Purpose: To report five cases of macular hole (MH) coexisting with uveal melanoma (UM) and review the literature. Methods: Seventeen patients (5 new and 12 from previous reports) with coexisting MH and UM were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the MH was diagnosed before or after tumor treatment. The clinical features, pathogenesis, management options, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Results: Of 505 patients with UM in our institution, 5 (1.0%) had a concurrent MH in the ipsilateral eye. The 17 patients reviewed had a mean age of 63.9 years at the time of MH diagnosis. Of 16 patients with available data on sex, 11 (64.7%) were female. There were no major differences in the demographic or clinical data of the groups. Of the 15 known tumor locations, 6 (35.3%) were juxtapapillary or macular. In patients who developed MH after UM treatment, the durations from tumor treatment (radiotherapy or transpupillary thermotherapy) to MH diagnosis were 3 to 56 months (median, 8.5 months). MH surgery was performed in nine eyes, and hole closure was achieved in seven eyes with postoperative data. The mean visual acuity showed a tendency of improvement after surgery. No intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination associated with surgery was observed. Conclusions MH is observed in approximately 1% of patients with UM, either before or after tumor treatment. Of patients with coexisting MH and UM, MH surgery appears to be safe and effective in those with stable tumors and visual potential.

Purpose: To report five cases of macular hole (MH) coexisting with uveal melanoma (UM) and review the literature. Methods: Seventeen patients (5 new and 12 from previous reports) with coexisting MH and UM were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the MH was diagnosed before or after tumor treatment. The clinical features, pathogenesis, management options, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Results: Of 505 patients with UM in our institution, 5 (1.0%) had a concurrent MH in the ipsilateral eye. The 17 patients reviewed had a mean age of 63.9 years at the time of MH diagnosis. Of 16 patients with available data on sex, 11 (64.7%) were female. There were no major differences in the demographic or clinical data of the groups. Of the 15 known tumor locations, 6 (35.3%) were juxtapapillary or macular. In patients who developed MH after UM treatment, the durations from tumor treatment (radiotherapy or transpupillary thermotherapy) to MH diagnosis were 3 to 56 months (median, 8.5 months). MH surgery was performed in nine eyes, and hole closure was achieved in seven eyes with postoperative data. The mean visual acuity showed a tendency of improvement after surgery. No intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination associated with surgery was observed. Conclusions MH is observed in approximately 1% of patients with UM, either before or after tumor treatment. Of patients with coexisting MH and UM, MH surgery appears to be safe and effective in those with stable tumors and visual potential.

Purpose: To report five cases of macular hole (MH) coexisting with uveal melanoma (UM) and review the literature. Methods: Seventeen patients (5 new and 12 from previous reports) with coexisting MH and UM were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the MH was diagnosed before or after tumor treatment. The clinical features, pathogenesis, management options, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Results: Of 505 patients with UM in our institution, 5 (1.0%) had a concurrent MH in the ipsilateral eye. The 17 patients reviewed had a mean age of 63.9 years at the time of MH diagnosis. Of 16 patients with available data on sex, 11 (64.7%) were female. There were no major differences in the demographic or clinical data of the groups. Of the 15 known tumor locations, 6 (35.3%) were juxtapapillary or macular. In patients who developed MH after UM treatment, the durations from tumor treatment (radiotherapy or transpupillary thermotherapy) to MH diagnosis were 3 to 56 months (median, 8.5 months). MH surgery was performed in nine eyes, and hole closure was achieved in seven eyes with postoperative data. The mean visual acuity showed a tendency of improvement after surgery. No intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination associated with surgery was observed. Conclusions MH is observed in approximately 1% of patients with UM, either before or after tumor treatment. Of patients with coexisting MH and UM, MH surgery appears to be safe and effective in those with stable tumors and visual potential.

Purpose: To report five cases of macular hole (MH) coexisting with uveal melanoma (UM) and review the literature. Methods: Seventeen patients (5 new and 12 from previous reports) with coexisting MH and UM were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the MH was diagnosed before or after tumor treatment. The clinical features, pathogenesis, management options, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Results: Of 505 patients with UM in our institution, 5 (1.0%) had a concurrent MH in the ipsilateral eye. The 17 patients reviewed had a mean age of 63.9 years at the time of MH diagnosis. Of 16 patients with available data on sex, 11 (64.7%) were female. There were no major differences in the demographic or clinical data of the groups. Of the 15 known tumor locations, 6 (35.3%) were juxtapapillary or macular. In patients who developed MH after UM treatment, the durations from tumor treatment (radiotherapy or transpupillary thermotherapy) to MH diagnosis were 3 to 56 months (median, 8.5 months). MH surgery was performed in nine eyes, and hole closure was achieved in seven eyes with postoperative data. The mean visual acuity showed a tendency of improvement after surgery. No intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination associated with surgery was observed. Conclusions MH is observed in approximately 1% of patients with UM, either before or after tumor treatment. Of patients with coexisting MH and UM, MH surgery appears to be safe and effective in those with stable tumors and visual potential.

Purpose: To report five cases of macular hole (MH) coexisting with uveal melanoma (UM) and review the literature. Methods: Seventeen patients (5 new and 12 from previous reports) with coexisting MH and UM were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the MH was diagnosed before or after tumor treatment. The clinical features, pathogenesis, management options, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Results: Of 505 patients with UM in our institution, 5 (1.0%) had a concurrent MH in the ipsilateral eye. The 17 patients reviewed had a mean age of 63.9 years at the time of MH diagnosis. Of 16 patients with available data on sex, 11 (64.7%) were female. There were no major differences in the demographic or clinical data of the groups. Of the 15 known tumor locations, 6 (35.3%) were juxtapapillary or macular. In patients who developed MH after UM treatment, the durations from tumor treatment (radiotherapy or transpupillary thermotherapy) to MH diagnosis were 3 to 56 months (median, 8.5 months). MH surgery was performed in nine eyes, and hole closure was achieved in seven eyes with postoperative data. The mean visual acuity showed a tendency of improvement after surgery. No intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination associated with surgery was observed. Conclusions MH is observed in approximately 1% of patients with UM, either before or after tumor treatment. Of patients with coexisting MH and UM, MH surgery appears to be safe and effective in those with stable tumors and visual potential.

Purpose: Little is known about the major risk factors for submacular hemorrhage (SMH). This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with SMH in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy receiving three consecutive loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept or ranibizumab injections. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 48 patients diagnosed with nAMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who completed three loading doses under a treat-and-extend regimen. Patients were divided into the SMH group and the non-SMH group (age- and sex-matched without SMH), with 24 patients in each group. Intravitreal injections, agents, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were compared. Results: In the SMH group, SMH occurred approximately 3.29 years after post-nAMD diagnosis. The non-SMH group received more intravitreal injections of aflibercept and brolucizumab during the follow-up period after the initial loading phase. The SMH group exhibited a higher prevalence of serous/hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) at the last visit before SMH occurrence compared to the non-SMH group. Patients with a PED increase in the past two visits showed a higher tendency in the SMH group. No other OCT features significantly correlated with SMH development. Conclusions The presence of serous/hemorrhagic PEDs may indicate a higher risk of SMH, and eyes with these features should be closely monitored to prevent sudden and devastating visual loss caused by SMH.

Purpose: Little is known about the major risk factors for submacular hemorrhage (SMH). This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with SMH in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy receiving three consecutive loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept or ranibizumab injections. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 48 patients diagnosed with nAMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who completed three loading doses under a treat-and-extend regimen. Patients were divided into the SMH group and the non-SMH group (age- and sex-matched without SMH), with 24 patients in each group. Intravitreal injections, agents, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were compared. Results: In the SMH group, SMH occurred approximately 3.29 years after post-nAMD diagnosis. The non-SMH group received more intravitreal injections of aflibercept and brolucizumab during the follow-up period after the initial loading phase. The SMH group exhibited a higher prevalence of serous/hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) at the last visit before SMH occurrence compared to the non-SMH group. Patients with a PED increase in the past two visits showed a higher tendency in the SMH group. No other OCT features significantly correlated with SMH development. Conclusions The presence of serous/hemorrhagic PEDs may indicate a higher risk of SMH, and eyes with these features should be closely monitored to prevent sudden and devastating visual loss caused by SMH.

Purpose: Little is known about the major risk factors for submacular hemorrhage (SMH). This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with SMH in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy receiving three consecutive loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept or ranibizumab injections. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 48 patients diagnosed with nAMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who completed three loading doses under a treat-and-extend regimen. Patients were divided into the SMH group and the non-SMH group (age- and sex-matched without SMH), with 24 patients in each group. Intravitreal injections, agents, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were compared. Results: In the SMH group, SMH occurred approximately 3.29 years after post-nAMD diagnosis. The non-SMH group received more intravitreal injections of aflibercept and brolucizumab during the follow-up period after the initial loading phase. The SMH group exhibited a higher prevalence of serous/hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) at the last visit before SMH occurrence compared to the non-SMH group. Patients with a PED increase in the past two visits showed a higher tendency in the SMH group. No other OCT features significantly correlated with SMH development. Conclusions The presence of serous/hemorrhagic PEDs may indicate a higher risk of SMH, and eyes with these features should be closely monitored to prevent sudden and devastating visual loss caused by SMH.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the incidence and visual outcomes of pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) in patients initially diagnosed with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods: In this study, 144 patients aged 20 to 55 years with treatment-naive chronic CSC, defined as the persistence of subretinal fluid (SRF) for ≥6 months, were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with PNV at the initial evaluation were categorized as group 1, whereas those who developed new-onset PNV during follow-up were categorized as group 2. Patients without PNV until the end of the follow-up were categorized as group 3. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 49.9 ± 39.9 months, new-onset PNV was diagnosed in 11.8% of patients with CSC. The time taken to reach the initial resolution was longest in group 1 (group 1, 11.13 ± 10.70 months; group 2, 8.14 ± 7.90 months; group 3, 7.32 ± 9.55 months), although these differences were not statistically significant. The numbers of injections needed to achieve initial resolution were 3.76 ± 5.90, 1.64 ± 2.06, and 1.74 ± 4.33 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with no significant differences. SRF recurrence was recorded in seven patients (29.2%) in group 1, nine (64.3%) in group 2, and 28 (26.7%) in group 3. The recurrence rates were significantly higher in group 2 than those in group 1 or 3. At the end of the follow-up period, significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity were achieved in groups 1 and 3, compared with baseline, but not in group 2. Conclusions Patients with chronic CSC with new-onset PNV exhibited higher SRF recurrence and worse visual outcomes compared to those with initial PNV or those with chronic CSC without PNV. Our study emphasizes the importance of routine screening for prompt diagnoses of new-onset PNV in individuals with chronic CSC.