1.The Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0
Hyo Seon RYU ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Dong Hyun KANG ; Yoo-Kang KWAK ; Han Deok KWAK ; Yoon-Hye KWON ; Dalyon KIM ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Jae Hyun KIM ; Ji Hun KIM ; Jin Won KIM ; Tae Hyung KIM ; Hae Young KIM ; Soo Min NAM ; Gyoung Tae NOH ; Jun Woo BONG ; Nak Song SUNG ; Seon Hui SHIN ; Kil-Yong LEE ; Sung Chul LEE ; Sea-Won LEE ; Jung Won LEE ; Jong Min LEE ; Myung Hoon IHN ; Joo Han LIM ; Woong Bae JI ; Dae Hee PYO ; Young Ki HONG ; Jung-Myun KWAK ;
Annals of Coloproctology 2026;42(1):4-33
Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.
2.Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DW1903 in Patients with Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 study
Jie-Hyun KIM ; Hwoon-Yong JUNG ; In Kyung YOO ; Seon-Young PARK ; Jae Gyu KIM ; Jae Kyu SUNG ; Jin Seok JANG ; Gab Jin CHEON ; Kyoung Oh KIM ; Tae Oh KIM ; Soo Teik LEE ; Kwang Bum CHO ; Hoon Jai CHUN ; Jong-Jae PARK ; Moo In PARK ; Jae-Young JANG ; Seong Woo JEON ; Jin Woong CHO ; Dae Hwan KANG ; Gwang Ha KIM ; Jae J. KIM ; Sang Gyun KIM ; Nayoung KIM ; Yong Chan LEE ; Su Jin HONG ; Hyun-Soo KIM ; Sora LEE ; Sang Woo LEE
Gut and Liver 2024;18(1):70-76
Background/Aims:
H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) have been used to treat gastritis by inhibiting gastric acid. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are more potent acid suppressants than H2RA.However, the efficacy and safety of low-dose PPI for treating gastritis remain unclear. The aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose PPI for treating gastritis.
Methods:
A double-blind, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 476 patients with endoscopic erosive gastritis to a group using esomeprazole 10 mg (DW1903) daily and a group using famotidine 20 mg (DW1903R1) daily for 2 weeks. The full-analysis set included 319 patients (DW1903, n=159; DW1903R1, n=160) and the per-protocol set included 298 patients (DW1903, n=147; DW1903R1, n=151). The primary endpoint (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoint (erosion and edema cure rates, improvement rates of hemorrhage, erythema, and symptoms) were assessed after the treatment. Adverse events were compared.
Results:
According to the full-analysis set, the erosion improvement rates in the DW1903 and DW1903R1 groups were 59.8% and 58.8%, respectively. According to the per-protocol analysis, the erosion improvement rates in the DW1903 and DW1903R1 groups were 61.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were not significantly different between two groups except that the hemorrhagic improvement rate was higher in DW1903 with statistical tendency. The number of adverse events were not statistically different.
Conclusions
DW1903 of a low-dose PPI was not inferior to DW1903R1 of H2RA. Thus, lowdose PPI can be a novel option for treating gastritis (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05163756).
3.Accuracy of Noninvasive Scoring Systems in Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sangsoo HAN ; Miyoung CHOI ; Bora LEE ; Hye-Won LEE ; Seong Hee KANG ; Yuri CHO ; Sang Bong AHN ; Do Seon SONG 8 ; Dae Won JUN ; Jieun LEE ; Jeong-Ju YOO
Gut and Liver 2022;16(6):952-963
Background/Aims:
Several noninvasive scoring systems have been developed to determine the risk of advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We examined the diagnostic accuracy of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD.
Methods:
For this meta-analysis, various databases including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, OVID Medline and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. After the acquired abstracts were reviewed by two investigators, manuscripts were chosen for a full-text examination.
Results:
Thirty-six studies evaluating biopsy-proven NAFLD were selected for meta-analysis. A total of 14,992 patients were analyzed. The lower cutoff sensitivity of the FIB-4 score predicting histological fibrosis stage 3 or more (≥F3) was 69%, with specificity of 64%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.96, and negative likelihood ratio (LR–) of 0.47. The low baseline sensitivity of the NFS score predicting ≥F3 was 70%, with a specificity of 61%, LR+ of 1.83, and LR– of 0.48. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the FIB-4 score predicting ≥F3 and ≥F2 were 76% and 68%, respectively. The AUC values of the NFS score predicting ≥F3 and ≥F2 were 74% and 60%, respectively.
Conclusions
The FIB-4 or NFS test can be used to predict the degree of liver fibrosis in NAFLD, and the diagnostic accuracy resulted as relatively high in fibrosis stages of F3 or higher.
