Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of endoscopically visualized radiofrequency for treating sacroiliac joint pain. Methods: The study protocol was preregistered on INPLASY (INPLASY202450011). A systematic search was carried out across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science, from their inception until May 6, 2024. Peer-reviewed studies on human participants with low back pain diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain and treated with endoscopically visualized radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were included. The study focused on evaluating changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from before the commencement of endoscopically visualized radiofrequency to postoperation. The quantitative syntheses employed a random-effects model, with effect sizes reported using the mean difference. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on 6-month and 12-month postoperative time points. Results: Four studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Three of the studies were case series, while one was a retrospective cohort study. The mean difference of VAS scores between the preoperative and 6-month and 12-month postoperative assessments was -5.60 and -5.96, respectively. The mean difference of the ODI between preoperative and 6-month and 12-month postoperative assessments was -21.03 and -23.67, respectively. A subgroup analysis of both outcome measurement indices at the 2 follow-up time points did not reveal any statistically significant differences. Conclusion Endoscopically visualized RFA demonstrates potential as a treatment modality for sacroiliac joint pain; however, there is currently insufficient evidence to substantiate its long-term efficacy.

Mounting evidence indicates that melatonin has possible activity against different tumors. Pazopanib is an anticancer drug used to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study tested the anticancer activity of melatonin combined with pazopanib on RCC cells and explored the underlying mechanistic pathways of its action. Methods: The 786-O and A-498 human RCC cell lines were used as cell models. Cell viability and tumorigenesis were detected with the MTT and colony formation assays, respectively. Apoptosis and autophagy were assessed using TUNEL, annexin V/propidium iodide, and acridine orange staining with flow cytometry. The expression of cellular signaling proteins was investigated with western blotting. The in vivo growth of tumors derived from RCC cells was evaluated using a xenograft mouse model. Results: Together, melatonin and pazopanib reduced cell viability and colony formation and promoted the apoptosis of RCC cells. Furthermore, the combination of melatonin and pazopanib triggered more mitochondrial, caspase-mediated, and LC3-II-mediated autophagic apoptosis than melatonin or pazopanib alone. The combination also induced higher activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) in the promotion of autophagy and apoptosis by RCC cells than melatonin or pazopanib alone. Finally, tumor xenograft experiments confirmed that melatonin and pazopanib cooperatively inhibited RCC growth in vivo and predicted a possible interaction between melatonin/pazopanib and LC3-II. Conclusion: The combination of melatonin and pazopanib inhibits the growth of RCC cells by inducing p38MAPK-mediated mitochondrial and autophagic apoptosis. Therefore, melatonin might be a potential adjuvant that could act synergistically with pazopanib for RCC treatment.

OBJECTIVETo observe the effect of combining red yeast rice and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) in lowering cholesterol in patients with primary hyperlipidemia, the later has also been shown to remove cholesterol in in vitro studies.

METHODSA double-blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering effect of the combination of red yeast rice and L. casei. Sixty patients with primary hyperlipidemia were recruited and randomized equally to either the treatment group (red yeast rice + L. casei) or the control group (red yeast rice + placebo). One red yeast rice capsule and two L. casei capsules were taken twice a day. The treatment lasted for 8 weeks, with an extended follow-up period of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was a difference of serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at week 8.

RESULTSAt week 8, the LDL-C serum level in both groups was lower than that at baseline, with a decrease of 33.85±26.66 mg/dL in the treatment group and 38.11±30.90 mg/dL in the control group; however, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The total cholesterol was also lower than the baseline in both groups, yet without a statistical difference between the two groups. The only statistically signifificant difference between the two groups was the average diastolic pressure at week 12, which dropped by 2.67 mm Hg in the treatment group and increased by 4.43 mm Hg in the placebo group (P<0.05). The antihypertensive activity may be associated with L. casei. Red yeast rice can signifificantly reduce LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglyceride.

CONCLUSIONThe combination of red yeast rice and L. casei did not have an additional effect on lipid profifiles.

OBJECTIVESTo investigate whether three strains of probiotics, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, and L. sporogenes, had signifificant inhibitive effects on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

METHODSThis is a 4-week, randomly assigned, parallel-group, doubled-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Fifty patients with a positive H. pylori infection urea breath test (△UBT) result > 10% and without ulcer symptoms were randomized into a treatment group and a placebo group by a computer generated allocation sheet with 1:1. These subjects took one capsule of probiotics or placebo twice daily. The primary measurement was the change in △UBT values.

RESULTSThe △UBT values during the 4-week treatment period and the 2-week follow-up period were not signifificantly different between the treatment group and the placebo group, indicating that the inhibitive effects on H. pylori were comparable between both groups. The monocyte count (%) was 5.77±1.11 in the treatment group versus 5.09±1.12 in the placebo group (P=0.044), and the basophile count was 0.55±0.32 in the treatment group versus 0.36±0.23 in the placebo group (P=0.024) at week 2 of the treatment period, both of which reached statistical signifificance. The monocyte count was 5.75±1.26 in the treatment group and 4.72±0.99 in the placebo group at the end of the follow-up period (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONThere was no signifificant inhibitive effects of the three probiotic strains (L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, and L. sporogenes) on H. pylori. Probiotics can not play the same role as antibiotics in the eradication of H. pylori, the role of probiotics is likely to be important as adjuvant to the triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori, especially in resistance cases.

Adult ; Aged ; Breath Tests ; Demography ; Double-Blind Method ; Endpoint Determination ; Female ; Helicobacter pylori ; drug effects ; Humans ; Lactobacillus ; metabolism ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Probiotics ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; Urea ; analysis ; Young Adult