ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xiaoji Hufei Formula in protecting children with close contact exposure to influenza， and to provide reference and evidence-based support for better clinical prevention and treatment of influenza in children. MethodsA multicenter， prospective， non-randomized， parallel， controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 in five hospitals， including Dongfang Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Confirmed influenza cases and influenza-like illness （ILI） cases were collected， and eligible children with close contact exposure to these cases were recruited in the outpatient clinics. According to whether the enrolled close contacts were willing to take Xiaoji Hufei formula for influenza prevention， they were assigned to the observation group （108 cases） or the control group （108 cases）. Follow-up visits were conducted on days 7 and 14 after enrollment. The primary outcomes were the incidence of ILI and the rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Secondary outcomes included traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） symptom score scale for influenza， influenza-related emergency （outpatient） visit rate， influenza hospitalization rate， and time to onset after exposure to influenza cases. ResultsA total of 216 participants were enrolled， with 108 in the observation group and 108 in the control group. Primary outcomes： （1） Incidence of ILI： The incidence was 12.0% （13/108） in the observation group and 23.1% （25/108） in the control group， with the observation group showing a significantly lower incidence （χ²=4.6， P<0.05）. （2） Influenza confirmation rate： 3.7% （4/108） in the observation group and 4.6% （5/108） in the control group， with no statistically significant difference. Secondary outcomes： （1） TCM symptom score scale： after onset， nasal congestion and runny nose scores differed significantly between the two groups （P<0.05）， while other symptoms such as fever， sore throat， and cough showed no significant differences. （2） Influenza-related emergency （outpatient） visit rate： 84.6% （11 cases） in the observation group and 96.0% （24 cases） in the control group， with no significant difference. （3） Time to onset after exposure： The median onset time after exposure to index patients was 7 days in the observation group and 4 days in the control group， with a statistically significant difference （P<0.05）. ConclusionIn previously healthy children exposed to infectious influenza cases under unprotected conditions， Xiaoji Hufei formula prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of ILI. Xiaoji Hufei Formula can be recommended as a specific preventive prescription for influenza in children.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xiaoji Hufei Formula in protecting children with close contact exposure to influenza， and to provide reference and evidence-based support for better clinical prevention and treatment of influenza in children. MethodsA multicenter， prospective， non-randomized， parallel， controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 in five hospitals， including Dongfang Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Confirmed influenza cases and influenza-like illness （ILI） cases were collected， and eligible children with close contact exposure to these cases were recruited in the outpatient clinics. According to whether the enrolled close contacts were willing to take Xiaoji Hufei formula for influenza prevention， they were assigned to the observation group （108 cases） or the control group （108 cases）. Follow-up visits were conducted on days 7 and 14 after enrollment. The primary outcomes were the incidence of ILI and the rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Secondary outcomes included traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） symptom score scale for influenza， influenza-related emergency （outpatient） visit rate， influenza hospitalization rate， and time to onset after exposure to influenza cases. ResultsA total of 216 participants were enrolled， with 108 in the observation group and 108 in the control group. Primary outcomes： （1） Incidence of ILI： The incidence was 12.0% （13/108） in the observation group and 23.1% （25/108） in the control group， with the observation group showing a significantly lower incidence （χ²=4.6， P<0.05）. （2） Influenza confirmation rate： 3.7% （4/108） in the observation group and 4.6% （5/108） in the control group， with no statistically significant difference. Secondary outcomes： （1） TCM symptom score scale： after onset， nasal congestion and runny nose scores differed significantly between the two groups （P<0.05）， while other symptoms such as fever， sore throat， and cough showed no significant differences. （2） Influenza-related emergency （outpatient） visit rate： 84.6% （11 cases） in the observation group and 96.0% （24 cases） in the control group， with no significant difference. （3） Time to onset after exposure： The median onset time after exposure to index patients was 7 days in the observation group and 4 days in the control group， with a statistically significant difference （P<0.05）. ConclusionIn previously healthy children exposed to infectious influenza cases under unprotected conditions， Xiaoji Hufei formula prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of ILI. Xiaoji Hufei Formula can be recommended as a specific preventive prescription for influenza in children.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified pelvic floor reconstruction in non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NNS RARP) for improving postoperative urinary control. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 79 prostate cancer patients who underwent NNS RARP at Tangdu Hospital during Jan.2020 and Dec.2023, including 29 in the reconstruction group, and 50 in the non-reconstruction group. The baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical stage, prostate volume, and biopsy Gleason score, and perioperative indexes including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, catheter indwelling time, complication rate, and positive rate of surgical margins were compared between the two groups. Additionally, urinary continence function was assessed before operation and 1,3,6, and 12 months after operation using the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form (ICIQ-SF) and the incontinence quality of life questionnaire score (I-QoL). Results No statistically significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time was significantly longer in the reconstruction group than in the non-reconstruction group [ (110.24±15.08) min vs. (101.80±9.89) min, P=0.010]. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, catheter indwelling time, complication rate, and positive rate of surgical margins between the two groups (P>0.05). The reconstruction group demonstrated significantly lower ICIQ-SF scores at 1 month [ (10.17±2.16) vs. (11.56±1.66), P=0.002],3 months [ (7.62±1.29) vs. (9.52±1.80), P<0.001], and 6 months postoperatively [ (4.93±1.22) vs. (6.18± 1.67), P=0.001]compared to the non-reconstruction group (adjusted P<0.0125). Conversely, the I-QoL scores were significantly higher in the reconstruction group at 1 month [ (73.32±10.30) vs. (63.88±9.55), P<0.001]and 3 months postoperatively [ (78.91±4.82) vs. (75.66±5.17), P=0.007] (adjusted P<0.0125). However, no significant differences were found in ICIQ-SF or I-QoL scores between the two groups preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively (adjusted P>0.0125). Conclusion The application of modified pelvic floor reconstruction technique in NNS RARP is safe and feasible. Although it slightly prolongs the operation time, it does not increase surgical risks; instead, it effectively promotes early recovery of postoperative urinary continence, thereby significantly enhancing patients'quality of life.

Renal tumor scoring systems can describe the anatomical characteristics of renal tumors. It is an important standard to evaluate the surgical complexity and to evaluate the surgical complexity and feasibility of partial nephrectomy. Scholars at home and abroad have established various scoring systems based on different anatomical parameters，such as R.E.N.A.L.，PADUA，C-Index，which are used to guide the clinical selection of surgical modalities，and predict perioperative complications and prognosis. In this paper，various scoring systems are grouped into three major categories according to their functions：prediction of surgical complexity，prediction of complications，and prediction of prognosis. The contents，characteristics and clinical application value of various renal tumor scoring systems are introduced in detail to guide urologists，enhance their surgical decision-making ability，and improve the clinical outcomes.

Background:Acupuncture(AP)is widely used in hospitalized patients.However,high-quality evidence supporting its use in patients with sepsis-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction remains limited.Objective:This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of AP in patients with sepsis-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction.Methods:PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,SinoMed,VIP Database,Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 10,2024.We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs)that focused on adult patients with sepsis receiving AP and compared them with a control group.The primary outcome was gastrointestinal indicators.Sensitivity analysis,subgroup analysis,and assessment of publication bias were conducted to explore the potential heterogeneity among the included studies.Results:A total of 23 RCTs involving 1603 patients were included.Overall,AP significantly improved gastrointestinal indicators,including intra-abdominal pressure(mean difference[MD]=-1.97cm H2O;95％confidence interval[CI]:-2.77,-1.16;P＜0.00001),bowel sounds(MD=0.91 per minute;95％CI:0.66,1.16;P＜0.00001),and gastric residual volume(MD=-46.94mL;95％CI:-83.45,-10.43;P=0.01).These findings were corroborated by subgroup and sensitivity analyses.AP also showed significant benefits in inflammation indicators(procalcitonin,tumor necrosis factor-α,and interleukin-6),gastrointestinal function indicators(D-lactate,diamine oxidase,intestinal fatty acid-binding protein,and motilin),disease severity scores(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score and gastrointestinal dysfunction score),clinical prognosis,and other critical clinical outcomes(total effective rate and time to achieve target enteral nutrition)(all P values＜0.05).Additionally,the mortality rate in the AP group was comparable to that of the control group.Conclusion:Our findings suggest that AP significantly improves gastrointestinal indicators and other clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and gastrointestinal dysfunction,indicating its potential as a promising therapeutic option.However,due to the small sample sizes and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies,further high-quality,multicenter RCTs are needed to validate these results.

Background: Acupuncture (AP) is widely used in hospitalized patients. However, high-quality evidence supporting its use in patients with sepsis-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction remains limited. Objective: This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of AP in patients with sepsisinduced gastrointestinal dysfunction. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, VIP Database, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 10, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on adult patients with sepsis receiving AP and compared them with a control group. The primary outcome was gastrointestinal indicators. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessment of publication bias were conducted to explore the potential heterogeneity among the included studies. Results: A total of 23 RCTs involving 1603 patients were included. Overall, AP significantly improved gastrointestinal indicators, including intra-abdominal pressure (mean difference [MD] = -1.97 cm H O; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.77, -1.16; P < 0.00001), bowel sounds (MD = 0.91 per minute; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.16; P < 0.00001), and gastric residual volume (MD = -46.94 mL; 95% CI:-83.45, -10.43; P = 0.01). These findings were corroborated by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. AP also showed significant benefits in inflammation indicators (procalcitonin, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6), gastrointestinal function indicators(D-lactate, diamine oxidase, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, and motilin), disease severity scores (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and gastrointestinal dysfunction score), clinical prognosis, and other critical clinical outcomes (total effective rate and time to achieve target enteral nutrition) (all P values < 0.05). Additionally, the mortality rate in the AP group was comparable to that of the control group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that AP significantly improves gastrointestinal indicators and other clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and gastrointestinal dysfunction, indicating its potential as a promising therapeutic option. However, due to the small sample sizes and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, further high-quality, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate these results.

Objective:The Social Isolation Scale for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was developed and tested for reliability and validity, which provided an effective tool for measuring the social isolation level of patients with T2DM.Methods:The initial scale was developed through literature review, qualitative interviews, and expert consultation. Convenience sampling method was used to select T2DM patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for questionnaire survey. The item analysis method was used to select the items of the scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate construct validity. The content validity of the scale was evaluated by the scale-level content validity index and the item-level content validity index. The criterion validity was verified by using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6 and the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. Reliability was tested through internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Results:Through literature review and qualitative interviews, 30 items of the scale were selected to form the first version scale. After two rounds of inquiries from 16 experts (expert authority coefficient = 0.897), the second version of the scale was formed. A total of 407 questionnaires were distributed in two stages using the second version scale. Among the 407 patients, there were 214 males and 193 females. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 61.338%. The final scale was determined to include 4 dimensions and 16 items, with the dimensions being "social support network", "frequency of social participation", "satisfaction with interpersonal relationships", and "diabetes-related sense of isolation".The average content validity index at the scale level was 0.929, the content validity index at the item level was 0.830 - 1.000, and the criterion validity was - 0.647 and 0.681. The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.822, and the test-retest reliability was 0.858.Conclusions:The Social Isolation Scale for people with T2DM has good reliability and validity. It is a reliable and valid tool for assessing social isolation in T2DM patients.

Background:Acupuncture(AP)is widely used in hospitalized patients.However,high-quality evidence supporting its use in patients with sepsis-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction remains limited.Objective:This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of AP in patients with sepsis-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction.Methods:PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,SinoMed,VIP Database,Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 10,2024.We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs)that focused on adult patients with sepsis receiving AP and compared them with a control group.The primary outcome was gastrointestinal indicators.Sensitivity analysis,subgroup analysis,and assessment of publication bias were conducted to explore the potential heterogeneity among the included studies.Results:A total of 23 RCTs involving 1603 patients were included.Overall,AP significantly improved gastrointestinal indicators,including intra-abdominal pressure(mean difference[MD]=-1.97cm H2O;95％confidence interval[CI]:-2.77,-1.16;P＜0.00001),bowel sounds(MD=0.91 per minute;95％CI:0.66,1.16;P＜0.00001),and gastric residual volume(MD=-46.94mL;95％CI:-83.45,-10.43;P=0.01).These findings were corroborated by subgroup and sensitivity analyses.AP also showed significant benefits in inflammation indicators(procalcitonin,tumor necrosis factor-α,and interleukin-6),gastrointestinal function indicators(D-lactate,diamine oxidase,intestinal fatty acid-binding protein,and motilin),disease severity scores(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score and gastrointestinal dysfunction score),clinical prognosis,and other critical clinical outcomes(total effective rate and time to achieve target enteral nutrition)(all P values＜0.05).Additionally,the mortality rate in the AP group was comparable to that of the control group.Conclusion:Our findings suggest that AP significantly improves gastrointestinal indicators and other clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and gastrointestinal dysfunction,indicating its potential as a promising therapeutic option.However,due to the small sample sizes and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies,further high-quality,multicenter RCTs are needed to validate these results.

Objective:The Social Isolation Scale for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was developed and tested for reliability and validity, which provided an effective tool for measuring the social isolation level of patients with T2DM.Methods:The initial scale was developed through literature review, qualitative interviews, and expert consultation. Convenience sampling method was used to select T2DM patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for questionnaire survey. The item analysis method was used to select the items of the scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate construct validity. The content validity of the scale was evaluated by the scale-level content validity index and the item-level content validity index. The criterion validity was verified by using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6 and the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. Reliability was tested through internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Results:Through literature review and qualitative interviews, 30 items of the scale were selected to form the first version scale. After two rounds of inquiries from 16 experts (expert authority coefficient = 0.897), the second version of the scale was formed. A total of 407 questionnaires were distributed in two stages using the second version scale. Among the 407 patients, there were 214 males and 193 females. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 61.338%. The final scale was determined to include 4 dimensions and 16 items, with the dimensions being "social support network", "frequency of social participation", "satisfaction with interpersonal relationships", and "diabetes-related sense of isolation".The average content validity index at the scale level was 0.929, the content validity index at the item level was 0.830 - 1.000, and the criterion validity was - 0.647 and 0.681. The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.822, and the test-retest reliability was 0.858.Conclusions:The Social Isolation Scale for people with T2DM has good reliability and validity. It is a reliable and valid tool for assessing social isolation in T2DM patients.

Background and objective Different degrees of self-transcendence exist in lung cancer patients,which can stimulate patients'self-awareness and promote them to face negative events in life positively,thus improving pa-tients'quality of life and treatment outcomes.However,there are few reports on self-transcendence in lung cancer patients in China,and the related influencing factors have not yet been clarified.This study aims to investigate the current situation of self-transcendence in lung cancer patients and explore its risk factors,so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical intervention decision-making.Methods 243 lung cancer patients who were admitted to the Department of Lung Cancer Center of West China Hospital,Sichuan University from September 2023 to February 2024 were enrolled as the study subjects;general infor-mation questionnaire,self-transcendence scale,Herth hope scale and social support scale were used for the investigation.The influencing factors related to self-transcendence of lung cancer patients were analyzed.Results The total mean score of self-transcendence in lung cancer patients was(44.73±8.94);the total mean score of hope level was(37.60±4.98),and the total mean score of social support was(41.31±7.27).Self-transcendence was positively correlated with hope level and social support(P＜0.001,P＜0.001).Education,hope level and social support were influencing factors of self-transcendence in lung cancer pa-tients(P＜0.05,P＜0.001,P＜0.05).Conclusion Self-transcendence in lung cancer patients was at a low level and was influenced by hope level and social support.Healthcare professionals should pay attention to improving the hope level of lung cancer pa-tients,carrying out targeted psychological interventions,and at the same time guiding them to enhance the perception of social support,so as to promote the realization of self-transcendence in patients.