85/690), 11.0%(76/690) vs. 8.3%(57/690), 0.3%(2/690) vs. 0.4%(3/690); all P>0.05]. No death occurred in patients of both groups. Bleeding is predominantly characterized by epistaxis and subcutaneous petechiae, which did not lead to interruption of antiplatelet therapy. Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor tablets produced by Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients after PCI surgery were basically the same as those of the original drug.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor tablets produced by Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (the generic drug) and ticagrelor tablets produced by AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (the original drug) in antiplatelet therapy.Methods:The study design was a retrospective cohort study. The subjects were patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and postoperative antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor tablets at First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University during January 2020 to July 2021. Through the hospital electronic medical record system, relevant clinical data of patients (age, gender, comorbidities, blood lipid level on admission, PCI indications, antiplatelet treatment regimen, efficacy and safety assessment endpoint events within 12 months of treatment, etc.) were collected. The patients were divided into the generic drug group and the original drug group. To exclude confounders, propensity score matching (PSM) method was used. The efficacy evaluation index was the incidence of the primary endpoint events (cardiogenic death, stroke, target revascularization, recurrent infarction) and secondary endpoint events (all-cause mortality, peripheral artery occlusion, stent thrombosis, angina attacks) within 12 months of treatment. The safety evaluation index was the incidence of bleeding event within 12 months of treatment.Results:A total of 1 486 patients were included in this study, including 734 in the generic drug group and 752 in the original drug group. The proportion of women and unstable angina, and the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were higher than those in the original drug group (all P<0.05). The proportion of patients with hyperlipidemia and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were lower than those in the original drug group (both P<0.05). After PSM, 690 patients were enrolled in the generic drug group and 690 patients in the original drug group (all P>0.05). No differences in the comparison of clinical features between the 2 groups was significant (all P>0.05). No differences in the incidences of primary endpoints, secondary endpoints, and bleeding events between the 2 groups was significant before and after PSM [before PSM: 12.1%(89/734) vs. 10.9%(82/752), 10.8%(79/734) vs. 8.4%(63/752), 0.3%(2/734) vs. 0.5%(4/752); after PSM: 12.6%(87/690) vs. 12.3%(85/690), 11.0%(76/690) vs. 8.3%(57/690), 0.3%(2/690) vs. 0.4%(3/690); all P>0.05]. No death occurred in patients of both groups. Bleeding is predominantly characterized by epistaxis and subcutaneous petechiae, which did not lead to interruption of antiplatelet therapy. Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor tablets produced by Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients after PCI surgery were basically the same as those of the original drug.