4.2020 Korean Emergency Physician Survey
Seon Koo KIM ; Kwang Hyun CHO ; In Byung KIM ; Mi Jin LEE ; Yoo Sang YOON ; Kyung Hye PARK ; Song Yi PARK ; Hong Jae KIM ; Dong Hoon KEY ; Beom Sok SEO ; Young Min JOO ; Chang Gun JEE ; Suk Jae CHOI ; In Hwan YEO ; Ji Hun KANG ; Woo Jin JUNG ; Dae Sung LIM ; Eu Sun LEE ; Hyung Min LEE ; Soon Joo WANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2022;33(4):1-10
Objective:
This study was carried out to establish a basis for understanding and correcting the problems of the emergency physicians (EP) in Korea by examining the current status through the 2020 emergency physician survey conducted by the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM).
Methods:
An online survey was conducted from January 15 to February 26, 2021, through a website and mobile application. The final questionnaire was classified into three types based on the clinical work in the emergency department (ED), current position, and the year of board certification. The contents of the questionnaire were organized into eight themes, and a subcommittee was put in charge of each.
Results:
Of the 400 emergency medical institutions surveyed, 295 hospitals (74.2%) had board-certified EPs, and 1,453 EPs (72.5%) out of 2,000 were working in the ED. Of these, on average, 7.2 EPs worked together, and they worked 11.6 days/153.1 hours per month and did night shifts 5.9 days per month. 30.7% showed excessive sleepiness during the day, and only 9.6% said that they could adhere to mealtimes. 27.1% responded that they suffered from depression. The level of satisfaction was 3.2 points, and 43.0% responded that they would choose emergency medicine (EM) again as their major. The most important factor in choosing EM was the availability of adequate free time. Their responses indicated that the retirement age was 59.7 years, and the upper age limit for the night shift was 54.3 years.
Conclusion
Though there have been improvements since the first survey in 2010, there was no notable increase in EP satisfaction. Therefore, appropriate future policies should be formulated and implemented based on these survey results.
5.2020 Korean Emergency Physician Survey
Seon Koo KIM ; Kwang Hyun CHO ; In Byung KIM ; Mi Jin LEE ; Yoo Sang YOON ; Kyung Hye PARK ; Song Yi PARK ; Hong Jae KIM ; Dong Hoon KEY ; Beom Sok SEO ; Young Min JOO ; Chang Gun JEE ; Suk Jae CHO ; In Hwan YEO ; Ji Hun KANG ; Woo Jin JUNG ; Dae Sung LIM ; Eu Sun LEE ; Hyung Min LEE ; Soon Joo WANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2022;33(5):520-520
6.KASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Seong Hee KANG ; Hye Won LEE ; Jeong-Ju YOO ; Yuri CHO ; Seung Up KIM ; Tae Hee LEE ; Byoung Kuk JANG ; Sang Gyune KIM ; Sang Bong AHN ; Haeryoung KIM ; Dae Won JUN ; Joon-Il CHOI ; Do Seon SONG ; Won KIM ; Soung Won JEONG ; Moon Young KIM ; Hong KOH ; Sujin JEONG ; Jin-Woo LEE ; Yong Kyun CHO ;
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(3):363-401
7.KASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Seong Hee KANG ; Hye Won LEE ; Jeong-Ju YOO ; Yuri CHO ; Seung Up KIM ; Tae Hee LEE ; Byoung Kuk JANG ; Sang Gyune KIM ; Sang Bong AHN ; Haeryoung KIM ; Dae Won JUN ; Joon-Il CHOI ; Do Seon SONG ; Won KIM ; Soung Won JEONG ; Moon Young KIM ; Hong KOH ; Sujin JEONG ; Jin-Woo LEE ; Yong Kyun CHO ;
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(3):363-401
8.Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of Korean ginseng extract GS-KG9 in a D-galactosamine-induced liver damage animal model
Yun Ho JO ; Hwan LEE ; Myeong Hwan OH ; Gyeong Hee LEE ; You Jin LEE ; Ji Sun LEE ; Min Jung KIM ; Won Yong KIM ; Jin Seong KIM ; Dae Seok YOO ; Sang Won CHO ; Seon Woo CHA ; Mi Kyung PYO
Nutrition Research and Practice 2020;14(4):334-351
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:
This study was designed to investigate the improvement effect of white ginseng extract (GS-KG9) on D-galactosamine (Ga1N)-induced oxidative stress and liver injury.
SUBJECTS/METHODS:
Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 6 groups. Rats were orally administrated with GS-KG9 (300, 500, or 700 mg/kg) or silymarin (25 mg/kg) for 2 weeks. The rats of the GS-KG9- and silymarin-treated groups and a control group were then intraperitoneally injected Ga1N at a concentration of 650 mg/kg for 4 days. To investigate the protective effect of GS-KG9 against GalN-induced liver injury, blood liver function indicators, anti-oxidative stress indicators, and histopathological features were analyzed.
RESULTS:
Serum biochemical analysis indicated that GS-KG9 ameliorated the elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in GalN-treated rats. The hepatoprotective effects of GS-KG9 involved enhancing components of the hepatic antioxidant defense system, including glutathione, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT). In addition, GS-KG9 treatment inhibited reactive oxygen species (ROS) production induced by GalN treatment in hepatocytes and significantly increased the expression levels of nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) proteins, which are antioxidant proteins. In particular, by histological analyses bases on hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, α-smooth muscle actin, and transforming growth factor-β1 staining, we determined that the administration of 500 mg/kg GS-KG9 inhibited hepatic inflammation and fibrosis due to the excessive accumulation of collagen.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings demonstrate that GS-KG9 improves GalN-induced liver inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis by attenuating oxidative stress. Therefore, GS-KG9 may be considered a useful candidate in the development of a natural preventive agent against liver injury.
9.Consensus guidelines for the definition of the end stage of disease and last days of life and criteria for medical judgment
Sang Min LEE ; Su Jung KIM ; Youn Seon CHOI ; Dae Seog HEO ; Sujin BAIK ; Bo Moon CHOI ; Daekyun KIM ; Jae Young MOON ; So Young PARK ; Yoon Jung CHANG ; In Cheol HWANG ; Jung Hye KWON ; Sun Hyun KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Jeanno PARK ; Ho Jung AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Ivo KWON ; Do Kyong KIM ; Ock Joo KIM ; Sang Ho YOO ; Yoo Seock CHEONG ; Younsuck KOH
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2018;61(8):509-521
In Korea, the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-sustaining Treatment Decision-making Act was enacted in February 2016 in order to ensure that the patient's self-determination in end-of-life care processes is respected. To enhance physicians' understanding of this act and to provide proper criteria for medical judgment in variety of clinical settings, consensus guidelines were published in November 2016. In this article, the characteristics of these guidelines and related issues regarding the definitions of ‘the end stage of disease’ and ‘last days of life’ and the criteria for medical judgment are presented and summarized. According to the guidelines, the term ‘end stage of disease’ refers to a state in which there is no possibility of a fundamental recovery and the symptoms are expected to worsen within months. The terms ‘the last days of life’ and ‘the final days of life’ refer to a state in which, despite treatment, the patient's condition is worsening and death is impending, with no possibility of recovery. The attending physician and another relevant specialist should both judge a patient's medical condition as either ‘end stage of disease’ for hospice/palliative care or ‘the last days of life’ for dying patient care according to the law. Caregivers should provide appropriate medical information to eligible patients for palliative or ‘end stage of disease’ care through advance care planning. Therefore, it is critically necessary that caregivers understand the legitimate process of hospice/palliative and dying patient care based on the patient's wishes and best interests. Physicians should apply these consensus guidelines to eligible patients considering their clinical course and the patients' wishes.
Advance Care Planning
;
Caregivers
;
Consensus
;
Hospices
;
Humans
;
Judgment
;
Jurisprudence
;
Korea
;
Palliative Care
;
Patient Care
;
Specialization
10.Consensus guidelines for the definition of the end stage of disease and last days of life and criteria for medical judgment
Sang Min LEE ; Su Jung KIM ; Youn Seon CHOI ; Dae Seog HEO ; Sujin BAIK ; Bo Moon CHOI ; Daekyun KIM ; Jae Young MOON ; So Young PARK ; Yoon Jung CHANG ; In Cheol HWANG ; Jung Hye KWON ; Sun Hyun KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Jeanno PARK ; Ho Jung AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Ivo KWON ; Do Kyong KIM ; Ock Joo KIM ; Sang Ho YOO ; Yoo Seock CHEONG ; Younsuck KOH
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2018;61(8):509-521
In Korea, the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-sustaining Treatment Decision-making Act was enacted in February 2016 in order to ensure that the patient's self-determination in end-of-life care processes is respected. To enhance physicians' understanding of this act and to provide proper criteria for medical judgment in variety of clinical settings, consensus guidelines were published in November 2016. In this article, the characteristics of these guidelines and related issues regarding the definitions of ‘the end stage of disease’ and ‘last days of life’ and the criteria for medical judgment are presented and summarized. According to the guidelines, the term ‘end stage of disease’ refers to a state in which there is no possibility of a fundamental recovery and the symptoms are expected to worsen within months. The terms ‘the last days of life’ and ‘the final days of life’ refer to a state in which, despite treatment, the patient's condition is worsening and death is impending, with no possibility of recovery. The attending physician and another relevant specialist should both judge a patient's medical condition as either ‘end stage of disease’ for hospice/palliative care or ‘the last days of life’ for dying patient care according to the law. Caregivers should provide appropriate medical information to eligible patients for palliative or ‘end stage of disease’ care through advance care planning. Therefore, it is critically necessary that caregivers understand the legitimate process of hospice/palliative and dying patient care based on the patient's wishes and best interests. Physicians should apply these consensus guidelines to eligible patients considering their clinical course and the patients' wishes.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail