Background/Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines have increasingly emphasised the importance of exacerbation prevention, and the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) response. This study aimed to describe the distribution and stability of BEC and understand real-world treatment patterns among COPD patients in South Korea. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis using data obtained from the KOrea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) registry between January 2012 and August 2018. KOCOSS is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study investigating early COPD amongst South Korean patients. BEC stability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient. “Exacerbators” were patients who had a record of ≥ 1 exacerbation in the 12 months prior to the visit. Results: The study included 2,661 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years. Most patients were male (92.0%). Mean BEC was significantly higher in exacerbators compared to non-exacerbators. Patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations at baseline had a less stable BEC over time (ICC = 0.44) compared to non-exacerbators (ICC = 0.57). Patients with BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL at baseline predominantly received triple therapy (43.8%). Conclusions This study may further develop current understanding on BEC profiles amongst COPD patients in South Korea. BEC measurements are stable and reproducible among COPD patients, which supports its use as a potential biomarker.

Background/Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines have increasingly emphasised the importance of exacerbation prevention, and the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) response. This study aimed to describe the distribution and stability of BEC and understand real-world treatment patterns among COPD patients in South Korea. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis using data obtained from the KOrea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) registry between January 2012 and August 2018. KOCOSS is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study investigating early COPD amongst South Korean patients. BEC stability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient. “Exacerbators” were patients who had a record of ≥ 1 exacerbation in the 12 months prior to the visit. Results: The study included 2,661 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years. Most patients were male (92.0%). Mean BEC was significantly higher in exacerbators compared to non-exacerbators. Patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations at baseline had a less stable BEC over time (ICC = 0.44) compared to non-exacerbators (ICC = 0.57). Patients with BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL at baseline predominantly received triple therapy (43.8%). Conclusions This study may further develop current understanding on BEC profiles amongst COPD patients in South Korea. BEC measurements are stable and reproducible among COPD patients, which supports its use as a potential biomarker.

Background/Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines have increasingly emphasised the importance of exacerbation prevention, and the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) response. This study aimed to describe the distribution and stability of BEC and understand real-world treatment patterns among COPD patients in South Korea. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis using data obtained from the KOrea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) registry between January 2012 and August 2018. KOCOSS is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study investigating early COPD amongst South Korean patients. BEC stability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient. “Exacerbators” were patients who had a record of ≥ 1 exacerbation in the 12 months prior to the visit. Results: The study included 2,661 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years. Most patients were male (92.0%). Mean BEC was significantly higher in exacerbators compared to non-exacerbators. Patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations at baseline had a less stable BEC over time (ICC = 0.44) compared to non-exacerbators (ICC = 0.57). Patients with BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL at baseline predominantly received triple therapy (43.8%). Conclusions This study may further develop current understanding on BEC profiles amongst COPD patients in South Korea. BEC measurements are stable and reproducible among COPD patients, which supports its use as a potential biomarker.

Background/Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines have increasingly emphasised the importance of exacerbation prevention, and the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) response. This study aimed to describe the distribution and stability of BEC and understand real-world treatment patterns among COPD patients in South Korea. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis using data obtained from the KOrea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) registry between January 2012 and August 2018. KOCOSS is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study investigating early COPD amongst South Korean patients. BEC stability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient. “Exacerbators” were patients who had a record of ≥ 1 exacerbation in the 12 months prior to the visit. Results: The study included 2,661 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years. Most patients were male (92.0%). Mean BEC was significantly higher in exacerbators compared to non-exacerbators. Patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations at baseline had a less stable BEC over time (ICC = 0.44) compared to non-exacerbators (ICC = 0.57). Patients with BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL at baseline predominantly received triple therapy (43.8%). Conclusions This study may further develop current understanding on BEC profiles amongst COPD patients in South Korea. BEC measurements are stable and reproducible among COPD patients, which supports its use as a potential biomarker.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background/Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines have increasingly emphasised the importance of exacerbation prevention, and the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) response. This study aimed to describe the distribution and stability of BEC and understand real-world treatment patterns among COPD patients in South Korea. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis using data obtained from the KOrea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) registry between January 2012 and August 2018. KOCOSS is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study investigating early COPD amongst South Korean patients. BEC stability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient. “Exacerbators” were patients who had a record of ≥ 1 exacerbation in the 12 months prior to the visit. Results: The study included 2,661 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years. Most patients were male (92.0%). Mean BEC was significantly higher in exacerbators compared to non-exacerbators. Patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations at baseline had a less stable BEC over time (ICC = 0.44) compared to non-exacerbators (ICC = 0.57). Patients with BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL at baseline predominantly received triple therapy (43.8%). Conclusions This study may further develop current understanding on BEC profiles amongst COPD patients in South Korea. BEC measurements are stable and reproducible among COPD patients, which supports its use as a potential biomarker.

Chronic respiratory diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory infections injure the alveoli; the damage evoked is mostly irreversible and occasionally leads to death. Achieving a detailed understanding of the pathogenesis of these fatal respiratory diseases has been hampered by limited access to human alveolar tissue and the differences between mice and humans. Thus, the development of human alveolar organoid (AO) models that mimic in vivo physiology and pathophysiology has gained tremendous attention over the last decade. In recent years, human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) have been successfully employed to generate several types of organoids representing different respiratory compartments, including alveolar regions. However, despite continued advances in three-dimensional culture techniques and single-cell genomics, there is still a profound need to improve the cellular heterogeneity and maturity of AOs to recapitulate the key histological and functional features of in vivo alveolar tissue. In particular, the incorporation of immune cells such as macrophages into hPSC-AO systems is crucial for disease modeling and subsequent drug screening. In this review, we summarize current methods for differentiating alveolar epithelial cells from hPSCs followed by AO generation and their applications in disease modeling, drug testing, and toxicity evaluation. In addition, we review how current hPSC-AOs closely resemble in vivo alveoli in terms of phenotype, cellular heterogeneity, and maturity.