BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Philippines. Telestroke systems have been introduced to improve timely recognition and referral; however, their effectiveness depends on utilization at the community level.

OBJECTIVE

To assess stroke and telestroke knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers among barangay health workers (BHWs), and to determine factors associated with telestroke utilization.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 202 BHWs. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Associations between variables were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Respondents had high stroke knowledge (75.5%, SD = 17.45) and telestroke knowledge (85.5%, SD = 18.82), as well as favorable attitudes (mean = 4.37). However, only 31.1% reported telestroke utilization. The most commonly reported barriers were lack of training (61.4%) and poor internet connectivity (15.8%). Telestroke familiarity was significantly associated with higher knowledge (p = 0.005) and more favorable attitudes (p = 0.001). Stroke-related training (p = 0.001) and years of experience (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with higher utilization.

CONCLUSION

Despite high knowledge and favorable attitudes, telestroke utilization among BHWs remains low. Training, familiarity, and infrastructure appear to play key roles in bridging the gap between knowledge and practice. Strengthening these factors may improve the effectiveness of community-based telestroke systems.

Human ; Occupational Groups ; Knowledge ; Attitude ; Stroke ; Technology

INTRODUCTION

Brain death occurs in patients who suffer from severe brain injuries, leading to coma, loss of brainstem reflexes, and apnea. Research indicates that misdiagnosis of brain death often arises from insufficient adherence to established guidelines. This study aims to evaluate and identify any significant variations in physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding brain death and organ donation.

METHODOLOGY

This cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians using random sampling. The questionnaire was validated prior to distribution. After obtaining informed consent, participants completed the questionnaire. Data analysis involved the use of frequency and distribution tables, as well as analysis of variance and multivariate analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A total of 113 participants were involved in the study. While years of experience and position influenced knowledge, field of specialization did not show a significant effect. Overall, attitudes remained consistent across different levels of experience and positions. The data revealed a notable lack of training and institutional resources. Although there were some differences in practices, they were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Significant differences in knowledge were observed based on years of practice. However, no significant differences were found in attitudes and practices, despite variations in responses. Regular seminars and workshops are crucial for staying updated with the latest guidelines. Additionally, it is important to ensure that local guidelines are readily accessible to the broader medical community.

Human ; Brain Death ; Organ Donation ; Tissue And Organ Procurement ; Knowledge ; Attitude