1.Pharmacogenomics in psychiatry: Practice recommendations from an Asian perspective (2024).
Shih Ee GOH ; Saumya Shekhar JAMUAR ; Siew Eng CHUA ; Derrick Chen Kuan YEO ; Jerome Hern Yee GOH ; Chee Hon CHIN ; Mohamed Zakir KARUVETIL ; Ee Lian LEE ; Daniel Shuen Sheng FUNG ; Giles Ming Yee TAN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2024;53(12):734-741
INTRODUCTION:
Pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry is an emerging area with potential clinical application of guiding medication choice and dosing. Interest has been fanned by commercial pharmacogenomic providers who have commonly marketed combinatorial panels that are direct-to-consumer. However, this has not been adopted widely due to a combination of barriers that include a varying evidence base, clinician and patient familiarity and acceptance, uncertainty about cost-effectiveness, and regulatory requirements. This review aims to examine recent updates in this field and provide a contextualised summary and recom-mendations for Asian populations in order to guide healthcare professionals in psychiatric practice.
METHOD:
A review of recent literature about current evidence and guidelines surrounding pharmacoge-nomics in psychiatric practice was carried out with particular attention paid to literature evaluating Asian populations. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Evidence to Decision framework was applied. Consensus meetings comprising workgroup psychiatrists from the public and private sectors were held prior to arriving at the key recommendations.
RESULTS:
Pharmacogenomic testing should be mainly limited to drug-gene pairs with established clinical evidence, such as antidepressants and CYP2C19/ CYP2D6. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic panels that assay multiple genes and analyse them via proprietary algorithms, are not presently recommended in Singapore's psychiatric setting due to inconclusive evidence on clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry is not recommended as standard clinical practice. Exceptions may include concerns about drug concentrations or potential severe adverse drug reactions. Studies investigating newly identified drug-gene associations, and clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of utilising pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry is encouraged.
Humans
;
Psychiatry/methods*
;
Pharmacogenetics
;
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics*
;
Asian People/genetics*
;
Pharmacogenomic Testing/methods*
;
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use*
;
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics*
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
;
Singapore
;
Mental Disorders/genetics*
;
Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use*
2.Fasting during Ramadan and Associated Changes in Glycaemia, Caloric Intake and Body Composition with Gender Differences in Singapore.
Ester C K YEOH ; Sueziani Binte ZAINUDIN ; Win Nie LOH ; Chin Lian CHUA ; Sharon FUN ; Tavintharan SUBRAMANIAM ; Chee Fang SUM ; Su Chi LIM
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2015;44(6):202-206
INTRODUCTIONMillions of Muslim patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) fast during Ramadan. However, little is known about the metabolic impact of Ramadan fasting. We aimed to study the changes in body composition and metabolic profile in this group of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe studied 29 Southeast Asian Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes; all underwent pre-Ramadan education. Study variables were weight change, body composition (using multifrequency bioimpedance method, InBody S20®, Biospace, South Korea), blood pressure (BP), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting lipid profile, and caloric intake assessment using FoodWorks® nutrient analysis software.
RESULTSTwenty-three subjects fasted ≥15 days; mean ± SD: 57 ± 11 years; 52% were males. HbA1c improved significantly (8.6 ± 2.4% pre-Ramadan vs 8.0 ± 2.3% end-Ramadan, P = 0.017). Despite similar body weight, there was reduction in body fat mass (BFM) (30.9 ± 11 kg vs 29.2 ± 12.2 kg, P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis suggested that the reduction in HbA1c was attributed by reduction in BFM (β = -0.196, P = 0.034). There was no change in visceral adiposity (visceral fat area (VFA)) but stratification by gender showed a reduction amongst females (137.6 ± 24.5 cm2 to 132.5 ± 25.7 cm2, P = 0.017). These changes occurred despite similar total caloric intake (1473.9 ± 565.4 kcal vs 1473.1 ± 460.4 kcal, P = 0.995), and proportion of carbohydrate (55.4 ± 6.3% vs 53.3 ± 7.5%, P = 0.25) and protein intake (17.6 ± 4.1% vs 17.3 ± 5.4%, P = 0.792), before and during Ramadan respectively, but with increased proportion of fat intake (11.9 ± 2.4% vs 13 ± 11.7%, P = 0.04). Seven out of 23 patients had medications adjusted to avert symptomatic hypoglycaemia but none of the patients developed severe hypoglycaemia.
CONCLUSIONRamadan fasting can be practiced safely with prior patient education and medication adjustment. It also confers modest benefits on metabolic profile and body composition, especially among females.
Adult ; Aged ; Biomarkers ; blood ; Blood Glucose ; metabolism ; Body Composition ; Body Mass Index ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; physiopathology ; Energy Intake ; Fasting ; physiology ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; metabolism ; Holidays ; Humans ; Islam ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prospective Studies ; Sex Factors ; Singapore ; Weight Gain ; Weight Loss

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail