BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic strategies after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in elderly patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) are debated due to the balance between ischemic and bleeding risks. Recent guidelines recommend early transitioning from triple antithrombotic therapy to dual antithrombotic therapy, but there are limited data on elderly patients. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc age-specific analysis of the PERSEO Registry population aimed to compare clinical features, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes of individuals aged ≥ 80 years and < 80 years who were on OAT and underwent PCI with stent. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events at 1-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), major bleeding [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5], and clinically relevant bleeding (BARC type 2-5). RESULTS: Among the 1234 patients enrolled, 31% of patients were aged ≥ 80 years (84 ± 3 years, 76% males). Compared to younger patients, elderly patients had higher rates of comorbidities such as hypertension, anaemia or chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation was the leading indication for OAT. Elderly patients were more often discharged on dual antithrombotic therapy (23%) compared to younger patients (13%) (P < 0.0001). They experienced higher net adverse clinical events (38% vs. 21%, P < 0.001), MACCE (24% vs. 12%, P < 0.001), as well as higher bleeding rates. Specifically, rates of major bleeding (9% vs. 6%, P = 0.026), and clinically relevant bleeding (21% vs. 12%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients on OAT undergoing PCI are a particular frail population with higher risk of MACCE and bleeding compared to younger patients despite a less aggressive antithrombotic therapy.

Objectives::Reported data regarding the prevalence, prognostic impact, and safety and efficacy of revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are scarce. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes among patients with LMCA disease undergoing PCI. Outcomes were compared between those with and without coronary CTO and between those with CTO who had successful and unsuccessful CTO recanalization procedures.Methods::All consecutive patients with significant LMCA disease (>50% stenosis at coronary angiography) who underwent PCI between July 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively included in our study. The primary endpoint of the study was long-term mortality. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of myocardial infarction, repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, stroke, and stent thrombosis.Results::Between July 2014 and December 2018, 578 patients underwent PCI for LMCA disease at Pederzoli Hospital and University of Turin were enrolled. They were divided into 3 groups: group A: 374 (65%) patients without CTO, group B: 108 (19%) patients with untreated or unsuccessfully treated CTO, and group C: 96 (17%) patients with successfully treated CTO. At a median follow-up of (1090 ± 279) days, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the primary and secondary endpoints. However, there was a trend towards higher mortality in patients with untreated or unsuccessfully treated CTO (13% vs. 19% vs. 14% in groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.12). The primary and secondary endpoints were further analyzed based on the presence or absence of myocardial viability: subgroup C1: 54 (56%) patients with successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) having viability, and subgroup C2: 42 (44%) patients with successful PTCA not having viability. There was a trend toward a statistically significant higher rate of death among patients in group B, who underwent unsuccessful recanalization with viable myocardium (19% vs. 9% vs. 19% in groups B, C1, and C2, respectively, P = 0.05). On multivariable analysis, the propensity for successful revascularization of CTO was associated with a reduced risk of death ( P = 0.01; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.87). Conclusions::Among patients with LMCA disease undergoing PCI, CTO represents a common finding associated with worse prognosis. Successful revascularization of CTO in patients with viable myocardium appears to significantly improve prognosis.

Objectives::Reported data regarding the prevalence, prognostic impact, and safety and efficacy of revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are scarce. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes among patients with LMCA disease undergoing PCI. Outcomes were compared between those with and without coronary CTO and between those with CTO who had successful and unsuccessful CTO recanalization procedures.Methods::All consecutive patients with significant LMCA disease (>50% stenosis at coronary angiography) who underwent PCI between July 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively included in our study. The primary endpoint of the study was long-term mortality. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of myocardial infarction, repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, stroke, and stent thrombosis.Results::Between July 2014 and December 2018, 578 patients underwent PCI for LMCA disease at Pederzoli Hospital and University of Turin were enrolled. They were divided into 3 groups: group A: 374 (65%) patients without CTO, group B: 108 (19%) patients with untreated or unsuccessfully treated CTO, and group C: 96 (17%) patients with successfully treated CTO. At a median follow-up of (1090 ± 279) days, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the primary and secondary endpoints. However, there was a trend towards higher mortality in patients with untreated or unsuccessfully treated CTO (13% vs. 19% vs. 14% in groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.12). The primary and secondary endpoints were further analyzed based on the presence or absence of myocardial viability: subgroup C1: 54 (56%) patients with successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) having viability, and subgroup C2: 42 (44%) patients with successful PTCA not having viability. There was a trend toward a statistically significant higher rate of death among patients in group B, who underwent unsuccessful recanalization with viable myocardium (19% vs. 9% vs. 19% in groups B, C1, and C2, respectively, P = 0.05). On multivariable analysis, the propensity for successful revascularization of CTO was associated with a reduced risk of death ( P = 0.01; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.87). Conclusions::Among patients with LMCA disease undergoing PCI, CTO represents a common finding associated with worse prognosis. Successful revascularization of CTO in patients with viable myocardium appears to significantly improve prognosis.