Background and Aims:Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection(SISMAD)is a relatively common type of visceral artery dissection,typically presenting with acute abdominal pain.In severe cases,it may lead to intestinal ischemia or even necrosis.With the widespread use of imaging techniques such as CT angiography(CTA),the detection rate of SISMAD has significantly increased.However,there is still controversy regarding its optimal treatment strategy,especially in choosing between conservative management and endovascular intervention,as no unified standard currently exists.This study aimed to compare the short-and medium-term outcomes of the two treatment modalities by retrospectively analyzing the clinical data of SISMAD patients treated at our center in order to provide evidence for individualized treatment decisions.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 174 patients diagnosed with SISMAD at Ningbo Second Hospital between January 2018 and December 2023.Among them,30 patients received conservative treatment,and 144 underwent endovascular intervention(including stent implantation alone or in combination with coil embolization of the false lumen).All patients were diagnosed using CTA or superior mesenteric artery angiography and classified accordingly.Patients were followed up at 1 month and 1 year after treatment to assess clinical symptom relief and radiological outcomes,including dissection remodeling and stent patency.Results:In the conservative group,the symptom relief rate was 90.0%at 1 month and 92.8%at 1 year;in the interventional group,the corresponding rates were 99.3%and 98.6%.The difference in symptom relief at 1 month was statistically significant(P=0.016),while the difference at 1 year was not(P>0.05).Subgroup analysis by classification showed that the interventional group generally had higher symptom relief rates than the conservative group across all types.However,none of the differences reached statistical significance(all P>0.05).The conservative group showed poorer symptom control in type Ⅲpatients,including one death.The technical success rate of endovascular treatment was 99.3%,with no cases of stent displacement or occlusion within 1 year.The complete remodeling rate was 86.8%,and the stent patency rate was 100.0%.Some patients had minor mural thrombus formation within the stent without evidence of flow obstruction.Conclusion:Endovascular intervention offers a high technical success rate and favorable short-and medium-term efficacy in SISMAD patients,particularly for type Ⅱ and Ⅲ cases with compromised true lumen perfusion.Treatment strategies should be tailored based on the dissection type and the degree of true lumen compression to improve clinical outcomes and reduce associated risks.

Background and Aims:Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection(SISMAD)is a relatively common type of visceral artery dissection,typically presenting with acute abdominal pain.In severe cases,it may lead to intestinal ischemia or even necrosis.With the widespread use of imaging techniques such as CT angiography(CTA),the detection rate of SISMAD has significantly increased.However,there is still controversy regarding its optimal treatment strategy,especially in choosing between conservative management and endovascular intervention,as no unified standard currently exists.This study aimed to compare the short-and medium-term outcomes of the two treatment modalities by retrospectively analyzing the clinical data of SISMAD patients treated at our center in order to provide evidence for individualized treatment decisions.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 174 patients diagnosed with SISMAD at Ningbo Second Hospital between January 2018 and December 2023.Among them,30 patients received conservative treatment,and 144 underwent endovascular intervention(including stent implantation alone or in combination with coil embolization of the false lumen).All patients were diagnosed using CTA or superior mesenteric artery angiography and classified accordingly.Patients were followed up at 1 month and 1 year after treatment to assess clinical symptom relief and radiological outcomes,including dissection remodeling and stent patency.Results:In the conservative group,the symptom relief rate was 90.0%at 1 month and 92.8%at 1 year;in the interventional group,the corresponding rates were 99.3%and 98.6%.The difference in symptom relief at 1 month was statistically significant(P=0.016),while the difference at 1 year was not(P>0.05).Subgroup analysis by classification showed that the interventional group generally had higher symptom relief rates than the conservative group across all types.However,none of the differences reached statistical significance(all P>0.05).The conservative group showed poorer symptom control in type Ⅲpatients,including one death.The technical success rate of endovascular treatment was 99.3%,with no cases of stent displacement or occlusion within 1 year.The complete remodeling rate was 86.8%,and the stent patency rate was 100.0%.Some patients had minor mural thrombus formation within the stent without evidence of flow obstruction.Conclusion:Endovascular intervention offers a high technical success rate and favorable short-and medium-term efficacy in SISMAD patients,particularly for type Ⅱ and Ⅲ cases with compromised true lumen perfusion.Treatment strategies should be tailored based on the dissection type and the degree of true lumen compression to improve clinical outcomes and reduce associated risks.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) combined with stent implantation in treatment of acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis. METHODS: Seventy patients with acute iliac vein thrombosis were treated with PMT combined stent implantation in Ningbo No.2 Hospital from November 2015 to November 2017. During the follow-up, the improvement of blood flow was evaluated, the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome was assessed by the Villalta rating scale, and the stent patency was examined with lower extremity ultrasound or angiography. RESULTS: The blood flow was significantly improved after procedure in all 70 patients, including 62 cases (88.6%) of grade Ⅲ clearance, 5 cases (7.1%) of grade Ⅱ clearance, and 3 cases (4.3%) of grade Ⅰ clearance. No significant complications occurred during the treatment. The patients were followed up for (15.0±2.5) months. During the follow-up, 64 patients (91.4%) had unobstructed stents, and 9 patients (12.8%) had post-thrombotic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS PMT combined with stent implantation is effective in the treatment of acute iliac vein thrombosis with a high medium-and long-term stent patency rate.
Femoral Vein ; surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Iliac Vein ; Prosthesis Implantation ; standards ; Stents ; Thrombectomy ; standards ; Treatment Outcome ; Venous Thrombosis ; surgery ; therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) combined with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis were identified in this retrospective study in our institution from November 2015 through December 2017. Patients were divided into two groups:PMT+PTA group (=50) and PMT only group (=44). Clot lysis rates, the retrieving and the embolism of the interior vena cava filter, as well as the incidence of complications were compared between two groups. The changes of serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase and hemoglobin were also measured perioperatively. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully. The average clot lysis rate was higher and the procedure time was shorter in PMT+PTA group than those in PMT group (both <0.01). No significant differences were found in the rates of venous stenosis, catheter-directed thrombolysis and stent placement between two groups (all >0.05). The interior vena cava filter was taken out in 82.0% (41/50) patients of PMT+PTA group and 81.8% (36/44) patients of PMT group (>0.05). There were no significant differences of the changes in serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase and hemoglobin (all >0.05). In PMT+PTA group, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and puncture bleeding occurred in 1(2.0%) and 2(4.0%) patients, while in PMT group, it was 0 and 2(4.5%), respectively (>0.05). CONCLUSIONS PMT combined with PTA is more effective than PMT alone for the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with less procedure time and without more incidence of pulmonary embolism.
Angioplasty ; standards ; Fibrinolytic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombectomy ; standards ; Thrombolytic Therapy ; standards ; Treatment Outcome ; Venous Thrombosis ; surgery ; therapy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with transcatheter thrombolysis in the treatment of acute iliac femoral venous thrombosis. METHODS: The clinical data of 170 patients with acute iliac venous thrombosis treated in Ningbo No.2 Hospital from September 2015 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 94 cases were treated with AngioJet mechanical thrombolysis or additional thrombolysis for residual thrombus (PMT group) and 76 cases were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT group). After thrombolytic treatment if there was stenosis of iliac vein, the transluminal angioplasty was also performed. The clearance of thrombus and safety were evaluated and compared between two groups. RESULTS: In PMT group there were 86 cases (91.5%) with grade Ⅲ, 5 cases (5.3%) with grade Ⅱ, 3 cases (3.2%) with grade Ⅰ clearance of thrombus; while in CDT group, there were 63 cases (82.9%) with grade Ⅲ, 7 cases (9.2%) with grade Ⅱ and 6 cases (7.9%) with grade Ⅰ clearance of thrombus (>0.05). The differences of diameter of two lower extremities 15 cm above knee after treatment in PMT and CDT groups were (2.3±0.9) cm and (2.5±1.1) cm, respectively (>0.05). The time of thrombolysis in group PMT was significantly shorter than that in group CDT[(2.6±1.2) d vs. (5.3±1.5) d, <0.05]. The dosage of urokinase in PMT group was significantly lower than that in CDT group[(15.0±5.0)×10 U vs. (26.5±7.5)×10 U, <0.05]. Hemoglobin decrease was observed in both groups, which was more significant in PMT group (<0.01). During the following period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrence and post-thrombosis syndrome in two groups (all >0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both PMT and CDT have good thrombus clearance effect in the treatment of acute iliac femoral venous thrombosis, however, PMT has the advantages of short thrombolytic time and less urokinase.
Catheterization, Peripheral ; Fibrinolytic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Iliac Vein ; pathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombectomy ; Thrombolytic Therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Venous Thrombosis ; surgery ; therapy