Although standardized diagnosis and treatment procedures and appropriate therapy have been recommended for hematological malignancies under the practice of evidence-based medicine,due to heterogeneity of the disease and individual differences in the population,different patients may get dif-ferent clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicities under the same therapy.How to predict the toler-ance of an individual with hematological malignancy to a specific regimen accurately is critical.This pa-per reviews the evaluation methods of treatment tolerance in patients with hematological malignancies,assisting clinicians in making scientific evaluation of tolerance for different patients and choosing the most suitable regimen.

Although standardized diagnosis and treatment procedures and appropriate therapy have been recommended for hematological malignancies under the practice of evidence-based medicine,due to heterogeneity of the disease and individual differences in the population,different patients may get dif-ferent clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicities under the same therapy.How to predict the toler-ance of an individual with hematological malignancy to a specific regimen accurately is critical.This pa-per reviews the evaluation methods of treatment tolerance in patients with hematological malignancies,assisting clinicians in making scientific evaluation of tolerance for different patients and choosing the most suitable regimen.

Objective:To evaluate the prognostic significance of clonal gene mutations using next-generation sequencing in patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) who achieved first complete remission after induction chemotherapy.Methods:The study, which was conducted from July 2011 to August 2017 in First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, comprised 195 newly diagnosed patients with CBF-AML, including 190 patients who achieved first complete remission after induction chemotherapy. The cohort included 134 patients with RUNX1-RUNXIT1 + AML and 56 patients with CBFβ-MYH11 + AML. The cohort age ranged from 15 to 64 years, with a median follow-up of 43.6 months. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the effects of clinical factors and genetic mutations on prognosis. Results:The most common genetic mutations were in KIT (47.6% ) , followed by NRAS (20.0% ) , FLT3 (18.4% ) , ASXL2 (14.3% ) , KRAS (10.7% ) , and ASXL1 (9.7% ) . The most common mutations involved genes affecting tyrosine kinase signaling (76.4% ) , followed by chromatin modifiers (29.7% ) . Among the patients receiving intensive consolidation therapy, the OS tended to be better in patients with CBFβ-MYH11 + AML than in those with RUNX1-RUNXIT1 + AML ( P=0.062) . Gene mutations related to chromatin modification, which were detected only in patients with RUNX1-RUNXIT1 + AML, did not affect DFS ( P=0.557) . The patients with mutations in genes regulating chromatin conformation who received allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) achieved the best prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified KIT exon 17 mutations as an independent predictor of inferior DFS in patients with RUNX1-RUNXIT1 + AML ( P<0.001) , and allo-HSCT significantly prolonged DFS in these patients ( P=0.010) . Conclusions:KIT exon 17 mutations might indicate poor prognosis in patients with RUNX1-RUNXIT1 + AML. Allo-HSCT may improve prognosis in these patients, whereas allo-HSCT might also improve prognosis in patients with mutations in genes related to chromatin modifications.