Objective:To explore the application value of P1 response threshold of cortical auditory evoked potential（CAEP） in evaluating the rehabilitation effect of cochlear implant in young children. Methods:Thirty-three young children after cochlear implantation were divided into groups according to hearing age: Group A（hearing age 1-<2 years old） 10 people; Group B（hearing age 2-<3 years old） 13 people; Group C（hearing age 3-<4 years old） 10 people. The subjective assessment was carried out using the assessment tool for hearing-impaired children- "Criteria and Methods for assessing Auditory and language ability of hearing-impaired children" and objective electrophysiological examination was carried out using CAEP to evaluate the rehabilitation effect. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results:The results of subjective assessment of auditory ability and language ability in each group showed an increasing trend with the increase of auditory age. In this study, the P1 response threshold of CAEP in CI implanted children had a significant positive correlation with the 2 kHz hearing threshold after intervention, and the P1 response threshold of CAEP was negatively correlated with many items in subjective auditory ability and language ability assessment. Conclusion:The P1 response threshold of CAEP has a stable correlation with the results of speech audiometry, which can effectively and objectively evaluate the postoperative rehabilitation effect of young children with cochlear implantation.
Humans ; Child, Preschool ; Infant ; Male ; Female ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Cochlear Implantation/rehabilitation* ; Cochlear Implants ; Auditory Threshold

Objective:The auditory and speech rehabilitation effects were assessed by the Categories of Auditory Performance（CAP） and the speech intelligibility rating scale（SIR） after cochlear implantation（CI） in prelingually elderly patients by telephone follow-up or face-to-face conversation. Methods:The clinical data of the prelingually deaf patients who underwent unilateral CI in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi People's Hospital, from December 2016 to December 2021 were collected. Thirty-eight patients were divided into Group A（SIR 1, 17 cases）, Group B（SIR 2, 10 cases） and Group C（SIR 3, 11 cases） according to the preoperative SIR Score. Nineteen patients with post-lingual hearing impairment were selected as the control group（Group D, 19 cases）. The effects of hearing and speech rehabilitation were evaluated using CAP and SIR Scores before surgery, 6 months after startup, and 1 year after startup. Results:There were no significant differences in CAP scores among the three groups of patients with prelingually deaf patients at 6 months and 1 year after startup（P>0.05）, but there were significant differences between group A and group D at 6 months and 1 year after startup（P<0.05）; the SIR Score of group A had statistical difference before surgery and 6 months after startup（P<0.05）, group B had statistical difference before surgery and 1 year after startup（P<0.05）, and group C and D had no statistical difference before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after startup, respectively（P>0.05）. Conclusion:For the prelingually deaf elderly patients, hearing will develop rapidly 6 months after startup, and the effect of postoperative auditory rehabilitation was positively correlated with the preoperative speech ability. In the aspect of speech, the prelingually dear elderly patients who have poor preoperative speech ability could benefit more from CI early after surgery. CI is not contraindicated in prelingually deaf elderly patients, even those with poor preoperative speech function.
Humans ; Aged ; Cochlear Implantation/methods* ; Cochlear Implants ; Speech Perception ; Deafness/rehabilitation* ; Hearing Tests ; Speech Intelligibility ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To investigate whether pre-lingual deafness adult caused by inadequate auditory compensation in childhood can benefit from cochlear implants and the related influencing factors. Methods: A total of 26 prelingual deafness as experimental group [11 males and 15 females, the age of operation was (24.5±5.7) years] and 13 postlingual deafness as control group [5 males and 8 females, the age at the time of operation was (42.2±11.4) years] were recruited. Objective assessment included hearing threshold and speech recognition rate tests while wearing cochlear implants. Subjective assessment used Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire to assess hearing-related quality of life of subjects. The changes of hearing ability in the prelingual deafness group before and after operation and the differences with the postlingual deafness group were compared, and the correlation between speech recognition ability and the age diagnosed as severe or profound deafness, the age of hearing aid invalid, and duration of wearing cochlear implant were analyzed as factor indicators. All statistical results were analyzed by SAS 9.4 software. Results: In terms of objective indicators, the speech recognition rate of pre-lingual deafness was significantly lower than that of post-lingual deafness [(35.4±28.0)% vs (80.9±8.0)%,t=7.67, P<0.001], while there was no statistical difference in hearing threshold between the two groups [(34.8±4.0) dB HL vs (33.1±3.7) dB HL, t=1.30, P>0.05]. The indicators in the subjective questionnaire showed that the prelingual deafness group was only weaker in advanced sound perception, confidence and total mean score than the post-lingual deafness group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in other aspects(P>0.05), meanwhile, all indicators of the prelingual deafness group were significantly improved compared with the preoperative level (P<0.001). There was a moderate positive correlation between the hearing quality and the speech recognition rate in the prelingual deafness group(r=0.51, P=0.008). The regression analysis showed that the invalid age of hearing aid was the exact influencing factor of speech recognition rate. Conclusions: Certain prelingual deaf adults can adapt to cochlear implants and obtain different degrees of auditory assistance. Compared with the improvement of objective auditory ability assessment, the patient who received cochlear implantation gain more improvement in auditory related quality of life subjectively. The ineffective age of preoperative hearing aid is an important factor, which needs to be aroused sufficient preoperative attention.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Cochlear Implantation/methods* ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness/rehabilitation* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Quality of Life ; Speech Perception ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss is a common complication associated with Noonan syndrome (NS), and the level of hearing loss for NS patients with sensorineural loss ranged from normal to severe. Additional insights into the outcome of cochlear implantation (CI)in children with NS with or without comorbidities are needed. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: In this study, five patients with NS, four with a mutation in PTPN11 and one who tested negative in mutation screening, diagnosed with the clinical scoring systemand underwent CI at ages ranging from 16 to 50 months were retrospectively reviewed. Patientswere evaluated for auditory perception (Categories of Auditory Performance), speech production (Korean Version of the Ling's Stage), and language ability (Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test). RESULTS: In five of the children with NS, CI was performed without any complications. Threepatients who received CI before 30 months of age showed outstanding outcomes. One patientwho received CI at 50 months showed limited benefit. One patient who was diagnosed with developmental delay and cochlear nerve hypoplasia underwent CI at 28 months with poor outcome. DISCUSSION: Our report suggests that although the benefit may be influenced by comorbidities associated with NS or delay in hearing rehabilitation, profound hearing loss in patientswith NS may be restored to normal levels in terms of auditory/speech perception and vocabulary/language development. The variable hearing outcomes also underscore the need for earlyscreening and detection of profound hearing loss, and regular follow-up for hearing evaluationin patients with NS.
Auditory Perception ; Child ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Cochlear Nerve ; Comorbidity ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss ; Humans ; Language ; Mass Screening ; Methods ; Noonan Syndrome ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Vocabulary

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) is another option for hearing rehabilitation in non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients who cannot undergo cochlear implantation (CI). However, the average performance of ABI is worse than that of CI. We analyzed the psycho-electrical parameters of each electrode and psycho-acoustic response to different frequency sounds in nontumor patients with ABI. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Sixteen patients with ABI from July 2008 to May 2013 were included in the study. They were followed up for 4 to 56 months. Among them, 12 were prelingual deaf with a narrow internal auditory canal or cochlear ossification. The remaining four were post-lingual deaf adults with severely ossified cochleae. We analyzed the electrical parameters [impedance, threshold level (T level), and dynamic range] of each of the 12 electrodes. We also evaluated the sound field pure-tone threshold, Ling 6 sound detection-identification test (Ling 6 test), and pitch ranking data of these patients. RESULTS: The impedance, T level, and dynamic range did not significantly differ among electrodes. However, the pure-tone threshold to sound field stimulation was elevated in the high tone area, where more variables were found than in the low frequency area. Patients could not identify /S/ and /Sh/ sounds in the Ling 6 test. The mean T level and the dynamic range of the three highest pitch-perceiving electrodes in each patient was higher and narrower, respectively, than those of the three lowest pitch-perceiving electrodes. CONCLUSION: The nontumor patients with ABI have difficulty perceiving high pitch sound. More sophisticated penetrating type electrodes and, if possible, bimodal stimulation with CI, could be considered.
Adult ; Auditory Brain Stem Implantation* ; Auditory Brain Stem Implants* ; Cochlea ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Electric Impedance ; Electrodes ; Hearing ; Humans ; Methods ; Rehabilitation

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) presents a muscular weakness in the face, shoulder girdle, and legs. In addition, bilateral, progressive, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) can be expressed. A 3-year-old boy visited with bilateral facial paralysis and bilateral hearing loss. Audiological evaluations revealed bilateral, progressive, sloping SNHL and bilateral hearing aids was used for more than 3 years. Cochlear implantation was carried out on left side when he was 6 years old and on right side when he was 7 years old. Seven months after cochlear implantation on left side, his shoulder muscle weakness was found and the genetic analysis showed decreased D4Z4 repeat size in 4qA allele confirming a diagnosis of FSHD. After auditory rehabilitation using electroacoustic stimulation, his hearing and speech perception were much improved. This case suggests that cochlear implantation can be beneficial in patients with SNHL associated with FSHD.
Alleles ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation* ; Cochlear Implants* ; Diagnosis ; Facial Paralysis ; Hearing ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Loss ; Hearing Loss, Bilateral ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural* ; Humans ; Leg ; Male ; Muscle Weakness ; Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral* ; Rehabilitation ; Shoulder ; Speech Perception

Labyrinthitis ossificans (LO) is a pathologic formation of fibrosis and new bone within the lumen of the otic capsule. The LO is a challenging issue in cochlear implantation since obliteration and obstruction of the cochlea make electrode insertion through scala tympani (classic route) difficult. Moreover, tympanomastoidectomy for resolution of chronic otitis media is also simultaneously considered for tympanogenic LO with severe to profound hearing loss because ossification could progress in case of staged or delayed implantation after initial tympanomastoidectomy. We report a patient with tympanogenic LO, who received subtotal petrosectomy with simultaneous cochlear implantation via scala vestibuli instead of the scala tympani for hearing rehabilitation.
Cochlea ; Cochlear Implantation* ; Cochlear Implants* ; Ear, Inner* ; Electrodes ; Fibrosis ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss ; Humans ; Labyrinthitis* ; Otitis Media ; Rehabilitation ; Scala Tympani ; Scala Vestibuli*

Refinement of surgical techniques has allowed hearing preservation after tumor resection to be prioritized. Moreover, restoration of hearing after tumor removal can be attempted in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas or those with a schwannoma in the only-hearing ear. Cochlear implantation (CI) has emerged as a proper method of acoustic rehabilitation, provided that the cochlear nerve remains intact. Studies of electrical promontory stimulation in patients after vestibular schwannoma resection have demonstrated favorable results. We describe herein two cases of hearing rehabilitation via CI implemented at the time of vestibular schwannoma resection. Tumors were totally removed, and cochlear implant electrodes were successfully inserted in both cases. Also, post operative CI-aided hearing showed improved results.
Acoustics ; Cochlear Implantation* ; Cochlear Implants* ; Cochlear Nerve ; Ear ; Electrodes ; Hearing ; Humans ; Methods ; Neurilemmoma ; Neuroma, Acoustic* ; Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVETo investigate the basic factors of the progress amplitude of hearing and speech rehabilitation effect of preschool deaf children with cochlear implants, and provide guidance for the improvement and optimization of rehabilitation strategies.

METHODUsing the standard hearing and language assessment tools, tracked and evaluated 1 422 CI preschool deaf children for a period of one year, and calculated the effect of hearing and speech rehabilitation, carried out the correlation analysis and variance analysis among different grouping variables.

RESULT(1) There was a negative correlation (P<0.01) between the rehabilitation effect and cochlear implantation age, existed the different degree of positive correlation (P<0.01) between the rehabilitation effect and parents cultural level, but no correlation between the rehabilitation effect and parents hearing status.(2) Father's education level, in comparison to mother's education level, had greater impact on the children rehabilitation effect.(3)There was positive correlation(r=0.689, P<0.01) between the progress amplitude of hearing and speech rehabilitation effect. (4) The progress amplitude of auditory and language rehabilitation effect of 2-3 years old group was the highest value(the progress amplitude of hearing and speech recognition rate reached 77.5%, the progress amplitude of language age progress rate reached 2.02 years old), and there were significant differences (P<0.05) between over 3 years old groups.

CONCLUSIONS(1) To expect the better progress amplitude of rehabilitation effect, cochlear implant age should not be more than 3 years old. (2) Father's effect in the process of rehabilitation is more helpful for deaf children's learning enthusiasms.

Age Factors ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness ; rehabilitation ; Hearing ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Language ; Speech Perception

Optical cochlear implant has been occuring as a new cochlear implant which utilizes laser pulses to stimulate hearing. Compared to electronic cochlear implant, it has demonstrated higher spatial selectivity and less radiation scattering, which could lead to higher fidelity cochlear prostheses. At present, most investigations have focused on experiments in vivo. Although a lot of exciting results have been obtained, the mechanisms of laser stimulation is still open. In this paper, a brief review on the recent new findings of optical cochlear implant is given, and possible mechanisms are discussed. In the end, new experimental proposals are suggested which could help to explore the mechanisms of laser-cochlea stimulation.
Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Hearing Loss ; rehabilitation ; Humans ; Lasers ; Optics and Photonics