OBJECTIVES: This systematic review examines recent pharmacoeconomic literature on denosumab' cost-effectiveness for bone metastasis treatment, providing evidence-based insights to guide healthcare policy decisions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed across Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify original articles published between 2017 and 2023. Key words consisted of bone metastases, denosumab, and cost-effectiveness in the search strategy. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed utilizing the revised Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS 2022). Data was extracted regarding methodological characteristics and cost-effectiveness analyses. RESULTS: A total of 111 studies were retrieved, of which 6 met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were based on clinical trials and published literature data and exhibited high methodological quality. Up to 83% (5 out of 6) of comparisons demonstrated that denosumab was more cost-effective or dominant compared to zoledronic acid. The adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios varied substantially by tumor type, ranging from CZK 436,339.09 to USD 136,234 per skeletal-related event avoided and from CZK 61,580.95 to USD 118,392.11 per quality-adjusted life year gained. CONCLUSIONS The majority of the included studies support denosumab as a more cost-effective treatment option for bone metastases in solid tumors compared to zoledronic acid. The application of CHEER (2022) enhances the reliability of pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
Denosumab/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Bone Neoplasms/economics* ; Cost-Benefit Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab in the treatment of prostate cancer with bone metastases. METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Sinomed , CNKI and Wanfang databases. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of included studies, and relevant data were extracted. meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and RStudio software, and forest plots were generated. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Compared with the control group, denosumab significantly reduced the risk of skeletal-related events (HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.93). In terms of safety, denosumab did not increase the risk of total adverse events, severe adverse events and the adverse events higher than CTC grade 3. CONCLUSION Denosumab can delay the time to first skeletal-related event with good safety. However, due to the limitations of this study, further high-quality, large-sample, multicenter RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
Humans ; Denosumab/therapeutic use* ; Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Male ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the changes in blood levels of calcium and bone metabolism biochemical markers in patients with primary osteoporosis receiving treatment with denosumab. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with primary osteoporosis treated in our Department between December, 2021 and December 2023 were enrolled. All the patients were treated with calcium supplements, vitamin D and calcitriol in addition to regular denosumab treatment every 6 months. Blood calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin (OC), type I procollagen amino-terminal propeptide (PINP), and type I collagen carboxy-terminal telopeptide β special sequence (β‑CTX) data before and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the first treatment were collected from each patient. RESULTS: Three months after the first denosumab treatment, the bone turnover markers (BTMs) OC, PINP, and β-CTX were significantly decreased compared to their baseline levels by 39.5% (P<0.001), 56.2% (P<0.001), and 81.8% (P<0.001), respectively. At 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment, OC, PINP, and β-CTX remained significantly lower than their baseline levels (P<0.001). Blood calcium level was decreased (P<0.05) and PTH level increased (P<0.05) significantly in these patients at months of denosumab treatment, but their levels were comparable to the baseline levels at 6, 9, and 12 months of the treatment (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Denosumab can suppress BTMs and has a good therapeutic effect in patients with primary osteoporosis, but reduction of blood calcium and elevation of PTH levels can occur during the first 3 months in spite of calcium supplementation. Blood calcium and PTH levels can recover the baseline levels as the treatment extended, suggesting the importance of monitoring blood calcium and PTH levels during denosumab treatment.
Humans ; Denosumab/therapeutic use* ; Calcium/blood* ; Parathyroid Hormone/blood* ; Biomarkers/blood* ; Osteoporosis/blood* ; Osteocalcin/blood* ; Procollagen/blood* ; Female ; Collagen Type I/blood* ; Peptide Fragments/blood* ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use* ; Bone and Bones/metabolism* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Vitamin D ; Peptides/blood* ; Aged

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of denosumab on bone mineral density around proximal femoral prosthesis after total hip arthroplasty(THA) in the postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients underwent unilateral primary THA were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-five patients received denosumab for osteoporosis as the treatment group, and the twenty-nine without denosumab were the control group. At 1 week, 3month, 6 months, and 12 months after THA, bone turnover markers and proximal femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) were measured. RESULTS: At 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, the level of TRACP-5b in the control group was significantly higher than that in the treatment group (P<0.05);the level of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) between two groups showed significant difference in 12 months after operation (control group was higher than treatment group, P<0.05). The BMD of Gruen 1 and Gruen 7 decreased at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation compared with 1 week after operation. Comparing the treatment group and the control group, the differences of the the decrease of BMD in Gruen 1 and Gruen 7 were no significant at 3 months after surgery. In Gruen 1, Gruen 7 at 6 months after operation and Gruen 1, Gruen 7 at 12 months after operation, the decrease of BMD in the control group was significantly higher than that in the treatment group(P<0.05). It is suggested that desudumab could inhibit the loss of BMD after 6 months, and continuously show a protective effect on bone mass at 12 months after operation. CONCLUSION After THA in postmenopausal patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fracture, Desuzumab can reduce the loss of BMD around the proximal femoral prosthesis and effectively inhibit bone resorption.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Bone Density ; Denosumab/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Postmenopause ; Absorptiometry, Photon ; Bone Remodeling ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis

Giant cell tumors(GCT) of bone is benign bone tumors with aggressive and osteolytic activity. As traditional treatment of GCT, removal of bone graft is disease with high local recurrence rate, and could reduce local recurrence by auxiliary means. Different surgical methods such as prosthesis replacement, wide resection and En-bloc resection could be selected for different parts of giant cell tumor of bone, based on the lesion location, size, extent of invasion, recurrence rate. For patients with special region of GCT of bone with removed incompletely and high surgical risk expected, arterial embolism could be performed. The application of bisphosphonates and denosumab are mainly used in treating recurrent, refractory, special parts, metastatic giant cell tumor of bone will bring new hope of treatment for giant cell tumor of bone, due to lower the recurrence rate. Chemotherapy is mainly used in the treatment of metastasis and malignant bone tumor. Radiotherapy for recurrent or unresectable bone giant cell tumor can control tumor progression, but there is the possibility of malignancy. While long-term follow-up studies and long-term results of applications of bisphosphonates and denosumab are lacking, new methods and development of new drugs are still be needed to treat patients with giant cell tumor of bone and also bring about more hope.
Bone Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Denosumab ; therapeutic use ; Diphosphonates ; therapeutic use ; Giant Cell Tumor of Bone ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Humans ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Treatment Outcome

Alkaline Phosphatase ; metabolism ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; therapeutic use ; China ; Denosumab ; therapeutic use ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; complications ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperlipidemias ; complications ; Hypertension ; complications ; Middle Aged ; Osteitis Deformans ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Pelvic Bones ; diagnostic imaging ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; complications ; Singapore ; Tibia ; diagnostic imaging ; Treatment Outcome

Osteoporosis is a major, growing healthcare issue. This is especially of concern in an ageing population like that of Singapore. Osteoporotic patients are at risk of fractures, which can result in increased morbidity and mortality. The use of antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates or denosumab has been proven to reduce fracture risk. However, the use of these medications has rarely been associated with the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw, a potentially debilitating condition affecting one or both jaws. Appropriate understanding of the patient's antiresorptive therapy regime, as well as early institution of preventive dental measures, can play an important role in preventing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Regular monitoring and prompt referral to specialist care is warranted for patients with established MRONJ.
Aged ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Denosumab ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Diphosphonates ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Jaw Diseases ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Osteonecrosis ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Osteoporosis ; complications ; drug therapy ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; complications ; drug therapy ; Risk Factors ; Singapore ; Treatment Outcome

Bone metastases are the main driver of morbidity and mortality in advanced prostate cancer. Targeting the bone microenvironment, a key player in the pathogenesis of bone metastasis, has become one of the mainstays of therapy in men with advanced prostate cancer. This review will evaluate the data supporting the use of bone-targeted therapy, including (1) bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid, which directly target osteoclasts, (2) denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) ligand inhibitor, which targets a key component of bone stromal interaction, and (3) radium-223, an alpha-emitting calcium mimetic, which hones to the metabolically active areas of osteoblastic metastasis and induces double-strand breaks in the DNA. Denosumab has shown enhanced delay in skeletal-related events compared to zoledronic acid in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Data are mixed with regard to pain control as a primary measure of efficacy. New data call into question dosing frequency, with quarterly dosing strategy potentially achieving similar effect compared to monthly dosing for zoledronic acid. In the case of radium-223, there are data for both pain palliation and improved overall survival in mCRPC. Further studies are needed to optimize timing and combination strategies for bone-targeted therapies. Ongoing studies will explore the impact of combining bone-targeted therapy with investigational therapeutic agents such as immunotherapy, for advanced prostate cancer. Future studies should strive to develop biomarkers of response, in order to improve efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these agents.
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use* ; Bone Neoplasms/secondary* ; Denosumab/therapeutic use* ; Diphosphonates/therapeutic use* ; Endothelins/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Radioisotopes/therapeutic use* ; Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use* ; Radium/therapeutic use* ; Samarium/therapeutic use* ; Strontium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use*

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe complication of bisphosphonates (BPs) or other targeted agent therapies. MRONJ appears as exposed bone, pus, and swelling in the oral and maxillofacial regions. However, neither surgery nor conservative therapy can eliminate symptoms thoroughly. In addition to BPs, several antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents, such as denosumab and bevacizumab, as well as targeted agents, such as sunitinib and temsirolimus, can cause osteonecrosis of  the  jaw according to the literature. This review aims to summarize the research progress on these new drugs.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw ; drug therapy ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; adverse effects ; Denosumab ; therapeutic use ; Diphosphonates ; Humans

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of denosumab was compared with placebo in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in this phase III study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 60 to 90 years with a T-score of <-2.5 and ≥-4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized to a single 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab or placebo for the 6-month double-blind phase. Eligible subjects entered the 6-month open-label extension phase and received a single dose of denosumab 60 mg. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar in the 62 denosumab- and 64 placebo-treated subjects who completed the double-blind phase. Treatment favored denosumab over placebo for the primary endpoint {mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at Month 6 [3.2% (95% confidence interval 2.1%, 4.4%; p<0.0001)]}; and secondary endpoints (mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Month 1, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD at Months 1 and 6, and median percent change from baseline in bone turnover markers at Months 1, 3, and 6). Endpoint improvements were sustained over 12 months in the open-label extension (n=119). There were no new or unexpected safety signals. CONCLUSION: Denosumab was well tolerated and effective in increasing BMD and decreasing bone turnover markers over a 12-month period in Korean postmenopausal women. The findings of this study demonstrate that denosumab has beneficial effects on the measures of osteoporosis in Korean postmenopausal women.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; *Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Bone Density ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/*therapeutic use ; Denosumab/*therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Femur ; Femur Neck ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy/*ethnology ; Postmenopause ; Republic of Korea