1.Application of autologous ear cartilage nasal tip framework combined with dermal fat dorsal grafting in rhinoplasty
Chuchu XIONG ; Tianqi ZHANG ; Shan ZHANG ; Qiuyue FU ; Hao CHEN ; Gang CHEN
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery 2025;41(8):799-808
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of autologous ear cartilage biomimetic nasal tip framework construction combined with dermal fat dorsal grafting in rhinoplasty.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of patients who underwent rhinoplasty at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to May 2023. Autologous ear cartilage with preserved perichondrium was harvested from patients, and fashioned into a nasal tip framework simulating the natural nasal tip structure. Dermal fat grafts were harvested from the lateral gluteal crease region where the dermis was thicker, and implanted into the nasal dorsum for augmentation rhinoplasty. Postoperative follow-up included observation of incision healing, nasal tip morphology, and complications. Pre- and postoperative photographs were taken to measure nasal length and nasal tip height. Ultrasound was used to measure subcutaneous fat thickness at the nasal root before and after surgery, and absorption rates were calculated. The absorption rate at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively = (1 -subcutaneous fat thickness at 6 or 12 or 24 months postoperatively/subcutaneous fat thickness at 1 month postoperatively) × 100%. Aesthetic satisfaction was evaluated based on surgeon assessment, patient self-evaluation, and third-party physician evaluation (satisfaction by all three parties was rated as markedly effective, by two parties as effective, by one party as fair, and by none as poor). The aesthetic satisfaction rate = (markedly effective + effective) cases/total cases × 100%. Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip height and nasal length were performed using paired t-tests, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Comparisons of subcutaneous fat thickness at the nasal root at different time points and absorption rates at different postoperative time points were performed using repeated measures ANOVA, with post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction. For subcutaneous fat thickness comparisons, P<0.007 was considered statistically significant; for absorption rate comparisons, P<0.017 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 38 patients were included, consisting of 5 males and 33 females, with a mean age of 29.42 years (range 20-38 years). All patients were followed up for 24 months postoperatively. All incisions healed well; nasal appearance was aesthetically pleasing; nasal dorsal height was satisfactory; nasal tip mobility was good; the framework was stable; and no complications occurred. At 24 months postoperatively, nasal tip height [(22.87±0.52) mm vs. (19.94±0.53) mm] and nasal length [(47.18±0.61) mm vs. (44.20±0.55) mm] were significantly increased compared to preoperative measurements (both P<0.01). Comparison of subcutaneous fat thickness at the nasal root between preoperative and postoperative time points (1, 6, 12, and 24 months) showed statistically significant differences ( P<0.007). Post-hoc comparisons revealed statistically significant differences between: postoperative 1 month and 6 months vs. preoperative; postoperative 12 months vs. postoperative 1 and 6 months; and postoperative 24 months vs. postoperative 1 and 6 months (all P<0.007). However, the comparison between postoperative 24 months and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference ( P>0.007). Comparison of absorption rates at postoperative time points (6, 12, and 24 months) showed statistically significant differences ( P<0.017). Comparisons between postoperative 12 months vs. 6 months, and postoperative 24 months vs. 6 months showed statistically significant differences (both P<0.017), while the comparison between postoperative 24 months and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference ( P>0.017). In the aesthetic satisfaction survey, 37 cases were markedly effective and 1 case was fair, achieving an aesthetic satisfaction rate of 97%. Conclusion:The use of autologous ear cartilage for constructing a biomimetic nasal tip framework combined with dermal fat dorsal grafting in rhinoplasty results in natural postoperative appearance and high patient satisfaction, demonstrating significant value for extensive clinical use.
2.Application of autologous ear cartilage nasal tip framework combined with dermal fat dorsal grafting in rhinoplasty
Chuchu XIONG ; Tianqi ZHANG ; Shan ZHANG ; Qiuyue FU ; Hao CHEN ; Gang CHEN
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery 2025;41(8):799-808
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of autologous ear cartilage biomimetic nasal tip framework construction combined with dermal fat dorsal grafting in rhinoplasty.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of patients who underwent rhinoplasty at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to May 2023. Autologous ear cartilage with preserved perichondrium was harvested from patients, and fashioned into a nasal tip framework simulating the natural nasal tip structure. Dermal fat grafts were harvested from the lateral gluteal crease region where the dermis was thicker, and implanted into the nasal dorsum for augmentation rhinoplasty. Postoperative follow-up included observation of incision healing, nasal tip morphology, and complications. Pre- and postoperative photographs were taken to measure nasal length and nasal tip height. Ultrasound was used to measure subcutaneous fat thickness at the nasal root before and after surgery, and absorption rates were calculated. The absorption rate at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively = (1 -subcutaneous fat thickness at 6 or 12 or 24 months postoperatively/subcutaneous fat thickness at 1 month postoperatively) × 100%. Aesthetic satisfaction was evaluated based on surgeon assessment, patient self-evaluation, and third-party physician evaluation (satisfaction by all three parties was rated as markedly effective, by two parties as effective, by one party as fair, and by none as poor). The aesthetic satisfaction rate = (markedly effective + effective) cases/total cases × 100%. Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip height and nasal length were performed using paired t-tests, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Comparisons of subcutaneous fat thickness at the nasal root at different time points and absorption rates at different postoperative time points were performed using repeated measures ANOVA, with post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction. For subcutaneous fat thickness comparisons, P<0.007 was considered statistically significant; for absorption rate comparisons, P<0.017 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 38 patients were included, consisting of 5 males and 33 females, with a mean age of 29.42 years (range 20-38 years). All patients were followed up for 24 months postoperatively. All incisions healed well; nasal appearance was aesthetically pleasing; nasal dorsal height was satisfactory; nasal tip mobility was good; the framework was stable; and no complications occurred. At 24 months postoperatively, nasal tip height [(22.87±0.52) mm vs. (19.94±0.53) mm] and nasal length [(47.18±0.61) mm vs. (44.20±0.55) mm] were significantly increased compared to preoperative measurements (both P<0.01). Comparison of subcutaneous fat thickness at the nasal root between preoperative and postoperative time points (1, 6, 12, and 24 months) showed statistically significant differences ( P<0.007). Post-hoc comparisons revealed statistically significant differences between: postoperative 1 month and 6 months vs. preoperative; postoperative 12 months vs. postoperative 1 and 6 months; and postoperative 24 months vs. postoperative 1 and 6 months (all P<0.007). However, the comparison between postoperative 24 months and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference ( P>0.007). Comparison of absorption rates at postoperative time points (6, 12, and 24 months) showed statistically significant differences ( P<0.017). Comparisons between postoperative 12 months vs. 6 months, and postoperative 24 months vs. 6 months showed statistically significant differences (both P<0.017), while the comparison between postoperative 24 months and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference ( P>0.017). In the aesthetic satisfaction survey, 37 cases were markedly effective and 1 case was fair, achieving an aesthetic satisfaction rate of 97%. Conclusion:The use of autologous ear cartilage for constructing a biomimetic nasal tip framework combined with dermal fat dorsal grafting in rhinoplasty results in natural postoperative appearance and high patient satisfaction, demonstrating significant value for extensive clinical use.
3.A retrospective analysis on Langerhans cell histiocytosis and the association between BRAF V600E mutation status and clinical features in children
Chuchu FENG ; Yang LI ; Xiaomin PENG ; Xilin XIONG ; Wenjun WENG ; Pingping WU
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics 2021;36(11):848-852
Objective:To investigate the clinical features of patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), and analyze the association between BRAF V600E mutation status and clinical features. Methods:A retrospective analysis was carried out for the clinical data of 60 patients with LCH at the Department of Pediatric Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between April 2013 and December 2019.Among them, 39 patients undertook BRAF V600E mutation testing, which in paraffin-embedded tissue samples were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow were tested by high-throughput sequencing, for analyzing the correlation between BRAF V600E mutation and clinical characteristics of LCH. Results:(1)Clinical characteristics: the age of 60 LCH patients was (4.08±0.45) years, with 43 male cases and 17 female cases.Patients at young age (≤2 years) and with risk organ (RO+ ) and central nervous system (CNS) risk lesions involvement were concentrated in the multisystem involvement (MS) group ( P<0.05). (2)Therapeutic response after induction therapy: the response to induction therapy was achieved in 28 of 60 treated patients (41.7%) and 32 (53.3%) did not.After excluding stratification factors of treatment regimen, MS ( OR=6.855, 95% CI: 2.077-22.622, P=0.002) and the age≤2 years ( OR=4.944; 95% CI: 1.601-15.275; P=0.005) were risk factors in poor chemotherapy response.RO+ ( OR=8.250, 95% CI: 1.617-42.090, P=0.005) was a significant risk factor for a poor chemotherapy response in JLSG-02 treatment group.Differently, RO+ had no dramatic effect on chemotherapy response in CCHG-LCH-2019 treatment group.(3) BRAF V600E mutation: 39 patients were determined BRAF V600E status, with the positive rate of BRAF V600E mutation in paraffin-embedded tissue samples reaching 70.3%(26 cases). BRAF V600E mutation was not associated with early treatment response, age, sex, MS and RO+ ( P>0.05). However, the positive rate of BRAF V600E in children with MS and CNS risk lesions was higher than the controls, with 76.0% (19 cases) vs.57.1% (8 cases) and 74.1% (20 cases) vs.58.3% (7 cases), respectively.Totally, 3 of 8 cases were positive in bone marrow, with 2 cases of MS, and 1 case of multiple bone invasions, and 1 of 5 cases was positive in peripheral blood, with liver and spleen being involved. Conclusions:LCH patients with age≤2 years, MS and RO+ exhibited a poor response to initial treatment, required for more aggressive treatment strategy.Lesion with activating BRAF V600E mutations suggests that LCH is a clonal disorder.There may be great variability between BRAF V600E mutations and MS as well as CNS risk lesions.In the mutation dataset, part of patients had positive BRAF V600E mutations in bone marrow/peripheral blood.This might suggest a different pathogenesis in such patients, has a certain clinical sense in some aspect.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail