Objective: This study presents an early multicentre experience with an adapted basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) technique using bilateral transpedicular access, evaluating its safety, efficacy, and potential for expanded indications. Methods: Participants were recruited from 2 Gold Coast centres based on the presence of chronic, sharp midline axial lower back pain and evidence of type 1 or type 2 Modic changes on imaging. The radiofrequency ablation procedure was performed via transpedicular access under computed tomographic guidance. Satisfaction outcomes were assessed at 2 months using a visual analogue scale and Likert scales. Statistical analyses compared outcomes according to sex and pain indications. Results: Forty patients were included in the study, of whom 33 underwent BVNA for Modic type 1 and type 2 vertebrogenic pain, and 8 underwent the procedure for expanded indications, with no complications reported. Among those treated for expanded indications, 2 had vertebrogenic endplate changes adjacent to a prior fusion, 2 had persistent pain following subacute osteoporotic fractures, and one each presented with a haemangioma, inflammatory endplate osteitis associated with spondyloarthropathy, and a postmyeloma fracture. Overall, 75% of participants reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment of their painful condition. All patients treated for expanded indications expressed satisfaction or high satisfaction, with visual analogue score reductions ranging from 30% to 100%. Conclusion Early experience with BVNA using a bilateral transpedicular access technique suggests that it is a safe and effective procedure. It may also be applicable in selected cases involving expanded indications, particularly where persistent back pain remains refractory to or unsuitable for other therapeutic options.

BACKGROUND: Massive retracted rotator cuff tears represent a therapeutic dilemma, particularly in the young and middle-aged patients who are not appropriate for a reverse total shoulder replacement. Interposition grafting using human dermal allograft offers an alternative treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent interposition grafting using human dermal allograft between December 2013 and May 2015 for massive rotator cuff tears at our tertiary referral center was performed. Preoperative and 6 month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments were performed in all patients, with postoperative graft integrity being the primary outcome measure. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Oxford shoulder score, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of follow-up was 54 years. On MRI, 84% of grafts were seen to have failed at 6 months. Strength was grossly reduced on the operative side when supraspinatus and subscapularis were tested; despite this, Constant score (mean, 48.2) was comparable to that in the previous reports. DASH and Oxford scores were a mean of 24.94 and 37.16, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, in particular the MRI findings, we cannot advocate the use of dermal allograft as an interposition graft for the repair of massive rotator cuff tears.
Acellular Dermis ; Allografts ; Arm ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hand ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Retrospective Studies ; Rotator Cuff ; Shoulder ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Tears ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Transplants