1.Clinical Outcomes and Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Ischemic Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction:A Retrospective Observational Study
Kyung Hoon CHO ; Ki Hong LEE ; Yong-Kyu LEE ; Seok OH ; Yongwhan LIM ; Joon Ho AHN ; Seung Hun LEE ; Dae Young HYUN ; Min Chul KIM ; Doo Sun SIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Jang Hoon LEE ; Joo-Yong HAHN ; Yu-Ri KIM ; Nam Sik YOON ; Hyung Wook PARK ; Weon KIM ; Myung Ho JEONG ;
Chonnam Medical Journal 2026;62(2):55-63
Limited data exist regarding the real-world practices and clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs).Using nationwide registry data from South Korea, we aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and clinical practices, especially implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) implantation, in patients with reduced LVEFs at least 40 days after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Of 13,056 patients with AMI between 2011 and 2015, we analyzed 350 (median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 56-75]) who had LVEFs <40% on follow-up transthoracic echocardiogram 40 days after the index event. The primary outcome was cardiac-cause mortality at 3 years. Secondary outcomes comprised major cardiovascular events as well as outcomes defined by the use of ICDs, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds), and electrophysiology studies. Among 350 patients, 39 (11.1%) died from cardiac causes during 3 years of follow-up. Eleven (3.1%) were hospitalized for ventricular tachycardia. The rate of ICD or CRT-D implantation up to 3 years was 5.7% (20/350). Cox time-to-event analysis revealed older age, LVEF <30%, diabetes mellitus, and previous MI or revascularization as positively associated with cardiac death, whereas the use of statins and body weight <67 kg were negatively associated. This nationwide Korean registry demonstrated that only 5.7% of patients who had reduced LVEFs after 40 days of AMI underwent ICD implantations over 3 years. Considering the high mortality, concerted efforts are needed to improve clinical outcomes for patients who may have been candidates for ICD implantation.
2.Neuroblastoma: A 2020 Survey Conducted by the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Hee-Beom YANG ; Soo Min AHN ; Min Jeng CHO ; Yong-Hoon CHO ; Soo Jin Na CHOI ; Yoon Mi CHOI ; Jae Hee CHUNG ; Seok Joo HAN ; In Geol HO ; Jeong HONG ; Kyong IHN ; Yeon Jun JEONG ; Eunyoung JUNG ; Dae Youn KIM ; Hae-Young KIM ; Ki Hoon KIM ; Seong Chul KIM ; Soo-Hong KIM ; Eun-Jung KOO ; Hyun Hee KWON ; Yong Jae KWON ; Nam-Hyuk LEE ; Ju Yeon LEE ; Sanghoon LEE ; Jung-Man NAMGOONG ; Chaeyoun OH ; Jung-Tak OH ; Jin Young PARK ; Junbeom PARK ; Jeong-Meen SEO ; Jae Ho SHIN ; Hyun Beak SHIN ; Joohyun SIM ; Jiyoung SUL ; Joon Kee YOUN ; Hyun-Young KIM
Advances in Pediatric Surgery 2025;31(2):66-76
Purpose:
To report a nationwide survey on neuroblastoma conducted by the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons (KAPS) in 2020.
Methods:
The clinical data of pediatric patients diagnosed with and treated for neuroblastoma from 2005 to 2019 in 19 hospitals of KAPS members were collected. Survival and prognostic factor analyses were performed using the log rank test and Cox proportional hazard analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
A total of 669 patients with neuroblastoma were registered for the study. The results were presented and discussed at the 36th annual meeting of the KAPS, which was held in Seoul on August 21, 2020.
Conclusion
This study provides information on patient demographics, prognostic outcomes, and comprehensive treatment outcomes for neuroblastoma. The study is expected to be an important reference for improving pediatric surgeons’ understanding and treatment of neuroblastoma.
3.Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Small Coronary Artery Disease
Man Su KIM ; Seong Ho PARK ; Seok OH ; Dae Yong HYUN ; Seung Hun LEE ; Yong Hwan LIM ; Jun Ho AHN ; Kyung Hoon CHO ; Min Chul KIM ; Doo Sun SIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Myung Ho JEONG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2024;99(5):253-262
Background/Aims:
Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with small coronary artery disease. However, further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of DEBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs).
Methods:
In total, 492 patients (age, 67.9 ± 11.0 years; 339 men) with small coronary artery lesions (diameter < 2.75 mm) were randomly assigned to group I (DEB) (n = 104; age, 67.2 ± 10.7 years; 83 men) and group II (DES) (n = 388; age, 68.0 ± 11.1 years; 254 men). For inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, the study population was stratified into groups I (n = 269) and II (n = 280). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups during 12 months of clinical follow-up.
Results:
Group I had shorter device lengths (22.4 ± 5.8 mm) compared with group II (27.4 ± 9.3 mm; p < 0.001). Additionally, devices in group I were smaller in diameter (2.4 ± 0.1 mm) compared with those in group II (2.6 ± 0.1 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in group I (53.8% ± 12.6%) than in group II (58.6% ± 11.9%; p < 0.001). After IPTW, no significant differences in LVEF were observed between groups I and II. During 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of total MACE did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusions
No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy between DEB and DES for the treatment of small coronary artery disease. Therefore, DEB can be considered a viable alternative to DES in patients with small coronary artery disease.
4.Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Small Coronary Artery Disease
Man Su KIM ; Seong Ho PARK ; Seok OH ; Dae Yong HYUN ; Seung Hun LEE ; Yong Hwan LIM ; Jun Ho AHN ; Kyung Hoon CHO ; Min Chul KIM ; Doo Sun SIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Myung Ho JEONG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2024;99(5):253-262
Background/Aims:
Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with small coronary artery disease. However, further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of DEBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs).
Methods:
In total, 492 patients (age, 67.9 ± 11.0 years; 339 men) with small coronary artery lesions (diameter < 2.75 mm) were randomly assigned to group I (DEB) (n = 104; age, 67.2 ± 10.7 years; 83 men) and group II (DES) (n = 388; age, 68.0 ± 11.1 years; 254 men). For inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, the study population was stratified into groups I (n = 269) and II (n = 280). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups during 12 months of clinical follow-up.
Results:
Group I had shorter device lengths (22.4 ± 5.8 mm) compared with group II (27.4 ± 9.3 mm; p < 0.001). Additionally, devices in group I were smaller in diameter (2.4 ± 0.1 mm) compared with those in group II (2.6 ± 0.1 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in group I (53.8% ± 12.6%) than in group II (58.6% ± 11.9%; p < 0.001). After IPTW, no significant differences in LVEF were observed between groups I and II. During 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of total MACE did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusions
No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy between DEB and DES for the treatment of small coronary artery disease. Therefore, DEB can be considered a viable alternative to DES in patients with small coronary artery disease.
5.Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Small Coronary Artery Disease
Man Su KIM ; Seong Ho PARK ; Seok OH ; Dae Yong HYUN ; Seung Hun LEE ; Yong Hwan LIM ; Jun Ho AHN ; Kyung Hoon CHO ; Min Chul KIM ; Doo Sun SIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Myung Ho JEONG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2024;99(5):253-262
Background/Aims:
Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with small coronary artery disease. However, further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of DEBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs).
Methods:
In total, 492 patients (age, 67.9 ± 11.0 years; 339 men) with small coronary artery lesions (diameter < 2.75 mm) were randomly assigned to group I (DEB) (n = 104; age, 67.2 ± 10.7 years; 83 men) and group II (DES) (n = 388; age, 68.0 ± 11.1 years; 254 men). For inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, the study population was stratified into groups I (n = 269) and II (n = 280). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups during 12 months of clinical follow-up.
Results:
Group I had shorter device lengths (22.4 ± 5.8 mm) compared with group II (27.4 ± 9.3 mm; p < 0.001). Additionally, devices in group I were smaller in diameter (2.4 ± 0.1 mm) compared with those in group II (2.6 ± 0.1 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in group I (53.8% ± 12.6%) than in group II (58.6% ± 11.9%; p < 0.001). After IPTW, no significant differences in LVEF were observed between groups I and II. During 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of total MACE did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusions
No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy between DEB and DES for the treatment of small coronary artery disease. Therefore, DEB can be considered a viable alternative to DES in patients with small coronary artery disease.
6.Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Small Coronary Artery Disease
Man Su KIM ; Seong Ho PARK ; Seok OH ; Dae Yong HYUN ; Seung Hun LEE ; Yong Hwan LIM ; Jun Ho AHN ; Kyung Hoon CHO ; Min Chul KIM ; Doo Sun SIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Myung Ho JEONG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2024;99(5):253-262
Background/Aims:
Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with small coronary artery disease. However, further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of DEBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs).
Methods:
In total, 492 patients (age, 67.9 ± 11.0 years; 339 men) with small coronary artery lesions (diameter < 2.75 mm) were randomly assigned to group I (DEB) (n = 104; age, 67.2 ± 10.7 years; 83 men) and group II (DES) (n = 388; age, 68.0 ± 11.1 years; 254 men). For inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, the study population was stratified into groups I (n = 269) and II (n = 280). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups during 12 months of clinical follow-up.
Results:
Group I had shorter device lengths (22.4 ± 5.8 mm) compared with group II (27.4 ± 9.3 mm; p < 0.001). Additionally, devices in group I were smaller in diameter (2.4 ± 0.1 mm) compared with those in group II (2.6 ± 0.1 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in group I (53.8% ± 12.6%) than in group II (58.6% ± 11.9%; p < 0.001). After IPTW, no significant differences in LVEF were observed between groups I and II. During 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of total MACE did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusions
No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy between DEB and DES for the treatment of small coronary artery disease. Therefore, DEB can be considered a viable alternative to DES in patients with small coronary artery disease.
7.National Survey of Gastroschisis and Omphalocele by Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Yeon Jun JEONG ; Dayoung KO ; Eun-Jung KOO ; Hyunhee KWON ; Dae Yeon KIM ; Soo-Hong KIM ; Wontae KIM ; Hae-Young KIM ; Hyun Young KIM ; Seong Chul KIM ; Younghyun NA ; Jung-Man NAMGOONG ; So Hyun NAM ; Sungjoo PARK ; Junbeom PARK ; Jinyoung PARK ; Tae-Jun PARK ; Jeong-Meen SEO ; Ji-Young SUL ; Joonhyuk SON ; Hyun Beak SHIN ; Joohyun SIM ; Jung-Tak OH ; Chaeyoun OH ; Joong Kee YOUN ; Sanghoon LEE ; Ju Yeon LEE ; Cheolgu LEE ; Kyong IHN ; Eunyoung JUNG ; Jae Hee CHUNG ; Yong-Hoon CHO ; Yun Mee CHOE ; Soo Jin Na CHOI ; Seok Joo HAN ; In Geol HO
Advances in Pediatric Surgery 2024;30(2):39-51
Purpose:
This study provides insights into the prevalence at birth, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of gastroschisis and omphalocele in Korea over the past decade, addressing the lack of localized data despite advanced healthcare capabilities.
Methods:
The study retrospectively analyzed data from 20 pediatric surgical centers in Korea from January 2012 to December 2021, including 269 patients diagnosed with gastroschisis or omphalocele. Data variables included gender, gestational age, birth weight, associated anomalies, type of defect, surgical interventions, and outcomes.
Results:
The study covered 269 patients, with 80 gastroschisis and 189 omphalocele cases. Gastroschisis prevalence at birth remained stable at 2.15 per 100,000 live births, while omphalocele increased to 5.08 per 100,000. Both conditions had similar gender ratios (0.95). Gastroschisis patients had lower birth weights (2,463.90±505.50 g) and smaller head circumferences (31.97±1.86 cm) compared to omphalocele patients (2,757.65±761.24 g, 32.78±2.64 cm). Omphalocele cases had more associated anomalies, especially cardiovascular issues. Prenatal diagnosis rates were high: 93.7% for gastroschisis and 86.4% for omphalocele. About 96.3% of gastroschisis and 84.1% of omphalocele patients were born in their treatment hospitals. Gastroschisis patients underwent surgery sooner (average 3.5 days) and started feeding later (16.5 days) than omphalocele patients (average 56.5 days to surgery, 6.6 days to start feeding). Hospital stays and follow-up durations were similar, averaging around 782.6 days for gastroschisis and 800.3 days for omphalocele patients. Survival rates were 89.7% for gastroschisis and 87.1% for omphalocele.
Conclusion
The study highlights the need for early diagnosis, centralized care, and specialized surgical approaches to optimize outcomes for gastroschisis and omphalocele patients in Korea. Enhanced prenatal screening and surgical protocols are recommended to improve these patients' prognosis.
8.A Preliminary Study About Occupational Stress and Career Satisfaction of Korean Psychiatrists
Dae yong SIM ; Jong Hyuk CHOI ; Yeong Gi KYEON
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2022;61(1):28-37
Objectives:
Physicians experience high occupational stress due to heavy workload, responsibility and stressful situations in the medical field. Although occupational stress decreases productivity and increases medical accidents, occupational stress on Korean psychiatrists is not well studied. In this study, we investigated the occupational stress and career satisfaction of Korean psychiatrists.
Methods:
Electronic surveys were conducted via e-mail, and a total of 266 psychiatrists fully answered the surveys. The surveys consisted of the Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS), career satisfaction and stress inventory for the health professional.
Results:
The mean KOSS score of Korean psychiatrists was lower than the score of other Korean professions (43.99 vs. 46.03). There are significant differences in the sub-items of KOSS, depending on the lifestyle, the career and the hospital on duty. Psychiatric residents scored significantly higher in job control and occupational climate than psychiatrists. On the other hand, workplace relationships and job insecurity scored significantly higher in psychiatrists. Psychiatrists working in general and university hospitals had higher stress in job demand than psychiatrists working at private psychiatric hospitals. Job control and lack of reward scores were high in psychiatrists working in national psychiatric hospitals, and 21.8% of psychiatrists answered that they would not become a psychiatrist again.
Conclusion
This study showed the overall job stress level of psychiatrists in Korea, and they were experiencing high job stress in different areas depending on factors, such as position, working environment and living habits.
9.Predictors of recurrent acute myocardial infarction despite successful percutaneous coronary intervention
Sang Hun LEE ; Myung Ho JEONG ; Joon Ho AHN ; Dae Young HYUN ; Kyung Hoon CHO ; Min Chul KIM ; Doo Sun SIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Jin Yong HWANG ; Weon KIM ; Jong Seon PARK ; Chang-Hwan YOON ; Seung Ho HUR ; Sang Rok LEE ; Kwang Soo CHA ;
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2022;37(4):777-785
Background/Aims:
Recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an adverse cardiac event in patients with a first AMI. The predictors of recurrent AMI after the first AMI in patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been elucidated.
Methods:
We analyzed the data collected from 9,869 patients (63.2 ± 12.4 years, men:women = 7,446:2,423) who were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health between November 2011 and October 2015, had suffered their first AMI and had received successful PCI during the index hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of recurrent AMI following the first AMI.
Results:
The cumulative incidence of recurrent AMI after successful PCI was 3.6% (359/9,869). According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the significant predictive factors for recurrent AMI were diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, and multivessel disease.
Conclusions
In this Korean prospective cohort study, the independent predictors of recurrent AMI after successful PCI for the first AMI were diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, and multivessel disease.
10.Effect of Low-Dose Nebivolol in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multi-Center Observational Study
Doo Sun SIM ; Dae Young HYUN ; Myung Ho JEONG ; Hyo Soo KIM ; Kiyuk CHANG ; Dong Ju CHOI ; Kyoo Rok HAN ; Tae Hoon AHN ; Jang Hwan BAE ; Si Wan CHOI ; Jong Seon PARK ; Seung Ho HUR ; Jei Keon CHAE ; Seok Kyu OH ; Kwang Soo CHA ; Jin Yong HWANG
Chonnam Medical Journal 2020;56(1):55-61
The optimal dose of beta blockers after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains uncertain. We evaluated the effectiveness of low-dose nebivolol, a beta1 blocker and a vasodilator, in patients with acute MI. A total of 625 patients with acute MI from 14 teaching hospitals in Korea were divided into 2 groups according to the dose of nebivolol (nebistol®, Elyson Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea): low-dose group (1.25 mg daily, n=219) and usual- to high-dose group (≥2.5 mg daily, n=406). The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, composite of death from any cause, non-fatal MI, stroke, repeat revascularization, rehospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure) at 12 months. After adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting, the rates of MACCE were not different between the low-dose and the usual- to high-dose groups (2.8% and 3.1%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 2.24, p=0.860). The low-dose nebivolol group showed higher rates of MI than the usual- to high-dose group (1.2% and 0%, p=0.008). The 2 groups had similar rates of death from any cause (1.1% and 0.3%, p=0.273), stroke (0.4% and 1.1%, p=0.384), repeat PCI (1.2% and 0.8%, p=0.428), rehospitalization for unstable angina (1.2% and 1.0%, p=0.743) and for heart failure (0.6% and 0.7%, p=0.832). In patients with acute MI, the rates of MACCE for low-dose and usual- to high-dose nebivolol were not significantly different at 12-month follow-up.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail