Objective:To explore the optimal age cutoff for diagnosis and the prognosis of early-onset gastric cancer in young patients.Methods:Clinicopathological data of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma aged ≤45 years who had undergone radical gastrectomy in the Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected. Patients with distant metastases, other malignant tumors, combined organ resection, gastric stump cancer, positive margin, and incomplete clinical or follow-up data were excluded. X-tile software analysis of the actual overall survival of the collected cases yielded an optimal cut-off of 32 years. Accordingly, the enrolled cases were divided into an early-onset young group (age ≤32 years) and young adult group (age >32 years). Clinicopathological characteristics, long-term survival, and postoperative recurrence were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify the factors affecting the prognosis of young patients with gastric cancer.Results:The study cohort comprised 462 patients, including 256 (55.4%) women, 419 (90.7%) with middle and lower gastric cancers, and 343 (74.2%) with poorly differentiated tumors. There were 101 patients in the early-onset young group and 361 in the young adult group. These groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex, body mass index, tumor location, tumor size, surgical procedure, neurovascular invasion, or tumor stage (all P>0.05). The proportion of patients with poorly differentiated tumors in the early-onset young group was significantly higher than that in the young adult group (89.1%[90/101] vs. 70.1%[253/361], χ 2=15.26, P<0.001). All study patients completed 5 years of follow-up, the median duration of which was 101 months (61-133 months). Death or tumor recurrence occurred in 151 patients (32.7%), in 118 of whom the sites of recurrence and metastasis could be identified, 38 in the early-onset young group and 80 in the young adult group. Fifty-five (46.6%) patients developed peritoneal metastases and 40 (33.9%) hematogenous metastases. In the early-onset young group, 20 patients developed peritoneal metastases, 11 hematogenous metastases, five distant lymph node metastases, and two local recurrence. In the young adult group, 35 patients developed peritoneal metastases, 29 hematogenous metastases, six local recurrences, and 10 distant lymph node metastases. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in the young adult group than in the early-onset young group (73.7% vs. 57.4%, P=0.002 and 70.6% vs. 55.4%, P=0.004, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis showed that age >32 years (HR=0.63, 95%CI: 0.43-0.90, P=0.012) was an independent protective factor for overall survival, whereas later N stage (HR=1.67, 95%CI:1.09-2.57, P=0.018) was an independent risk factor for overall survival after surgery ( P<0.05). Age >32 years (HR=0.60, 95%CI: 0.41-0.86, P=0.006) was also an independent protective factor for disease-free survival, whereas later N stage was an independent risk factor (HR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.08-2.64, P=0.021). Conclusion:Young patients with early-onset gastric cancer aged ≤32 years have worse tumor differentiation and prognosis.

Objective:To investigate the impact of bedside ultrasound-guided hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery on the prognosis of patients with only positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY+) and no other distant metastases.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 49 patients with only positive peritoneal lavage cytology who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection from December 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the HIPEC group (27 cases) and the non-HIPEC group (22 cases) based on whether they received postoperative bedside ultrasound-guided HIPEC. The patterns of postoperative recurrence and metastasis and the 3-year survival rates were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were conducted to determine the prognostic factors.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in all baseline clinicopathological data between the two groups ( P>0.05); the median follow-up time for all patients was 31 months (ranging from 13 to 73 months), and the overall recurrence rate for all patients was 55.1% (27/49). Among them, 12 cases (24.5%) had peritoneal metastasis, 7 cases (14.3%) had hematogenous recurrence, 5 cases (10.2%) had distant lymph node metastasis, and 3 cases (6.1%) had local recurrence. The overall recurrence rates of patients in the HIPEC group and the non-HIPEC group were 51.8% (14/27) and 59.1% (13/22), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (χ 2=0.26, P=0.612). The peritoneal metastasis rate of patients in the HIPEC group was 18.5% (5/27), which was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group at 31.8% (7/22). However, there was no statistically significant difference (χ 2=1.16, P=0.282). The proportions of local recurrence, hematogenous metastasis, and distant lymph node metastasis were comparable between the two groups (all P>0.05). The cumulative 3-year recurrence rates of the two groups were similar (70.7% vs. 71.3%, P=0.266). In the HIPEC group, the 3-year overall survival rate was 61.1%, which was significantly higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (31.5%). The difference was statistically significant ( P=0.014). The disease-free progression survival rates of the two groups were 29.3% and 28.7% respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between them ( P=0.266). Cox multivariate analysis showed that no postoperative HIPEC (HR=5.21, 95%CI:1.90-14.31, P=0.001), poor tumor differentiation (HR=3.78, 95%CI:1.07-13.26, P=0.038), and later N stage (HR=6.18, 95%CI:1.39-7.59, P=0.017) were independent risk factors for the overall survival rate after surgery ( P<0.05). Later N stage (HR=3.67, 95%CI:1.07-12.55, P=0.038) was an independent risk factor for the disease-free progression survival rate after surgery ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Bedside ultrasound-guided HIPEC after laparoscopic gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection can improve the overall survival of CY+ gastric cancer patients.

Objective:To explore the optimal age cutoff for diagnosis and the prognosis of early-onset gastric cancer in young patients.Methods:Clinicopathological data of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma aged ≤45 years who had undergone radical gastrectomy in the Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected. Patients with distant metastases, other malignant tumors, combined organ resection, gastric stump cancer, positive margin, and incomplete clinical or follow-up data were excluded. X-tile software analysis of the actual overall survival of the collected cases yielded an optimal cut-off of 32 years. Accordingly, the enrolled cases were divided into an early-onset young group (age ≤32 years) and young adult group (age >32 years). Clinicopathological characteristics, long-term survival, and postoperative recurrence were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify the factors affecting the prognosis of young patients with gastric cancer.Results:The study cohort comprised 462 patients, including 256 (55.4%) women, 419 (90.7%) with middle and lower gastric cancers, and 343 (74.2%) with poorly differentiated tumors. There were 101 patients in the early-onset young group and 361 in the young adult group. These groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex, body mass index, tumor location, tumor size, surgical procedure, neurovascular invasion, or tumor stage (all P>0.05). The proportion of patients with poorly differentiated tumors in the early-onset young group was significantly higher than that in the young adult group (89.1%[90/101] vs. 70.1%[253/361], χ 2=15.26, P<0.001). All study patients completed 5 years of follow-up, the median duration of which was 101 months (61-133 months). Death or tumor recurrence occurred in 151 patients (32.7%), in 118 of whom the sites of recurrence and metastasis could be identified, 38 in the early-onset young group and 80 in the young adult group. Fifty-five (46.6%) patients developed peritoneal metastases and 40 (33.9%) hematogenous metastases. In the early-onset young group, 20 patients developed peritoneal metastases, 11 hematogenous metastases, five distant lymph node metastases, and two local recurrence. In the young adult group, 35 patients developed peritoneal metastases, 29 hematogenous metastases, six local recurrences, and 10 distant lymph node metastases. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in the young adult group than in the early-onset young group (73.7% vs. 57.4%, P=0.002 and 70.6% vs. 55.4%, P=0.004, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis showed that age >32 years (HR=0.63, 95%CI: 0.43-0.90, P=0.012) was an independent protective factor for overall survival, whereas later N stage (HR=1.67, 95%CI:1.09-2.57, P=0.018) was an independent risk factor for overall survival after surgery ( P<0.05). Age >32 years (HR=0.60, 95%CI: 0.41-0.86, P=0.006) was also an independent protective factor for disease-free survival, whereas later N stage was an independent risk factor (HR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.08-2.64, P=0.021). Conclusion:Young patients with early-onset gastric cancer aged ≤32 years have worse tumor differentiation and prognosis.

Objective:To investigate the impact of bedside ultrasound-guided hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery on the prognosis of patients with only positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY+) and no other distant metastases.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 49 patients with only positive peritoneal lavage cytology who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection from December 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the HIPEC group (27 cases) and the non-HIPEC group (22 cases) based on whether they received postoperative bedside ultrasound-guided HIPEC. The patterns of postoperative recurrence and metastasis and the 3-year survival rates were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were conducted to determine the prognostic factors.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in all baseline clinicopathological data between the two groups ( P>0.05); the median follow-up time for all patients was 31 months (ranging from 13 to 73 months), and the overall recurrence rate for all patients was 55.1% (27/49). Among them, 12 cases (24.5%) had peritoneal metastasis, 7 cases (14.3%) had hematogenous recurrence, 5 cases (10.2%) had distant lymph node metastasis, and 3 cases (6.1%) had local recurrence. The overall recurrence rates of patients in the HIPEC group and the non-HIPEC group were 51.8% (14/27) and 59.1% (13/22), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (χ 2=0.26, P=0.612). The peritoneal metastasis rate of patients in the HIPEC group was 18.5% (5/27), which was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group at 31.8% (7/22). However, there was no statistically significant difference (χ 2=1.16, P=0.282). The proportions of local recurrence, hematogenous metastasis, and distant lymph node metastasis were comparable between the two groups (all P>0.05). The cumulative 3-year recurrence rates of the two groups were similar (70.7% vs. 71.3%, P=0.266). In the HIPEC group, the 3-year overall survival rate was 61.1%, which was significantly higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (31.5%). The difference was statistically significant ( P=0.014). The disease-free progression survival rates of the two groups were 29.3% and 28.7% respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between them ( P=0.266). Cox multivariate analysis showed that no postoperative HIPEC (HR=5.21, 95%CI:1.90-14.31, P=0.001), poor tumor differentiation (HR=3.78, 95%CI:1.07-13.26, P=0.038), and later N stage (HR=6.18, 95%CI:1.39-7.59, P=0.017) were independent risk factors for the overall survival rate after surgery ( P<0.05). Later N stage (HR=3.67, 95%CI:1.07-12.55, P=0.038) was an independent risk factor for the disease-free progression survival rate after surgery ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Bedside ultrasound-guided HIPEC after laparoscopic gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection can improve the overall survival of CY+ gastric cancer patients.

Objective:To study the accuracy and positioning error of image guidance during the treatment of body stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by cone beam CT (CBCT) of VERO system.Methods:The clinical data of 80 NSCLC patients from January 2017 to December 2018 in Lishui People′s Hospital of Zhejiang Province were retrospectively analyzed. The maximum density projection and average density projection were reconstructed by four dimensional cone beam CT (4DCBCT), and internal target volume (ITV) was obtained by mapping the tumor profile. The translational and rotating tumor positioning errors were determined by comparing the manual ITV registration with the motion-fuzzy tumor on the CBCT. At the same time, correction was completed by the robot positioning bed and circular rotation. After correction, the CBCT was verified to evaluate the residual error.Results:The initial set average three dimensional vector displacement was significantly greater than the six dimensional automatic calibration displacement: (6.8 ± 2.1) mm vs. (1.5 ± 0.5) mm, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.01); 94.0% (425/452) of the rotation error was ≤ 3°. If there was no image guidance, the stereo positioning based on ExacTrac required 6.6 mm in the left-right direction, 9.8 mm in the up-down direction, and 6.5 mm in the front-back direction. After six dimensional correction of residual errors, the safety margins in three directions were reduced to 3.0, 3.2, and 3.1 mm, respectively. Conclusions:Online image guidance using ITV-CBCT matching technology and the automatic six dimensional correction of the VERO system can reduce the positioning error in SBRT treatment of NSCLC patients and improve the accuracy of tumor positioning.

Objective: To investigate the effect and mechanism of LncRNA ANRIL on the radiosensitivity of HCT116 cells line and nude mouse transplant tumors. Methods: The expression of LncRNA ANRIL in colorectal cancer cells was detected by qPCR. The negative control siRNA, ANRIL siRNA, miR-NC mimic, miR-195 mimic, miR-NC inhibitor and miR-195 inhibitor were transfected into HCT116 cells, and marked as negative control group, silencing ANRIL group, overexpressing miR-NC group, overexpressing miR-195 group, inhibiting miR-NC group and inhibiting miR-195 group, and the HCT116 cells without any treatment were marked as the blank control group. The clone formation assay was used to detect radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells, flow cytometry was used to detect apoptosis. The web site, StarBase, was used to predict the downstream miRNAs of ANRIL and dual luciferase reporter gene assay was used to further verify. Subcutaneous tumor transplantation assay was used to detect the effect of ANRIL on the growth of colorectal cancer cells after irradiation. Results: After irradiation with 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy, the cell survival fraction of silencing ANRIL group was significantly decreased when compared with that of negative control group (P<0.05), and the radiosensitivity ratio was 1.52. The apoptosis rate of the silencing ANRIL+ 4 Gy group was significantly higher than that of the negative control+ 4 Gy group ((27.86±2.78)% vs. (12.06±1.46)%, P<0.05). The results of the experiment on nude mouse transplant tumors showed that the tumor volume in the negative control group was lower than that of the silent ANRIL group on days 13, 16, 19, 22 and 25 ((234±66) mm³, (273±63) mm³, (296±72) mm³, (321±85) mm³ and (403±94) mm³ vs. (357±79) mm³, (485±124) mm³, (617±143) mm³, (764±174) mm³ and (985±221) mm³P<0.05). MiR-195 is a target gene of ANRIL, and inhibition of miR-195 can reverse the inhibitory effect of silencing ANRIL on radiosensitivity, apoptosis and xenografts of HCT116 cells. Conclusions LncRNA ANRIL regulates the radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by miR-195, which may provide a new sensitizing target for clinical colorectal cancer radiotherapy.

Objective To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of hippocampal formation (HF) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Methods Fifty-nine NPC patients underwent IMRT.Simultaneous integrated boost technology was used to determine the doses for the target areas.The dose ranges of the HF were collected by dose-volume histogram.The influence of T stage on the exposure doses ( Dmax,Dmean,D20,V10,V20,V30,and V40 ) were compared.Results The maximum dose for the HF (Dmax) ranged from 11.1 to 78.2 Gy(F =24.2,P ＜0.05) and the Dmean ranged from 3.2 to 44.6 Gy ( F =16.3,P ＜ 0.05 ).The Dmax and Dmean of the T1-2 stage patients were (40.8 ±9.4) Gy and ( 12.5 ±5.1 ) Gy,respectively,both significantly lower than those of the T3-4 stage patients [ (58.6± 14.8) Gy,(20.9± 9.3 ) Gy].The mean exposed volume of the T4 stage patients was significantly larger than that of the T1 and T2 stages patients.Conclusions In the IMRT of NPC,the HF receives rather high irradiation dose.T stage is the main factor influencing the dose,especially T3 and T4 stages deserve serious attention.