1.Effect of sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with or without dizziness/vertigo on auditory prognosis in patients with moderately severe hearing loss and above.
Changshuo SHAN ; Xiaonan WU ; Guohui CHEN ; Yun GAO ; Qiuju WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(3):223-227
Objective:To analyze the incidence and impact on the auditory prognosis of vertigo/dizziness in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with moderately severe hearing loss and above. Methods:Clinical data of patients with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss hospitalized from January 2008 to December 2022, aged 18-60 years, PTA≥50 dB HL, and within 14 days of onset were selected. Based on the clinical records of sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients, we determined whether they were accompanied by vertigo/dizziness. The degree of hearing loss is referenced to the 2021 WHO grading criteria and divided into the moderately severe, severe, profound, and total deafness groups. The SPSS 22.0 software was applied to analyze the difference in the auditory prognosis between sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with moderately severe hearing loss and above who have dizziness/vertigo and those who do not. Results:A total of 697 patients with moderately severe hearing loss and above were collected, including 382 males and 315 females, with an average age of(40.8±11.0) years. The proportions of sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with dizziness/vertigo among those with moderately severe to total deafness hearing loss were 18.4%, 35.7%, 47.9%, and 76.4% respectively. Compared to the moderately severe, severe, profound, and total deafness groups, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001). The complete recovery rates of sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with moderately severe to total deafness hearing loss were 28.2%, 25.2%, 18.2%, and 1.9% respectively, and the total effective rates were 72.8%, 83.5%, 86.7%, and 78.0% respectively. There were statistically significant differences in complete recovery rate(P<0.001), significant efficiency rate(P<0.001), effective rate(P=0.026), and no recovery rate(P=0.022) among the moderately severe, severe, profound, and total deafness groups. The differences in complete recovery between sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with and without vertigo/dizziness were statistically significant in the moderately severe, severe, profound, and total deafness groups(P<0.05), while the total effective rates were only statistically significant in the profound group compared to those without vertigo/dizziness(P<0.05). After inpatient treatment, sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients with dizziness/vertigo had statistically significant final hearing thresholds at 4 000 and 8 000 Hz for moderately severe hearing loss patients, 2 000-8 000 Hz for severe hearing loss patients, 500-8 000 Hz for profound hearing loss patients, and 2 000-8 000 Hz for total deafness patients compared to those without dizziness/vertigo(P<0.05). Conclusion:The higher the degree of hearing loss in patients with moderately severe hearing loss and above, the higher the proportion of accompanied vertigo/dizziness. Patients with vertigo/dizziness have poorer recovery of high-frequency hearing, and the complete recovery rate is significantly lower than the patients without vertigo/dizziness.
Humans
;
Male
;
Female
;
Hearing Loss, Sudden/complications*
;
Adult
;
Dizziness/complications*
;
Prognosis
;
Middle Aged
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications*
;
Vertigo/complications*
;
Young Adult
;
Adolescent
2.Research on the prognosis and efficacy criteria of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Changshuo SHAN ; Dayong WANG ; Qiuju WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(11):1085-1090
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a common and frequently-occurring disease. Looking at the efficacy evaluation of the diagnosis and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss at home and abroad, each country has its own characteristics in the indicators and criteria of the treatment efficacy evaluation, and the common indicators of efficacy evaluation include: average pure-tone hearing threshold, the absolute value of hearing improvement of impaired frequency, the percentage of average pure-tone hearing threshold increase, speech discrimination score, speech recognition threshold, etc. The evaluation criteria mostly take the efficacy grade or the improvement level of average hearing threshold as the criterion of effective treatment, and the lack of unified standards is not conducive to the homogenization of global research related to sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In order to provide reference for the clinical evaluation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in China, this study systematically reviewed the clinical practice guidelines and the evaluation indexes and criteria of clinical efficacy in high quality clinical multicenter studies of the disease in many countries.
Humans
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis*
;
Hearing Loss, Sudden/therapy*
;
Prognosis
;
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
;
China
;
Auditory Threshold
;
Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail