Early neurologic deterioration (END) is common and occurs within a few hours to days after an ischemic stroke. Traditionally, END has been treated as a collective entity, including the occurrence of new deficits (recurrence) and the aggravation of pre-existing neurologic deficits (progression). END arises from distinct mechanisms that require different therapeutic approaches. We reviewed clinical and experimental studies addressing the epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment of END, focusing on differentiating END due to recurrence from END due to progression and on interventions including antiplatelet therapy, direct thrombin inhibition, and induced hypertension. Early recurrence is closely associated with thrombus growth and new ischemic events, particularly in atherothrombotic disease. Early recurrence is also common in patients with cancer-associated stroke. Thrombin and platelet activation play central roles under both conditions. In contrast, progression is mainly driven by infarct growth, that is, the evolution from incomplete infarction to complete infarction due to impaired perfusion, especially in lesions involving the subcortical fiber tracts. Therapeutic implications differ accordingly. Recurrence may respond to potent antithrombotic strategies, including combined antiplatelet and direct thrombin inhibition, whereas progression may benefit from induced hypertension. However, recurrence and progression often occur simultaneously, making clinical differentiation challenging. END should be conceptualized as a spectrum of clinical presentations arising from distinct mechanisms. Recognizing recurrence and progression as separate processes is essential for mechanism-oriented treatments. Future trials should adopt this framework to develop individualized strategies and improve outcomes in patients with acute stroke.

Background: and Purpose Although blood pressure (BP) elevation is common in acute ischemic stroke, and guidelines recommend reducing systolic BP to <185 mm Hg prior to reperfusion therapy, the safety and efficacy of active BP lowering in the hyperacute phase before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective hospital-based registry that included consecutive patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion who underwent EVT between 2016 and 2024. Patients were categorized into the active BP lowering in the emergency department (ED) group or the absence of BP lowering in the ED group based on whether they received intravenous antihypertensive treatment prior to EVT. The primary outcome was the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months. Propensity score matching and multivariable regression analyses were also performed. Results: Of the 492 included patients, 53 (10.8%) received active BP lowering in the ED. After propensity score matching, patients who underwent active BP lowering showed a worse distribution of 3-month mRS scores compared with those who did not receive BP lowering (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.80; p=0.013). The active BP lowering group exhibited greater infarct volume growth (adjusted β coefficient, 33.4; 95% CI, 18.2 to 48.7; p<0.001), whereas the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage did not differ between groups. Conclusions Active BP lowering in the ED before EVT was associated with worse functional outcomes and increased infarct growth without a corresponding reduction in the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. These findings highlight the need for caution in initiating antihypertensive therapy before reperfusion and support further investigations to define optimal pre-EVT BP management.

Background: and Purpose The relationship between thrombus histology and long-term stroke patient outcomes remains unexplored. We aimed to determine whether the histological characteristics of thrombi are associated with long-term outcomes in stroke patients and to identify the thrombus features linked to these outcomes. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 512 patients with ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular thrombectomy between July 2017 and July 2023. Patients were followed up for long-term major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence. Thrombus histology was assessed using immunohistochemistry, including the proportion of fibrin, red blood cells, and platelets, as well as the distribution patterns categorized as layered, erythrocytic, diffuse platelet, and mixed. Results: During a median follow-up of 38.1 months, 164 patients experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, with an incidence rate of 3.02 per 100 person-years. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence was associated with the diffuse platelet pattern and proportion of platelets and red blood cells within the thrombus. After adjusting for confounders, the diffuse platelet pattern independently predicted major adverse cardiovascular events, including mortality and stroke recurrence. Subgroup analysis also demonstrated that the association between the diffuse platelet pattern and major adverse cardiovascular events was consistent across key clinical subgroups based on age (≥65 vs. <65 yr), atrial fibrillation, cancer status, and discharge medications. Conclusions Thrombus histology could provide predictive value for long-term prognosis. In particular, histological distribution patterns may be more important than simple composition in thrombus research, including in the prediction of prognosis.

Background: and Purpose Patients with ischemic stroke with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) represent therapeutic challenges, and the optimal antithrombotic regimen remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy with OAC plus antiplatelet therapy in this population. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched through June 30, 2025, for studies enrolling patients with ischemic stroke and evidence of both AF and LAA. Outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Peto method, with random-effects sensitivity analyses, stratified by short-term (<3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) follow-up. Results: Eight cohort studies were analyzed. In the short-term, combination therapy was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14–0.97; p=0.043), without a significant increase in major bleeding, although this association did not persist under random-effects sensitivity analysis (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13–1.07; p=0.067). Conversely, long-term combination therapy was associated with higher risks of major bleeding (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08–1.45; p=0.002), all-cause mortality (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01–1.54; p=0.039), and composite outcome (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.27–1.74; p<0.001), without reducing recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00–1.26; p=0.054). Conclusions While long-term OAC plus antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding risk without preventing recurrent stroke, short-term combination therapy may offer benefits in selected patients with concomitant LAA, though this early efficacy signal should be interpreted with caution.

Purpose: This study evaluates the prognostic significance of tumor size at disease progression (PD) and depth of response (DOR) in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We performed post hoc analysis using data from six prospective clinical trials conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group. Patients with tumor size at PD was categorized into ‘Mild PD’ and ‘Significant PD’ based on the cutoff values of relative change from baseline using maximally selected rank statistics. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between PD and DOR categories. Results: Among the 194 evaluable patients, 130 experienced PD. A 35.48% decrease from baseline in tumor size at PD was chosen for the cutoff between mild and significant PD for OS (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ −35.48%; significant PD > −35.48%). The mild PD had superior OS compared to the significant PD (25.8 vs. 12.8 months; Hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.266-0.843, p=0.009). When using an exploratory cutoff based on whether the tumor size was below vs. exceeded from the baseline (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ 0%; significant PD > 0%), OS remained significantly longer in the mild PD (17.1 vs. 11.8 months; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.392-0.932, p=0.021). The greatest DOR was associated with the longest OS and PFS (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion Tumor size at PD and DOR were significant prognostic factors for progressive disease. Maintaining a sufficiently reduced tumor size even during PD was associated with better survival outcomes.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.

Purpose: This study evaluates the prognostic significance of tumor size at disease progression (PD) and depth of response (DOR) in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We performed post hoc analysis using data from six prospective clinical trials conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group. Patients with tumor size at PD was categorized into ‘Mild PD’ and ‘Significant PD’ based on the cutoff values of relative change from baseline using maximally selected rank statistics. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between PD and DOR categories. Results: Among the 194 evaluable patients, 130 experienced PD. A 35.48% decrease from baseline in tumor size at PD was chosen for the cutoff between mild and significant PD for OS (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ −35.48%; significant PD > −35.48%). The mild PD had superior OS compared to the significant PD (25.8 vs. 12.8 months; Hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.266-0.843, p=0.009). When using an exploratory cutoff based on whether the tumor size was below vs. exceeded from the baseline (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ 0%; significant PD > 0%), OS remained significantly longer in the mild PD (17.1 vs. 11.8 months; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.392-0.932, p=0.021). The greatest DOR was associated with the longest OS and PFS (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion Tumor size at PD and DOR were significant prognostic factors for progressive disease. Maintaining a sufficiently reduced tumor size even during PD was associated with better survival outcomes.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.