Objective:To analyze the characteristics of bone and joint injuries-related articles published in Chinese Journal of Trauma (hereinafter referred to as the "Journal") from 1985 to 2024. Methods:Using the VIP Chinese Journal Database and Wanfang Database as data sources, all the articles on bone and joint injuries published in the Journal from 1985 to 2024 were retrieved. Analysis covered publication volume, citation frequency, research hotspot distribution, institutional affiliations, author characteristics, and funding support over the 40-year period.Results:During the 40 years since the Journal′s establishment, a total of 3 696 articles on bone and joint injuries have been published, with a total of 34 568 citations and an average of 9.35 citations per article. In the first decade following its foundation (1985-1994), the Journal mainly focused on research hotspots such as internal fixation of fractures (20.59%, 77/374), fracture classification (14.71%, 55/374), and surgical instruments (12.57%, 47/374); In the second decade (1995-2004), the Journal mainly focused on open fractures (11.56%, 101/874), osteoarthritis (9.73%, 85/874), and biomechanics (9.50%, 83/874) and other research hotspots; Osteoporosis (25.84%, 362/1 401), minimally invasive surgery (17.63%, 247/1 401), and rehabilitation (13.63%, 191/1 401) prevailed in the third decade (2005-2014), while tissue engineering (18.62%, 195/1 047), 3D printing (16.43%, 172/1 047), and intelligent technology (13.18%, 138/1 047) emerged as focal points in the fourth decade (2015-2024). Most publications involved 1-5 institutions, though 21 articles had>10 collaborating institutions. The maximum number of collaborating institutions reached 52, all observed in consensus and guideline documents. The average number of collaborating authors per article ranged from 3 to 7, primarily from renowned medical universities and major Grade A tertiary hospitals. Funding support rates increased progressively over the years: 0.80% (1985-1994), 13.04% (1995-2004), 22.13% (2005-2014), and 53.01% (2015-2024).Conclusion:Over the 40-year period, the Journal′s bone and joint injuries-related articles have exhibited substantial growth in publication volume, shift alongside disciplinary advances, technological innovations, and clinical needs in research hotspots, changes of geographical distribution from concentration to broader expansion in institutional collaborations, significant academic influence in core authors, and consistent upward trend in funding support rates.

Objective:To analyze the characteristics of bone and joint injuries-related articles published in Chinese Journal of Trauma (hereinafter referred to as the "Journal") from 1985 to 2024. Methods:Using the VIP Chinese Journal Database and Wanfang Database as data sources, all the articles on bone and joint injuries published in the Journal from 1985 to 2024 were retrieved. Analysis covered publication volume, citation frequency, research hotspot distribution, institutional affiliations, author characteristics, and funding support over the 40-year period.Results:During the 40 years since the Journal′s establishment, a total of 3 696 articles on bone and joint injuries have been published, with a total of 34 568 citations and an average of 9.35 citations per article. In the first decade following its foundation (1985-1994), the Journal mainly focused on research hotspots such as internal fixation of fractures (20.59%, 77/374), fracture classification (14.71%, 55/374), and surgical instruments (12.57%, 47/374); In the second decade (1995-2004), the Journal mainly focused on open fractures (11.56%, 101/874), osteoarthritis (9.73%, 85/874), and biomechanics (9.50%, 83/874) and other research hotspots; Osteoporosis (25.84%, 362/1 401), minimally invasive surgery (17.63%, 247/1 401), and rehabilitation (13.63%, 191/1 401) prevailed in the third decade (2005-2014), while tissue engineering (18.62%, 195/1 047), 3D printing (16.43%, 172/1 047), and intelligent technology (13.18%, 138/1 047) emerged as focal points in the fourth decade (2015-2024). Most publications involved 1-5 institutions, though 21 articles had>10 collaborating institutions. The maximum number of collaborating institutions reached 52, all observed in consensus and guideline documents. The average number of collaborating authors per article ranged from 3 to 7, primarily from renowned medical universities and major Grade A tertiary hospitals. Funding support rates increased progressively over the years: 0.80% (1985-1994), 13.04% (1995-2004), 22.13% (2005-2014), and 53.01% (2015-2024).Conclusion:Over the 40-year period, the Journal′s bone and joint injuries-related articles have exhibited substantial growth in publication volume, shift alongside disciplinary advances, technological innovations, and clinical needs in research hotspots, changes of geographical distribution from concentration to broader expansion in institutional collaborations, significant academic influence in core authors, and consistent upward trend in funding support rates.

Athletic injury are caused by the trauma encountered during exercise, which can lead to different degrees of pain, mobility impairment, and even disability in severe cases. Currently, the traditional rehabilitation methods have limited efficacy and personalized treatment is insufficient. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology provides a novel solution for the rehabilitation of patients with athletic injuries by establishing a direct communication and control channel between the brain and external device. BCI technology has unique advantages in motor function reconstruction, sensory loss improvement, and neuropathic pain regulation through motor intention decoding, neurofeedback, and artificial sensory feedback. BCI system involves three key aspects: brain signal acquisition, analysis and processing, and external device control and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) provides new insights for signal analysis and processing in it. To further promote the development of new rehabilitation techniques, reduce treatment costs, and promote the overall rehabilitation of patients, the authors elaborated on the characteristics of BCI technology, existing problems in motor rehabilitation, and applications of BCI in athletic injury rehabilitation so as to provide reference and inspiration for researchers in related fields, accelerate innovation, breakthrough, transformation and application of BCI technology, and benefit more patients with athletic injuries.

Objective:To explore the clinical value of a trinity strategy for the treatment of multiple orthopedic trauma.Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 1 267 patients with multiple orthopedic trauma admitted to Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University from June 2013 to May 2023, including 862 males and 405 females, aged 18-93 years [(55.2±19.8)years]. Associated injuries included hemorrhagic shock in 632 patients, traumatic wet lung in 274, cranial injuries in 135, abdominal and pelvic bleeding in 116, pneumothorax in 89, urinary injury in 13, and vesical rupture in 8. All the patients were treated with the trinity strategy and the treatment process was divided into the phases of first aid, remodeling, and rehabilitation. The first aid phase focused on stabilizing symptoms and saving lives; the remodeling phase centered on restoring the anatomical structure and alignment; the rehabilitation phase aimed for functional recovery through the integration of both Western and traditional Chinese medicine. The all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery and fracture healing time were calculated; the excellent and good rates of Constant-Murley shoulder score, Mayo elbow score, Gartland-Werley wrist score, Harris hip score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score and the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score at the last follow-up and the overall excellent and good rate of all joint function scores were measured. The short form health survey (SF-36) scores were collected preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively, including 8 aspects such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. The incidence of postoperative complications was recorded.Results:All the patients were followed up for 6-18 months [(10.2±4.2)months]. The mortality rate during the acute phase (within 30 days after surgery) was 2.37% with 12 deaths due to hemorrhagic shock, 10 due to traumatic brain injury, 6 due to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and 2 due to pulmonary infection. The average fracture healing time averaged 3.8-18 months [(11.5±4.2)months], with 89.49% of the patients having bone union within 12 months after surgery, 8.93% having bone union within 18 months after surgery, and 1.58% undergoing reoperation. For the patients with internal fixation failure and nonunion, the average healing time was extended to (10.2±2.2)months and (13.7±3.3)months respectively. At the last follow-up, the excellent and good rates of Constant-Murley shoulder score, Mayo elbow score, Gartland-Werley wrist score, Harris hip score, HSS knee score, and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score were 83.93%, 90.24%, 94.12%, 85.57%, 88.46%, and 92.31% respectively, with an overall excellent and good rate of 89.11%. At 6 months after surgery, the SF-36 scores of all the patients in the eight dimensions,including the physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health were (74.4±8.6)points, (44.7±14.4)points, (77.4±10.9)points, (68.4±18.2)points, (72.5±16.0)points, (76.8±8.7)points, (49.9±17.6)points, and (72.8±17.9)points, significantly improved compared with those before operation [(63.4±12.7)points, (30.9±17.4)points, (56.4±18.0)points, (55.4±24.7)points, (53.5±21.0)points, (55.8±24.3)points, (36.9±24.0)points, (58.8±21.6)points] ( P<0.01). Complications of different degrees occurred in 214 patients (16.89%), including lung infections in 118 patients (9.31%), lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in 50(3.95%), pressure injuries in 26(2.05%), internal fixation failure in 12(0.95%), and nonunion in 8(0.63%). Conclusions:The trinity strategy provides whole-process management, personalized treatment, and overall rehabilitation for multiple orthopedic trauma. It can decrease mortality, shorten fracture healing time, improve joint function and quality of life, and reduce the incidence of complications.