Objective To summarize the clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted left thoracic small-incision minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting(MIDCAB).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the procedures and treatment outcomes of robotic-assisted MIDCAB in the Army Medical Center of PLA from October 2016 to June 2023.Baseline clinical information,MIDCAB-related data,perioperative conditions and data during follow-up were collected and analyzed.Results There were 23 patients subjected,including 21 males and 2 females,with a mean age of 58.17±7.49 years,and a body mass index(BMI)of 23.99±3.25 kg/m2.All of them experienced angina pectoris,and 1 had a history of myocardial infarction,1 had dilated cardiomyopathy,2 patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD),and 10 had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Robotic-assisted MIDCAB procedure was successfully completed.No internal mammary artery injury or transformation of the procedure occurred in these cases,and excellent bridging vessel flow was achieved after anastomosis of the internal mammary artery to left anterior descending branch.The incision length in the left chest was 8(8,8)cm,the operation time was 380(300,465)min,the intraoperative bleeding volume was 300(100,400)mL,the length of ICU stay was 3(2,3)d,the amount of thoracic drainage was 780(525,1 040)mL,and the postoperative length from surgery to discharge was 11.17±2.38 d.No mortality was observed during or within 30 d of hospitalization,and 1 patient was readmitted due to pericardial effusion within 30 d,and was discharged after symptomatic treatment including pericardiocentesis and drainage.No deaths,major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(MACCE),or re-revascularization occurred in all patients during outpatient and telephone follow-up.Conclusion Robotic-assisted internal mammary artery dissection is a delicate and safe technique,and coronary artery bypass grafting in minimally invasive small-incision off-pump is effective,safe and feasible,with satisfactory short-and mid-term outcomes.The technique is suitable for minimally invasive coronary artery disease surgery and is worthy of popularization and application.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of bridging thrombectomy and direct thrombectomy in patients with acute anterior circulation large core infarction.Methods:A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed; 131 patients with acute anterior circulation large core infarction with an onset time≤ 24 hours received endovascular treatment (EVT) at Department of Intervention Neurosurgery, Nanyang Central Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, from June 2022 to June 2024 were chosen; they were divided into bridging thrombectomy group (accepted intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] before EVT, n=55) and direct thrombectomy group ( n=76). Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the differences in efficacy and safety between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 90 days after thrombectomy, and good prognosis rate 90 days after thrombectomy (mRS scores of 0-2). Safety indicators included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy, mortality 90 days after thrombectomy, and ratio of patients receiving decompressive craniectomy after surgery. Results:No significant difference between the direct thrombectomy group and bridging thrombectomy group was noted in terms of mRS score 90 days after thrombectomy (3 [2, 6] vs. 3 [2, 6]), good prognosis rate 90 days after thrombectomy (38.2% vs. 25.5%), ICH incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy (30.3% vs. 40.0%), sICH incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy (21.1% vs. 21.8%), mortality rate within 90 days of thrombectomy (28.9% vs. 25.5%), and ratio of patients receiving decompressive craniectomy after surgery (9.2% vs. 9.1%, P>0.05). Core infarction volume at 100 mL was used as grouping standard, subgroup analysis showed that when the core infarction volume was 70-100 mL and >100 mL, respectively, no significant difference in sICH incidence was noted between the bridging thrombectomy group and direct thrombectomy group ( P>0.05). Conclusion:For patients with acute anterior circulation large core infarction with an onset time≤ 24 hours, bridging thrombectomy has similar efficacy and safety as direct thrombectomy.

Objective:To report the 5-year survival outcomes and recurrence patterns of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer in order to provide more valuable long-term follow-up results for clinical practice.Methods:This was a prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical trial (FUGES-014; Clinical-Trials.gov, NCT03524287). Patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer who underwent RTG at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from March 5, 2018, to February 10, 2020, were included in the analysis. To evaluate the long-term efficacy of RTG in the most objective manner possible, we performed a propensity score-matched (1∶2) comparative analysis with historical control patients who had undergone laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) from the FUGES-002 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02333721) in which the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.Results:Prior to matching, there were 48 cases in the RTG group and 263 cases in the LTG group; patients in the LTG group had more advanced cT and pT stages ( P=0.044 and 0.006, respectively) compared to the RTG group. After matching, there were 48 cases in the RTG group and 96 cases in the LTG group; however, no statistically significant differences were observed in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). Both groups had a median follow-up of 72 months. The 5-year DFS rates were 75.0% (95%CI: 63.7%- 88.3%) in the RTG group and 61.4% (95%CI: 52.5%-72.0%) in the LTG group ( P=0.116). Similarly, the 5-year OS rates were 79.2% (95%CI: 68.5%-91.5%) and 64.6% (95%CI: 55.7%-74.9%) in the RTG and LTG groups, respectively ( P=0.100). Within 5 years after surgery, tumor recurrence occurred in 10 patients (20.8%) in the RTG group and 33 patients (34.4%) in the LTG group ( P=0.124), and peritoneal recurrence was the predominant pattern in both groups (8.3%[4/48] vs. 10.4%[10/96]; risk difference: -0.02, P=0.554). Gastric cancer-related death was the predominant cause of death in both groups (16.7% [8/48] vs. 31.2% [30/96]; risk difference: -0.15, P=0.064). Among patients stratified by different pathological stages, no statistically significant differences were found in DFS, OS, or recurrence rates between the RTG and LTG groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:We find the long-term oncological outcomes of RTG for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer to be noninferior to those of LTG. RTG should therefore be considered as a valid option for standardized minimally invasive surgery for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Objective:To report the 5-year survival outcomes and recurrence patterns of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer in order to provide more valuable long-term follow-up results for clinical practice.Methods:This was a prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical trial (FUGES-014; Clinical-Trials.gov, NCT03524287). Patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer who underwent RTG at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from March 5, 2018, to February 10, 2020, were included in the analysis. To evaluate the long-term efficacy of RTG in the most objective manner possible, we performed a propensity score-matched (1∶2) comparative analysis with historical control patients who had undergone laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) from the FUGES-002 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02333721) in which the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.Results:Prior to matching, there were 48 cases in the RTG group and 263 cases in the LTG group; patients in the LTG group had more advanced cT and pT stages ( P=0.044 and 0.006, respectively) compared to the RTG group. After matching, there were 48 cases in the RTG group and 96 cases in the LTG group; however, no statistically significant differences were observed in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). Both groups had a median follow-up of 72 months. The 5-year DFS rates were 75.0% (95%CI: 63.7%- 88.3%) in the RTG group and 61.4% (95%CI: 52.5%-72.0%) in the LTG group ( P=0.116). Similarly, the 5-year OS rates were 79.2% (95%CI: 68.5%-91.5%) and 64.6% (95%CI: 55.7%-74.9%) in the RTG and LTG groups, respectively ( P=0.100). Within 5 years after surgery, tumor recurrence occurred in 10 patients (20.8%) in the RTG group and 33 patients (34.4%) in the LTG group ( P=0.124), and peritoneal recurrence was the predominant pattern in both groups (8.3%[4/48] vs. 10.4%[10/96]; risk difference: -0.02, P=0.554). Gastric cancer-related death was the predominant cause of death in both groups (16.7% [8/48] vs. 31.2% [30/96]; risk difference: -0.15, P=0.064). Among patients stratified by different pathological stages, no statistically significant differences were found in DFS, OS, or recurrence rates between the RTG and LTG groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:We find the long-term oncological outcomes of RTG for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer to be noninferior to those of LTG. RTG should therefore be considered as a valid option for standardized minimally invasive surgery for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of bridging thrombectomy and direct thrombectomy in patients with acute anterior circulation large core infarction.Methods:A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed; 131 patients with acute anterior circulation large core infarction with an onset time≤ 24 hours received endovascular treatment (EVT) at Department of Intervention Neurosurgery, Nanyang Central Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, from June 2022 to June 2024 were chosen; they were divided into bridging thrombectomy group (accepted intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] before EVT, n=55) and direct thrombectomy group ( n=76). Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the differences in efficacy and safety between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 90 days after thrombectomy, and good prognosis rate 90 days after thrombectomy (mRS scores of 0-2). Safety indicators included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy, mortality 90 days after thrombectomy, and ratio of patients receiving decompressive craniectomy after surgery. Results:No significant difference between the direct thrombectomy group and bridging thrombectomy group was noted in terms of mRS score 90 days after thrombectomy (3 [2, 6] vs. 3 [2, 6]), good prognosis rate 90 days after thrombectomy (38.2% vs. 25.5%), ICH incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy (30.3% vs. 40.0%), sICH incidence within 72 hours of thrombectomy (21.1% vs. 21.8%), mortality rate within 90 days of thrombectomy (28.9% vs. 25.5%), and ratio of patients receiving decompressive craniectomy after surgery (9.2% vs. 9.1%, P>0.05). Core infarction volume at 100 mL was used as grouping standard, subgroup analysis showed that when the core infarction volume was 70-100 mL and >100 mL, respectively, no significant difference in sICH incidence was noted between the bridging thrombectomy group and direct thrombectomy group ( P>0.05). Conclusion:For patients with acute anterior circulation large core infarction with an onset time≤ 24 hours, bridging thrombectomy has similar efficacy and safety as direct thrombectomy.

Objective:To compare and evaluate recurrence patterns after robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) versus laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG).Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study of 2915 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma confirmed by postoperative histology as T1-4aN0-3M0, who had undergone minimally invasive radical gastrectomy at four large gastric cancer treatment centers (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital: 1426 patients; the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University: 1108; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital: 196; and First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University: 185 cases) between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2019. 930 patients had undergone RAG (RAG group) and 1985 had undergone LAG (LAG group). We assessed the following characteristics: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, tumor size, extent of surgery, extent of lymph node dissection, pT, pN, year of surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy, after propensity score matching (1:1). There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups formed by propensity score matching (837 in each group) (all P>0.05). The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence pattern, and conditional RFS were compared. Results:We detected no significant differences in the overall recurrence rate at 3 years (128/837 [15.3%] vs. 141/837 [16.8%], P=0.387) or time to recurrence (15.7±8.1 months vs. 16.4±8.4 months, P=0.449) between the RAG and LAG groups. Peritoneal recurrence was the most common type of recurrence in both groups (55 [6.6%] vs. 69 [8.2%], P=0.524). The difference in 3-year RFS between the RAG and LAG groups was not statistically significant (83.2% vs. 82.5%, P=0.781). We found that age > 60 years, total gastrectomy, and worse pT stage and pN stage were independent risk factors for recurrence in the study patients (all P<0.05), whereas the surgical procedure (RAG or LAG) was not an independent risk factor for RFS ( P=0.242). The 3-year conditional RFS at various time points was comparable between the two groups (1 year postoperatively: 84.6% vs. 84.7%, P=0.793; 3 years postoperatively: 91.5% vs. 94.9%, P=0.647). Conclusions:In this multicenter study of patients with locally resectable gastric cancer, we demonstrated that RAG performed by surgeons at large gastric cancer centers is not inferior to LAG in 3-year recurrence rate or recurrence patterns.

Objective:To compare and evaluate recurrence patterns after robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) versus laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG).Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study of 2915 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma confirmed by postoperative histology as T1-4aN0-3M0, who had undergone minimally invasive radical gastrectomy at four large gastric cancer treatment centers (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital: 1426 patients; the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University: 1108; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital: 196; and First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University: 185 cases) between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2019. 930 patients had undergone RAG (RAG group) and 1985 had undergone LAG (LAG group). We assessed the following characteristics: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, tumor size, extent of surgery, extent of lymph node dissection, pT, pN, year of surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy, after propensity score matching (1:1). There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups formed by propensity score matching (837 in each group) (all P>0.05). The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence pattern, and conditional RFS were compared. Results:We detected no significant differences in the overall recurrence rate at 3 years (128/837 [15.3%] vs. 141/837 [16.8%], P=0.387) or time to recurrence (15.7±8.1 months vs. 16.4±8.4 months, P=0.449) between the RAG and LAG groups. Peritoneal recurrence was the most common type of recurrence in both groups (55 [6.6%] vs. 69 [8.2%], P=0.524). The difference in 3-year RFS between the RAG and LAG groups was not statistically significant (83.2% vs. 82.5%, P=0.781). We found that age > 60 years, total gastrectomy, and worse pT stage and pN stage were independent risk factors for recurrence in the study patients (all P<0.05), whereas the surgical procedure (RAG or LAG) was not an independent risk factor for RFS ( P=0.242). The 3-year conditional RFS at various time points was comparable between the two groups (1 year postoperatively: 84.6% vs. 84.7%, P=0.793; 3 years postoperatively: 91.5% vs. 94.9%, P=0.647). Conclusions:In this multicenter study of patients with locally resectable gastric cancer, we demonstrated that RAG performed by surgeons at large gastric cancer centers is not inferior to LAG in 3-year recurrence rate or recurrence patterns.

Indocyanine green(ICG)near-infrared imaging technology has significant research value in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and has garnered widespread attention and research both domestically and internationally.However,the application of ICG near-infrared ima-ging technology in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is still in the exploratory stage in current clinical practice,with no unified standards es-tablished as yet.This review introduces the mechanism of ICG fluorescence imaging and discusses the indications and contraindications of ICG use in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.The application methods and procedures of ICG molecular fluorescence imaging technology in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and its clinical applications are elaborated upon.Finally,the practical applications of ICG-guided laparo-scopic radical gastrectomy is summarized and generalized to help facilitate its promotion and further standardization.

Gastric cancer(GC)is one of the most common malignancies worldwide.In our country,the majority of patients are diagnosed with GC at alocally advanced stage.Fortunately,clinical studies have demonstrated that minimally invasive radical gastrectomy,particularly laparoscopic surgery,is just as effective as traditional open surgery in terms of both short-and long-term outcomes.Consequently,minim-ally invasive surgery has become the primary surgical approach for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC).Advancements in surgical techniques and technologies are enabling even more precise and minimally invasive approaches to GC surgery.Based on recent do-mestic and international studies,this study aimed to review and elaborate on the development of minimally invasive surgery for LAGC.

Objective:To investigate the influencing factors of operation time for laparos-copic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and analyze the learning curve of LSG in sarcopenic obesity (SO) and non-sarcopenic obesity (NSO).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 240 obesity patients who underwent LSG in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022 were collected. There were 52 males and 188 females, aged (30±8)years. Patients underwent L3 vertebral body horizontal axial computer tomography (CT) scanning before and after receiving LSG to accurately segment muscles and fats. Observation indicators: (1) treatment and follow-up; (2) influencing factors of operation time for LSG; (3) cumulative sum (CUSUM) of learning curve; (4) comparison of clinical data between patients in the initial and profi-cient stages. Measurement data with normal distribution were represent as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(IQR), and comparison between groups was conducted using the non-parameter test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Logistic regression model. The CUSUM of learning curve was calculated and the fitting process was conducted on scatter plot of learning curves. Results:(1) Treatment and follow-up. Of the 240 patients, there were 97 cases of SO and 143 cases of NSO. All 240 patients underwent LSG successfully, without conversion to open surgery. The operation time of 240 patients was (108±23)minutes. None of patient died during the perioperative period and all patients underwent follow-up during the postoperative 6 months. (2) Influencing factors of operation time for LSG. Results of multivariate analysis showed that SO was an independent factor influencing operation time for LSG ( odds ratio=2.207, 95% confidence interval as 1.207-4.038, P<0.05). (3) CUSUM of learning curve. Results of CUSUM of operation time in patients of SO and NSO showed that the best fit equation of patients of SO was y=-4E-08x 6+1E-05x 5-0.001 1x 4+0.063 1x 3-1.89x 2+28.126x-48.671 (x means the number of surgical cases), with goodness-of-fit R 2 as 0.833, and the best fit equation of patients of NSO was y=3E-09x 6-1E-06x 5+0.000 2x 4-0.010 9x 3+0.063 8x 2+12.053x-65.025 (x means the number of surgical cases), with goodness-of-fit R 2 as 0.716. Based on the trend of CUSUM of learning curve of operation time, the peak value of number of surgical cases in patients of SO and NSO was 81 and 36, respec-tively, which was used to divide the learning curve as two stages of the initial stage and the proficient stage. (4) Comparison of clinical data between patients in the initial and proficient stages. ① Of the 97 patients of SO, there were 81 cases and 16 cases in the initial stage and the proficient stage of LSG, with the operation time, postoperative duration of hospital stay as (119±23)minutes, (5.9±2.3)days and (106±21)minutes, (4.7±0.5)days, showing significant differences between them ( t=2.074, 2.147, P<0.05). ②Of the 143 patients of NSO, there were 36 cases and 107 cases in the initial stage and the proficient stage of LSG, with gender (female), height, preoperative body mass, defatted body mass, operation time, postoperative duration of hospital stay, body mass at postoperative 6 month, body mass index (BMI) at postoperative 6 month, percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) at postoperative 6 month, cases with EWL% >100% at postoperative 6 month, excess BMI at post-operative 6 month as 20, (170±10)cm, (110±25)kg, (57±12)kg, (108±22)minutes, (6.1±1.6)days, (80±16)kg, (27.63±4.22)kg/m2, 83%±35%, 9, 1.99(6.03)kg/m2 and 87, (164±8)cm, (99±20)kg, (52±12)kg, (100±19)minutes, (4.7±1.1)days, (71±16)kg, (25.89±4.48)kg/m2, 103%±42%, 48, 0.31(5.82)kg/m2, showing significant differences between them ( χ2=9.484, t=3.266, 2.424, 2.141, 2.137, 5.821, 2.740, 1.993, -2.524, χ2=4.432, Z=-2.300, P<0.05). Conclusions:SO is an independent factor influencing operation time for LSG. It is suggested that the surgeons need to finish 81 cases and 36 cases master LSG in patients of SO and NSO.