1.Asia-Pacific consensus statement on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis
Akira TAGUCHI ; Daisuke INOUE ; Jin-Woo KIM ; Keskanya KESKANYA ; Wai Sin CHAN ; Hee Dong CHAE ; Chung-Hwan CHEN ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG ; Eddie Siu Lun CHOW ; Yoon-Sok CHUNG ; Linsey GANI ; Muhammad Kamil BIN HASSAN ; Unnop JAISAMRARN ; Chakorn VORAKULPIPAT ; Nutchada SRIYARANYA ; Aasis UNNANUNTANA ; Tanawat AMPHANSAP ; Seng Bin ANG ; Fen Lee HEW ; Julie LI-YU ; Terence Ong Ing WEI ; Jeyakantha JEYAKANTHA ; Mark Anthony SANDOVAL ; Thawee SONGPATANASILP ; Monica Therese CATING-CABRAL ; Thanut VALLEENUKUL ; Lalita WATTANACHANYA ; Chih-Hsing CHIH-HSING ; Weibo XIA ; Jawl-Shan HWANG ; Hiroshi HAGINO ; Natthinee CHARATCHAROENWITTHAYA
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2026;12(1):1-17
A unified consensus statement on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has not yet been established among the Asian member countries or regions of the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS). This study aimed to develop a consensus on MRONJ in patients with osteoporosis across these countries and regions. In this study, the term “Asia-Pacific” refers specifically to the Asian member countries and regions of AFOS. A structured survey consisting of nine MRONJ-related questions was distributed across 10 countries and regions to assess the level of agreement and summarize regional perspectives. In addition, a manual literature review and voting were conducted to evaluate the current evidence on MRONJ. The key aspects of MRONJ, including definition, staging, diagnosis, pathogenesis, risk factors, management, and prevention, were generally consistent among the AFOS countries and regions. The annual incidence and incidence rate of MRONJ associated with low-dose antiresorptive therapy in patients with osteoporosis ranged from 0.025% to 0.136% and 21 to 283 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. However, evidence regarding the benefits of drug discontinuation before dental surgery, such as tooth extraction, remains insufficient. Large-scale, multinational studies across AFOS countries and regions are warranted to determine the incidence of MRONJ better and evaluate the impact of antiresorptive drug discontinuation before dental procedures. These findings may contribute to the devel opment of effective evidence-based strategies for preventing MRONJ in patients with osteoporosis.
2.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
3.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
4.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
5.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
6.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
7.Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies 2025 consensus on atypical femoral fractures in patients with osteoporosis
Thanut VALLEENUKUL ; Thawee SONGPATANASILP ; Unnop JAISAMRARN ; Surapong ANURAKLEKHA ; Varalak SRINONPRASERT ; Sumapa CHAIAMNUAY ; Aasis UNNANUNTANA ; Lalita WATTANACHANYA ; Hataikarn NIMITPHONG ; Noratep KULACHOTE ; Ong-art PHRUETTHIPHAT ; Rahat JARAYABHAND ; Tanawat AMPHANSAP ; Ekasame VANITCHAROENKUL ; Pojchong CHOTIYARNWONG ; Satoshi MORI ; Kwang-kyoun KIM ; Swan Sim YEAP ; Sharmila Sunita PARAMASIVAM ; Linsey GANI ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG ; Julie LI-YU ; Mark Anthony SANDOVAL ; Chung-Hwan CHEN ; Natthinee CHARATCHAROENWITTHAYA
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(4):111-120
Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are a rare but serious complication of prolonged anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. This study aimed to develop consensus-based recommendations for the clinical management of AFFs across the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS), for harmonizing practice and improving patient outcomes.A structured questionnaire covering ten key domains related to AFFs was distributed to expert representatives from the 10 AFOS member countries or regions. Responses were analyzed to identify areas of consensus and variation in regional practice. A concurrent narrative review of the literature was conducted to inform evidencebased recommendations. Survey responses were obtained from 8 of 10 participating AFOS member nations or regions. Among these, Thailand, Malaysia, South Korea, and Hong Kong reported established national guidelines or position statements on AFFs. Contributing risk factors include extended anti-resorptive therapy, femoral geometry, comorbidities, and specific pharmacologic exposures. Diagnosis depends on clinical suspicion and multimodal imaging, with high concordance in diagnostic criteria across regions. Screening emphasizes full-length femoral imaging in highrisk individuals. Incomplete AFFs are managed conservatively or with prophylactic fixation, while complete AFFs typically require intramedullary nailing, tailored to anatomic variations such as femoral bowing. Post-fracture care involves discontinuation of anti-resorptives, assessment for secondary osteoporosis, and potential initia tion of anabolic therapy, including teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab.This AFOS-led initiative highlights the importance for early detection, individualized management, and region-specific strategies. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach—encompassing risk assessment, im aging surveillance, surgical intervention, and tailored pharmacologic treatment—is crucial to reduce AFFs impact and improve skeletal health outcomes across Asia.
9.Effects of bone metabolism on hematopoiesis: A Mendelian randomization study
Shun-Cheong HO ; Gloria Hoi-Yee LI ; Anskar Yu-Hung LEUNG ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2024;10(4):151-156
Objectives:
Osteoblast is known to regulate hematopoiesis according to preclinical studies but the causal rela tionship in human remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate causal relationships of bone mineral density (BMD) with blood cell traits using genetic data.
Methods:
Summary statistics from the largest available genome-wide association study were retrieved for total body BMD (TBBMD), lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD), femoral neck BMD (FNBMD) and 29 blood cell traits including red blood cell, white blood cell and platelet-related traits. Using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, inverse-variance weighted method was adopted as main univariable MR analysis. Multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the casual effect is independent of confounders.
Results:
BMD was positively associated with reticulocyte-related traits, including high light scatter reticulocyte count and percentage, immature reticulocyte fraction, reticulocyte count and percentage, with causal effect estimate (beta) ranging from 0.023 to 0.064. Conversely, inverse association of BMD with hematocrit, hemo globin, and red blood cell count was observed, with beta ranging from − 0.038 to − 0.019. The association remained significant in MVMR analysis after adjustment for confounders. For white blood cells, BMD was inversely associated with neutrophil count (beta: 0.029 to − 0.019) and white blood cell count (beta: 0.024 to − 0.02). Results across TBBMD, LSBMD, and FNBMD were consistent.
Conclusions
This study suggested bone metabolism had a causal effect on hematopoietic system in humans. Its causal effect on red blood cell traits was independent of confounders. Further studies on how improving bone health can reduce risk of hematological disorders are warranted.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail