1.Risks factors for death among COVID-19 patients combined with hypertension, coronary heart disease or diabetes.
Hang YANG ; Lin Cheng YANG ; Rui Tao ZHANG ; Yun Peng LING ; Qing Gang GE
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2020;52(3):420-424
OBJECTIVE:
The pathogenesis of myocardial injury upon corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remain unknown,evidence of impact on outcome is insufficient, therefore, we aim to investigate the risk factors for death among COVID-19 patients combined with hypertension, coronary heart disease or diabetes in this study.
METHODS:
This was a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Patients of Sino-French Eco-City section of Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China attended by Peking University Supporting Medical Team and admitted from Jan. 29, 2020 to Mar. 20, 2020 were included. The positive nucleic acid of COVID-19 virus and combination with hypertension, coronary heart disease or diabetes were in the standard. We collected the clinical data and laboratory examination results of the eligible patients to evaluate the related factors of death.
RESULTS:
In the study, 94 COVID-19 patients enrolled were divided into the group of death (13 cases) and the group of survivors (81 cases), the average age was 66.7 years. Compared with the survival group, the death group had faster basal heart rate(103.2 beats/min vs. 88.4 beats /min, P=0.004), shortness of breath(29.0 beats /min vs. 20.0 beats /min, P<0.001), higher neutrophil count(9.2×109/L vs. 3.8×109/L, P<0.001), lower lymphocyte count(0.5×109/L vs. 1.1×109/L, P<0.001), creatine kinase MB(CK-MB, 3.2 μg/L vs. 0.8 μg/L, P<0.001), high sensitivity cardiac troponin Ⅰ(hs-cTnⅠ, 217.2 ng/L vs. 4.9 ng/L, P<0.001), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP; 945.0 μg/L vs. 154.0 μg/L, P<0.001), inflammatory factor ferritin(770.2 μg/L vs. 622.8 μg/L , P=0.050), interleukin-2 recepter(IL-2R, 1 586.0 U/mL vs. 694.0 U/mL, P<0.001), interleukin-6(IL-6, 82.3 ng/L vs. 13.0 ng/L, P<0.001), interleukin-10(IL-10, 9.8 ng/L vs. 5.0 ng/L, P<0.001)were higher than those in the survival group. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors for death were old age, low non oxygen saturation, low lymphocyte count, myocardial injury, abnormal increase of IL 2R, IL-6, and IL-10. Multivariate regression showed that old age (OR=1.11, 95%CI=1.03-1.19, P=0.026), low non oxygen saturation(OR=0.85, 95%CI=0.72-0.99, P=0.041), and abnormal increase of IL-10(>9.1 ng/L, OR=101.93, 95%CI=4.74-2190.71, P=0.003)were independent risk factors for COVID-19 patients combined with hypertension, coronary heart disease or diabetes.
CONCLUSION
In COVID-19 patients combined with hypertension, coronary heart disease or diabetes, the risk factors for death were old age, low non oxygen saturation, low lymphocyte count, myocardial injury, and abnormal increase of IL-2R, IL-6, and IL-10. Old age, low non oxygen saturation and abnormal increase of IL-10 were independent risk factors.
Aged
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Coronary Disease/complications*
;
Coronavirus Infections/mortality*
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Humans
;
Hypertension/complications*
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/mortality*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
SARS-CoV-2
2.Progress in the study on COVID
Jiajun ZHOU ; Yongwu YU ; Ling ZHANG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2020;45(10):1241-1246
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is now a major public health problem worldwide. Infectivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is extremely strong. The one major target of the virus is the lung, which leads to the deaths of respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. The kidney is also one of the main organs attacked by viruses, which directly damage the renal tubules through angiotensin converting enzyme-2 and cause cytokine storm, resulting in kidney damage and increasing the risk of death in the patients. Early investigation of risk factors for kidney injury, detection of kidney injury indicators, timely supporting treatment and renal replacement therapy for the existence of kidney injury patients are useful for reducing the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients.
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Humans
;
Kidney
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology*
;
SARS-CoV-2
3.Research progress in nervous system damage caused by SARS
Peng HUANG ; Li TANG ; Yi REN ; Liqun LIU
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2020;45(10):1247-1254
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a major outbreak in the world. SARS-CoV-2 infection can not only involve in the respiratory system, but also cause severe nervous system damage. Studies have shown that SRAS-CoV-2 can invade the nervous system through hematogenous and transneuronal pathways, and may cause nervous system damage in patients with COVID-19 by inhibiting cellular immunity, hypoxemia, inflammation, inducing neuronal degeneration and apoptosis, and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) mechanism. It can lead to intracranial infection, toxic encephalopathy, acute cerebrovascular disease, muscle damage, peripheral nervous system injury, acute myelitis, demyelination disease or other nervous system diseases.
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A
;
Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology*
;
Research
;
SARS-CoV-2
4.Mental health status and its influencing factors among general population and medical personnel in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 pandemic.
Zhengrong LIU ; Xudong ZHANG ; Zhihan LÜ ; Jie LIANG ; Yudi DENG ; Linfei FENG
Journal of Southern Medical University 2020;40(10):1530-1538
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the mental health status and its influencing factors among general population and healthcare professionals in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS:
A online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March 11st to March 15th, 2020.The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts to survey the participants'basic information, understanding of COVID-19 outbreak-associated information, cognition of COVID-19 pandemic and status of anxiety and depression.A total of 1433 valid responses were collected, including 706 from the general population and 727 from healthcare professionals.Cronbach's α coefficient and exploratory factor analysis were used for reliability and validity assessment.Chi-square, Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for univariate analysis and ordinal or nominal logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis of the data.
RESULTS:
There was no significant difference between the general population and the healthcare professionals in terms of anxiety, depression and cognition of COVID-19 outbreak after adjustment for demographic variables, but the levels of anxiety and depression of these participants were both higher than those before the pandemic.In the participants from the general population, multivariate logistic regressions showed an OR for anxiety of 1.93(1.18, 3.17) among those who spent 1-2 h a day in reading COVID-19-related news, while those who spent over 3 h had an OR value for anxiety of 1.88(1.14, 3.11);the unmarried individuals had a depression OR of 2.19(1.51, 3.18). Inaccurate cognition of COVID-19 outbreak was positive correlated with the occurrence of anxiety and depression.Unmarried individuals and those with higher educational levels had better cognition of COVID-19 outbreak.Among the healthcare professionals, multivariate logistic regressions suggested that insufficient rest time and worries about contracting the virus contributed to the occurrence of anxiety and depression.Among the nursing staff, the OR of obvious depression was 2.99(1.45, 6.18).Compared to healthcare professionals not working in designated hospital for COVID-19, those who work in the designated hospitals had ORs for obvious and severe depression of 0.48(0.25, 0.93) and 0.39(0.17, 0.89), respectively.Concerns over contracting the virus increased the possibility of incorrect cognition of COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS
Psychological interventions are essential for both the general population and healthcare professionals, especially for unmarried individuals in the general population and the nursing staff.An excessive exposure to COVID-19-related information may have detrimental effects on the mental health.For healthcare professionals, sufficient rest needs to be ensured, and education programs on COVID-19 should be implemented among both residents and healthcare professionals to improve their mental health.
Anxiety/epidemiology*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
Health Status
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
SARS-CoV-2
6.Analysis on the efficacy and safety of fibrinolytic therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Fen WEI ; Xin Xin SHUAI ; Zhi Jian CHEN ; Gui Lan CAO ; Ling WANG ; Ting QIU ; Ting HU ; Ling WU ; Qin ZHANG ; Hai Xia HUANG ; Yan Wan ZHANG ; Lin ZHU ; Xiang CHENG
Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2020;48(6):472-476
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fibrinolysis strategy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the COVID-19 epidemic, and to provide reference value for optimization of fibrinolytic process on the premise of prevention and control of COVID-19 transmission, including self-protection of medical staff. Methods: The efficacy and safety of fibrinolysis were retrospectively analyzed in 7 patients with acute STEM, who hospitalized from February 29, 2020 to April 3, 2020 in the Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. To optimize the fibrinolytic process on the premise of prevention and control of COVID-19 transmission, including self-protection of medical staff, a full-time medical team in charge of fibrinolysis under third-grade protection was established. The acute STEMI patients were treated immediately in a fixed and isolated area in emergency department before receiving green channel fibrinolysis. Blood samples for complete blood count, COVID-19 antibody test and nasopharyngeal swab samples for COVID-19 nucleic acid test were made before fibrinolysis, while the chest CT examination was accomplished after fibrinolysis. By comparing differences of time from the first electrocardiogram (ECG) to fibrinolysis before and after the improvement of fibrinolytic process, the effect of optimization of the fibrinolytic process was evaluated. Results: In the present study, seven patients with acute STEMI received fibrinolysis therapy, 6 of them achieved reperfusion and no bleeding was observed in all of the patients. Five out of the 7 patients were hospitalized after fibrinolysis, and the hospitalization days were 19.6 days on average. By following up to April 14, 2020, none of the 7 patients died. The first 2 patients were treated according to the routine medical procedure and the time from the first ECG to fibrinolysis were 201 and 106 minutes, respectively. After the optimization of the fibrinolytic process, the time from the first ECG to fibrinolysis of the last 5 patients were 42, 46, 51, 43 and 54 minutes, respectively,which was significantly shorter than that before optimization. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 epidemic, fibrinolysis in patients with acute STEMI is safe, effective and easy to implement. Therefore, it is recommended as the top priority for the patients with acute STEMI with indications for fibrinolysis. On the premise of prevention and control of COVID-19 transmission, including self-protection of medical staff, the duration of myocardial ischemia can be shortened by optimization of the fibrinolytic process.
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Epidemics
;
Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use*
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy*
;
Thrombolytic Therapy
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
7.Coronavirus Disease 2019 Influenza A in Children: An Observational Control Study in China.
Yang ZHAO ; De Lin SUN ; Heather C BOUCHARD ; Xin Xin ZHANG ; Gang WAN ; Yi Wei HAO ; Shu Xin HE ; Yu Yong JIANG ; Lin PANG
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2020;33(8):614-619
This study aimed to understand the differences in clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory features between the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) and influenza A in children. Data of 23 hospitalized children with COVID-19 (9 boys, 5.7 ± 3.8 years old) were compared with age- and sex-matched 69 hospitalized and 69 outpatient children with influenza A from a hospital in China. The participants' epidemiological history, family cluster, clinical manifestations, and blood test results were assessed. Compared with either inpatients or outpatients with influenza A, children with COVID-19 showed significantly more frequent family infections and higher ratio of low fever (< 37.3 °C), but shorter cough and fever duration, lower body temperature, and lower rates of cough, fever, high fever (> 39 °C), nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sore throat, vomiting, myalgia or arthralgia, and febrile seizures. They also showed higher counts of lymphocytes, T lymphocyte CD8, and platelets and levels of cholinesterase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and lactic acid, but lower serum amyloid, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and shorter prothrombin time. The level of alanine aminotransferase in children with COVID-19 is lower than that in inpatients but higher than that in outpatients with influenza A. Pediatric COVID-19 is associated with more frequent family infection, milder symptoms, and milder immune responses relative to pediatric influenza A.
Betacoronavirus
;
physiology
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Child
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
blood
;
epidemiology
;
immunology
;
virology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Influenza, Human
;
blood
;
epidemiology
;
immunology
;
Male
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
blood
;
epidemiology
;
immunology
;
virology
9.Guidelines for personal protection against coronavirus disease 2019 for deseases control person (T/BPMA 0002-2020).
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2020;41(8):1180-1183
Betacoronavirus
;
Coronavirus
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
epidemiology
;
prevention & control
;
Disease Transmission, Infectious
;
prevention & control
;
Guidelines as Topic
;
Humans
;
Infection Control
;
organization & administration
;
Pandemics
;
prevention & control
;
Personal Protective Equipment
;
standards
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
epidemiology
;
prevention & control
;
Primary Prevention
;
methods
;
standards
;
Safety
;
standards
;
Safety Management

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail