Obstructive colorectal cancer is a common malignant bowel obstruction. Colostomy or colostomy following tumor resection may be the first choice for emergency surgery. The intestinal and systemic conditions of patients undergoing emergency surgery are often poor, and patients need to undergo multiple operations, which increase the surgical risk and economic burden and reduce the quality of life of patients. Poor intraoperative visualization may also affect the radical operation of emergency surgery. Transanal decompression tube (TDT) can rapidly decompress and drain the obstructed bowel, effectively relieve obstruction symptoms, and improve the success rate of primary radical resection. The TDT squeeze the tumor lightly, causing no spread of tumor cells, and is cheap, but the cavity of transanal decompression tube is small and easily blocked, and requires tedious flushing or regular replacement. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) can relieve intestinal obstruction effectively, provide sufficient preparation time for preoperative examination and improvement of nutritional status. By improving patient's tolerance to radical surgery, SEMS might be used as an important treatment strategy choice for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, SEMS may squeeze the tumor, leading to the spread of tumor cells, increase the recurrence rate and metastasis rate, and reduce the survival rate. Moreover, intestinal wall edema still existed during the operation following SEMS, and the rate of ostomy after anastomosis was as high as 34%. We hypothesized that prolonging the interval between stent insertion and surgery to 2 months, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered during this interval (SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy), would help improve outcomes. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment approach with a high laparoscopic resection rate, low stoma formation rate and improvement in the overall survival for patients with left-sided colon cancer obstruction. The patient physical status is improved, the primary tumor is downstaged, and intestinal wall edema is relieved during the relatively longer interval between SEMS placement and surgery. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy may be a preferred therapeutic strategy for obstructive left colon cancer.
Humans ; Quality of Life ; Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects* ; Colonic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Stents/adverse effects* ; Intestinal Obstruction/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: This study aims to survey the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in China and to analyze its risk factors, so as to prevent and control SSI after colorectal surgery. Methods: An observative study was conducted. Based on a program of Chinese SSI Surveillance from 2018 to 2020, the clinical data of all adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery during this time period were extracted. These included demographic characteristics and perioperative clinical parameters. Minors, pregnant women, obstetric or gynecological surgery, urological system surgery, retroperitoneal surgery, resection of superficial soft tissue masses, and mesh or other implants were excluded. A total of 2122 patients undergoing colorectal surgery from 50 hospitals were included, including 1252 males and 870 females. The median age was 63 (16) years and the median BMI was 23 (4.58) kg/m². The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within 30 days after colorectal surgery. The secondary outcomes were mortality within 30 days postoperatively, length of ICU stays and postoperative hospital stays, and cost of hospitalization. Patients were divided into the SSI group and non-SSI group based on the occurrence of SSI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze risk factors of SSI after colorectal surgery, and subgroup analysis was conducted for open and laparoscopic surgery. Results: The incidence of SSI after colorectal surgery was 5.6% (119/2122), including 47 cases (47/119, 39.5%) with superficial incisional infections, 24 cases (24/119, 20.2%) with deep incisional infections, and 48 cases (48/119, 40.3%) with organ/space infections. The occurrence of SSI significantly increased mortality [2.5% (3/119) vs. 0.1%(3/2003), χ²=22.400, P=0.003], the length of ICU stay [0 (1) day vs. 0(0) day, U=131 339, P<0.001], postoperative hospital stay [18.5 (12.8) days vs. 9.0 (6.0) days, U=167 902, P<0.001], and medical expenses [75 000 (49 000) yuan vs. 60 000 (31 000) yuan, U=126 189, P<0.001] (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that hypertension (OR=1.782, 95%CI: 1.173-2.709, P=0.007), preoperative albumin level (OR=1.680, 95%CI: 1.089-2.592, P=0.019), a contaminated or infected incision (OR= 1.993, 95%CI: 1.076-3.689, P=0.028), emergency surgery (OR=2.067, 95%CI: 1.076-3.972, P=0.029), open surgery (OR=2.132, 95%CI: 1.396-3.255, P<0.001), and surgical duration (OR=1.804, 95%CI: 1.188-2.740, P=0.006) were risk factors for SSI, while preoperative skin preparation (OR=0.478, 95%CI: 0.310-0.737, P=0.001) was a protective factor for SSI. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery. The incidence of SSI in the open surgery group was 10.2%, which was significantly higher than that in the laparoscopic or robotic group (3.5%, χ²=39.816, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis identified that a contaminated or infected incision (OR=2.168, 95%CI: 1.042-4.510, P=0.038) and surgical duration (OR=2.072, 95%CI: 1.171-3.664, P=0.012) were risk factors for SSI after open surgery, while mechanical bowel preparation (OR=0.428, 95%CI: 0.227-0.807, P=0.009) and preoperative skin preparation (OR=0.356, 95%CI: 0.199-0.634, P<0.001) were protective factors for SSI after open surgery. In laparoscopic surgery, diabetes mellitus (OR= 2.292, 95%CI: 1.138-4.617, P=0.020) and hypertension (OR=2.265, 95%CI: 1.234-4.159, P=0.008) were risk factors for SSI. Conclusions: The incidence of SSI after colorectal surgery is 5.6%. Minimally invasive surgery should be selected to reduce the occurrence of postoperative SSI. To prevent the occurrence of SSI after open surgery, skin preparation and mechanical bowel preparation should be performed before the operation, and the duration of the operation should be shortened as much as possible. In the perioperative period, care of patients with hypertension, diabetes, and contaminated or infected incisions should be given particular attention.
Adult ; Albumins ; China/epidemiology* ; Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects* ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension/complications* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Surgical Wound Infection/etiology*

Anastomotic leakage (AL) has always been a persistent issue for colorectal surgeons. It is still difficult to reduce the incidence of AL despite the advances in technology and equipment. With the development of evidence-based medicine, increasing high-risk factors for AL have been identified. How to efficiently and systematically combine and quantify these isolated risk factors to provide a scientific early warning of AL in clinical practices and help surgeons in choosing the optimal prophylactic strategies, is of great significance for reducing the incidence of AL. There are generally two types of AL prediction models in colorectal surgery, including prognostic models (for preoperative and intraoperative AL prediction) and diagnostic models (for early warning and improving the early diagnosis rate of AL). Prophylactic strategies for AL include stabilizing the underlying diseases, improving anemia and hypoalbuminemia, choosing an appropriate operative time window, and emphasizing and improving anastomotic techniques (including choosing an appropriate size of stapler). However, a prophylactic ostomy is still the most common method for surgeons. However, how to reduce the morbidity of complications following prophylactic ostomy and how to avoid the conversion of the prophylactic stoma to permanent stoma need further study.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods* ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) enterocolitis after gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: Clinical and pathological data of 17 cases with MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery from March 2015 to March 2017 at Department of General Surgery of Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) age of 18 to 80 years;(2) with history of gastrointestinal surgery; (3) diarrhea symptoms within 7 days after gastrointestinal surgery; (4) use of antibiotics before diarrhea; (5) fecal smear showing a large number of gram positive cocci; (6) fecal culture suggested the presence of MRSA; (7) application of antibiotic therapy against MRSA was effective. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1)clostridium difficile toxin positive; (2) toxic shock syndrome caused by food poisoning. According to gender, age, and inpatient ward, 1:2 pairing was performed, and 34 patients with non-MRSA enteritis from the hospitalized cases in the same ward were selected as the control group for retrospective case-control study. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, and constitution index between two groups (all P>0.05), indicating that the two groups were comparable. The χ² test was used to perform univariate analysis on 11 factors, including the nature of the primary disease, colorectal surgery, emergency surgery, use of multiple antibiotics, preoperative bowel preparation, perioperative hormone, intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, perioperative nasogastric tube, diabetes history, intensive care unit stay, and previous infectious disease hospitalization, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: MRSA enteritis occurred 3 to 5 days after surgery in all the 17 cases, and 4 cases developed septic shock rapidly. Univariate analysis showed that the operation site (colorectal surgery) (χ²=4.747, P=0.029) and use of two antibiotics before MRSA enteritis (χ²=3.959, P=0.047) were associated with MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that colorectal surgery was the only independent risk factor for MRSA enteritis after gastrointestinal surgery(OR=5.526, 95%CI: 1.350-22.602,P=0.017), while the use of two antibiotics was not (OR=0.204, 95%CI:0.051-0.819, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS MRSA enteritis has a rapid onset, and a high incidence of septic shock, which requires immediate attention. Colorectal surgery is an independent risk factor for MRSA enteritis.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Case-Control Studies ; Colorectal Surgery ; adverse effects ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Enterocolitis ; etiology ; microbiology ; Humans ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Staphylococcal Infections ; etiology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk of postoperative complications in elderly colorectal cancer patients over 65 years with comorbid cardiovascular diseases.

METHODSA total of 381 elderly colorectal cancer patients over 65 years were pathologically diagnosed as colorectal adenocarcinoma and underwent the first surgery in Beijing Hospital during January 2013 and December 2014. Patients were divided into comorbid cardiovascular disease group (258 cases) and non-cardiovascular disease group (123 cases) according to the existence of comorbid cardiovascular disease. The morbidity of postoperative complication was compared between two groups.

RESULTSThere was no significant difference in the morbidity of postoperative complication between two groups [27.9%(72/258) vs. 29.3%(36/123), P>0.05]. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification of postoperative complications, the morbidities of complication at all levels between two groups were not significantly different(all P>0.05). But in terms of cardiovascular complications, the morbidity of comorbid cardiovascular disease group was significantly higher than that of non-cardiovascular disease group [7.4%(19/258) vs. 0.8%(1/123), χ=6.678, P=0.010], while no significant differences in pulmonary and abdominal complications were found between two groups(all P>0.05). The morbidities of other complications (deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection and renal complications, etc.) of comorbid cardiovascular disease group were lower than those in non-cardiovascular disease group [2.7%(7/258) vs. 8.1%(10/123), χ=5.733, P=0.017]. Different types of cardiovascular diseases, different levels of cardiac risk index and American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) rating were not significantly related to the patient's occurrence of postoperative complications(all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONSSurgery treatment for elderly colorectal cancer patients over 65 years with comorbid cardiovascular diseases is safe. However, strict cardiovascular monitoring should be performed and necessary measures should be carried out in time.

Adenocarcinoma ; complications ; surgery ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; complications ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Comorbidity ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of intra-abdominal infection(IAI) after colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODSClinical and follow-up data of 773 colorectal cancer patients undergoing operation in our hospital from October 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into intra-abdominal cavity infection group (110 cases, IAI group) and non intra-abdominal infection group(663 cases, non-IAI group). All the patients administered prophylactic antibiotics 30 minutes to 2 hours before operation. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the risk factors of IAI.

RESULTSPreoperative factors associated with postoperative IAI included hepatic cirrhosis, kidney diseases, diabetes or other basic diseases, prophylactic use of drugs, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, intestinal obstruction, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) anesthetic grading score (all P<0.05). Postoperative factors associated with postoperative IAI included use of laparoscopy or stapler, united exenteration, existence of anastomotic fistula, time of drainage tube placement, operation time and tumor staging (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative diabetes(OR=2.36, 95% CI:1.45 to 4.76, P<0.01), combined exenteration (OR=2.02, 95% CI:1.02 to 4.00, P<0.01), anastomotic leak (OR=4.41, 95% CI:1.77 to 10.99, P=0.001), operation time≥140 minutes (OR=2.88, 95% CI:1.78 to 4.67, P<0.01) and period of postoperative drainage≥10 days(OR=4.57, 95% CI:2.78 to 7.52, P<0.01) were independent risk factors of postoperative IAI, while the use of stapler was protective factor (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.60, P<0.01). Compared with prophylactic use of cephamycins plus metronidazole, cefuroxime plus metronidazole had a higher rate of IAI(OR=2.10, 95% CI:1.23 to 3.58, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONSPrevention of postoperative IAI is required for colorectal cancer patients, particularly in those with preoperative diabetes, combined exenteration, anastomotic leak, operation time longer than 140 minutes and postoperative drainage period longer than 10 days. Preoperative use of cephamycins plus metronidazole has better efficacy in prevention of postoperative IAI.

Anastomotic Leak ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Drainage ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction ; Intraabdominal Infections ; epidemiology ; Laparoscopy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

Colorectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; trends

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) based on the occurrence of anastomosis leakage, surgical site infection (SSI), and severity of surgical complication when performing elective colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MBP and non-MBP patients were matched using propensity score. The outcomes were evaluated according to tumor location such as right- (n=84) and left-sided colon (n=50) and rectum (n=100). In the non-MBP group, patients with right-sided colon cancer did not receive any preparation, and patients with both left-sided colon and rectal cancers were given one rectal enema before surgery. RESULTS: In the right-sided colon surgery, there was no anastomosis leakage. SSI occurred in 2 (4.8%) and 4 patients (9.5%) in the non-MBP and MBP groups, respectively. In the left-sided colon cancer surgery, there was one anastomosis leakage (4.0%) in each group. SSI occurred in none in the rectal enema group and in 2 patients (8.0%) in the MBP group. In the rectal cancer surgery, there were 5 anastomosis leakages (10.0%) in the rectal enema group and 2 (4.0%) in the MBP group. SSI occurred in 3 patients (6.0%) in each groups. Severe surgical complications (Grade III, IV, or V) based on Dindo-Clavien classification, occurred in 7 patients (14.0%) in the rectal enema group and 1 patient (2.0%) in the MBP group (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Right- and left-sided colon cancer surgery can be performed safely without MBP. In rectal cancer surgery, rectal enema only before surgery seems to be dangerous because of the higher rate of severe postoperative complications.
Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects/*methods ; Elective Surgical Procedures/*adverse effects/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Preoperative Care/*adverse effects/methods ; *Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the associated factors for postoperative ileus following radical resection for colorectal cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 1366 colorectal cancer patients undergoing radical resection by the same surgical team in our hospital from January 2000 to September 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify the associated factors of postoperative ileus.

RESULTSA total of 70 patients(5.1%) developed postoperative ileus. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that N2(OR=1.893, 95%CI:1.083-3.306), history of colorectal cancer resection(OR=4.899, 95%CI:1.490-16.110), preoperative obstruction (OR=2.616, 95%CI:1.297-5.280), right hemicolectomy(OR=2.024, 95%CI:1.052-3.894) and left hemicolectomy(OR=3.030, 95%CI:1.401-6.550) were risk factors for postoperative ileus following radical resection for colorectal cancer, while laparoscopic operation(OR=0.520, 95%CI:0.319-0.849) was protective.

CONCLUSIONSPostoperative ileus following radical resection for colorectal cancer is associated with surgical procedures. Laparoscopic colorectal resection can reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus.

Colectomy ; adverse effects ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Humans ; Ileus ; etiology ; surgery ; Incidence ; Laparoscopy ; Multivariate Analysis ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVETo assess the influence of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection on the peritoneal microstructure injury and expression of t-PA/PAI-1 molecules.

METHODSA total of 50 patients with colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled between June 2011 and February 2012 in the Shanxi Provincial Hospital and were assigned into laparoscopic group (LO, n=27) and conventional laparotomy group (CO, n=23) based on patients expectancy and surgeon decision. Optical microscope and scanning electron microscope were employed for comparison of the postoperative peritoneal injury between LO and CO. Before and after surgery, t-PA and PAI-1 of peritoneal tissue were determined by ELISA in both groups.

RESULTSOptical microscope and scanning electronic microscopy scan indicated less serosal injury in LO group than that in CO group with regard to serosa integrity, continuity of covering adipocytes and mesothelial cells, and the aggregation level of inflammatory cells (P<0.01). The injury score was 38.22 in CO in and 14.67 in LO and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between LO and CO in terms of postoperative t-PA in the omentum, t-PA and PAI-1 in the intestinal serosa tissue (P>0.05), however PAI-1 in the omentum was significantly lower in LO group compared to CO group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer causes less peritoneal structural injury and less influence on the fibrinolytic capacity, which may contribute to less postoperative adhesion.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; metabolism ; surgery ; Colorectal Surgery ; adverse effects ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneum ; metabolism ; pathology ; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 ; metabolism ; Prospective Studies ; Tissue Plasminogen Activator ; metabolism ; Young Adult