1.Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Thyroid Cancers:2025 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guideline
Eun Ju HA ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Jung Hwan BAEK ; Hyun Kyung LIM ; Hye Shin AHN ; Seon Mi BAEK ; Yoon Jung CHOI ; Sae Rom CHUNG ; Ji-hoon KIM ; Jae Ho SHIN ; Ji Ye LEE ; Min Ji HONG ; Hyun Jin KIM ; Leehi JOO ; Soo Yeon HAHN ; So Lyung JUNG ; Chang Yoon LEE ; Jeong Hyun LEE ; Young Hen LEE ; Jeong Seon PARK ; Jung Hee SHIN ; Jin Yong SUNG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong Gyu NA ;
Korean Journal of Radiology 2025;26(1):10-28
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.
2.Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Thyroid Cancers:2025 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guideline
Eun Ju HA ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Jung Hwan BAEK ; Hyun Kyung LIM ; Hye Shin AHN ; Seon Mi BAEK ; Yoon Jung CHOI ; Sae Rom CHUNG ; Ji-hoon KIM ; Jae Ho SHIN ; Ji Ye LEE ; Min Ji HONG ; Hyun Jin KIM ; Leehi JOO ; Soo Yeon HAHN ; So Lyung JUNG ; Chang Yoon LEE ; Jeong Hyun LEE ; Young Hen LEE ; Jeong Seon PARK ; Jung Hee SHIN ; Jin Yong SUNG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong Gyu NA ;
Korean Journal of Radiology 2025;26(1):10-28
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.
3.Current status of pancreatic islet xenotransplantation
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):1-11
Pancreatic islet transplantation represents the optimal treatment for severe hypoglycemia, a serious complication experienced by patients with long-term type 1 diabetes who are undergoing insulin therapy. However, the limited availability of donor organs restricts its widespread use. Porcine pancreatic islets could offer a viable alternative to address this organ shortage. For successful pancreatic islet xenotransplantation using porcine pancreatic islets, efficacy and safety must first be demonstrated in pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) preclinical studies, as outlined in the consensus statement of the International Xenotransplantation Association. Our group has achieved long-term survival of wild-type porcine islet grafts in immunosuppressed NHPs by employing two immunosuppressive protocols: one based on CD40-CD40L blockade and another utilizing clinically available immunosuppressants. A clinical trial for pancreatic islet xenotransplantation, following the latter protocol, has received approval from the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). This review aims to highlight the results of clinical trials involving porcine islet xenotransplantation to date, along with the age-specific and other characteristics of the porcine islets used in these trials and the preclinical NHP studies that support them. It offers insights into the perspectives around the first clinical islet xenotransplantation approved by the Korean MFDS, emphasizing improved long-term graft survival.
4.Current status of pancreatic islet xenotransplantation
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):1-11
Pancreatic islet transplantation represents the optimal treatment for severe hypoglycemia, a serious complication experienced by patients with long-term type 1 diabetes who are undergoing insulin therapy. However, the limited availability of donor organs restricts its widespread use. Porcine pancreatic islets could offer a viable alternative to address this organ shortage. For successful pancreatic islet xenotransplantation using porcine pancreatic islets, efficacy and safety must first be demonstrated in pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) preclinical studies, as outlined in the consensus statement of the International Xenotransplantation Association. Our group has achieved long-term survival of wild-type porcine islet grafts in immunosuppressed NHPs by employing two immunosuppressive protocols: one based on CD40-CD40L blockade and another utilizing clinically available immunosuppressants. A clinical trial for pancreatic islet xenotransplantation, following the latter protocol, has received approval from the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). This review aims to highlight the results of clinical trials involving porcine islet xenotransplantation to date, along with the age-specific and other characteristics of the porcine islets used in these trials and the preclinical NHP studies that support them. It offers insights into the perspectives around the first clinical islet xenotransplantation approved by the Korean MFDS, emphasizing improved long-term graft survival.
5.Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Thyroid Cancers:2025 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guideline
Eun Ju HA ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Jung Hwan BAEK ; Hyun Kyung LIM ; Hye Shin AHN ; Seon Mi BAEK ; Yoon Jung CHOI ; Sae Rom CHUNG ; Ji-hoon KIM ; Jae Ho SHIN ; Ji Ye LEE ; Min Ji HONG ; Hyun Jin KIM ; Leehi JOO ; Soo Yeon HAHN ; So Lyung JUNG ; Chang Yoon LEE ; Jeong Hyun LEE ; Young Hen LEE ; Jeong Seon PARK ; Jung Hee SHIN ; Jin Yong SUNG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong Gyu NA ;
Korean Journal of Radiology 2025;26(1):10-28
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.
6.Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Thyroid Cancers:2025 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guideline
Eun Ju HA ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Jung Hwan BAEK ; Hyun Kyung LIM ; Hye Shin AHN ; Seon Mi BAEK ; Yoon Jung CHOI ; Sae Rom CHUNG ; Ji-hoon KIM ; Jae Ho SHIN ; Ji Ye LEE ; Min Ji HONG ; Hyun Jin KIM ; Leehi JOO ; Soo Yeon HAHN ; So Lyung JUNG ; Chang Yoon LEE ; Jeong Hyun LEE ; Young Hen LEE ; Jeong Seon PARK ; Jung Hee SHIN ; Jin Yong SUNG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong Gyu NA ;
Korean Journal of Radiology 2025;26(1):10-28
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.
7.Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Thyroid Cancers:2025 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guideline
Eun Ju HA ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Jung Hwan BAEK ; Hyun Kyung LIM ; Hye Shin AHN ; Seon Mi BAEK ; Yoon Jung CHOI ; Sae Rom CHUNG ; Ji-hoon KIM ; Jae Ho SHIN ; Ji Ye LEE ; Min Ji HONG ; Hyun Jin KIM ; Leehi JOO ; Soo Yeon HAHN ; So Lyung JUNG ; Chang Yoon LEE ; Jeong Hyun LEE ; Young Hen LEE ; Jeong Seon PARK ; Jung Hee SHIN ; Jin Yong SUNG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong Gyu NA ;
Korean Journal of Radiology 2025;26(1):10-28
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.
8.Current status of pancreatic islet xenotransplantation
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):1-11
Pancreatic islet transplantation represents the optimal treatment for severe hypoglycemia, a serious complication experienced by patients with long-term type 1 diabetes who are undergoing insulin therapy. However, the limited availability of donor organs restricts its widespread use. Porcine pancreatic islets could offer a viable alternative to address this organ shortage. For successful pancreatic islet xenotransplantation using porcine pancreatic islets, efficacy and safety must first be demonstrated in pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) preclinical studies, as outlined in the consensus statement of the International Xenotransplantation Association. Our group has achieved long-term survival of wild-type porcine islet grafts in immunosuppressed NHPs by employing two immunosuppressive protocols: one based on CD40-CD40L blockade and another utilizing clinically available immunosuppressants. A clinical trial for pancreatic islet xenotransplantation, following the latter protocol, has received approval from the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). This review aims to highlight the results of clinical trials involving porcine islet xenotransplantation to date, along with the age-specific and other characteristics of the porcine islets used in these trials and the preclinical NHP studies that support them. It offers insights into the perspectives around the first clinical islet xenotransplantation approved by the Korean MFDS, emphasizing improved long-term graft survival.
9.Current status of pancreatic islet xenotransplantation
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):1-11
Pancreatic islet transplantation represents the optimal treatment for severe hypoglycemia, a serious complication experienced by patients with long-term type 1 diabetes who are undergoing insulin therapy. However, the limited availability of donor organs restricts its widespread use. Porcine pancreatic islets could offer a viable alternative to address this organ shortage. For successful pancreatic islet xenotransplantation using porcine pancreatic islets, efficacy and safety must first be demonstrated in pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) preclinical studies, as outlined in the consensus statement of the International Xenotransplantation Association. Our group has achieved long-term survival of wild-type porcine islet grafts in immunosuppressed NHPs by employing two immunosuppressive protocols: one based on CD40-CD40L blockade and another utilizing clinically available immunosuppressants. A clinical trial for pancreatic islet xenotransplantation, following the latter protocol, has received approval from the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). This review aims to highlight the results of clinical trials involving porcine islet xenotransplantation to date, along with the age-specific and other characteristics of the porcine islets used in these trials and the preclinical NHP studies that support them. It offers insights into the perspectives around the first clinical islet xenotransplantation approved by the Korean MFDS, emphasizing improved long-term graft survival.
10.Long-Term Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: 10 Years and Beyond
Ho Sung MYEONG ; Sang Soon JEONG ; Jung Hoon KIM ; Jae Meen LEE ; Kwang Hyon PARK ; Kawngwoo PARK ; Hyun Joo PARK ; Hye Ran PARK ; Byung Woo YOON ; Eun Jung LEE ; Jin Wook KIM ; Hyun Tai CHUNG ; Dong Gyu KIM ; Sun Ha PAEK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(32):e229-
Background:
We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs).
Methods:
Among the 233 CCM patients who underwent GKS, 79 adult patients (96 lesions) followed for over 10 years were included and analyzed retrospectively. Annual hemorrhage rate (AHR) was analyzed the entire cohort of 233 patients and the subset of 79 enrolled patients by dividing lesions into overall CCM lesions and brainstem lesions. AHR, neurologic outcome, adverse radiation effect (ARE), and changes of lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared before and after GKS. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for hemorrhage following GKS.
Results:
Mean follow-up duration of 79 enrolled patients was 14 years (range, 10–23 years).The AHR of all CCMs for entire cohort at each time point was 17.8% (pre-GKS), 5.9% (≤ 2 years post-GKS), 1.8% (≤ 10 years post-GKS). The AHR of all CCM for 79 enrolled patients was 21.4% (pre-GKS), 3.8% (2 years post-GKS), 1.4% (10 years post-GKS), and 2.3% (> 10 years post-GKS). The AHR of brainstem cavernous malformation (CM) for entire cohort at each time point was 22.4% (pre-GKS), 10.1% (≤ 2 years post-GKS), 3.2% (≤ 10 years post-GKS). The AHR of brainstem CM for 79 enrolled patients was 27.2% (pre-GKS), 5.8% (2 years post-GKS), 3.4% (10 years post-GKS), and 3.5% (> 10 years post-GKS). Out of the 79 enrolled patients, 35 presented with focal neurologic deficits at the initial clinical visit. Among these patients, 74.3% showed recovery at the last follow-up. Symptomatic ARE occurred in five (6.4%) patients. No mortality occurred. Most lesions were decreased in size at the last follow-up MRI. Previous hemorrhage history (hazard ratio [HR], 8.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–65.88; P = 0.043), and brainstem location (HR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.26–7.64; P = 0.014) were significant risk factors for hemorrhage event.
Conclusion
GKS for CCM showed favorable long-term outcomes. GKS should be considered for CCM, especially when it has a previous hemorrhage history and brainstem location.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail