INTRODUCTION

It is anticipated that Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has greater risk in acquiring COVID-19 infection and poorer outcome. However, current worldwide data are conflicting.

This study primarily aims to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with COPD and those without COPD in terms of length of hospital stay (LOS), recovery or mortality, treatment received, and predictors of mortality.

This is a retrospective cohort chart review of 1,017 admitted adult COVID-19 patients from July to December 2020. Age, gender, smoking status, current control and medications for COPD, COVID-19 severity, symptoms, treatment, and outcomes of the two study groups were compared.

Prevalence rate of COPD was 3.8%. COVID-19 patients with COPD were older (median age of 69 vs 54, pCONCLUSION

COPD increases the risk for severe COVID-19 and lengthens LOS.

BACKGROUND

Efforts to control Hansen's d isease have progressed through multidrug therapy implementation. However, documented cases of relapse present challenges to its effective management and eradication. Understanding the contributing factors to relapse is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and achieving better outcomes against Hansen's Disease.

To determine the epidemiological profile and clinical patterns of patients diagnosed with Hansen's Disease Relapse in selected Tertiary Government Hospitals in the Philippines from November 2016 to October 2021.

This was a multi-center, retrospective study involving a five-year chart review method. Charts of all Hansen's Disease Relapse patients were obtained from participating institutions with necessary approvals. Data collection followed approved forms, and patient profiles were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Pre- and post- relapse profiles were compared using T-tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Fisher's Exact Test. Relapse time across subgroups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

A total of 60 relapse cases were included in the study. Majority were single, unemployed males aged 26-35, with low household screening. The Bacillary Index significantly decreased post- relapse. Documented comorbidities included G6PD deficiency before treatment and lepra reactions during MDT. Patients on 12-month MDT regimens had higher relapse time than those on 24-month regimens.

This study underscores the influence of socioeconomic, gender, and age-related factors on relapse. It emphasizes the imperative for enhanced public health measures in accordance with the WHO Global Leprosy Strategy and the importance of considering clinical factors while advocating for continuous improvements in leprosy management protocols.

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is prevalent in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the association of Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index with CKD among T2DM patients with concomitant NAFLD.

A single center, analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 216 T2DM patients with concomitant NAFLD. Clinical data were obtained via retrospective review of medical charts. The outcome of interest was CKD which was based on self-report obtained from medical charts or estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)RESULTS

Higher FIB-4 index was found to be significantly associated with CKD. Patients with FIB-4 index of 1.45-3.25 (moderate risk) and >3.25 (high risk) have about 3 times higher odds of CKD. However, after controlling for the significant confounders, only those who belong to high-risk group was found to be associated with CKD.

This study has demonstrated that FIB4 index > 3.25, an index of liver fibrosis, is significantly associated with development of CKD in T2DM patients with concomitant NAFLD.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Philippines. Most Filipino CKD patients prefer hemodialysis due to barriers such as cost and availability of Kidney Transplant. End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients face high symptom burden and unmet palliative care needs. Even with advancement in dialysis technology, the annual mortality rate of dialysis patients remains between 20% and 25%. While Advance Care Planning (ACP) can help align care with patient preferences by facilitating discussions about values and future decisions, its utilization in dialysis population remains low due to barriers in implementation. There is limited research specifically addressing the preferences and influencing factors of Advance Care Planning among CKD patients on hemodialysis in the Philippines.

This study aimed to determine the ACP preferences of CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis and to identify the clinicodemographic factors associated with these preferences.

An analytic cross-sectional study was conducted involving 96 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis at Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center (BGHMC) from October to November 2024. Data were collected using validated questionnaires administered either through face-to-face interviews or self-administration, depending on patients’ preferences and capabilities. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were employed for data analysis.

The study revealed limited awareness of ACP among participants (86.5%), underscoring the need for education. Family-centered decision-making was prominent, with most participants preferring family members as surrogate decision-makers and confidants. Quality of life was prioritized over life extension, and preferences for “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) orders were notable. Educational attainment and ethnicity significantly influenced preferences, with higher education linked to greater awareness; and Ethnicity shaping preferences for decision-makers, confidants, timing of discussions, and resuscitation choices. Additionally, duration of dialysis was linked to care setting preferences, while social support systems influenced the preferred place for discussions.

The findings highlight critical associations between clinicodemographic factors and ACP preferences among hemodialysis patients. Addressing these associations through targeted education and culturally sensitive approach can promote high-quality end-of-life care, aligned with diverse patient needs, values, and preferences.

BACKGROUND

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients often face critical treatment decisions that significantly affect their quality of life, making Shared Decision-Making (SDM), a collaborative approach between patients and healthcare providers, an essential component of patient-centered care.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of SDM on decisional readiness and patient satisfaction among CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) at Southern Isabela Medical Center (SIMC).

An analytical cross-sectional design was utilized. The Tagalog Version of SDM Q-9 questionnaire, Decision survey and CSAT survey tool were given to HD patients of SIMC from September – October 2024. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation and chi square test were used to report and analyze data.

One hundred eight (108) CKD patients on HD were included in the study. Shared decision-making score was high and overall satisfaction on health services was outstanding. Higher decisional readiness was associated with greater odds of reporting outstanding satisfaction (OR = 3.47, 95% CI: 2.563–4.688, p = 0.009). There was no significant association between patient satisfaction and SDM (r= 0.111, p =0.253.). Shared decision-making had a significant but weak positive correlation with decisional readiness (r =0.2043, p 0.035).

This study showed that fostering SDM positively enhances patients’ preparedness to make healthcare decisions. Decisional readiness is strongly associated with patient satisfaction, as confident patients are more likely to be satisfied with their care. The findings underscore the need for improved patient education to boost decisional readiness and support ongoing SDM practices. Integrating SDM into clinical workflows is essential to advancing patient-centered care and improving health outcomes for CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant and growing global health concern. Worldwide, 537 million adults have diabetes and 206 million of them are from the Western Pacific Region1. Local prevalence continues to remain high at 7.5%, with 4,303,899 adult Filipinos suffering from diabetes in 2021. DM significantly contributes to the growing burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide with about 50% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) being due to diabetic nephropathy alone. Likewise, 60% of Filipinos on maintenance dialysis have ESRD due to DM and hypertension. The primary care setting is the initial point of contact between healthcare providers and patients with type 2 diabetes, hence, the development of clinical practice guidelines that will provide guidance in caring for patients with stable complications of diabetes. The guideline is the first of 3 that are being developed by the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with type 2 diabetes and stable microvascular complications – nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy.

This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and management of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and early stage CKD and is divided into 5 main sections – Clinical Assessment, Diagnostic Tests, Pharmacologic Treatment, Non-pharmacologic Treatment and Patient Outcomes.

The method of guideline development followed the ADAPTE process. The Technical Working Group identified 19 key questions after consultation with colleagues and patients. Recommendations were adopted from high-quality clinical practice guidelines whenever applicable for most of the key clinical questions. On the other hand, the De Novo method of evidence review was used to answer key clinical questions for which recommendations from reviewed guidelines were not available. A modified GRADEPro was used in assessing the quality of evidence – high, moderate, low or very low. Following external review by a nephrologist, the draft recommendations were sent to the members of the consensus panel. Voting on whether to include or not by the consensus panel was facilitated to determine the strength of each recommendation – strong, moderate or weak.

After reviewing 3 high-quality clinical practice guidelines and the current evidence, the technical working group was able to develop 40 recommendations for the 19 key clinical questions.

Peripheral nerve block (PNB) has been successfully used as the sole anesthetic for Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion, and has been shown to provide satisfactory anesthesia and analgesia perioperatively, especially among critically – ill patients.

This report describes the anesthetic management of an 18 – year old underweight patient with End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and decompensated heart failure who was scheduled for PD catheter insertion. He was given a left lateral Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and a right Rectus sheath (RS) block as the main anesthetic. Fifteen mL of Isobaric Bupivacaine 0.375% with Epinephrine 1:400,000 dilution was injected for the TAP block, and 10mL for the RS block, for a total volume of 25mL (93.7mg). Sedation was given via a Remifentanil infusion at 0.1mcg/kg/min. Intraoperatively, the patient was awake, conversant, and comfortable, no pressors were used, and no conversion to general anesthesia was done. Post-operatively, he had good pain control, with a pain score of 1/10, and successfully underwent dialysis via the PD catheter on the 2ndhospital day.

This pediatric patient who is critically ill is not a good candidate for general or neuraxial anesthesia due to the risk of hemodynamic instability and perioperative decompensation. PNB was done to provide anesthesia, and ensure good pain control post-operatively, and a right TAP and left RS were done instead of a bilateral TAP to lower the LA volume and decrease the risk of LA toxicity.

Unilateral TAP with contralateral RS is a safe anesthetic technique among critically-ill pediatric patients who will undergo PD catheter insertion without the risk of hemodynamic instability with general or neuraxial anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Stigma remains a profound barrier to public health, particularly in managing diseases such as Hepatitis B, which is highly prevalent in hyperendemic regions like the Philippines. The social stigma associated with such health conditions can severely limit access to care and hinder adherence to treatment, exacerbating the overall disease burden. Despite the critical impact of stigma on health outcomes, there is a notable gap in the systematic evaluation of the tools used to measure stigma related to health conditions like Hepatitis B. This study aims to fill this gap by reviewing existing instruments for their methodologies, reliability, and validity to inform the development of a refined tool tailored to the Philippine context.

A systematic search was conducted across six databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Open Grey, DissOnline, Philippine Health Research Registry (PHRR), and Health Research and Development Information Network (HERDIN), following PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy focused on identifying quantitative and mixed-methods studies using questionnaires to measure HBV-related stigma and discrimination. Studies published between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2023, were considered. The selection process involved screening for duplicates, reviewing titles and abstracts, and performing a full-text review based on predetermined eligibility criteria.

The initial search yielded 1,198 articles, with 24 duplicates removed. After title and abstract screening, 28 articles were considered for full-text review, resulting in 17 relevant articles in the final analysis with 15 unique instrumentations. The majority of studies employed cross-sectional designs (n=8), with a significant concentration in Asian countries (n=11), indicating a regional focus in HBV stigma research. The review identified a range of questionnaire methodologies, but most studies lacked specificity regarding the type of stigma measured. The Likert Scale was the most commonly used measurement tool, yet few studies provided cut-off values for stigma levels. Validity and reliability testing was reported in 12 articles, including pilot studies, Cronbach’s alpha, and factor analysis.

The lack of a universal methodology and specificity in existing instruments underscores the importance of developing a refined tool that can accurately capture the nuances of stigma and discrimination associated with HBV. The urgent need for standardized, reliable, and culturally sensitive questionnaires is evident, underscoring their importance in developing effective public health strategies and improving treatment outcomes for individuals living with HBV, especially in the Philippines.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the real-world data and our clinical experience with metallic stents (MSs) and conventional polymeric stents (PSs) in the management of both malignant and benign chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO), in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. METHODS: Clinical data from our institution, including outcomes for all ureteric stents inserted for long-term management of CUO from all causes from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the MS and PS episodes. RESULTS: A total of 247 stents were placed in 63 patients with CUO over the 4-year study period. Of these, 45 stents were MSs. There was no significant difference in all baseline characteristics between the MS and PS groups, except for the aetiology of obstructive cause. Mean indwelling stent duration was significantly greater for MS than for PS (228.6 ± 147.0 vs. 146.1 ± 66.0 days, P < 0.001), thereby leading to lower average number of stent changes per year in the MS group compared to the PS group (1.4 vs. 6.3 times, respectively). Despite the higher unit cost of MS compared to PS, there was no significant mean cost difference overall (cost per dwelling day SGD 7.82 ± SGD 10.44 vs. SGD 8.23 ± SGD 20.50, P = 0.888). CONCLUSION Resonance MS is a better option than PS to manage CUO from malignant and benign causes because its significantly longer indwelling time mitigates the higher unit cost of the stent. It potentially reduces the number of procedures and operations in patients. Thus, it should be considered for all patients with CUO requiring long-term ureteric drainage.
Humans ; Ureteral Obstruction/economics* ; Female ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents/economics* ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Chronic Disease ; Ureter/surgery* ; Metals ; Adult ; Aged, 80 and over

It is crucial that policy makers, healthcare providers and relevant stakeholders understand how integrated care may be improved at our emergency departments (EDs) and what benefits that would bring. The potential that exists for right-siting care of special patient groups who could be managed in an ambulatory setting with the integration of a variety of hospital-based and community-based clinical support services is tremendous. This review describes the best practice and value of integrated care at the EDs. Local evidence is cited and compared with findings from overseas. The opportunities of care transition interventions among discharged patients are outlined, including that for paediatric patients, palliative care patients and patients with chronic diseases. This review also suggests ways to move forward to meet the aim of providing holistic care at EDs through integrated care programmes, innovation and research.
Humans ; Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration* ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated ; Palliative Care ; Chronic Disease