Objectives: . This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of intranasal insulin in treating persistent and refractory olfactory dysfunction following viral infections. Methods: . A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, covering all articles indexed up to July 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated changes in olfactory scores in patients receiving intranasal insulin, either compared with a control group (placebo or no treatment) or between pre- and post-treatment measurements. Secondary outcomes included serum glucose and insulin levels and the proportion of patients achieving significant olfactory recovery. Results: . Eight studies including 457 participants were reviewed. Intranasal insulin was generally associated with improvement in olfactory scores. Delivery via absorbable materials may enhance both threshold and discrimination outcomes, whereas self-administration demonstrated minimal benefit. Several studies also reported higher rates of substantial olfactory recovery with absorbable material-based delivery. Combination therapy with intranasal insulin and budesonide was suggested to further improve threshold scores. Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with no major changes in serum glucose levels, although one study documented a mild hypoglycemic event. Conclusion . Current evidence suggests that intranasal insulin, particularly when delivered using absorbable materials, may offer therapeutic benefit for persistent post-viral olfactory dysfunction. Corticosteroid coadministration may also provide additional improvements. These findings remain preliminary and require confirmation in larger, well-controlled studies.

Background and Objectives: A substantial proportion of patients presenting with sinus headaches are ultimately diagnosed with migraines. The ID-Migraine tool has been developed to aid in identifying migraine patients in primary care settings. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of validation studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the ID-Migraine tool. Methods: Data were extracted regarding true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives, along with study characteristics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Results: In total, 30 studies involving 9,942 participants were included in the final analysis. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for the ID-Migraine tool was 13.84. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.846. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.865 and 0.702, respectively, while the negative predictive value was 0.791 and the positive predictive value was 0.799. Conclusion The ID-Migraine screening tool is highly accurate and user-friendly for identifying migraines among patients presenting with sinus headaches. By employing this tool, unnecessary diagnostic tests or treatments can be minimized, and patients can be promptly referred to appropriate specialists.

PURPOSE: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new method of accessing intracavitary organs in order to minimize pain by avoiding incisions in the body wall. The aim of this study is to determine patients' acceptance of NOTES in Korea and to compare their views about laparoscopic surgery and NOTES for benign and malignant diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The target number of total subjects was calculated to be 540. The subjects were classified into 18 sub-groups based on age groups, gender, and history of prior surgery. The questionnaire elicited information about demographic characteristics, medical check-ups, diseases, endoscopic and surgical histories, marital status and childbirth, the acceptance of NOTES, and the preferred routes for NOTES. In addition, the subjects chose laparoscopic surgery or NOTES for a hypothetical cholecystectomy and rectal cancer surgery, and responded to questions regarding the acceptable complication rate of NOTES, the appropriate cost of NOTES, and the reason(s) why they did not select NOTES. RESULTS: 486 of 540 patients (90.0%) who agreed to participate in this study completed the questionnaire. NOTES was preferred by the following patients: elderly; a history of treatment due to a disease; having regular check-ups; and a history of an endoscopic procedure (p<0.05). The most preferred route for NOTES was the stomach (67.1%). Eighty-four percent of the patients choosing NOTES responded that the complication rate of the new surgical method should be the same or lower than laparoscopic surgery. Vague anxiety over a new surgical method was the most common reason why NOTES was not selected in benign and malignant diseases (64% and 73%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients appear to be interested in the potential benefits of NOTES and would embrace it if their concerns about safety are met. We believe that qualified surgical endoscopists can meet these safety concerns, and that NOTES development has the potential to flourish.
Aged ; Anxiety ; Cholecystectomy ; Endoscopy* ; Humans ; Korea* ; Laparoscopy ; Marital Status ; Mass Screening* ; Methods ; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery* ; Parturition ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Stomach