Purpose: To determine the prevalence of tamoxifen retinopathy and assess the utility of a screening protocol using non-mydriatic fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: Between May and October 2024, patients on tamoxifen therapy at a breast surgery clinic were offered screening including non-mydriatic fundus photography and OCT. Among those who consented, 290 patients (580 eyes) were included after excluding other retinal diseases. We investigated tamoxifen duration, cumulative dose, central retinal thickness, BMI, underlying diseases, menopausal status, and history of chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or oral contraceptives. Results: All patients were taking 20 mg of tamoxifen daily. The mean treatment duration was 55.7 ± 29.5 months for those treated longer than two years (n = 193), with a mean BMI of 22.1 ± 3.0 kg/m2. Systemic comorbidities included dyslipidemia (n = 27, 14.0%), hypertension (n = 19, 9.8%), diabetes mellitus (n = 13, 6.7%), and cardiovascular disease (n = 4, 2.1%). Additionally, patient histories included chemotherapy (n = 84, 43.7%), postmenopausal status (n = 56, 29.1%), hormone therapy (n = 52, 27.0%), and oral contraceptive use (n = 14, 7.2%). Tamoxifen retinopathy was not observed in any of the patients. Conclusions In this cross-sectional study, the prevalence of tamoxifen retinopathy, as assessed by non-mydriatic fundus photography and OCT in this study, was 0%, which is lower than previously reported rates (0.9%–12%). Although specialized examination by an ophthalmologist, including a dilated fundus examination and OCT remains the diagnostic gold standard, practical constraints can limit its routine clinical use. Our study evaluated a screening protocol performed without ophthalmologist intervention. However, we found that limitations in image quality compromised the detection of subtle lesions, such as crystalline deposits. Consequently, this approach may be insufficient to serve as a primary screening strategy.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether individuals with consistently normal liver enzyme levels are protected from alcohol-related liver disease and investigated whether heavy drinking increases liver disease risk independent of normal biomarker status. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study using Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2002–2019), including 19,035 participants aged ≥40 years who maintained normal liver enzyme levels (aspartate aminotransferase ≤40 μ/L, alanine aminotransferase ≤40 μ/L, gamma-glutamyl transferase ≤63 μ/L for men and ≤35 μ/L for women) across multiple examinations conducted between 2002 and 2008. Participants were categorized as abstainers (≤1 time/mo), moderate drinkers (≤2 times/wk), and heavy drinkers (≥3 times/wk). Primary outcomes included incident liver disease identified using diagnostic codes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), with age-stratified analyses performed. RESULTS: Heavy drinkers demonstrated a significantly higher risk of liver disease than abstainers (HR, 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40 to 2.14), whereas moderate drinkers showed no significant association (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.19). Consistent patterns emerged for middle-aged adults (40–69 years), with attenuated effects among participants aged ≥70 years. When alcoholic liver disease was analyzed specifically, both moderate (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.58) and heavy drinkers (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.09 to 3.91) exhibited significantly increased hazards. CONCLUSIONS Despite normal liver enzyme levels, heavy alcohol consumption was associated with a significantly increased risk of liver disease. These findings challenge current reactive screening paradigms relying solely on biomarker abnormalities and support proactive alcohol counseling regardless of enzyme results. More sensitive strategies are needed for early detection of alcohol-related liver injury.

Background: There are limited long-term clinical outcome data comparing first-generation (1G) versus second-generation (2G) drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with single-vessel disease (SVD). We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 1G- and 2G-DES in SVD patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over 10 years of clinical follow-up. Methods: A total of 2,312 consecutive patients with SVD who underwent PCI with 1G-DES (paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents, n = 811) or 2G-DES (zotarolimus [Endeavor, Endeavor Resolute]- or everolimus-eluting stents [Promus Element, Xience], n = 1,082) were enrolled.After propensity score matching, 2 matched groups (538 pairs) were generated. Study endpoints included individual and composite clinical outcomes through 10 years. Results: During the 10-year follow-up, the 2G-DES group had lower incidences of myocardial infarction (MI; hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.92; P = 0.028) and target lesion revascularization (TLR; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.91; P = 0.021) than the 1G-DES group. Rates of total death, cardiac death, non-target vessel revascularization, stroke, major adverse cardiac events, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar between groups. Conclusions In our single-center, all-comer registry, 2G-DES were associated with lower incidence rates of MI and TLR compared to 1G-DES in SVD patients over 10 years of followup, indicating a safer and more durable effect than 1G-DES.

Background: Hip fractures (HFs) are major osteoporotic injuries associated with morbidity, loss of independence, increased mortality, and an increased socioeconomic burden.The total number of HFs is increasing owing to an aging population. While studies have focused on 30-day or 1-year mortality after HF surgery, studies reporting long-term mortality are lacking. Our study bridges this knowledge gap by exploring the relationship between frailty, postoperative complications, and the 5-year mortality after HF surgery.This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with 5-year mortality after HF surgery. The impact of the Hip-Multidimensional Frailty Score (Hip-MFS) and postoperative complications on 5-year mortality was compared. Methods: This retrospective study included 536 individuals aged 65 years and older with HFs who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2014. The Hip-MFS was calculated using the comprehensive geriatric assessment. Patients whose Hip-MFS score above 8 considered as frail. Postoperative complications included pneumonia, urinary tract infection, delirium, pulmonary thromboembolism, and unplanned intensive care unit admission after surgery.The primary outcome was 5-year mortality. Univariate and multivariate cox-regression, Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to assess predictive value of frailty and postoperative complications on 5-year mortality. Results: The mean age was 80.5 ± 7.0 years and 71.3% (n = 382) were women. Overall, 48.3% (n = 259) were diagnosed with femoral neck fractures, and 51.7% (n = 277) were diagnosed with intertrochanteric fractures. A total of 223 (41.6%) patients experienced postoperative complications. The overall mortality rate was 60.4% (n = 324), with 1-year and 5-year mortality rates after HF surgery being 13.8% (n = 74) and 43.8% (n = 235), respectively. In the multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors, the high-risk Hip-MFS group and the group with postoperative complications had hazard ratios for 5-year survival of 1.513 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.105–2.017; P = 0.010) and 1.470 (95% CI, 1.117–1.936;P = 0.006), respectively. Patients who had postoperative complications with a low Hip-MFS showed better 5-year survival than those without postoperative complications with a high Hip-MFS in the Kaplan–Meier curve (P = 0.013). Conclusion A high Hip-MFS risk and postoperative complications were associated with an increased 5-year mortality rate. In comparison to the occurrence of postoperative complications, the frailty status evaluated using the Hip-MFS had a more significant impact on long-term mortality after HF surgery.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

Background: Hip fractures (HFs) are major osteoporotic injuries associated with morbidity, loss of independence, increased mortality, and an increased socioeconomic burden.The total number of HFs is increasing owing to an aging population. While studies have focused on 30-day or 1-year mortality after HF surgery, studies reporting long-term mortality are lacking. Our study bridges this knowledge gap by exploring the relationship between frailty, postoperative complications, and the 5-year mortality after HF surgery.This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with 5-year mortality after HF surgery. The impact of the Hip-Multidimensional Frailty Score (Hip-MFS) and postoperative complications on 5-year mortality was compared. Methods: This retrospective study included 536 individuals aged 65 years and older with HFs who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2014. The Hip-MFS was calculated using the comprehensive geriatric assessment. Patients whose Hip-MFS score above 8 considered as frail. Postoperative complications included pneumonia, urinary tract infection, delirium, pulmonary thromboembolism, and unplanned intensive care unit admission after surgery.The primary outcome was 5-year mortality. Univariate and multivariate cox-regression, Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to assess predictive value of frailty and postoperative complications on 5-year mortality. Results: The mean age was 80.5 ± 7.0 years and 71.3% (n = 382) were women. Overall, 48.3% (n = 259) were diagnosed with femoral neck fractures, and 51.7% (n = 277) were diagnosed with intertrochanteric fractures. A total of 223 (41.6%) patients experienced postoperative complications. The overall mortality rate was 60.4% (n = 324), with 1-year and 5-year mortality rates after HF surgery being 13.8% (n = 74) and 43.8% (n = 235), respectively. In the multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors, the high-risk Hip-MFS group and the group with postoperative complications had hazard ratios for 5-year survival of 1.513 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.105–2.017; P = 0.010) and 1.470 (95% CI, 1.117–1.936;P = 0.006), respectively. Patients who had postoperative complications with a low Hip-MFS showed better 5-year survival than those without postoperative complications with a high Hip-MFS in the Kaplan–Meier curve (P = 0.013). Conclusion A high Hip-MFS risk and postoperative complications were associated with an increased 5-year mortality rate. In comparison to the occurrence of postoperative complications, the frailty status evaluated using the Hip-MFS had a more significant impact on long-term mortality after HF surgery.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

Background: Hip fractures (HFs) are major osteoporotic injuries associated with morbidity, loss of independence, increased mortality, and an increased socioeconomic burden.The total number of HFs is increasing owing to an aging population. While studies have focused on 30-day or 1-year mortality after HF surgery, studies reporting long-term mortality are lacking. Our study bridges this knowledge gap by exploring the relationship between frailty, postoperative complications, and the 5-year mortality after HF surgery.This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with 5-year mortality after HF surgery. The impact of the Hip-Multidimensional Frailty Score (Hip-MFS) and postoperative complications on 5-year mortality was compared. Methods: This retrospective study included 536 individuals aged 65 years and older with HFs who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2014. The Hip-MFS was calculated using the comprehensive geriatric assessment. Patients whose Hip-MFS score above 8 considered as frail. Postoperative complications included pneumonia, urinary tract infection, delirium, pulmonary thromboembolism, and unplanned intensive care unit admission after surgery.The primary outcome was 5-year mortality. Univariate and multivariate cox-regression, Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to assess predictive value of frailty and postoperative complications on 5-year mortality. Results: The mean age was 80.5 ± 7.0 years and 71.3% (n = 382) were women. Overall, 48.3% (n = 259) were diagnosed with femoral neck fractures, and 51.7% (n = 277) were diagnosed with intertrochanteric fractures. A total of 223 (41.6%) patients experienced postoperative complications. The overall mortality rate was 60.4% (n = 324), with 1-year and 5-year mortality rates after HF surgery being 13.8% (n = 74) and 43.8% (n = 235), respectively. In the multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors, the high-risk Hip-MFS group and the group with postoperative complications had hazard ratios for 5-year survival of 1.513 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.105–2.017; P = 0.010) and 1.470 (95% CI, 1.117–1.936;P = 0.006), respectively. Patients who had postoperative complications with a low Hip-MFS showed better 5-year survival than those without postoperative complications with a high Hip-MFS in the Kaplan–Meier curve (P = 0.013). Conclusion A high Hip-MFS risk and postoperative complications were associated with an increased 5-year mortality rate. In comparison to the occurrence of postoperative complications, the frailty status evaluated using the Hip-MFS had a more significant impact on long-term mortality after HF surgery.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.