This paper summarizes Li Fei's academic insights and clinical experience in treating intractable facial paralysis.Li Fei posits that prolonged illness inevitably leads to deficiency and stasis,and thus,the treatment of intractable facial paralysis should first focus on identifying the etiology and syndrome differentiation,resolving stasis and unblocking stagnation,and regulating qi and blood,with particular emphasis on the relaxation of the meridian sinew system.The meridian sinew system,affiliated with the meridian and collateral,serves as the framework through which qi and blood nourish muscles,tendons,and joints,playing a crucial role in facial paralysis treatment.Guided by the theory of the meridian sinew system,Li Fei employs syndrome-based treatment,integrating the anatomy of facial expression muscles.His approach includes needle-knife therapy to release adhesions and break stasis,acupuncture to harmonize qi and blood,and intradermal needle therapy for sustained stimulation.Through these methods,the meridian sinew system is relaxed,qi and blood are regulated,and facial muscles are nourished,leading to gradual recovery from facial paralysis.

Objectives:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator(S-ICD)after transvenous lead extraction(TLE)in ICD patients without pacing indications. Methods:All patients who underwent TLE at Peking University People's Hospital from June 2018 to October 2023 were consecutively included.TLE indication,S-ICD implantation indication,defibrillation threshold(DFT)test,complications and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results:A total of 11 patients with TV-ICD underwent S-ICD implantation after TLE,eight patients were males and median age were 56(44,65)years.The indications for TLE were infection and lead dysfunction.Nine patients were implanted with S-ICD for secondary prevention,and the most common cause of implantation was ion channelopathies(5 cases).The operative time for S-ICD was 51(48,58)minutes and no perioperative complications were noted.Eight patients underwent DFT testing,and 100%were successful.During a median follow up of 30(9,39)months,a total of six appropriate treatments occurred in two patients,and no complications occurred,including inappropriate treatment,ineffective treatment,infection,lead malfunction and death. Conclusions:Our study provides evidence for S-ICD implantation as a replacement after TV-ICD removal.The S-ICD implantation after TLE is safe and effective.

Objectives:To evaluate the strategy and clinical outcomes of reimplanting biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy (Biv-CRT) devices after transvenous removal of coronary sinus left ventricular leads due to device-related infections. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data and surgical outcomes of all patients who underwent transvenous removal of infectious coronary sinus left ventricular leads and subsequent reimplantation of Biv-CRT devices at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2013 to December 2022.Follow-up was performed to assess the incidence of complications and all-cause mortality. Results:A total of 167 patients underwent coronary sinus left ventricular lead removal due to infection,removal was successful in 161 cases (96.4％) and failed in 6 cases (3.6％).Among the patients with successful removal,109 cases (67.7％) were scheduled for Biv-CRT device reimplantation.After a median time of 7 (5,7) days,6 cases (5.5％) of reimplantation failed,while 103 reimplantations (94.5％) were successful.Among these successful reimplantation cases,102 patients (99.0％) were through the right-side approach,and 1 case (1.0％) through the left-side approach due to bilateral pocket infections.Of the 161 patients with successful removal,58 cases (36.0％) did not undergo left ventricular lead reimplantation,including 39 cases (24.2％) where the initial indications for Biv-CRT were questionable or had resolved.During the one-year postoperative follow-up,among the 103 patients who had undergone Biv-CRT device reimplantation,7 patients (6.8％) died,1 patient (1.0％) experienced pocket infection,and 1 patient (1.0％) had right atrial lead dislodgment. Conclusions:Reimplantation of Biv-CRT devices after removal of coronary sinus left ventricular leads due to infections is feasible,with a high success rate,low complication rate,and low mortality rate for right-side approach implantation.Therefore,for patients re-evaluated to have indications for repeated Biv-CRT after lead removal,right-side reimplantation of the coronary sinus left ventricular lead should be recommended.

Objective:To evaluate the safety of leadless pacemaker implantation in super-elderly patients.Methods:Eleven patients with average age of 90 (86, 92) years who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation in the Department of Cardiology, Peking University People′s Hospital from March 2021 to May 2022 were included. The clinical data and implantation information were collected. The complications (cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, pacemaker reinfection, femoral vein hematoma) and death of patients were documented at 24 h, 3 d, and 1, 3, 6 months after pacemaker implantation.Results:There were 9 males and 2 females with the body mass index of 21(19, 23)kg/m 2. The underlying diseases were hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous cerebral infarction and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation in 9, 9, 9, 6, 4, 4, 4 patients, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 49% (45%, 52%), the hemoglobin concentration was 118 (114, 122)g/L, 4 patients were taking anticoagulant drugs, and 6 patients were taking antiplatelet drugs. Eight patients were newly implanted with a leadless pacemaker, 2 patients were implanted after removal the old ones, and 1 case was implanted at the same time as removal. The implantation time was 45(40, 47) minutes, the X-ray exposure time was 14 (13, 15) minutes, the release time was 1 (1, 2), the threshold value was 0.50(0.38, 0.75)V/0.24 ms, the impedance was 730 (700, 770) Ω, and the perceived R-wave amplitude 8.2(6.7, 12.8) mV. During the follow-up period of 8 (6, 10) months, no patient had pacemaker dysfunction; and the threshold, R wave sensing, and impedance were stable and maintained within the normal range. No cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, pacemaker reinfection or death occurred perioperatively and during the follow-up period; 1 patient had hematoma after femoral vein puncture, which improved after compression treatment. Conclusion:This single-center and small-sample study shows that leadless pacemaker implantation is safe for super-elderly patients.