Cross Infection ; microbiology ; therapy ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal ; Fungi ; classification ; drug effects ; isolation & purification ; Humans ; Mycoses ; microbiology ; therapy ; Patient Care Management ; methods ; Singapore

Adult ; Aged ; Antifungal Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; classification ; Candida ; drug effects ; isolation & purification ; Carcinoma ; pathology ; therapy ; Cross Infection ; microbiology ; therapy ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal ; Female ; Fractures, Bone ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mycoses ; microbiology ; therapy ; Patient Care Management ; methods ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ; complications ; therapy ; Surgical Wound Infection ; microbiology ; therapy ; Symptom Flare Up ; Treatment Outcome

Most of the intra-abdominal infections are benign and critical diseases caused by trauma, surgery and gastrointestinal diseases, which require the attention of surgeons. The increase of drug resistance of pathogens is a common clinical problem. The intra-abdominal infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria is a huge challenge faced by clinicians, and is mainly found in hospital-acquired abdominal infections, of which gram-negative bacteria are the most common. This paper firstly summarizes the common types, early diagnosis and risk factors of multidrug-resistant bacteria according to the literature, and then describes the treatment strategy of intra-abdominal infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria from four aspects: anti-infective medication, infection source control, resuscitation and organ support, and nutritional support treatment. In addition, we should promote gastrointestinal function recovery through nutritional support treatment and prevent intestinal source infection, on the basis of understanding the risk factors of multidrug-resistant infection, rational use of anti-infective medication and infection source control measures. At the same time, proper organ function support can help to improve the success rate in the treatment of multidrug-resistant intra-abdominal infection.
Abdominal Cavity ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Bacteria ; drug effects ; Bacterial Infections ; microbiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Cross Infection ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Drug Resistance, Multiple ; Humans ; Intraabdominal Infections

PURPOSE: Patients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) should be treated as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) according to guidelines published in 2005. However, controversy still exists on whether the high mortality of NHAP results from multidrug resistant pathogens or underlying disease. We aimed to outline differences and factors contributing to mortality between NHAP and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients aged 65 years or older with either CAP or NHAP from 2008 to 2014. Patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia other than NHAP or HAP were excluded. RESULTS: Among 317 patients, 212 patients had CAP and 105 had NHAP. Patients with NHAP had higher mortality, more frequently used a ventilator, and had disease of higher severity than CAP. The incidences of aspiration, tube feeding, and poor functional status were higher in NHAP. Twenty three out of 54 NHAP patients and three out of 62 CAP patients had multidrug resistant pathogens (p<0.001). Eleven patients with NHAP died at discharge, compared to 7 patients with CAP (p=0.009). However, there was no association between mortality rate and presence of multidrug-resistant pathogens. The number of involved lobes on chest X-ray [odds ratio (OR)=1.708; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.120 to 2.605] and use of mechanical ventilation (OR=9.537; 95% CI, 1.635 to 55.632) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with NHAP had higher mortality than patients with CAP. The excess mortality among patients with NHAP and CAP was related to disease severity but not to the presence of multidrug resistant pathogens.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use ; Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy/microbiology/mortality ; Cross Infection/drug therapy/*mortality ; *Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Female ; *Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Male ; *Nursing Homes ; Odds Ratio ; Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy/microbiology/*mortality ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUNDIt is important to achieve the definitive pathogen identification in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), but the traditional culture results always delay the target antibiotic therapy. We assessed the method called quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP) as a new implement for steering of the antibiotic decision-making in HAP.

METHODSTotally, 76 respiratory tract aspiration samples were prospectively collected from 60 HAP patients. DNA was isolated from these samples. Specific DNA fragments for identifying 11 pneumonia-related bacteria were amplified by qLAMP assay. Culture results of these patients were compared with the qLAMP results. Clinical data and treatment strategies were analyzed to evaluate the effects of qLAMP results on clinical data. McNemar test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTSThe detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Streptococcus pneumonia, and Acinetobacter baumannii by qLAMP was consistent with sputum culture (P > 0.05). The qLAMP results of 4 samples for Haemophilus influenzae, Legionella pneumophila, or Mycoplasma pneumonia (MP) were inconsistent with culture results; however, clinical data revealed that the qLAMP results were all reliable except 1 MP positive sample due to the lack of specific species identified in the final diagnosis. The improvement of clinical condition was more significant (P < 0.001) in patients with pathogen target-driven therapy based on qLAMP results than those with empirical therapy.

CONCLUSIONqLAMP is a more promising method for detection of pathogens in an early, rapid, sensitive, and specific manner than culture.

Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Cross Infection ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; Pilot Projects ; Pneumonia ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; Prospective Studies ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; drug effects ; pathogenicity

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, the incidence of nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) has been increasing and is now the leading cause of death among nursing home residents. This study was performed to identify risk factors associated with NHAP mortality, focusing on facility characteristics. METHODS: Data on all patients > or = 70 years of age admitted with newly diagnosed pneumonia were reviewed. To compare the quality of care in nursing facilities, the following three groups were defined: patients who acquired pneumonia in the community, care homes, and care hospitals. In these patients, 90-day mortality was compared. RESULTS: Survival analyses were performed in 282 patients with pneumonia. In the analyses, 90-day mortality was higher in patients in care homes (12.2%, 40.3%, and 19.6% in community, care homes, and care hospitals, respectively). Among the 118 NHAP patients, residence in a care home, structural lung diseases, treatment with inappropriate antimicrobial agents for accompanying infections, and a high pneumonia severity index score were risk factors associated with higher 90-day mortality. However, infection by potentially drug-resistant pathogens was not important. CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable institutional factors in care homes are important prognostic factors for NHAP.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Cause of Death ; Cross Infection/diagnosis/drug therapy/microbiology/*mortality ; Female ; *Homes for the Aged ; *Hospitals ; Humans ; Inappropriate Prescribing ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; *Nursing Homes ; Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis/drug therapy/microbiology/*mortality ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Providencia species frequently colonize urinary catheters and cause urinary tract infections (UTIs); however, bacteremia is uncommon and not well understood. We investigated the clinical features of Providencia bacteremia and the antibiotic susceptibility of Providencia species. METHODS: We identified cases of Providencia bacteremia from May 2001 to April 2013 at a tertiary care hospital. The medical records of pertinent patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen cases of Providencia bacteremia occurred; the incidence rate was 0.41 per 10,000 admissions. The median age of the patients was 64.5 years. Eleven cases (78.6%) were nosocomial infections and nine cases (64.3%) were polymicrobial bacteremia. The most common underlying conditions were cerebrovascular/neurologic disease (n = 10) and an indwelling urinary catheter (n = 10, 71.4%). A UTI was the most common source of bacteremia (n = 5, 35.7%). The overall mortality rate was 29% (n = 4); in each case, death occurred within 4 days of the onset of bacteremia. Primary bacteremia was more fatal than other types of bacteremia (mortality rate, 75% [3/4] vs. 10% [1/10], p = 0.041). The underlying disease severity, Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, and Pitt bacteremia scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors (p = 0.016, p =0.004, and p = 0.002, respectively). Susceptibility to cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam was noted in 100%, 86%, and 86% of the isolates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Providencia bacteremia occurred frequently in elderly patients with cerebrovascular or neurologic disease. Although Providencia bacteremia is uncommon, it can be rapidly fatal and polymicrobial. These characteristics suggest that the selection of appropriate antibiotic therapy could be complicated in Providencia bacteremia.
APACHE ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Bacteremia/diagnosis/drug therapy/*microbiology/mortality ; Child ; Cross Infection/diagnosis/drug therapy/*microbiology/mortality ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Enterobacteriaceae Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/*microbiology/mortality ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Providencia/drug effects/*isolation & purification ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; *Tertiary Care Centers ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) is included under healthcare-associated pneumonia. However, the optimal treatment strategy for NHAP has been controversial in several studies. We evaluated the clinical features of NHAP compared to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients admitted with pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in elderly patients aged > or = 65 years with NHAP or CAP who were hospitalized at Jeju National University Hospital between January 2012 and April 2013. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were enrolled, and 58 (27.7%) had NHAP. The patients with NHAP were older, had more frequent central nervous system disorders, and showed worse clinical parameters. Potential drug-resistant pathogens were more frequently detected in the NHAP group (22.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.018), and the incidences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were 8.6% and 10.3%, respectively. In-hospital mortality occurred in 13 patients (22.4%) with NHAP and 17 patients (11.2%) with CAP (p = 0.039). In multivariate analyses, only higher pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.001), and the PSI score was higher in the NHAP group than that in the CAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients admitted with NHAP showed more severe pneumonia at onset, higher rates of potentially drug-resistant pathogens, and worse clinical outcomes than those with CAP. However, higher in-hospital mortality in those with NHAP seemed to be related to the PSI score reflecting host factors and severity of pneumonia rather than the type of pneumonia or the presence of drug-resistant pathogens.
Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis/microbiology/mortality/*therapy ; Cross Infection/diagnosis/microbiology/mortality/*therapy ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Female ; *Homes for the Aged ; Hospital Mortality ; *Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Multivariate Analysis ; *Nursing Homes ; Odds Ratio ; *Patient Admission ; Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis/microbiology/mortality/*therapy ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Over the last 30 years, Serratia marcescens (S. marcescens) has emerged as an important pathogen, and a common cause of nosocomial infections. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with mortality in patients with S. marcescens bacteremia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients who had one or more blood cultures positive for S. marcescens between January 2006 and December 2012 in a tertiary care hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Multiple risk factors were compared with association with 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The 28-day mortality was 22.4% (22/98 episodes). In a univariate analysis, the onset of bacteremia during the intensive care unit stay (p=0.020), serum albumin level (p=0.011), serum C-reactive protein level (p=0.041), presence of indwelling urinary catheter (p=0.023), and Sequential Oran Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at the onset of bacteremia (p<0.001) were significantly different between patients in the fatal and non-fatal groups. In a multivariate analysis, lower serum albumin level and an elevated SOFA score were independently associated with 28-day mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.206, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.044-0.960, p=0.040, and adjusted OR 1.474, 95% CI 1.200-1.810, p<0.001, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Lower serum albumin level and an elevated SOFA score were significantly associated with adverse outcomes in patients with S. marcescens bacteremia.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Bacteremia/drug therapy/microbiology/*mortality ; Cross Infection/mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Organ Failure ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Serratia Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/*mortality ; Serratia marcescens/drug effects/*isolation & purification ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSETo investigate and analyze the clinical and etiological characteristics of community-acquired intraabdominal infections (CIAIs) and hospital-acquired or nosocomial intraabdominal infections (NIAIs) in a comprehensive hospital, to understand the characteristics, pathogen composition, and drug resistance of CIAIs as well as NIAIs, and to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

METHODSWe collected the clinical data of patients with intraabdominal infections admitted to our hospital from June 2013 to June 2014. In vitro drug sensitivity tests were conducted to separate pathogens, and the data were analyzed using the WHONET 5.4 software and SPSS 13.0 software.

RESULTSA total of 221 patients were enrolled in the study, including 144 with CIAIs (55 mild-moderate and 89 severe) and 77 with NIAIs. We isolated 322 pathogenic strains, including 234 strains of gram-negative bacteria, 82 strains of gram-positive bacteria, and 6 strains of fungi. Based on clinical features, NIAIs and severe CIAIs presented significantly higher values in age, length of hospital stay, mortality, and the incidence of severe intra-abdominal infection than mild-moderate CIAIs (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the prognosis between NIAIs and severe CIAIs. Primary diseases leading to CIAIs and NIAIs mostly were hepatobiliary diseases and gastrointestinal diseases respectively. Bacteria isolated from various types of IAIs mainly were Enterobacteriaceae; mild-moderate CIAIs mostly were mono-infection of gram-negative bacteria; NIAIs mostly were mixed infections of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria; and severe CIAIs were from either type of infection. The rate of Extended Spectrum b-Lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae was much higher in NIAIs than in CIAIs (p < 0.05). The antimicrobial drug sensitivity of gram-negative bacteria isolated from NIAIs was significantly lower than that of CIAIs.

CONCLUSIONCIAIs and NIAIs have their own unique clinical features and epidemiological features of pathogens which should be considered during the initial empiric therapy for the rational use of antimicrobial drugs. Regional IAIs pathogenic bacteria have their own features in drug resistance, slightly different from some recommendations of 2010 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines.

Adult ; Aged ; Bacterial Infections ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; Community-Acquired Infections ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; microbiology ; Cross Infection ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; microbiology ; Female ; Humans ; Intraabdominal Infections ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; microbiology ; Male ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies